Showing posts with label Call for Papers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Call for Papers. Show all posts

Tuesday, 13 October 2026

Call for papers: Epistemologies of the Hinterland: The Making of Rural Knowledge in the 20th Century and beyond

Call for papers: Epistemologies of the Hinterland: The Making of Rural Knowledge in the 20th Century and beyond


The publication project aims to analyze epistemic complexes that defined rurality along several hierarchical divides: civilization/nature; science/belief, the individual/community; urban/rural; system/habit; measurement/experience; rationality/emotion etc. We want to bring together case studies from different contexts of rurality that offer a new perspective on rural knowledge. We are looking forward to proposals that discuss the “how” of knowledge production in all its contradictions and inherent power relations. 

15 November 2026: abstract submission deadline

June 2027: in-person author workshop in Vienna

For more details see below.

 

Call for papers

Epistemologies of the Hinterland: The Making of Rural Knowledge in the 20th Century and beyond


Today’s rural environments mirror long historical processes. Especially since the industrial revolution, they can be conceived as the outcome of social, administrative-technological, political, and scientific interventions in a taken-for-granted nature. In our publication project we aim to reconsider these interventions as epistemic complexes that defined rurality along several hierarchical divides that also carved out European modernity: civilization/nature; science/belief, the individual/community; urban/rural;

system/habit; measurement/experience; rationality/emotion etc.

Focusing on examples from the area of rurality, we want to search for encounters between bodies of knowledge that have historically been perceived as incommensurable and look at the practices, subjects and objects of knowledge production. We envision analyses of incommensurability narratives to open perspectives on developments since the early 20th century, but also on the most recent global climate debates and their often very local pinpoints as well as on recent political attempts to re-naturalize complex histories as national cultures.

We want to bring together case studies from different contexts of rurality that offer a new perspective on rural knowledge. At the centre of our attention is on the “how” of knowledge production in all its contradictions, perceived incommensurabilities and inherent power relations. We are focusing mainly on the 20th century, with some sojourns into the 21st century, and on Europe situated within its imperial, colonial, and global context, and the neo-national backlash of re-naturalizing complex histories as national cultures. The significance of science is a central, but not the only aspect.

We are seeking to publish the contributions as a special issue of an international peer-reviewed journal such as Knowledge or Science in Context. 

Topics can include but are

not limited to:

- researching rurality from different disciplinary perspectives

- relations between the researchers and the researched

- historicity of wilderness, nature, and rural spaces

- knowledge production and gender

- hygiene and eugenics in colonial contexts

- knowledge production about precarious agricultural regions (mountains, tundra)

- agricultural modernization

- education in rural areas

- environment, growth and the EU

- global aspects of climate debates and their local contexts

- media and knowledge dissemination

To ensure a concise and coherent publication, we will organize two meetings (online and in person) to work on questions and concepts, drafts and pre-circulated papers. The author workshop will take place in Vienna in June 2027.

Preliminary timetable:

15 November 2026: abstract submission deadline

December 2026: online meeting over concept of special issue

June 2027: in-person author workshop in Vienna 

Please send your abstract of 500 words max. to dietlind.huechtker(at)univie.ac.at. 

The deadline for abstracts is the 15th November 2026.

Image:  Unkown author, One of the new pavilions of the University of Agriculture, pl. Grundwaldskim in Wrocław, 1967, © Wikimedia Commons.

Sunday, 11 October 2026

CFP: Science in the Field: People, Practices and Environments in the Russian Empire and Soviet Union

 CFP: Science in the Field: People, Practices and Environments in the Russian Empire and Soviet Union (Fribourg, 14–15 June 2027)



Submission deadline: 1 December 2026

We invite proposals for an international conference on the history of scientific fieldwork in the Russian Empire and Soviet Union. The conference will examine how knowledge was produced through encounters with particular environments and populations and how observations, specimens, measurements, and other materials gathered in the field were transformed into scientific and administrative knowledge.

We are particularly interested in expeditions and scientific stations; the practices and material conditions of fieldwork; interactions between scientists, local inhabitants, guides, translators, technicians, and other participants; and the movement of knowledge and materials between the field and universities, laboratories, museums, observatories, and administrative institutions. We also welcome contributions examining the relationship between scientific research and projects of resource exploitation, agriculture, public health, territorial administration, and environmental transformation.

Geographically, the conference seeks to bring together research on Central Asia, the Caucasus, Siberia, Ukraine, and other regions of the Russian Empire and Soviet Union, while examining relations between scientific centres and the different environments in which field research took place. Contributions may address the earth and environmental sciences, geography, botany and zoology, archaeology and ethnography, medicine and epidemiology, and related fields.

We particularly welcome research based on primary sources and contributions that examine continuities and transformations across 1917, as well as the international and transnational dimensions of field science.

The conference languages are English and Russian. Presentations should be approximately 20 minutes.

Proposals should include:

a paper title;

an abstract of up to 300 words;

a brief indication of the principal primary sources;

a short biographical note (maximum 100 words).

Please send proposals by 1 December 2026 to Katja Doose (katja.doose@univ-lyon2.fr) and Oybek Makhmudov (oybek81@yandex.ru).

The organizers will provide accommodation in Fribourg for three nights (13–16 June 2027). Limited travel funding is available, with priority given to doctoral and early-career researchers and participants without access to institutional travel funding. Invitation letters for visa applications can be provided.

The conference is organized as the final conference of the SNSF-funded project “Myths of Equality: The Gendered History of Science in Central Asia, 1870–1970s” (SEQUAL).

Organizing Committee:

Christine Bichsel (University of Fribourg)

Katja Doose (Université Lumière Lyon 2)

Nargiza Kenzhaeva (State Pedagogical University of Chirchik)

Oybek Makhmudov (State Pedagogical University of Chirchik)

Contact Information

Katja Doose

Université Lumière Lyon 2

katja.doose@univ-lyon2.fr 

Oybek Makhmudov 

State Pedagogical University Chirchik 

oybek81@yandex.ru


Tuesday, 22 September 2026

CFP: Animals as Protein Factories: A History of European Livestock across the East-West Divide (1950s – present)

 CFP: Animals as Protein Factories: A History of European Livestock across the East-West Divide (1950s – present), Centre Marc Bloch in Berlin, 15 to 16 June 2027

This workshop explores how industrial livestock farming (whether for pigs, cows, chickens, or salmon) transformed animals as well as human diets on both sides of the Iron curtain, reshaped working communities, and caused massive environmental damage by altering landscapes and agricultural infrastructure. It also examines the upheaval in the relationships between humans and non-humans in the production of livestock, while considering aquaculture as an extension of the boundaries of the industrial domestication of living beings.

It traces how post-1945 frameworks shaped farming systems in Western, Southern, and Eastern Europe, including former Soviet states (incl. the Caucasus and Central Asia). It also addresses the collapse of working communities following the fall of the Eastern Bloc, and the subsequent integration of these regions into the global European market and its specific standardization. By analyzing the expansion of the European Union in Southern and Eastern Europe, the legacy of the Eastern Bloc, and recent shifts, like the fast-tracked integration of Ukraine and Moldova following Russia’s war of aggression, the event connects agricultural history and modern geopolitics. Additionally, it explores Europe’s colonial and post-colonial trade relationships—such as for livestock, feed, and technology exports—with non-European economies. The workshop also links these geopolitical frameworks to local environmental factors like climate, soil, topography, and water systems.

The event welcomes broad comparative, transnational or multi-scale approaches, while equally encouraging case studies focused on specific European locations that need not compare directly. This interdisciplinary workshop brings together experts from history, geography, sociology, anthropology, economy, veterinary medicine, biology, agriculture. Interest in audiovisual documentary collections and oral history projects are especially welcomed.

The proposals may focus on the following five themes: 1) Workers and Experts 2) The reshaping of the relationships between humans and non-humans and the life cycle of domesticated animals 3) The circulation of technologies, knowledge and consumption standards across a divided continent 4) Environmental disasters and the spatial distribution of industrial livestock farming 5) Between collapse and expansion – socio-economic and political entanglements in European livestock farming.

You can find an extended version of the call here (https://cmb.hu-berlin.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/CfP-Animals-as-Factories.pdf).

Submission of Proposals:

Please complete the application form online by 18 October 2026. The link to the application form is here (https://framaforms.org/animals-as-protein-factories-a-history-of-european-livestock-across-the-east-west-divide-1950s). The application should include a 300–500 words abstract and a brief biographical note (100-150 words).

Conference discussions will be based on pre-circulated papers, which should not exceed 10,000 words. A selection of papers is planned for publication.

Organization:

The workshop will take place at the Centre Marc Bloch in Berlin from 15 to 16 June 2027 and will be held in English.

Participants’ travel and accommodation will be partly covered. When applying, please indicate whether you have access to alternative sources of funding to cover these costs.

In line with our commitment to reducing the workshop’s environmental impact, air travel will only be eligible for reimbursement if there is no train connection available under 10 hours.

The workshop is designed as an in-person encounter. Online participation will be considered only in exceptional circumstances, in particular for colleagues from overseas or for those based in Ukraine who are unable to leave the country.

For any questions, please feel free to contact us at animals.as.factories@gmail.com

Organizing Committee

Margot Lyautey (Helmut-Schmidt-Universität/Universität der Bundeswehr, Hamburg)

Nathalie Moine (CNRS/Centre Marc Bloch, Berlin)

Anna Safronova (Leibniz-Zentrum Moderner Orient, Berlin)

Call for papers: Development Knowledge and Policies from the Global South, 1930–2000

Call for papers: Development Knowledge and Policies from the Global South, 1930–2000. Organisers: Teresa Huhle, Katharina Kreuder-Sonnen, Frederik Schulze (Department of History & Global South Studies Center, University of Cologne). Cologne 19.07.2027 - 20.07.2027, Deadline 18.10.2026


In recent years, scholarship on the history of developmentalism has included the Global South by exploring anti-developmentalist thought and resistance to development policies. At the same time, historiography started to acknowledge the participation of Global South actors in the making of Cold War development projects. Our conference aims to systematize these approaches and to resituate the Global South within the history of twentieth century developmentalism. To this end, we want to explore development knowledge and policies which were produced by actors from the Global South.

We can build on scholarship that has illuminated the dynamic and heterogeneous trajectories of development throughout the twentieth century by moving beyond a focus on Point IV and US-American policies and situating them within a broader chronological, geographical, and substantive context (Unger 2018, Lorenzini 2019). Authors have described non-US-American origins of the idea of “development” (McVety 2018). They have also analyzed the role of the League of Nations (Clavin 2013) as well as late imperial policies of development from the 1930s to the 1950s (Cooper 1996). Studies of community development in the 1950s and 1960s have highlighted that there was not only modernization theory-led authoritative planning but there also existed small-scale and bottom-up development schemes (Immerwahr 2015/ Pohl-Valero 2026). The broad disenchantment with large-scale state-led development projects, the rise of NGOs in the sector, and the turn to entrepreneurial approaches of development have been described for the period since the 1970s (Scott 1998, Davies 2014, Macekura 2015). Concepts of sustainable development and ideas of de-growth are receiving growing attention, too (Borowy/Schmelzer 2017). What is more, global histories of Eastern European state socialism have shed light on development thinking and practices beyond the Iron Curtain and have diversified our image of North-South entanglements during the Cold War (Mark/Kalinovsky/Marung 2020).

Yet, the historiographical narrative continues to be shaped predominantly by ideas and practices originating in the Global North. Critical scholarship has paid great attention to analyzing the continuity of exploitative and partly violent power relations that were inherent to many development policies stemming from the Global North. This line of research has understood local actors as agents of resistance against these power relations and interpreted development critique, post-development approaches, and indigenous knowledge as opposition to Western development thought (Escobar 1995, Lang/Mokrani 2013).

As a consequence, the Global South is still often treated as a “supposed local institutional and scientific vacuum” (Pohl-Valero 2026, 21). Ideas and practices of development devised by local elites – on national, regional, or community levels – are therefore mostly overlooked. The workshop aims at uncovering how actors and institutions from the Global South (co-)produced theoretical and practical knowledge to develop their countries, regions, and communities. We welcome contributions discussing one or several of the following areas:

1. Development knowledge (co-)produced in the Global South

African socialism, ujamaa, and dependency theory are among the most well-known concepts of development brought forward, negotiated, and circulated by actors from the Global South. What other concepts were there and what fields of knowledge have been identified as relevant to development by actors from Africa, Latin America, and Asia? In which socio-cultural settings have they been developed? What institutions and actors contributed to stabilizing and circulating them? How where they put into practice?

2. Relations between the Global North and the Global South

How did actors from the Global South conceive of their relationship to development policies from the Global North? Did they understand their knowledge as in resistance to approaches from the United States, Western, or Eastern Europe? Or did they regard them as adaptation or local transformation of Northern ideas and practices? How did actors from the Global North react to non-Western development approaches? How can we describe this relationship, taking Global South agency into account but not losing power asymmetries from sight?

3. Debate and resistance within Global South societies

How did development thinkers and practitioners from Africa, Latin America, and Asia negotiate their ideas and concepts within their respective societies? How did they react when facing resistance? What power relations did their ideas and practices imply?

4. Networks and institutions of development knowledge from the South

Can we identify specific spatial or institutional hubs for the emergence of development knowledge from the Global South? What role did the UN-system play and how did institutions of South-South interaction contribute to the production and circulation of alternate development knowledge?

The workshop is open to a variety of fields of development thought and intervention such as urban planning, infrastructure development, economics, business administration, agriculture, family planning, public health, and social planning. We particularly welcome contributions that address the listed questions and fields of development from a history of knowledge perspective.

The workshop will be based on pre-circulated papers of max. 4,000 words which need to be submitted by 31 May 2027.

If you are interested in participating, please send your abstract of max. 400 words and a short CV (1 page) to the organizers by October 18, 2026. Travel and accommodation costs will be reimbursed depending on the outcome of a conference grant application. A budget for junior researchers has already been secured.

Organizers:

Teresa Huhle (teresa.huhle@uni-koeln.de)

Katharina Kreuder-Sonnen (katharina.kreuder-sonnen@uni-koeln.de)

Frederik Schulze (frederik.schulze@uni-koeln.de)

Bibliography

Clavin, Patricia (2013). Securing the World Economy: The Reinvention of the League of Nations, 1920–1946. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cooper, Frederick (1996). Decolonization and African Society: The Labor Question in French and British Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davies, Thomas (2014). NGOs: A New History of Transnational Civil Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Escobar, Arturo (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Immerwahr, Daniel (2015). Thinking Small: The United States and the Lure of Community Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lang, Miriam and Dunia Mokrani, eds. (2013). Beyond Development: Alternative Visions from Latin America. Quito: Fundación Rosa Luxemburg.

Lorenzini, Sara (2019). Global Development: A Cold War History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Macekura, Stephen (2015). Of Limits and Growth: The Rise of Global Sustainable Development in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mark, James; Artemy M. Kalinovsky and Steffi Marung, eds. (2020). Alternative Globalizations: Eastern Europe and the Postcolonial World. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Maruca, Barbara and Matthias Schmelzer (2017). “Sustainable Degrowth,” in Iris Borowy and Matthias Schmelzer, eds. History of the Future of Economic Growth: Historical Roots of Current Debates on Sustainable Degrowth. Milton Park: Routledge, 174–197.

McVety, Amanda Kay (2018). “Wealth and Nations. The Origins of International Development Assistance,” in Stephen J. Macekura and Erez Manela, eds. The Development Century. A Global History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21–39.

Pohl-Valero, Stefan (2026). “State, Experts, and Rural Development in Colombia, 1930–50. A Local Genealogy of International Community Development,” in History of Science, online first, 10.1177/00732753261428874.

Scott, James C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Unger, Corinna R. (2018). International Development: A Postwar History. London: Bloomsbury.

Kontakt

Teresa Huhle (teresa.huhle@uni-koeln.de)

Katharina Kreuder-Sonnen (katharina.kreuder-sonnen@uni-koeln.de)

Frederik Schulze (frederik.schulze@uni-koeln.de)


[Image: Roger Joseph Felli – the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ghana in Gdańsk. Janusz Uklejewski, 1979 / PAP, from the page afrotopie.online]


Tuesday, 15 September 2026

CfP: 14th Biennial European Society for Environmental History (ESEH) Conference

 CfP: 14th Biennial European Society for Environmental History (ESEH) Conference

Environmental History Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries

Salzburg, Austria | 7-10 September 2027

The European Society for Environmental History (ESEH) is pleased to invite proposals for panel sessions, individual papers, book presentations, posters, roundtables, and more experimental presentation formats for its upcoming biennial conference. The conference theme, Environmental History Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries, aims to highlight and reinforce the interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary nature and culture of environmental history.

The Conference will be held in Salzburg, Austria, from 7 to 10 September 2027. It is organised by the ESEH and the University of Salzburg.

The deadline for submissions is 15 October 2026, 23:59 CET.

Notifications will be sent out in February 2027.

Submit: https://www.conftool.pro/eseh2027/

Conference website: http://www.eseh2027.at/

Download here (https://eseh.org/sviluppo/wp-content/uploads/CfP-ESEH-2027.pdf) the call in PDF.


Sunday, 30 August 2026

CFP: Utopia(s) in the Arts and Art Spaces from the 1960s to the Present Day. Paris 02/2027, deadline: 20.10.2026

 CFP: Utopia(s) in the Arts and Art Spaces from the 1960s to the Present Day. Paris 02/2027, deadline: 20.10.2026


In his encyclopaedia of hopes, Bloch presents certain arts (painting, opera, literature and music) as “outlines of a better world” (Bloch, 1959). Art thus contributes to the emergence of utopia by preparing consciousness for it. At the heart of the notion of utopia – from manifestations predating the coining of the term to contemporary realizations – lies a constant questioning of the social status quo and a proposal for alternative societies. Utopia has developed around an evocative poetics that cuts across artistic disciplines. The symbolism constructed by utopia, shaped through artistic manifestations, tends to materialize in its realized counterpart. In this regard, the philosopher Roland Schaer points to the porosity between the literary – or more broadly fictional – counterpart and realized utopian projects. Thus, “utopia is, on the one hand, an imaginary projection into the fictional space created by the text of the narrative; on the other hand, the project it sets forth assumes implementation and as such it veers toward the side of history while simultaneously drawing its sustenance from fiction.” (Schaer, 2000).


The aim of this symposium is to examine the extension of the practice of utopia, both as a fictional genre and as a project, within various artistic manifestations and within art spaces themselves. It will also involve examining discourses on the subject. Indeed, utopia is considered in its transdisciplinary dimension, both from a methodological standpoint and in terms of the arts concerned (visual arts, literature, music, performing arts). The idea of contemporaneity is constitutive of this study, since the goal is to understand the evolution and current relevance of the notion. Proposals must focus on works or projects dating from after the 1960s, a decade that marked a significant renewal of utopia in light of its penetration into institutional critique and its echoes in the formation of counterculture. Across various artistic forms, utopia has been reconceptualized to push the limits of bourgeois institutions, reinvent the relationship between art and the public, and contribute to the upheaval of society.


The symposium invites contributions along the following lines of inquiry:


Axis 1 – Naming Utopia: Vocabulary and Interdisciplinary Typology

- epistemology of utopian terminology

- language shared across fields

- disciplinary differences and nuances

- common core underlying recourse to utopia


Axis 2 – Utopia as an Artistic Apparatus Presenting an Alternative to the World of Reference

- forms of the utopian work: literal apparatus / conceptual apparatus

- evolution and persistence of topoi, particularly uses of space

- “war of imaginaries”

- updating of utopian motifs (communities, emotions, identities, individualities, the living world…)


Axis 3 – Utopian Materializations: Spaces and Practices of Art

- art spaces: planned, transitory or realized; spaces of representation/display, dissemination, experimentation, pedagogy, resistance

- spatial practices and “utopian” discourses in the art and architecture of art places

- experimental practices and modes of artistic organization


Submission Guidelines

Proposals from researchers at all career stages (including Ph.D. students) are welcome, as are those from artists and practitioners of utopia.

Paper proposals, written in French or English, should not exceed 400 words (excluding bibliography) and must be accompanied by a short biographical note. They should be sent by 20 October 2026 to the following address: JEUtopieArts@protonmail.com

Applicants will be notified of the outcome, following review of the proposals, by the end of November.


Organizing Committee

Clara Cazaubiel (PhD candidate in Museum Studies, CERLIS, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle)

Camille Lucot (PhD candidate in Comparative Literature, LISAA, Université Gustave Eiffel)

Adrian Wetter (PhD candidate in Film Studies, THALIM, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, and Universität Kassel, Germany)


Scientific Committee

Antoine de Baecque (Professor of Film Studies, ARTS, Ecole Normale Superieure)

Irène Langlet (Professor of Comparative Literature, LISAA, Université Gustave Eiffel)

François Mairesse (Professor of Museum Studies, CERLIS, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle)


Wednesday, 26 August 2026

Call for Abstracts | 2026 Graduate Conference "Cusanus Contra Bohemos. Revisiting Nicholas of Cusa,"

  Call for Abstracts | 2026 Graduate Conference

We are pleased to invite submissions for the 2026 Graduate Conference "Cusanus Contra Bohemos. Revisiting Nicholas of Cusa," hosted by students from the Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies at Charles University, Prague, on 19–20 November 2026.

The conference is one of the results of GA UK 334126 and will explore Nicholas of Cusa’s work in its broader historical and intellectual context, with particular emphasis on his political and legal thought and the interconnections between jurisprudence, political authority, ecclesiology, and sovereignty.

Topics of particular interest include:

• Cusanus and his contemporaries

• Law, theology, and political legitimacy

• Cusanus’ contribution to legal philosophy and jurisprudence

• Sovereignty and political authority in De Concordantia Catholica, De Auctoritate Praesidendi, and Epistola ad Bohemos

• Secular and ecclesiastical power in Cusanus’ political thought

• New approaches to his political and legal writings

• Cusanian mereology and the notion of Unity

All Cusanus-related contributions are welcome. We particularly encourage submissions from graduate students, doctoral candidates, and early-career researchers, while scholars at all career stages are warmly invited to apply.

🎓 Confirmed Keynote Speakers

Paul Richard Blum (Loyola University Maryland)

Lenka Karfíková (Charles University)

Andrea Fiamma (Academy of Sciences)

Witalij Morosow (Kues Academy)

📄 Submission Guidelines

Please submit an anonymous abstract of no more than 300 words, together with a short personal bio, to:

📧 cusanus.contra.bohemos@gmail.com

Submission deadline: 1 September 2026

Notification of acceptance: 10 September 2026

The conference will be held in person in Prague, Czech Republic. Please note that the conference is self-funded; travel and accommodation expenses cannot be reimbursed.

For further questions, please contact the organisitators at cusanus.contra.bohemos@gmail.com.

We look forward to receiving your submissions! 

Sunday, 16 August 2026

CALL FOR APPLICATIONS: SUMMER ACADEMY ON "SCIENCE IMAGINES ITS FUTURE

 CALL FOR APPLICATIONS: SUMMER ACADEMY ON "SCIENCE IMAGINES ITS FUTURE <https://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/research/projects/science-imagines-its-future>"


Organizers: Lorraine Daston (MPIWG/University of Chicago), David Kaiser (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), and Erika Milam (Princeton University)


The Max Planck Institute for the History of Science (MPIWG) seeks ten Early Career Fellows (graduate students, postdocs, assistant professors or the equivalent) to participate in two summer academies to be held in Berlin on June 14–18, 2027 and June 26–30, 2028, with the support of the Balzan Foundation.


The topic of the summer academies will be how disciplines in the natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities have deliberated about how to invest their always scarce resources of time, talent, and money in projects that will shape research in an always uncertain future, especially the middle- and long-term future, from the next five years to the next century.

(See full description here. <https://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/research/projects/science-imagines-its-future>)


The topic has been broadly construed, and research projects may focus on any discipline, epoch, or locale. Candidates may come from any country or discipline but should be able to present their work and discuss that of others in English.


Early Career Fellows will be given the opportunity to present their own work at the Summer Academies as well as to interview senior scholars and scientists on the topic. They will also play a central role in planning the second Summer Academy in 2028. Travel and accommodation costs will be covered.


Please read the full CALL and the application requirements here. <https://www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/news/call-applications-summer-academy-science-imagines-its-futures>

Applications should be submitted by November 1, 2026.


Tuesday, 28 July 2026

Call for Papers: Metals, Minerals, and Material Worlds: Art, Extraction, and Knowledge in Central Europe and Beyond

Call for Papers: Metals, Minerals, and Material Worlds: Art, Extraction, and Knowledge in Central Europe and Beyond

An International Symposium of the Minescapes Research Project

Institute of Art History, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague May 19-21, 2027.


We invite proposals for papers for an international symposium, Metals, Minerals, and Material Worlds: Art, Extraction, and Knowledge in Central Europe and Beyond, to be held at the Institute of Art History of the Czech Academy of Sciences in Prague on May 19–21, 2027. Proposals are due October 1, 2026 (see submission details below).


This symposium, organized by Tina Asmussen (German Mining Museum Bochum: Leibniz Research Museum for Georesources) and Pamela Smith (Center for Science and Society, Columbia University), with Sylva Dobalová and Martin Mádl (both Institute of Art History, Czech Academy of Sciences), is part of the ongoing series Minescapes: Socio-Natural Sites of Resource, Extraction, and Knowledge that investigates the complexity and dynamics of human-environmental interactions in mining landscapes using the concept of a “material complex.” Research on a material complex begins in a study of the natural materials and follows them through reciprocal interactions with human bodily practices, techniques, and skills into substances and objects that are given meaning, used, consumed, desired, and studied by human communities. Each of these stages—the materials; the human–material interactions via skilled practice; and the objects and subjects and their meanings in production, use, consumption, and afterlives—can and often do form self-contained sites of study and analysis. In contrast, the Minescapes events aim, through drawing upon the archives of nature (mines, forests, water systems) and society (archives, libraries, art collections), to bring together these often rich separate areas of study into a unified field in order to raise fruitful questions for individual disciplines as well as for the whole.


The Prague symposium brings together scholars from across disciplines to examine the material worlds of metals and minerals—following them from the geological and mineralogical conditions of their formation, through their extraction, smelting, processing, transport, and trade, into the objects, images, and substances they become, and on to their use, consumption, and afterlives. Central Europe—with its long and densely documented history of metal and mineral extraction, its merchant-capitalist enterprises, and its movement of materials across local and global networks—offers a rich setting for these questions, while contributions that extend the perspective beyond the region are equally welcome.


We welcome proposals from scholars in any discipline and at any career stage whose work speaks to the symposium theme. We are especially interested in contributions that bridge the disciplinary boundaries by which the study of metals and minerals has conventionally been divided. Relevant fields and approaches include, but are not limited to:


●       the history of art and art conservation, including technical art history and conservation science, with particular interest in early modern sculpture, metalwork, and the material culture of metals and minerals

●       the history of early modern science, technology, and medicine, including metallurgy, mineralogy, and alchemy

●       environmental, economic, and political-economic history, including the organization of mining, labor, capital, and trade

●       the history of mining and of mining knowledge

●       the natural sciences, including geology, geochemistry, geography, forest science, and materials science


By bringing these conventionally separate fields into conversation, the symposium aims to construct a more integrated history of art and making as human engagement with the materials of the natural environment.

Practical information


This symposium is generously supported by the Getty Foundation's Connecting Art Histories program, through the project The Material Complex of Copper in Central Europe and Beyond. In keeping with the program’s aims, the symposium seeks to bridge the historical geo-political divisions that have long separated research networks across Europe, and therefore especially encourages the participation of scholars based at Central and Eastern European institutions. Scholars from all regions and institutions are warmly invited to apply; please note, however, that the symposium's capacity to provide full financial support for travel and accommodation will be limited.


Proposals should include full name, current affiliation, and email address; a paper title; an abstract of no more than 300 words; a short CV (max. 2 pages with PhD or other terminal degree completion year or expected completion).


Submissions are due October 1, 2026, and should be sent to minescapes2027@gmail.com.


Monday, 27 July 2026

CFP: “Life Cycles under Socialist Regimes: Managing Gender Relations, Aging, and Health”

 The Institute of Contemporary History, Ljubljana, invites paper proposals for the Workshop “Life Cycles under Socialist Regimes: Managing Gender Relations, Aging, and Health,” to be held on February 16, 2027, in Ljubljana, Slovenia.

State socialism, as a political and economic system, was one of the major innovations of the twentieth century and became a global phenomenon in its latter half, with socialist regimes emerging across Europe, Asia, Africa, and the Americas. State socialism can be understood as a political regime characterized by single-party government, directed modernization under systemic governmentality, and the predominance of state property. From the 1950s onward, socialist governance increasingly embraced the notion that political, economic, and social lives could be organized and governed as closed systems. With the “scientific and technological revolution” integrated into the ideology as a new stage on the path to communism, the accumulation and application of knowledge became a central function of state socialist regimes, while holistic, systemic governmentality turned into a key feature of the ideology. The workshop will explore how socialist states sought to manage human life cycles through scientific knowledge, administrative practices, and institutional interventions. Focusing on gender relations, aging, and health, it will examine these fields as central dimensions of socialist biopolitics and as sites where broader models of governance and technocratic management were developed. Bringing together perspectives from conceptual, institutional, and political history as well as the social sciences, the workshop will investigate how socialist regimes attempted to organize social reproduction, welfare, health, and individual life trajectories between the 1950s and 1991. Possible topics include, but are not limited to, the development and implementation of official policies concerning family, gender, demographic change, health, and aging; group and individual responses to official policies; the role of scientific research and expert communities in shaping socialist governance; international cooperation and the circulation of knowledge, expertise, and technologies; and the communication of scientific knowledge to broader publics. We are particularly interested in approaches that examine how scientific and technological visions influenced understandings of the human body, social reproduction, and socialist futures, including the role of techno-optimism, popular science, and the intersections between science fact and science fiction. The workshop will situate these developments within a global and comparative framework, paying particular attention to the circulation of ideas, institutions, and practices beyond national boundaries.

The workshop is part of the project Socialist Management in a Global Context: Technocratic Developments in the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, 1955–1991, sponsored by the Slovenian Research Agency (ARIS). It is part of a series of four workshops, the results of which will be published together. The selection of papers will, hence, be based on their quality and coherence. Submissions addressing developments outside the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia are explicitly encouraged.

Please submit a 300-word abstract and a short biography to PD Dr. Ivan Sablin (ivan.sablin@inz.si) by September 15, 2026. Notifications of acceptance are expected by the end of October. Invited participants will be expected to submit drafts of up to 7,000 words by February 1, 2027. The organizers will be able to provide accommodation to the participants but cannot cover their travel costs. See less


Friday, 24 July 2026

CFP: Beyond Borders: Global Histories of Transboundary Rivers

 Beyond Borders: Global Histories of Transboundary Rivers

International Online Workshop

University of Ostrava, Czech Republic

November 19-20, 2026

 

More than 300 river basins cross international borders, providing freshwater, energy, transportation, food, and ecosystem services for billions of people. Yet transboundary rivers are far more than shared natural resources. They are political, technological, legal, ecological, and diplomatic spaces where states, engineers, scientists, international organizations, and local communities have negotiated competing visions of development, sovereignty, environmental protection, and cooperation.

Although transboundary rivers have attracted growing scholarly attention, research remains fragmented across disciplines. Environmental historians have explored changing human–river relationships; historians of technology have examined hydraulic engineering and infrastructure; historical geographers have analysed river landscapes and territorial change; scholars of Science and Technology Studies (STS) have investigated expertise and knowledge production; political scientists and scholars of international relations have focused on water diplomacy and international institutions; legal scholars have examined international water law; while hydrologists and water-governance researchers have developed sophisticated frameworks for understanding river basin management. Yet these conversations often do not intersect.

This workshop starts from the premise that understanding transboundary rivers requires genuine interdisciplinary dialogue. Rather than treating rivers simply as environmental systems or geopolitical boundaries, we invite participants to explore them as dynamic socio-environmental systems shaped simultaneously by ecology, infrastructure, science, law, diplomacy, economics, and politics.

Building upon the Czech Science Foundation (GAČR) project An Environmental History of Transboundary Rivers in Cold War East-Central Europe, the workshop seeks to expand regional scholarship into a broader comparative and global conversation. It aims to establish an international interdisciplinary network dedicated to the historical study of transboundary rivers and to identify new directions for collaborative research at the intersection of environmental history, history of technology, geography, international law, political science, STS, and water governance.

 

We welcome contributions from scholars working in:

Environmental History

History of Technology

History of Science

Historical Geography

Science and Technology Studies (STS)

Water History

Environmental Humanities

Political Ecology

International Relations

International Environmental Law

Environmental Governance

Hydrology and Water Governance

Geography

Anthropology

Sociology

Environmental Planning

 

We welcome proposals on topics including, but not limited to:

Comparative histories of transboundary river basins

International river commissions and basin organizations

Environmental governance across political borders

Water diplomacy and international cooperation

Rivers during the Cold War

Hydraulic engineering, dams, and river regulation

Navigation and inland waterways

Flood protection and disaster management

Pollution, water quality, and environmental monitoring

Fisheries, wetlands, and aquatic ecosystems

Hydrological science, environmental expertise, and knowledge production

International organizations and shared waters

Climate change and the historical governance of river basins

Colonial and postcolonial river governance

Indigenous and local perspectives on transboundary rivers

Comparative and global approaches to river history

Rivers, sovereignty, and international environmental law

Methods and concepts for interdisciplinary river research

Studies covering all world regions and historical periods are welcome.

 

Format:

The workshop will be held in online format.

Rather than focusing exclusively on completed research, we particularly encourage proposals presenting original archival research, conceptual interventions, comparative perspectives, methodological reflections, and work in progress.

The workshop is designed to maximize discussion and exchange across disciplines. Each paper will receive substantial time for discussion, and the programme will conclude with a roundtable on future directions in the interdisciplinary study of transboundary rivers.

---

Submission

Please submit:

an abstract of 300–500 words

a short biography (100 words)

to: cesh@osu.cz

Submission deadline: 15 September 2026

Notification of acceptance: 1 October 2026

Sunday, 12 July 2026

*Second International Conference on Early Women Psychoanalysts*

 *Second International Conference on Early Women Psychoanalysts*


The International Association for Spielrein Studies is pleased to announce

the Second

International Conference on Early Women Psychoanalysts, dedicated to women

who engaged with psychoanalysis before the end of World War II. The

conference will be held online on April 10–11, 2027.



Participation is free for students and only $15 for all other attendees.



Selected contributions from the conference will be considered for inclusion

in a second edited volume associated with the Early Women Psychoanalysts

project, edited by Klara Naszkowska. For further details and the Call for

Papers please visit:

https://www.spielreinassociation.org/conference-early-women-psychoanalysts


Call for Papers: 14th Biennial European Society for Environmental History (ESEH) Conference

  Call for Papers: 14th Biennial European Society for Environmental History (ESEH) Conference

"Environmental History Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries"

 Salzburg, Austria | 7-10 September 2027

 The deadline for submissions is 15 October 2026, 23:59 CET.

More: https://eseh.org/cfp-14th-biennial-european-society-for-environmental-history-eseh-conference/

Saturday, 4 July 2026

Call for papers: Cartographies of Crises

Call for papers: Cartographies of Crises: Mapping Conflict, Disaster, and Uncertainty (19th–21st Centuries)


The international workshop Cartographies of Crises: Mapping Conflict, Disaster, and Uncertainty (19th–21st Centuries) organised by the Institute of History of the Czech Academy of Sciences (Prague, Czechia) and the University of Erfurt, Centre for Transcultural Studies / Perthes Collection (Gotha, Germany) will take place on 26th–27th November 2026 at the Centre for Transcultural Studies / Perthes Collection (CG2 - Pagenhaus, Schlossplatz 1, Gotha).

Call for Papers (https://www.hiu.cas.cz/user_uploads/badatelum_i_verejnosti/udalosti/2026_11_26_27_workshop_cartographies_of_crises/cfp_cartographies_of_crises_workshop_2026.pdf)


Thematic mapping has played a crucial role in visualising, interpreting, and communicating physical and socio-economic phenomena. This has been particularly true in times of crises, when maps have been used to represent wars, forced migrations, epidemics, environmental disasters, social upheavals, political conflicts, and anticipatedthreat scenarios. In such contexts, maps have served not only as instruments of documentation but also as analytical tools, persuasive arguments, and means of intervention.

This workshop focuses on the cartographies of crises from the 19th to the 21st century and seeks to advance research on the thematic mapping of crises. Contributions are invited that engage with a broad range of cartographic practices, from individual and hand-drawn maps to official state mapping, thematic atlases, recent digital mapping projects, and approaches associated with Historical GIS and Digital Humanities.

Particular attention will be paid to the ways in which maps represent experiences of uncertainty, disruption, displacement, and shifting identities, as well as to the role of cartography in shaping public perceptions of crises and historical memory. Proposals are welcome that explore how actors across the political and social spectrum have used cartography in response to different forms of crisis – from state and institutional mapping efforts to grassroots and counter-mapping practices – and how these maps both reflected

and shaped individual and collective understandings of phenomena such as war, displacement, epidemics, and environmental disasters.

The workshop seeks to foster interdisciplinary dialogue on this specific category of cartographic sources and to encourage comparative perspectives across different historical periods and world regions. Contributions focusing on non-Western actors and cartographic traditions are particularly welcome. The study of how crises have been mapped and visualised offers new insights into both individual and collective responses to situations of threat and uncertainty, as well as into the role of maps in shaping processes of governance, intervention, and social transformation. The topic is particularly relevant today, as the study of historical crisis mapping deepens our understanding of the visual languages through which contemporary crises are represented, interpreted, and governed.

Contributions addressing, but not limited to, the following themes are invited:

Maps as analytical tools and instruments of power and governance: crisis management, political argumentation, propaganda, real-time mapping during ongoing crises and disasters, and the role of state and institutional actors;

Visual languages and cartographic conventions: standardisation, symbols, techniques of representation;

Counter-mapping and grassroots practices: non-institutional actors, communities, and individuals as producers of crisis cartographies; maps as tools of resistance, negotiation, and contestation;

Methodological and comparative perspectives: Historical GIS, Digital Humanities, digital mapping projects, transnational approaches, and studies of non-Western cartographic traditions.

The deadline for submitting abstracts (300 words) and a short CV is 10 September 2026. Authors will be notified of the acceptance or rejection of their proposals by 20 September 2026. Each participant will have 20 minutes for their presentation, followed by discussion.

Please submit your proposal using the online form available at: https://forms.gle/Sg1kyeNoSyH5Rukv7

There is no registration fee. To facilitate international participation, the organisers will cover accommodation costs for all accepted speakers. Travel expenses will be covered either partially or in full, depending on available funding.

Organisers:

Jitka Močičková (Institute of History of the Czech Academy of Sciences): mocickova@hiu.cas.cz

Dominic Keyssner (University of Erfurt): dominic.keyssner@uni-erfurt.de

The workshop is organised with the support of the Strategy AV21 research programme Identities in the World of Wars and Crises (Czech Academy of Sciences, 2026) and the University of Erfurt.


Sunday, 21 June 2026

CFP: Unionize the Science: Agency and Infrastructures of Knowledge in Eurasia, 20th–21st Centuries

 Unionize the Science: Agency and Infrastructures of Knowledge in Eurasia, 20th–21st Centuries

International Conference

Yerevan, Armenia | 5–7 November, 2026


The Yerevan Center for International Education (YCIE) is delighted to announce the international conference “Unionize the Science: Agency and Infrastructures of Knowledge in Eurasia, 20th–21st Centuries.” The conference is funded and organized as part of the YCIE Co-Funded Conferences program and will be held in Yerevan, Armenia, November 5–7, 2026.


The conference explores the social agency of science in socialist and post-socialist contexts, with particular attention to the institutional, material, and spatial infrastructures that shaped the production, circulation, and contestation of knowledge. Rather than approaching the history of knowledge through narratives of grand achievement or through images of scientists operating beyond bureaucratic and political structures, this event foregrounds science as a domain of action embedded in broader relations between state, society, economy, and culture.


We welcome proposals from historians of science, STS scholars, historians of late socialism, sociologists, anthropologists of knowledge, and researchers from related fields. The conference aims to create an interdisciplinary forum for examining how scientific knowledge was produced, institutionalised, circulated, and redefined across Eurasian contexts in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.


Yerevan offers an especially compelling setting for this discussion. In the late Soviet period, the Armenian SSR was a major scientific hub, and today Yerevan remains a site where scientific institutions, infrastructures, and memories continue to be reinterpreted and publicly contested.


We particularly encourage proposals addressing themes such as:


Geographies of knowledge: technopoles, clusters, and scientific cities;

Research infrastructures and the materiality of science;

Big science projects and their publics, including nuclear and space programmes, cybernetics, and computer networks.

Innovations, from grassroots initiatives to state regulation;

Knowledge and technology transfers across socialist and post-socialist worlds;

Scientific Institutes and Universities as third spaces;

Science and technology heritage in Central Eurasia;

Political economy of knowledge production;

Cultural representations of science;

Science and technology heritage in Central Eurasia;

Big science projects and their publics, including nuclear and space programmes, cybernetics, and computer networks.

Funding and Organization 

The conference is funded by the Yerevan Center for International Education (YCIE). 


Organizing Committee: Dr. Mikhail Piskunov, Dr. Timofey Rakov, and Dr. Alexander Fokin.


Submission Guidelines

All materials must be submitted in English.

All submissions must be made online via the electronic form; email submissions will not be accepted.

Deadline: August 2, 2026

Notification of acceptance: By September 2, 2026

To apply, please submit the following via the electronic form below:

Your paper abstract (maximum 1,500 characters, including spaces)

Your CV in PDF format

Working language: English


Format: In-person event only


Travel and Accommodation

Travel and accommodation costs are the responsibility of participants.

YCIE will provide a limited number of accommodation grants for the duration of the conference upon request. Please note that only one hotel room can be provided per co-authored paper. Accommodation decisions will be communicated along with the conference selection results.

There is no registration fee.

For any inquiries, please contact: timofey.rakov@gmail.com


Wednesday, 17 June 2026

CFP: Mineral Expertise: The Rules of Knowing Earthly Matter in the Early Modern World

 CFP: Mineral Expertise: The Rules of Knowing Earthly Matter in the Early Modern World - Bologna (Italy), 04.02.2027 - 06.02.2027, Deadline: 10.07.2026


Minerals have been extracted as resources, traded as commodities, ingested as medicine, and examined for knowledge across the early modern world. Their lifecycle was structured by mineral expertise rooted in tradition and trained bodies – a bezoar pulverised by a town apothecary, ore assayed by a company metallurgist, gemstones authenticated by a court jeweller. Minerals were key to medicine, metallurgy, alchemy and magic and thus a site to negotiate and legitimate forms of knowledge. Precisely because so much was at stake – both the value of objects and the reputation of people – mineral expertise was subject to scrutiny by peers and official regulation.


A central concern of the workshop is to critically assess the concept of expertise. Before the emergence of modern credentialing and professional licensing, claims to mineral knowledge were fluid and contested. We therefore approach expertise as a context-dependent process of negotiation and legitimation. It emerged when actors combined specialised skills with claims to generalisable knowledge and obtained some form of formal acknowledgment for it. Yet we are interested not only in those who have come to be recognised as experts, but in the broader topography of knowledge within which such recognition was negotiated. Which empirical practices cut across distinctions of status, and which ones did not? How did expertise relate to shared knowledge (common knowledge, the period eye, a well-indexed archive)? What distinguished experts from experienced state officials, skilled artisans, or shrewd market-goers? What were the rules of knowing earthly matter in the early modern world?


This workshop aims to compare mineral expertise from different angles. We are interested in contributions from historians of science, technology and medicine, economic historians, archaeologists and archaeometallurgists working on the period between c.1450 and c.1850 CE. By using minerals as a boundary object both of historical actors and historians who study them, we aim for a richer account of how early modern people engaged the mineral world. We aim for a history of mineral expertise that is attentive to local practices and alert to the broader structures of knowledge/power and value-making in which these practices were embedded.


The workshop will take place on 4-6 February, 2027 at the University of Bologna. We aim to discuss approximately 12 pre-circulated article-length papers (6.000–8.000 words) over two days. Decisions regarding the publication of the papers in a special issue will be made after the workshop. We welcome creative contributions that engage with, but are not limited to, the following questions:


What was mineral knowledge?

- What distinguished expertise in minerals from other kinds of earth-related knowledge (e.g. that of a farmer) and expertise in other materials (e.g. plant matter)? How were historical distinctions asserted, contested, and institutionalised?

- How was expertise valorised and employed in sites of labour — the mine, the home,the office, the laboratory, the museum? How did artisanal or vernacular knowledge validate or contradict expertise?

- How was expertise valorised and employed in imperial expansion and long-distance trade? How did different traditions of mineral knowledge interact or clash, adapt or become marginalised in contexts of empire and colonisation?

- When did specialist knowledge matter decisively? When did social networks, local experience, or consensus prove equally or more powerful?


How was mineral knowledge regulated?

- How did legal and bureaucratic frameworks — testing sites, law courts, guilds, tax regimes — shape the conditions under which expertise was recognised and gain public authority?

- What role did archives, records, and formal procedures play in transforming knowledge into expertise, or expertise into public information? What do administrative sources reveal — and conceal — about the range of actors involved in the making of mineral expertise?

- How were conflicts over mineral expertise adjudicated, and what do such disputes reveal about competing epistemologies and claims to authority?

- Which moral values were invoked in policies seeking to regulate medical, commercial, and occupational practice (e.g. peace, cosmic order, the common good, thrift, charity, godliness, justice)? Whom did experts claim to serve – and whom did they actually serve – when they worked in the ambiance of the state?


We welcome papers from all parts of the world and approaches that engage with cross-cultural encounters and wide-ranging knowledge exchange, as well as those that drill deep into a specific place and time. Since early modern categories were fluid and diverse, we are interested in both objects recognized as “minerals” today and more expansive understandings or boundary cases.


The workshop is co-organized by Monica Azzolini, Sebastian Felten and Sarah Seinitzer, as a collaboration between the SCARCE project (ERC StG, Grant number 101076422) and the Department of Philosophy (History of Science) at the University of Bologna. Potential contributors should send an abstract of no more than 250 words and a 200 word bio to scarce.geschichte@univie.ac.at by 10 July 2026. Limited funding is available to cover travel and accommodation in Bologna. Please indicate if you have other funding sources to cover your travel expenses.


Sunday, 14 June 2026

CFP: International Conference “Education after Totalitarianism”

 International Conference “Education after Totalitarianism”

The Martynas Mažvydas National Library of Lithuania, in collaboration with Vytautas Magnus University, the Faculty of Architecture at Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, the Institute of Educational Sciences at Vilnius University, as well as the Embassy of the Kingdom of Denmark in Lithuania and the Danish Cultural Institute in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, is organizing an international academic conference on October 1–2, 2026.  


The conference “Education after Totalitarianism: Legacies and Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe” will bring together researchers and practitioners to discuss the development of education systems after 1989–1991.  


The event will seek to reveal how historical experiences of totalitarianism shaped education policy, institutions, and practices in Central and Eastern Europe, as well as the challenges and changes the region faces today.  


The conference will examine how education policy, curriculum content, and value foundations have changed in the region’s countries following the collapse of the Soviet and socialist systems. More than three decades later, not only general regional trends are evident, but also striking differences: some countries have achieved internationally recognized results, while others still face challenges posed by ongoing reforms and disputes over values.  


The relevance of the conference is further underscored by the increasingly frequent public discourse in Lithuania regarding the state of the education system, the direction of reforms, and the response to global challenges. An understanding of these issues will be sought by comparing Lithuania’s experience with that of other Central and Eastern European countries with similar historical trajectories.  


Researchers and education policy experts from Lithuania and abroad are invited to the conference. Proposals for the conference may be submitted by June 30, 2026, via email to valstybingumocentras@lnb.lt.   


The conference language is English; the event will take place at the Martynas Mažvydas National Library of Lithuania in Vilnius.  


The conference is part of the event series “A Year with Denmark: Bridges of Culture and Solidarity”, organized by the National Library of Lithuania in collaboration with the Embassy of the Kingdom of Denmark in Lithuania and the Danish Cultural Institute in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. The initiative is dedicated to marking the 35th anniversary of Denmark’s recognition of Lithuania’s restored independence. The series of events is supported by the Danish Ministry of Culture.  

Saturday, 13 June 2026

CFP: Central and Eastern Europe as Method(ology) in Disability Studies

The Faculty of Management and Social Communication and the Research Platform “Disability Studies in Eastern Europe: Reconfigurations” (Jagiellonian University, Kraków) invite paper submissions for a conference "Central and Eastern Europe as Method(ology) in Disability Studies" that will be held on 27-28 November 2026, Kraków


Call for Papers

The Central and Eastern European region constitutes a specific context for the development of activism and critical disability studies. Post-socialist countries are marked by distinct historical and political trajectories that complicate generalized understandings of the Global North and have contributed to the emergence of particular conditions for the development of disability activism and critical disability studies. The socialist system and the post-socialist transformation shaped public institutions in a particular way—not only those dedicated to persons with disabilities/disabled people (we use both terms, as their choice reflects different individual preferences and modes of self-identification), but all others as well. At the same time, it hindered the development of independent initiatives, including social activism. The interests of minority and marginalized groups were often subordinated to the overarching struggle against an oppressive political system before 1989 and to economic concerns during the post-socialist transition. During both periods, attention was primarily directed toward the rights of the so-called normative majority. Although activism by disabled people/persons with disabilities did exist, it is often not recognized or commemorated today.


For these reasons, the systemic transformation and transition to a democratic capitalist system did not result in the recognition of civil and human rights for all, but rather for those groups that were already privileged. Moreover, neoliberal capitalism—characterized by an emphasis on independence, entrepreneurship, self-reliance, productivity, mobility, communicativeness, and flexibility—has contributed to economic disparities, inadequate support systems, insufficient accommodations, and restricted access to education, employment, and public services. These conditions have not been conducive to strengthening the professional, social, academic, or political participation of persons with disabilities/disabled people.


The ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) by Central and Eastern European countries (which celebrates its 20th anniversary this year) has contributed to improving the situation of this group by setting directions for legal, political, and cultural change. In a number of contexts in the region, the Convention is not only regarded as a normative framework—whose legal provisions, however, often fall short of producing meaningful change in practice—but is also actively used by disability movements as a political and policy instrument, as well as a tool for advocacy, shadow reporting, and monitoring of states, thereby fostering a strong sense of ownership and engagement. At the same time, the Convention emerged from extensive disability activism and advocacy and remains deeply rooted in disability studies and disability organizing; its genealogy, therefore, cannot be understood solely as top-down. However, in many countries in the region, the implementation of its provisions remains slow, fragmented, and, at times, merely declarative.


Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, ongoing since 2022, has placed the entire region in a state of insecurity and has directly affected the situation of disabled people/persons with disabilities. Among other factors, this contributes to the fact that persons with disabilities/disabled people in Central and Eastern Europe find themselves in a distinct position compared to many contexts commonly associated with the Global North, although both categories are internally diverse and should not be treated as homogeneous. This situation is shaped by multiple historical, political, and socio-economic conditions, including—but not limited to—the ongoing war in Ukraine.


Critical disability studies emerge directly from the realities in which they are situated. In order to maintain both scholarly credibility and social impact, they must continually undertake the work of situating themselves in context. This includes taking into account the past, present, and potential futures of the region and the groups they concern, as well as the cultural competences, experiences, and discourses within which the researcher operates. These situated experiences of disabled people/persons with disabilities, as well as those of allies and both disabled and non-disabled researchers, form the foundation for further knowledge production, the development of language and concepts, and the recognition of relationships between phenomena.


 


This raises important questions:


What does the “toolbox” of critical disability studies in Central and Eastern Europe look like today?


Which methodological approaches developed within Anglophone critical disability studies allow us to conceptualize and understand the situation of persons with disabilities/disabled people, as well as to study activist, artistic, and emancipatory movements in the region?


What concepts, rooted in local knowledge and experience, do we apply in our research projects?


What theories and methodologies do we therefore develop? How do we share them? How do we develop them?


In the countries of the region, critical disability studies still rarely function as a distinct academic discipline—there is a lack of dedicated study programs, departments, institutes, or doctoral programs. Consequently, research in this field remains dispersed across various disciplines, such as cultural studies, sociology, history, art studies, as well as legal and political sciences. While this dispersion hinders institutional development and research collaboration, it is also seen as a potential strength: it fosters theoretical and methodological diversity, enables the combination of research tools, and supports the circulation of knowledge about disability across disciplines. As a result, disability studies in the region are characterised by a high degree of interdisciplinarity and intersectionality.


For these reasons, the emergence of locally conditioned research practices, theoretical approaches, and activist and emancipatory strategies in the region is increasingly evident. The resulting “toolbox” represents not only a creative adaptation of theories developed in Anglophone contexts, filtered through the historical and contemporary experiences of disabled people/persons with disabilities in Central and Eastern Europe, but also includes approaches that are alternative to, or in critical dialogue with, them. In this sense, knowledge production in the region is not confined to local contexts alone but contributes to broader theoretical and methodological debates. Although the development of this field can be traced through a growing number of academic publications, as well as self-advocacy and activist initiatives, there have so far been relatively few attempts to systematically capture and map it.


The conference Disability Studies in Eastern Europe – Reconfigurations, held in Kraków in May 2024 (marking the culmination of the long-standing research platform of the same name, which has networked scholars from the region), provided an opportunity to examine the scale, condition, and research areas within Eastern European critical disability studies. At the same time, it sought to map the specificity of research methods and methodologies, as well as the self-advocacy and activist strategies of persons with disabilities/disabled people in Central and Eastern Europe. Rather than asking what Central and Eastern European disability studies can offer to a presumed “global field,” it is important to consider how CEE disability studies contributes to and reshapes disability studies more broadly, how it is positioned within these knowledge hierarchies, and how the “global” field is itself structured by dominant Anglophone—particularly American and British—frameworks.


 


We invite submissions addressing, however, not exclusively, the following issues:


how theoretical tools in critical disability studies are mobilised, adapted, and transformed in Central and Eastern European contexts, and how these engagements both contribute to and unsettle dominant Anglophone epistemological frameworks that often define what counts as “global” disability studies;

autoethnography and reflective accounts in one’s own research, self-advocacy, and activist tools;

the development of activist and artivist movements in Central and Eastern Europe;

art and culture created by disabled people/persons with disabilities:  unique aesthetics, critical and emancipatory tools, potential for individual and collective agency;

the local contexts of implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in the countries of the region;

the impact of the history of disability on modes of research and on the current situation of persons with disabilities/disabled people;

mapping the specificity of critical disability studies in the region from both institutional and substantive perspectives;

access to education and the possibilities for academic career development for disabled researchers.

 


SUBMISSION:

You may submit:


individual paper proposal, that should include an abstract up to 250 words;

panel proposal, that should include an abstract of the panel and abstracts of 3 to 4 papers/presentations (each up to 250 words);

roundtable proposal, that should include an abstract of the roundtable (up to 250 words) and list of  discussants and their affiliations.

To submit your proposal please use the SUBMISSION FORM (https://forms.office.com/e/LaT4Axm5a0).


The deadline for submitting proposals is 20 July 2026. Presenters will be notified of the acceptance of their paper or panel by 1st September 2026.


The conference will be held  in Kraków in person. There is no conference fee.


The rules of procedures can be found here (https://ujchmura-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal/magda_zdrodowska_uj_edu_pl/IQBCUiYp_DFeTZ3M7DmKSnFeAemMd0W3kxEGlQbkga_IuhM?e=enLrNn). If you have any questions please feel free to write to: monika.kwasniewska@uj.edu.pl or magda.zdrodowska@uj.edu.pl


 


Program Committee:


Monika Kwaśniewska Mikuła (Jagiellonian University), chair


Hana Drštičková (Charles University in Prague)


Magda Szarota (Polish Academy of Sciences)


Magdalena Zdrodowska (Jagiellonian University), organising team


Wednesday, 10 June 2026

Call for papers: Nourishing the Socialist Bloc: Food, Health, and Environment after 1945

 Call for papers: Nourishing the Socialist Bloc: Food, Health, and Environment after 1945

26–27 November 2026

‘George Barițiu’ Institute of History & Romanian Academy of Sciences, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

[https://sites.google.com/view/nutripol-statesocialism/news]

Tuesday, 26 May 2026

CFP: Life Reform Movements in the Baltics and East Central Europe: Local and Global Perspectives, c. 1860–1930

Call for Papers

Life Reform Movements in the Baltics and East Central Europe: Local and Global Perspectives, c. 1860–1930


A joint conference organized by the Centre for Baltic and East European Studies (CBEES) at Södertörn University, the Herder Institute for Historical Research on East Central Europe, the Institute for the Culture and History of the Germans in Northeast Europe (IKGN e.V.),

and the Martin Opitz Library

Venue: Södertörn University (Stockholm, Sweden)

Date: February 18–19, 2027


In the last decades of the 19th century, a wave of issue-driven life reform movements emerged across Europe and America, particularly in the areas of nutrition, clothing, consumption, housing, healthcare and moral reform. These movements both accompanied and critiqued processes of industrialization, urbanization, mass communication, and broader societal change. The rapidly evolving modern ways of life, especially in large cities, were often perceived as flawed or problematic. In response, life reform movements promoted alternative ways of living. Campaigns for animal welfare and temperance, as well as tobacco abstention and vegetarianism, combined countercultural agendas with a strong commitment to social reform. Abolitionist movements, meanwhile, criticized bourgeois double standards and condemned trafficking and prostitution as consequences of poverty and wider social inequalities. More broadly, life reform movements responded to the environmental challenges posed by industrialization and urban growth by advocating a return to nature.


This conference approaches these developments as transimperial, translocal, and transnational—if not global—phenomena. While they emerged in multiethnic and multicultural societies of Eastern and Central Europe, they were also shaped by regional and local particularities. We understand life reform movements as responses to political, socioeconomic, and cultural transformations, while at the same time reflecting the specific trajectories of modernity in Eastern Europe. They were closely intertwined with processes of imperial decline and nation-building that accompanied the collapse of the German, Habsburg, and Romanov Empires. As a result, national modes of thinking both influenced these movements and were, in turn, reshaped by them, alongside the impact of Soviet ideology.


The conference examines these movements in their horizontal entanglements and their transnational and transimperial dimensions, viewing them as social and cultural phenomena shaped by the specific contexts of different societies and communities. Through the lens of life reform movements, it also focuses on people, non-human actors, ideas, practices, infrastructures and materialities, including art, literature and media. We aim to explore the circulation, transfer, and fusion of life reform ideas and practices across boundaries—whether national, cultural, imperial, ideological, social, physical, or environmental.


We also want to highlight interactions and (dis)connections, as well as tensions and conflicts, between different life reform movements, paying particular attention to their broader societal effects and to the ways in which they were shaped by specific spatial and contextual settings.

Moreover, the conference aims to advance the discussion on the epistemological dimensions of knowledge production about life reform movements by reflecting on conflicting interpretations of sources, silences in the archives, and the challenges posed by overlooked or marginalized historical sources and phenomena.


We warmly welcome proposals on these and other topics closely related to the conference’s themes, and invite contributions drawing on a wide range of disciplines, theories, methodologies, and primary sources.

Topics and fields

- gender / sexual / moral reform

- social conditions and hygiene

- youth / education

- environment (housing, interiors, including living conditions)

- animal welfare, anti-vivisection

- consumption: temperance, dietary reform, vegetarianism

- garden cities and their aesthetics

- life reform and science, religion, vernacular knowledge, beliefs.


Please send your abstract of max. 500 words and a brief CV of 300 words until July 30, 2026 to: forum@herder-institut.de

We will inform the selected participants until September 1, 2026.

To facilitate discussion, we kindly ask participants to submit an extended abstract (5–10 pages) outlining their main arguments until February 1, 2027.

Participants are invited to submit a chapter up to 9000 words including references and annotations following the conference until July 30, 2027.

Deadlines:

- Abstract of max. 500 words: July 30, 2026

- Extended abstract: February 1, 2027

- Book chapter: July 30, 2027


Ujwary: Stanisław Krauze (1902–1977). Farmaceuta, bromatolog, społecznik [Stanisław Krauze (1902–1977): Pharmacist, Bromatologist, Social Activist].

Maria Ujwary: Stanisław Krauze (1902–1977). Farmaceuta, bromatolog, społecznik [Stanisław Krauze (1902–1977): Pharmacist, Bromatologist, Soc...