Wednesday, 9 September 2026

Belarusian Historical Scholarship in Exile: Current State and Challenges.

 A new series of analytical papers examining the current state and key challenges of Belarusian scholarship in exile has been published following the completion of the project Belarusian Historical Scholarship in Exile: Current State and Challenges.


Online version: https://www.icelds.org/portfolio/new-analytical-paper-series-examines-belarusian-scholarship-in-exile/


Implemented with the financial support of the EU4Belarus: Support to Advanced Learning and Training (SALT II) programme, funded by the European Union, the project sought to strengthen professional dialogue and expert exchange within the Belarusian academic and intellectual community outside the country.

The publication series responds to the profound changes that have affected Belarusian academia since 2020. For many scholars, exile was not a planned or gradual process but the result of political pressure, repression and the destruction of institutional conditions for independent academic work in Belarus. As a consequence, a substantial part of the academic community has continued its work abroad, becoming integrated into different universities, research institutions and academic systems.

These developments have led to increasing fragmentation. Belarusian researchers today work in different institutional, linguistic and disciplinary environments, often within local or international research agendas that leave limited space for sustained reflection on Belarusian issues. Opportunities for regular professional exchange among Belarusian scholars abroad remain limited and frequently depend on informal networks.

At the same time, interest in Belarusian history and historical memory has grown. However, this interest does not always correspond to the logic of academic research and is not always accompanied by the resources necessary to support it. As a result, many researchers find themselves balancing different audiences and expectations without sufficient opportunities to reconcile them.

Against this background, the project aimed to create a space for professional reflection on the conditions under which Belarusian historical scholarship exists in exile today. Rather than proposing institutional solutions or seeking to formulate common positions, it focused on facilitating informed discussion and the exchange of experience among invited experts in a confidential setting.

The analytical paper series is the principal outcome of this work. Drawing on a series of expert seminars, the publications examine the institutional, linguistic and professional conditions in which Belarusian historical scholarship is developing outside the country. They also address the interaction between Belarusian and foreign historical narratives, the structural challenges facing scholars in exile, the opportunities and limitations of different institutional models, and possible approaches to strengthening the long-term resilience of Belarusian scholarship.

Rather than presenting a single perspective or claiming to represent the entire academic community, the papers document the current state of the field at a particular moment. They bring together the principal observations and reflections emerging from the expert discussions and are intended to contribute to continued professional dialogue on the future of Belarusian scholarship in exile.

The analytical paper series was edited by Dr. Hanna Vasilevich, who coordinated the editorial process and worked closely with the authors in developing and preparing the manuscripts for publication.

Here you can access papers prepared during the project:

Interstate dialogue on historical issues between Belarus and Germany: obstacles and failure factors (by Victor Shadurski)

From emergency to institution-building: Belarusian historical scholarship in exile after 2020 (by Nina Skepyan)

Institutional barriers to academic reintegration: the Irish context and Belarusian historical scholarship in exile (by Vadzim Holubeu)

Reactive by condition: why the exile model of Belarusian academia cannot sustain itself (by Hanna Vasilevich)

Competing interpretations of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in contemporary national narratives (by Viktar Yakubau)

Digital authoritarianism and historians in exile: the disappearance of Belarus’s digital archives? (by Aliaksei Bratachkin)

Francysk Skaryna across national narratives: Belarus, Lithuania, Poland and Czechia (by Aliaksandr Parshankou)

Studying resistance across Eastern Europe: toward a new analytical paradigm (by Tatsiana Astrouskaya)

Producing Belarusian history after 2020: how exile reshapes historical knowledge (by Kiryl Kascian)

Policy paper: Belarusian historical scholarship in exile, its current state and challenges (by Hanna Vasilevich and Maxim Karaliou)

New book in open access: 𝙄𝙣 𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙛𝙚𝙘𝙩 𝙍𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙖𝙣: 𝙉𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙎𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙩𝙮, 𝙍𝙖𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝘿𝙚𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙎𝙤𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙎𝙚𝙡𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙞𝙣 𝙈𝙤𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙣 𝙍𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙖 by Marius Turda

 New book in open access: 𝙄𝙣 𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙛𝙚𝙘𝙩 𝙍𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙖𝙣: 𝙉𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙎𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙩𝙮, 𝙍𝙖𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝘿𝙚𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙎𝙤𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙎𝙚𝙡𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙞𝙣 𝙈𝙤𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙣 𝙍𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙖 by Marius Turda 


Exploring debates on Romanian national character and race from the 1880s to the 1950s, Turda’s study demonstrates how racism and eugenics shaped policies of ethnic purification under the Antonescu regime. It argues that the Holocaust in Romania targeted both Jews and Roma as part of a broader biopolitical nationalism, and that the eugenic ideal of the “perfect” Romanian remained embedded in communist visions of the “new man” and “perfect” society. 

Read more and preorder your copy here: https://www.aup.nl/en/book/9789048573608/in-search-of-the-perfect-romanian

Monday, 7 September 2026

Webinar: Central State Scientific and Technical Archives of Ukraine

  Join us for Webinar next Friday!

Central State Scientific and Technical Archives of Ukraine

Friday 11 September 2026 · 16:00 Kyiv / 15:00 Berlin / 09:00 Bloomington · zoom


In this session, Prof. Dr. Marat Balyshev, Head of the Central State Scientific and Technical Archives of Ukraine (TsDNTA), examines the work of his institution during Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine. The session is moderated by Dr. Ewa Sułek.

This lecture traces the changes across the archives’ principal areas of activity, driven by the need to safeguard documents, maintain institutional continuity, and widen access to archival information under wartime conditions. Particular attention is given to the development of digital archival resources: the digitisation of scientific and technical documentation, the creation of electronic catalogues and a collection of digital use copies, and the implementation of the TOPAZ information retrieval system. The lecture also outlines the international dimension of the archives’ work — cooperation with foreign archival, academic, and cultural institutions, participation in international projects and professional events, and the role of international charitable assistance in strengthening the institution’s material and technical capacity, acquiring modern digitisation equipment, and sustaining stable operations throughout the war.

A second focus falls on the archives’ cultural and educational projects. Drawing on two case studies — “Site of Resistance: Infrastructure Projects of the Azovstal Metallurgical Plant” and “Industrial Utopia: The Unrealised Project of the Kharkiv Nuclear Power Plant” — the lecture considers new approaches to using archival documents in exhibition, research, and public-facing work, including thematic web resources, documentary films, 3D models, and works of art created on the basis of archival holdings. It assesses how archival documentation can generate new forms of representing archival heritage: forms that invite a rethinking of Ukraine’s scientific and technical legacy, extend its presence in the public sphere, draw new audiences to the history of science, technology, and industry, and open fresh possibilities for communication between archives and society.

The lecture will be of interest to historians, archivists, researchers in the history of science and technology, students, and all those interested in Ukraine’s scientific, technical, and industrial heritage.

Every session runs with simultaneous Ukrainian–English interpretation — ask questions in either language — and ends with an open Q&A.

 Free · registration required

 Register for Webinar 2: https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/C3XqTlTHQ3mV2fu-qdqRpw

The project is a part of the Lysiak-Rudnytsky Ukrainian Studies Programme held by the Ukrainian Institute in cooperation with the Cultural Diplomacy Foundation, with financial support from the International Renaissance Foundation and Mnozhyna Foundation.

See you next Friday, September 11!

Sunday, 6 September 2026

Milan Hanyš: Mezi Prahou a Siónem Intelektuální portrét Felixe Weltsche. Centrum pro studium demokracie 2026 [Between Prague and Sion: An Intellectual Portrait of Felix Weltsch].

 Milan Hanyš: Mezi Prahou a Siónem Intelektuální portrét Felixe Weltsche. Centrum pro studium demokracie 2026 [Between Prague and Sion: An Intellectual Portrait of Felix Weltsch]. ISBN 978-80-7325-616-6


Felix Weltsch (1884-1964), filosof, publicista a šéfredaktor pražského sionistického týdeníku Selbstwehr, byl jednou z ústředních postav německo-židovského intelektuálního života v meziválečné Praze a blízkým přítelem Franze Kafky a Maxe Broda. Přes svůj kulturní a myšlenkový dosah zůstal v české recepci dosud stranou pozornosti.

Kniha rekonstruuje Weltschovo myšlení v celé jeho tematické šíři: od filosofických základů pražského sionismu a teorie národního humanismu přes politickou teorii obranyschopné demokracie a analýzu antisemitismu jako symptomu krize liberální společnosti až po reflexi holocaustu. Weltsch si kladl otázky, které neztratily nic ze své naléhavosti: Jak bránit demokracii před jejími nepřáteli? Jak smířit národní identitu s humanistickými hodnotami? Co antisemitismus vypovídá o většinové společnosti? Kniha vychází z rozsáhlého pramenného výzkumu a metod intelektuálních dějin. Součástí svazku je i antologie pěti Weltschových textů, které vycházejí v češtině poprvé.


GLOHRA workshop Mind the gap: engaging Europe’s East in global health debates

GLOHRA workshop Mind the gap: engaging Europe’s East in global health debates

Dates: October 29–30, 2026
Location: Charité, Berlin, Germany
Format: Hybrid (in-person or online participation)
Registration deadline: October 9, 2026

Capacity: Limited to 30 in-person participants; places allocated based on responses below  

Details: https://tinyurl.com/bdzjuf88


Confirmed speakers: Valentyna Mazhbits, Botakoz Kassymbekova, Daniel James, Dora Vargha, Bogdan Cristian Iacob, Petra Ezzeddine, Joanna Talewicz, Lois Orton, Olga Fuseini, and Dominika Pszczółkowska-Mościcka. The full programme will be published closer to the workshop date.


Participation, including catering during the event, is free of charge. Participants are expected to cover their own travel and accommodation.

The workshop is organised by Dr Tereza Hendl (University of Augsburg, the RUTA Association), Dr Joanna Karolina Malinowska (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, the RUTA Association), Professor Kerem Böge and Dr Solveig Kemna from the Charité, Berlin. The workshop is funded by the awarded grant from the German Alliance for Global Health research (GLOHRA).


Friday, 4 September 2026

CFP:Fish out of place: how animals shape infrastructure

 


ESEH 2027 Panel Proposal


We invite proposals for a panel to be submitted to the ESEH conference at Salzburg, 7 — 10 September 2027


Deadline for Proposals: 20 September 2026


 Fish out of place: how animals shape infrastructure


Hydraulic infrastructure, fishing vessels, hatcheries and fish ponds are usually studied as expressions of human ambition: to engineer environments and to manage fish populations. Less attention has been paid to the ways fish failed to behave as expected. They did not swim up fishways, did not spawn, avoided fishing gear, or simply failed to appear. As highly mobile animals, fish kept eluding the technical logic of engineers and fishers, of fisheries scientists, aquaculturists and water managers. Their movements limited what infrastructure could do, and prompted new efforts to adapt or redesign it. This panel explores the role of animals in infrastructural change through the lens of fish and other aquatic life. It brings together environmental history and the history of science and technology, and is open to European and non-European cases from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.


Please send a communication of interest along with a short abstract (200 words) to christian.zumbraegel@uni-bielefeld.de and anna.safronova@zmo.de  by 20 September 2026, so that we can build a coherent panel together.


 

Sunday, 30 August 2026

Ruben Zeeman (ed.) Censorship and Self-Censorship in History Education: A Comparative Approach to Backsliding Democracies

Ruben Zeeman (ed.) Censorship and Self-Censorship in History Education: A Comparative Approach to Backsliding Democracies. CEU Press 2026. ISBN: 9789048577118


Censorship of history education takes place around the world. A striking feature of recent examples is that they often coincide with challenges to democratic governance. This book examines this interplay between censorship and self-censorship in history education and so-called democratic backsliding. It does so in two parts. The first brings together an interdisciplinary group of academics, high school teachers and human rights advocates to assess the characteristics of censorship and self-censorship in Brazil, India, Hungary and the United States. Their analyses move between local, national and transnational developments to capture the overlaps and differences between state and non-state censorial practices and strategies of resistance. The second, thematic part explores some of the formal characteristics of contemporary censorship of history education, including the impact of social media, continuities of colonialism and the challenges against gender and sexuality education.


Introduction - Ruben Zeeman - Transnational History Education and Backsliding Democracy

Regional Essays

1. Brazil

a. Paolo Otero dos Santos - The Diffuse Vigilance of History Teaching in Contemporary Brazil

b. Luanna Jales - Historical Visibility for Women, Black and Indigenous Peoples in Brazil and Latin America

c. Juliana Cesario Alvim Gomes - History, Sexuality and Gender Education: Intersections and Interactions in Brazil

2. Hungary

a. Andrea Petö and Flore Higuet - Illiberal History Education: The Case of Hungary

b. Péter Bihari - History Teaching in Hungary

c. Andreas Holtberget - History Teaching under Threat? Recent Cases from East-Central and Southeastern Europe

3. India

a. Aditya Mukherjee and Mridula Mukherjee - Weaponizing History: Threat to Democracy in India

b. Shraddha Kumbhojkar - History Textbooks in Maharashtra: Vernacular Realities

c. Adnaan Farooq - ‘Saffronization’ of the History Curriculum in India under the BJP

4. United States

a. Jeremy Young and Jacqueline Allain - State-Level Educational Censorship Legislation Affecting Colleges and Universities

b. Nelva Williamson - Teaching in the Age of Anti-History: A Teacher's Reflection

c. Mathias Möschel - European Critiques and Actions Against Critical Race Theory

Thematic Essays

1. Robbert-Jan Adriaansen - Teaching on Thin Ice: Social Media, Epistemic Conflict, and the Targeting of History Educators

2. Mariana Prandini Assis - Reimagining Gender and Sex Education as a Political Right

3. Eugenia Ama Breba Anderson and Samuel Adu-Gyamfi - The Hidden History Curriculum: Negotiated Gender History Education in Ghana

4. Antoon de Baets - History Education Moratoria during Transitions to Democracy

Conclusion

Eckhardt Fuchs and Wibke Westermeyer

Censorship in School Education

Index.


Belarusian Historical Scholarship in Exile: Current State and Challenges.

  A new series of analytical papers examining the current state and key challenges of Belarusian scholarship in exile has been published fol...