Thursday, 16 October 2025

CfA: Reproductive Governance from Below: Childbearing, Trust, and Community Norms in East Central Europe, 1850–1945

 CfA: Reproductive Governance from Below: Childbearing, Trust, and Community Norms in East Central Europe, 1850–1945

The deadline for the submission of abstracts is December 1, 2025.

The deadline for the accepted papers: April 1, 2026.

This Special Issue encourages reconceptualization of fertility as a structuring force, reversing conventional explanations of demographic behavior. Rather than treating reproduction as a passive outcome of ethnicity, religion, or economy, it analyses the decisions made by families and communities, challenging the teleology of demographic transition theory while moving beyond classic family history and historical demography. The Special Issue focuses on East Central Europe, especially the Habsburg Empire and successor states, where similar institutions produced divergent reproductive strategies. This imperial context offers an ideal comparative laboratory, combining shared legal frameworks with varied kinship systems and community norms. The innovative aspect of this approach lies in the reversal of causality: instead of reading fertility as a reaction to external pressures, the Special Issue shows how practices of childbearing reshaped authority, economic strategies, and community cohesion. It foregrounds reproductive governance from below, calling attention to the ways in which midwives, older women, and village judges, for instance, sustained or contested norms. This perspective complements analyses of church and state, stressing interactions between formal and informal authorities. Methodologically, the Special Issue integrates historical anthropology, microhistory, and gender history with demographic tools, network analysis, and GIS. It pioneers the use of underexplored “crisis archives,” such as the documents produced during abortion trials and inheritance disputes, presbytery minutes, folklore, and various ego-documents, which, precisely because they emerge from moments of tension, reveal hidden negotiations of norms.

Topics of interest include (but are not limited to):

the role of trust, reputation, and the influence of informal authorities (midwives, older women, village judges) on reproductive decision-making

the role of informal and formal authorities: comparing community actors with clergy, teachers, and officials across local contexts

the role of community cooperation, female solidarity, and the informal market for abortion through abortion trials

the role of “folk” knowledge about birth control, with particular regard to the roles of doctors, midwives, and older women

the light shed on childbearing practices by conflicts and crises, as evidenced in abortion trials, reconciliation papers, inheritance disputes, and domestic-violence cases

the role of reproductive strategies and abortion decisions in rural Jewish and Roma communities

methodological reflections on analyses of childbearing practices and the sources on which these analyses are based.

We welcome submissions from scholars in various disciplines, including history, the history of science, the history of education, art history, literary history, and cultural studies. We especially encourage submissions that offer interdisciplinary perspectives and engage with current historiographical debates.

Please send an abstract of no more than 500 words and a short biographical note with a selected list of the author’s three most important publications (we do not accept full CVs) no later than December 1, 2025.

Proposals should be submitted to the special editor of the issue by email:

koloh.gabor@abtk.hu

The editors will ask the authors of selected papers to submit their final articles (max. 10,000 words) no later than April 1, 2026.

The articles will be published open access after a double-blind peer-review process. We provide proofreading for contributors who are not native speakers of English.

All articles must conform to our submission guidelines.

The Hungarian Historical Review is a peer-reviewed international quarterly of the social sciences and humanities, the geographical focus of which is Hungary and East-Central Europe. For additional information, please visit the journal’s website: https://hunghist.org/

Contact:

koloh.gabor@abtk.hu

Wednesday, 15 October 2025

15th Bukovyna International Historical and Local History Conference Dedicated to the 150th Anniversary of the Yuri Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

15th Bukovyna International Historical and Local History Conference Dedicated to the 150th Anniversary of the Yuri Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Chernivtsi, October 17–18, 2025, hybrid.

Program and zoom links: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FxNk5pU1CSXNbkgwptmOX8YZfBcLsLTK/view?usp=sharing

Anna Mazanik: Sanitizing Moscow: Waste, Animals, and Urban Health in Late Imperial Russia

 Anna Mazanik: Sanitizing Moscow: Waste, Animals, and Urban Health in Late Imperial Russia. University of Pittsburgh Press 2025. isbn : 9780822967729



Sanitizing Moscow presents an environmental history of public health reforms in late imperial Moscow between 1870 and 1917. It explores the relationship between Russia’s urban modernization and the more-than-human environment in the context of the major social and political changes, triggered by the liberal reforms of the 1860s and 1870s, and the transnational rise of scientific medicine and sanitary technologies. Mazanik is the first to combine environmental history and the history of urban public health in the context of imperial Russia.


about the author

Anna Mazanik is an environmental and medical historian of Russia and a research fellow at the Max Weber Network Eastern Europe in Germany. Born in Moscow, she has studied in Russia, Hungary, Germany, and the United States and holds a PhD in history from Central European University. She lives in Munich.



More Praise

  Sanitizing Moscow is a superb book that focuses on efforts in late imperial Russia to improve public health in complex and sometimes contradictory ways. It deftly shows how social, political, and cultural factors influenced the establishment of a sewage system, the regulation of a public abattoir, and the imposition of a health regime on children. 

Andy Bruno, Indiana University Bloomington


A deeply researched, creatively argued, and well-written book that will appeal to several different audiences, Sanitizing Moscow offers at the same time fascinating granular detail about everyday life in turn-of-the century Moscow and contributes to larger arguments around Europe’s influence on Russia as well as about the global impacts of the revolutions in scientific thinking on disease and sanitation. 

Ryan Jones, University of Oregon


Dějiny věd a techniky - History of Sciences and Technology, 2025 / 1-2

Dějiny věd a techniky - History of Sciences and Technology, 2025 / 1-2. URL: https://dvt-journal.cz/en/issues/2025-1-2/

From Whale Oil to a Cornerstone of Organic Chemistry: The Double Anniversary of Benzene [cs]

Tomáš Hermann – Vladimír Karpenko

Von Economo’s Encephalitis: An Enigmatic Pandemic, Pandemic Enigma, or a ʽSyndemicʼ of Its Kind? [en]

Milan Novák – Michal V. Šimůnek – Avi Ohry

The History of Chemistry in Technical Museum Exhibitions: Development, Important Figures, and Technological Milestones [cs]

Ivana Lorencová

Theatrum Divinum by Matouš Konečný (1616): A Bohemian “Popular Encyclopaedia” in the Context of Early Modern Mosaic Physics [cs]

Jan Čížek

Women’s religious institutions and their nursing activities 1800-1950 in the Czech Lands 1800-1950 [cs]

Antonín Šťastný

Reviews and News [cs]

Sunday, 12 October 2025

CFP: Recycling in the Cold War Era: Capitalist and Socialist Waste Regimes

 CFP: Recycling in the Cold War Era: Capitalist and Socialist Waste Regimes. Berlin 09.07.2026 - 10.07.2026, Deadline 01.12.2025


Throughout most of human history, waste and its reuse have played a central role in economic activity. During the Cold War, rivalry between the Eastern and Western blocs extended beyond the arms race and ideological confrontation. Competition for economic and technological supremacy also encompassed waste recycling—shaping resource flows, production and consumption systems, and later, environmental protection. In both capitalist and socialist economies, recycling was integral to resource governance, embedded in efforts toward efficiency, self-sufficiency, modernization, and international leadership.

While waste studies have grown rapidly, they have focused more on discarding than on recycling and related issues such as reprocessing waste into recyclates and integrating them into production flows. This conference will therefore explore waste recycling during the Cold War in greater detail. It will examine the actors, practices, and material streams of recycling in both socialist and capitalist regimes, addressing questions such as: What differences and similarities can be identified in actors, materials, practices, technologies, or symbolic meanings? Was recycling driven by ideological confrontation, or was it more often a pragmatic response to shortages, technological challenges, or environmental concerns? What regional specifics can be observed? How did different regimes influence or learn from one another? And in what cases did asymmetrical waste trade between blocs shape recycling schemes?

To date, Anglophone research remains fragmented, often focusing on single waste types or individual countries. The most comprehensive study of recycling in the Cold War context is Zsuzsa Gille’s work on the Hungarian waste regime (2007). More recent research has explored entanglements between East and West Germany (Lange 2020; Stuck & Weber 2025). Studies on national programs include plastics in Poland (Kijeński & Polaczek 2005), France (Dufour 2023), and Norway (Haavard B. A. 2024); paper or glass in the Netherlands, Germany, and Hungary (Oldenziel & Veenis 2013; Weber 2021; Pal 2023); and metals in the United States (Zimring 2005). Yet many regions remain underrepresented, and comparative analysis of recycling practices and technologies across—and within—blocs is still lacking.

Existing work has shown how waste symbolized industrial crisis and became a site for of civic engagement and environmental activism (Park 2004; Westermann 2013; Boyce 2013) But it remains unclear how Cold War recycling reflected and shaped civic culture, ideology, and policy in different systems. The symbolic meaning of waste—how it shifted under political, economic, and cultural pressures, and how it shaped understandings of modernity, progress, efficiency and responsibility—also remains underexplored.

In sum, scholarship offers only a fragmented picture of socialist and capitalist recycling practices during the Cold War. What is missing is a broader understanding of how recycling models were formed, developed, and interacted across historical contexts - including continuities, ruptures, and their impact on global and regional material flows. This also applies to the role of different actors in shaping these practices and to the changing symbolic meanings of waste within the bipolar world order.

The two-day, international workshop, organized by Tatiana Perga and Heike Weber, thus aims to bring together different perspectives on recycling in the Cold War era.

Our keynote speaker is Zsuzsa Gille with the report “Recycling in the Socialocene.”

Papers should engage with the following topics:

1. Institutions and Recycling Systems

We invite analyses of how institutional mechanisms for waste recycling developed in both Eastern and Western bloc countries. This includes the roles of private businesses, state bodies, ministries, municipalities, parties, and NGOs in shaping and enforcing recycling policies. Particular attention may be given to legal frameworks, planned and market-based instruments, international agreements, and institutional transformations during periods of reform and crisis.

2. Economic Systems, Technologies, and Innovations

We seek papers on how different economic systems influenced recycling principles, technology choices, and investments in infrastructure. Comparisons of strategies and technological solutions that stimulated innovation and efficient resource use in contexts of scarcity, competition, and ideological mobilization are especially welcome. Relevant aspects include R&D, economic incentives, patents, technology transfer, international cooperation, and informal economies.

3. (Trans)national Material Flows and Recycling Infrastructures

We aim to examine the emergence of recycling infrastructures, networks, and logistics, and their role in exchange and interaction between socialist and capitalist regimes. This perspective highlights both cooperation and competition in global and regional recycling histories, as well as the role of material flows as hidden diplomacy across the Cold War divide. Shadow economies, black markets, and informal recycling networks will also be considered.

4. Actors, Knowledge, and Their Networks

We want to explore the diversity of actors involved in recycling processes: state and municipal authorities, businesses, industrial enterprises, corporations, trade unions, schools and households, the military and prisons, institutions for the disabled cooperatives, international organizations, individual waste collectors, and more. We are interested in how these groups engaged with recycling—whether voluntarily, under compulsion, ideologically, or economically motivated—and how their participation shaped perceptions of responsibility, labour, scarcity, profit, and modernization.

5. Environmental Discourses, Knowledge, Risks

We welcome contributions on how waste and recycling were conceptualized environmentally in socialist and capitalist countries. Were elements of environmental knowledge and concern about waste present as early as the 1950s or 1960s, and how were they framed? This theme also addresses how the environmental consequences of waste production and accumulation entered public debate, science, education, and activism. Focus may be placed on perception of risks in the 1970s-1980s, the rise of environmental consciousness, the role of scientific expertise, transnational exchanges of knowledge, and conflicts over waste and its politicization.

We welcome contributions from economics, technology studies, sociology, history, political science, and related disciplines.

The workshop will be held at TU Berlin on the 9th – 10th of July 2026.

We will apply for funding to cover travel and accommodation.

Papers (6,000-8,000 words) are due by June 1st to be pre-circulated before the workshop. Each presenter will give a 10-minute presentation, followed by a discussion. We aim to publish the papers as a special issue of the journal.

Proposals should include an abstract (max. 300 words) and a one-page CV.

The deadline for sending proposals is the 1st of December 2025, with notification of acceptance by mid-December.

Please send proposals to tetiana.perga@tu-berlin.de.






RUTA Annual Conference 12–15 July 2026 Rooted knowledges and dialogues for change

 RUTA Association for Central, South-Eastern, and Eastern European, Baltic, Caucasus, Central and Northern Asian Studies in Global Conversation

Annual Conference

12–15 July 2026

Rooted knowledges and dialogues for change

URL: https://ruta-association.org/conference/rooted-knowledges-and-dialogues-for-change/


For many years, canonized expertise on the RUTA region(s) has been produced from the outside, in particular through a Western academic gaze. This gaze has further largely reproduced the Russian imperial perspective on RUTA societies. In doing so, it elevated imperial lines of thought, devaluing and othering the intellectual and cultural heritage of peripheralized communities, who have been interpreted predominantly through metropolitan vantage points. Institutionalised as authoritative expertise, these ways of knowledge-making have obscured the colonial foundations of research as an endeavour: imperial societies studying, categorising and explaining the Other, to whom they relate from curious afar and in ways that commonly extract and abstract from lived realities. These ‘proper’ ways of conducting research have often prioritised distance over connection, emphasising a certain type of objectivity as a quality produced through detachment, while devaluing closeness, relational bonds and emotions as obstacles to ‘pure’ and reliable knowledge.

With our RUTA communities, we have been reclaiming the work of knowledge-making on the RUTA region(s) and societies. During our 2026 annual conference, we will be exploring rooted and embodied knowledges as catalysts for change and as drivers of shifts in power. In particular, we are keen to ask, how does the production of knowledge and cultural heritage differ when it is rooted in the places and communities it speaks to, and what possibilities does this enable? By re-connecting with generations of knowledges from the RUTA region(s) as well as those in dialogues with us, we wish to discuss what is distinctive about scholarship and art that is embedded within our regions and communities. How do our research and art practices change when they are rooted in a place, centering the lived and embodied experiences of its people? And what do such embodied and rooted knowledges and art mean for those who make them, those who learn from them, and for the ways we engage with the world?

Generations of thinkers and advocates of social justice and the makers of political art have emphasized the crucial role of positionality for thinking, acting and creative practice that stands the chance to empower, mobilise and improve the wellbeing of oppressed communities. Their observations appear even more pressing in the context of resistance against authoritarian rule, imperial subjugation and wars of aggression. What is the role of rooted knowledges in the protection of human life and our precious ecosystems amid the rise of (neo)colonialism and fascism? And how can we best protect what is endangered beyond an over-emphasis on the resilience of affected communities, but with insistence on the ending of the cycles of perpetration and systems of destruction and violence?

These questions also invite us to engage with the inherent vulnerability of our bodies as sites of knowledge production and what the fundamentally frail condition of human existence teaches us about knowledge-making, but also more broadly about the need for justice, safety and real possibilities for thriving, thinking, writing and creating. Moreover, in a world where the safety of some is paid with the lives of those who dare to resist systemic destruction, can the shift toward embodied knowledges contribute to much-needed shifts in power for a more equitable protection of human life and endangered environments? How do we then carry knowledges from one place to another, in ways that convey the urgency of change? These concerns highlight the importance of direct and equitable dialogues, but also the crucial need for turning dialogues into meaningful actions. In particular, actions that will lead toward the changes that communities at risk have been advocating for and paving with their thinking and work.

We especially welcome contributions on these (but not only these) topics:

Rooted knowledges and RUTA dialogues.

Emotions as sources and vectors of knowledge.

Embodied and rooted knowledges: approaches and methodologies.

Positionality in research, activism and art.

Perspectives on and beyond resilience.

Vulnerability, embodiment, dissent.

Ecocide and environmental protection.

Indigeneity and Indigenous approaches to lifeways in and beyond the RUTA regions.

Never again for anyone: preventing and stopping genocides and epistemicides.

Transitional justice: what it is and why it is important.

Antifascism and transformative social movements.

Border violence, belonging and asylum.

Migration: forced migration, exploitation, socio-economic justice.

Labour relations in the RUTA region(s): addressing exploitation and extractivism.

Social reproduction and gender equity.

Queering and decolonising the canon.

Archives and libraries as sites of resistance.

Allyship and solidarities across regional, disciplinary and academic / activist borders.

Politically engaged research and its methods.

Identifying and countering disinformation and propaganda.

Disruptive and reparative knowledges.

The conference will take place from July, 2026 in Ukraine’s Carpathian Mountains, in a location with on-site air raid shelters. The Carpathians are recognised as a Green All state and local guidelines regarding safety and security will be strictly adhered to throughout the conference. For safety and security reasons, the venue and logistics pertaining to the conference will be disclosed to registered participants close to the conference date.

Proposals of panels, roundtables, as well as individual presentations must be submitted by November 15, 2025. Confirmations of acceptance will be communicated by the end of January 2026.

Preference will be given to transregional panels that bring region(s) into conversation (ideally, perspectives on an umbrella topic by scholars from multiple RUTA region(s), tracing how particular concerns manifest in similar / different ways across the region).

Submissions that discuss the RUTA region(s) in the global context are highly encouraged.

Individual Papers

Paper abstract (300 words max.)

Biography (100 words max.)

Individual submissions will be clustered into trans-regionally conceptualised panels that will involve experts working from/on different parts of the RUTA region(s) and beyond.

Panels and Roundtables

Panels (consisting of four papers; or held e.g. as a discussion on a particular concept or text, in which case please propose a suitable format under the panel description in the submission form) and roundtables (with a maximum of five participants-speakers, including a moderator – in total a maximum six people per roundtable)

Panel and roundtable abstract (300 words max.)

List of participants with presentation titles and paper abstracts (each 300 words max.)

Biography of each participant (100 words max. per participant)

We strongly encourage and prioritise trans-regional panels and roundtables, involving researchers working from/on various parts of the RUTA region(s) and globally. In regards to the format of the debates, we welcome panels and roundtables discussing particular topics, but also e.g. different ways that specific concepts or theories have been worked with or critiqued in various parts of the RUTA region(s) and globally. We also welcome panels and roundtables that will focus on discussing the significance of a specific core text and its links or importance to the RUTA region(s) and beyond; and those that will explore how to conduct socially responsible, ethically sound, non-extractivist and anti-colonial forms of research and fieldwork in the RUTA region(s) and globally.

Artistic Engagements

Possible artistic engagements might include pop-up events, workshops, art interventions, activations, performances, screenings, etc.

Project description (500 words max.). Please include information about the necessary equipment and setting requirements. Priority will be given to projects that meet the criteria of feasibility.

Biography of each participant (100 words max. per participant).

Conference registration fee: the conference will have sliding scale fees. As the RUTA Association, we are committed to making our conferences affordable for scholars from the RUTA region(s).

There will be a limited number of travel grants that participants in need of financial assistance and without institutional funding can apply for.

Please send your enquiries to: conference@ruta-association.org

Studia Historiae Scientiarum Vol. 24 (2025): FirstView Articles

 Studia Historiae Scientiarum Vol. 24 (2025): FirstView Articles

Webmastered and edited by Michał Kokowski

Published: 30-09-2025

EDITORIAL

The Evolutionary Transformation of the Journal. Part 12DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.001.21839

Michał Kokowski

 PDF (Język Polski)

WORKSHOP OF THE HISTORIAN OF SCIENCE

A Proposal for a Research Method within the History of Science in the Context of the Discussion on its Scientific StatusDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.002.21840

Wiesław Wójcik

 PDF (Język Polski)

FOCAL POINT

Introduction. Socialist Science Cities: from Utopia to Urban LifeDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.003.21841

Mikhail Piskunov, Timofey Rakov

 PDF

Dunaújváros and Paks: Socialist Science and Technology Cities of Hungary?DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.004.21842

Melinda Harlov-Csortán, Máté Tamáska

 PDF

Remembering Science Cities: Urban Space and Community Identity of Post-Soviet Scientific and Technical IntelligentsiaDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.005.21843

Madina Kalashnikova

 PDF

‘And Here We’ll have a Science Town’: Akademgorodok of the Kola Scientific Center as a Form of Organization of the Scientific Space in the Soviet NorthDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.006.21844

Vera Kliueva

 PDF

SCIENCE IN POLAND

The Arduous Path to Independence. Ethnography/Ethnology within the Structures of the Polish Academy of Sciences and the Polish Academy of SciencesDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.007.21845

Róża Godula-Węcławowicz, Renata Hołda

 PDF (Język Polski)

The Origins of the 1880 Edition of Stanisław Janikowski’s Słowniczek wyrazów psychijatrycznych…DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.008.21846

Lucyna Agnieszka Jankowiak

 PDF (Język Polski)

Bureaucratization and the National Culture Fund – a Phenomenon of a Bureaucracy-Free Institution in the Science of the Second Polish RepublicDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.009.21847

Mateusz Hübner

 PDF (Język Polski)

Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae – One Hundred Years of Evolution in Form and Content (1923–2022)DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.010.21848

Piotr Köhler

 PDF

Krakow School of Architecture: Włodzimierz GruszczyńskiDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.011.21849

Tomasz Węcławowicz

 PDF (Język Polski)

Institutional Censorship of Academic Humanities Publishing in Communist Poland. Preliminary Findings and Research PerspectivesDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.012.21850

Kamila Budrowska

 PDF

The Scientific Collection of the Jagiellonian University Museum – 2024. On the Sixtieth Anniversary of its Opening to the PublicDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.013.21851

Ewa Wyka

 PDF (Język Polski)

SCIENCE BEYOND BORDERS

History of Research on Heavy Metals in the Roadside EnvironmentDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.014.21852

Joanna Korzeniowska

 PDF

BIBLIOMETRICS, SCIENCE POLICY, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION

Evaluation of Journals on the History of Science and History in the Transparent Model of Journal Evaluation by the Pracownia Naukoznawstwa IHN PAN© 2024 and 2025DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.016.21854

Michał Kokowski

 PDF (Język Polski)

PRESENTATIONS AND REVIEWS

Fifth volume of Encyclopaedia of Shevchenko Scientific Society. Naukove tovarystvo imeni Shevchenka: Entsyklopediia. Vol. 5, Dash. – Zh. Edited by Oleh Kupchyns’kyi, Oleksandra Savula. L’viv, 2022. – 700 pp.DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.015.21853

Vitalii Telvak, Viktoria Telvak

 PDF

VARIA

On the Contribution of Professor Vladimir Andreevich Mozharov to the Development of Metallurgy in the 20th CenturyDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.017.21855

Dmytro Zhurylo, Volodymyr Levchenko

 PDF

Application of Electrical Engineering within Ukrainian Tactical Medicine in the First Decade of the Russian-Ukrainian War (2014–2024)DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.018.21856

Hanna Demochko, Ihor Robak, Vasyl Malikov

 PDF

NEWS, COMMENTS, LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Statement by the Authors of the Article “School Books in Galicia in the Second Half of the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries in the Light of the Work of the Commission for School Handbooks at the National School Board” Published in the Journal Education – Technology – Information Science (2018) Regarding the Unauthorized Borrowings from an Article by Professor Maria Stinia (2004)DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.019.21857

Wojciech Walat, Tomasz Warzocha

 PDF (Język Polski)

RAPORT ON THE ACTIVITY OF THE PAU COMMISSION ON THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE

The Activity Report of the PAU Commission on the History of Science in 2024/2025DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.020.21858

Michał Kokowski

 PDF (Język Polski)


CfA: Reproductive Governance from Below: Childbearing, Trust, and Community Norms in East Central Europe, 1850–1945

 CfA: Reproductive Governance from Below: Childbearing, Trust, and Community Norms in East Central Europe, 1850–1945 The deadline for the su...