Thursday 29 July 2021

Conference Forensic Cultures, 26-28 August 2021


On 26-28 August 2021, Utrecht University will be hosting the conference “Forensic Cultures”, an international online conference on the critical study of forensic cultures. This conference is part of the ERC-Consolidator project “Forensic Cultures in Europe, 1930-2000”.


In recent years research into the history of forensic science has expanded. In addition to institutional developments and advances in technology, increasingly the entanglements between legal frameworks, forensic institutes, technology and culture have been explored by historians and scholars from other disciplines. These entanglements come together in the notion of ‘forensic cultures’, which may be defined as the theory and practice of forensic science, medicine and psychiatry as they come to the fore in specific locations such as the courtroom, the mortuary, textbooks of forensic medicine, psychiatric assessment reports or the media. Moreover, these forensic practices are embedded in cultural contexts and political regimes. Forensic cultures can thus refer to both the representation and the practice of forensics. The conference aims to explore these different forensic cultures through a critical review of its constituting components and through different lenses such as Science and Technology Studies, praxiography, new materialism, history of knowledge, cultural theory, critical legal studies, and gender and queer theory.


The program will feature keynote speaker professor Alison Adam who will be speaking on blood typing, gender and forensic objectivity. Other contributors will focus on local, national or transnational forensic cultures from the perspective of new empirical research and different theoretical approaches.


The conference will take place online. If you would like to attend, please send an email to: forensiccultures@gmail.com. The link to the conference will then be sent to you in due time.


For more information and the full programme, see: https://force.sites.uu.nl/call-for-papers-conference-forensic-cultures/

Provisional Conference Programme “Forensic Cultures”

Thursday 26th of August

9:00 Welcome by Willemijn Ruberg

9:15 Keynote Alison Adam, ‘Blood will out: blood typing, gender and forensic objectivity’

10:15 Break

10:30 Panel 1: Infanticide and Forensic Expertise

Chair: Willemijn Ruberg

·       Siska van der Plas, ‘The role of gender in the image of male and female child murderers in Dutch courtrooms and newspapers, 1960-1989’

·       Tony Ward and Rachel Dixon, ‘Infanticide cases, forensic evidence and the element of certainty in twentieth-century England’

·       Daniel Grey, ‘The Lady Vanishes? Forensic culture, “common sense” and the ongoing problem of infanticide in England and Wales, 1900-2020’

·       Sara Serrano Martínez, ‘The umbilical cord problem and experts’ and judges’ attitudes towards infanticide in the Spanish forensic culture (c. 1923-1959)’

12:10 Lunch

13:00 Panel 2: Political Regimes and Disciplines

Chair: TBD

·       Kateřina Lišková, ‘Sexology as forensic science in state-socialist Czechoslovakia. On the intersections of expertise with the state and changes in the understanding of sexual deviance’

·       Volha Parfenchyk, ‘How law reads emotions: Translating the motive of jealousy into Russian legal discourse’

·       Mikhail Pogorelov, ‘Redefining professional jurisdiction of forensic psychiatry in early Soviet Russia, 1918 – 1936’

14:25 Break

14:40

Panel 3: The Authority of Experts in the Courtroom

Chair: Volha Parfenchyk

·       Svein Atle Skålevåg, ‘Forensic cultures and the relative significance of criminal responsibility’

·       Gethin Rees, ‘Forensic expert marginalisation: Post-controversy science in the courtroom’

·       Sandra Menenteau, ‘From the art to the science of reports: Legal expectations and medical responses regarding autopsy reports in the 19th century France’

·       Samuel Scharff, ‘Competing forensic cultures at the intersection of psychiatry and American law, 1949-1954’

16:30 Closing

Friday 27th of August

9:00 Panel 4: Knowledge Transfer

Chair: TBA

·       Annette Mülberger, ‘Teaching psychology to jurists: The first Spanisch textbook by Mira (1932)’

·       Ana María Gómez López, ‘Forensic taphonomy and its multiple histories’

·       Heather Wolffram, ‘Teaching Grossian criminalistics in Imperial Germany’

·       Nicola Labanca, ‘Dissecting the Italian crime scene. Salvatore Ottolenghi, the founder of Italian academic forensic science and his unpublished university lectures between politics and history’

10:40 Early lunch break

12:45 Panel 5: Performance of Forensic Science

Chair: Kateřina Lišková

·       Pauline Dirven, ‘The forensic expert look: Embodied performances of forensic expertise, England 1920-1950’

·       Filipe Santos, ‘The “key” to the crime: Criminal cases and the projection of expectations about forensics DNA technologies in the Portuguese press’

·       Željana Tunić, ‘”Forensic lookalikes”. Imitating forensic gestures and producing nationalistic truth regimes in late-socialist Yugoslavia and its successor states’

14:10 Break

 14:20

Panel 6: Sexual Violence and Forensic Expertise

Chair: Pauline Dirven

·       Stephanie Wright, ‘”Facts that are declared proven”: Francoism, forensic medicine, and the policing of sexual violence in twentieth-century Spain’

·       Alejandra Palafox Menegazzi, ‘Medical-forensic representations of the crime of rape in Chile (1900-1950)’

·       Lara Bergers, ‘The making of a victim. Investigative and trial practices in twentieth-century Dutch sex crimes cases’

15:45 Break

16:00 Networking Activity

17:00 Closing

Saturday 28th of August

9:00 Panel 7: Mass Violence and Forensic Evidence

Chair: Sara Serrano-Martínez

·       Taline Garibian, ‘Forensics in death camps. Keit Mant’s investigations on Nazi Germany crimes’

·       María Fernanda Olarte-Sierra, ‘Sorting victims out: humanitarian and judicial forensic peace-making in the Colombian (post) conflict context’

·       Alexa Stiller, ‘Mass violence, international criminal tribunals and the increase in non-governmental forensic investigations in the 1990s’

10:25 Break

10:35 Panel 8: Politics and Identification Practices

Chair: Lara Bergers

·       Franco Capozzi, ‘Reassessing the legacy of Cesare Lombroso: Criminal anthropology in the courtroom in Liberal and Fascist Italy (1910-1930)’

·       Emilia Musumeci, ‘Identifying the enemy: Forensic culture in Fascist Italy’

·       Helena Machado, ‘From early start of criminal DNA databases to contemporary data politics in forensic genetics’


12:00 Break

12:15 Closing Comments

12:45 Closing

Marek Łucja, Rafał Łętocha (eds.), Ile z nauki ile z ideologii? Religioznawstwo w PRL [How much science, how much ideology: Study of religion in Polish People's Republic]. Kraków: Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Instytut Religioznawstwa Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, 2021. ISBN: 9788382292022

 

Opis

 W zamierzeniu powojennych władz komunistycznych badania nad religią i religijnymi zjawiskami miały wspomagać działania prowadzące do laicyzacji życia społecznego i ograniczenia wpływów Kościoła. Z tego powodu w okresie tzw. demokracji ludowej rozwój religioznawstwa jako niezależnej dyscypliny naukowej niezmiernie utrudniano. Środowisko religioznawcze, instytuty badawcze, a także dydaktyka akademicka nie były wolne od ideologizacji i instrumentalnego wykorzystania do celów ideologiczno-politycznych.Oddana do rąk czytelnika publikacja to pokłosie konferencji zorganizowanej pod tym samym tytułem w 2017 r. przez Oddział Instytutu Pamięci Narodowej w Krakowie i Instytut Religioznawstwa Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Ma ona, podobnie jak konferencja, charakter przyczynkarski. Wskazuje problemy i zagadnienia badawcze oraz otwiera dyskurs naukowy dotyczący funkcjonowania i rozwoju religioznawstwa w okresie PRL. Zwłaszcza zaś problemów jego ideologizacji i wykorzystania w polityce władz komunistycznych. Zwraca też uwagę na rodzące się, mimo warunków niesprzyjających swobodnym badaniom, zalążki religioznawstwa jako autentycznej dyscypliny naukowej.

Publikacja zawiera dwanaście artykułów pogrupowanych w trzy bloki tematyczne, dotyczące prawnych i politycznych uwarunkowań rozwoju i kształtowania się tej dyscypliny, instytucji zaangażowanych w upowszechnianie i formowanie religioznawstwa w interpretacji marksistowskiej oraz sylwetek wybranych religioznawców i obszarów badań. Walorem przygotowanego studium jest interdyscyplinarność. Rozważania na temat religioznawstwa okresu PRL podjęli bowiem historycy, religioznawcy, filozofowie i prawnicy. 


Dora Kosorčić, Damir Agičić (eds.): Klub studenata historije Sveučilišta SHS u Zagrebu – Zapisnici [Minutes of the Association of History Students of the University of SHS in Zagreb], Zagreb: Srednja Europa 2021.

 

URL: https://srednja-europa.hr/novosti/klub-studenata-historije-sveucilista-shs-u-zagrebu-zapisnici/

U knjizi su objavljeni transkribrirani zapisnici sjednica Kluba slušača historije, odnosno Kluba studenata historije koje je djelovalo na zagrebačkom Filozofskom fakultetu u međuratnom razdoblju. Zapisnici Kluba studenata historije, pohranjeni u Hrvatskom državnom arhivu u fondu “Klub studenata Historije Sveučilišta Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca u Zagrebu” zapisnici su odborskih sjednica i glavnih skupština kluba u razdoblju od njegova osnivanja 1925. godine do prestanka rada 1941. godine. Ovi zapisnici predstavljaju vrijednu povijesnu građu, budući da pružaju uvid u organizaciju i unutarnji život jedne od većih i aktivnijih studentskih organizacija na zagrebačkom Filozofskom fakultetu u međuratnom razdoblju, ali omogućavaju i uvid u aspekte znanstvenog, političkog, društvenog i kulturnog života i svakodnevice studenata u međuratnom razdoblju. Uz to, ovi su zapisnici vrijedan izvor i za povijest hrvatske historiografije; u radu kluba, kao njegovi mentori i savjetnici studenata, predavači ili voditelji stručnih ekskurzija, aktivno su sudjelovali istaknuti hrvatski povjesničari: Ferdo Šišić, Grga Novak, Milan Prelog, Ljudmil Hauptmann i drugi. (Klub studenata historije Sveučilišta Srba, Hrvata i Slovenaca u Zagrebu, Dora Kosorčić)


Zapisnike su prepisali studenti Lucija Bakšić, Ivan Grkeš, Josip Humjan, Lea Kasabašić, Nenad Jurilj, Robert Korenić, Andrijana Petrina i Sven Španić. Redigirala ih je doktorandica Dora Kosorčić a konačno pregledao i uredio profesor Damir Agičić.

Monday 26 July 2021

Vol. 5 No. 1-2 (2020): Serendipities. Journal for the Sociology and History of the Social Sciences (OPEN ACCESS)

full issue URL: https://tidsskrift.dk/Serendipities/issue/view/9174/1479


Editorial

Academic Exchange and Internationality in East European Social Science

Matthias Duller

---

Articles

Not only scholarships

The Ford Foundation, its material support, and the rise of social research in Poland

Jarosław Kilias

---

Academic Mobility and Epistemological Change in State Socialist Romania

Three Generations of Sociologists, Western Social Science, and Quality of Life Research

Adela Hîncu

---

The Social Sciences in Hungary During the Cold War and After

Viktor Karády

--

Why Geography in Poland Has Never Radicalized

Political and International Entanglements of Polish Geography Seen Through the Prism of Antoni Kukliński’s Professional Trajectory

Tomasz Zarycki

 --

Book Reviews

Bessner: Democracy in Exile

Christian Dayé

 --

Wagner: Bauman

Shaun Best

---

Vannier: La sociologie en toutes lettres

Baudry Rocquin


Heike Karge: Der Charme der Schizophrenie. Psychiatrie, Krieg und Gesellschaft im kroatisch-serbischen Raum [The Charm of Schizophrenia: Psychiatry, War, and Society in the Croato-Serbian Region]. Oldenbourg: De Gruyter 2021. ISBN: 9783110738926

 


(Deutsch unten)

About this book

This long-term study (1870 to 1950) asks how mental illness was diagnosed, interpreted, and experienced in the Croato-Serbian region during times of war and peace, and places the answers in their specific cultural, institutional and societal contexts. The "age of anxiety" arrived late and was dominated by the diagnosis of "schizophrenia." One surprising reason for this was the dominance of patients coming from rural areas.


Author information

Heike Karge, Institute of History, University of Regensburg, Germany.

---------

Über dieses Buch

Wie psychisches Kranksein im kroatisch-serbischen Raum diagnostiziert, gedeutet und erfahren wurde, wird in dieser Langzeitstudie (für 1870 bis 1950) in kulturelle, institutionelle und gesellschaftliche Zusammenhänge gestellt.


Den untersuchten Raum kann man laut Heike Karge für diese Zeit als schizophren bezeichnen. Die Krankenakten offenbaren nämlich, dass dortige Patienten kaum als neurotisch, hysterisch oder nervös, sondern vornehmlich eben als schizophren eingeordnet wurden. Anders als im deutschen, russisch-sowjetischen und US-amerikanischen Bereich wurden dort auch für Soldaten beider Weltkriege kaum je Diagnosen gestellt, die spezifisch an den Krieg angebunden waren. Gesellschafts- und wissenschaftsgeschichtlich bedeutsam ist, dass eine wesentliche Ursache für das späte Aufkommen des „nervösen Zeitalters" im südslawischen Bereich in einem Fremdheitsempfinden des urbanen Fachpersonals gegenüber den mehrheitlich vom Lande stammenden Patienten begründet lag.


Autoreninformation

Heike Karge, Institut für Geschichte, Universität Regensburg, Deutschland.

Thursday 22 July 2021

Call for Papers: Re-Configuring “Central” Europe in Its Way towards Modernity. Language, Knowledge and Ideology Transfer through Translations of Secular Texts in Pre-Modern Times (1770-1830). November the 5th-6th 2021, online.

 


Aim: The conference aims to bring together interdisciplinary contributions from various fields of research (philology, history, translation studies), regarding the translation process of secular texts in Central-Europe in the time-frame 1770-1830.


Format:


A section with key-note speakers that aims to enlarge the general theoretical framework, through contributions regarding the process and mechanism of translation in the time-frame 1770-1830.

Keynote Speakers:


C.S. I Dr. Eugenia Dima, Iaşi


Prof. Dr. Eugen Munteanu, Iaşi


Prof. Dr. Alin Mihai Gherman, Alba-Iulia


Specialized sections that will focus on particular aspects and case studies, reflecting the central theme. Focus points: linguistics, history and translation studies.

Theoretical concept: This conference aims to open  the concept of translation to an interdisciplinary approach rooted in the new methodological horizon propagated by the postcolonial studies and cultural anthropology, because the old descriptors that defined the history of culture, such as “influence”, “reception”, “acculturation”, “amalgamation”, “assimilation”, “diffusion” etc can no longer be applied in their traditional sense defined by the comparative studies, but are opened now to revision under the principles and methodology of the cultural anthropology and by a “constructivist” school of thought that regards the “cultural difference” as a relative, fluid and unstable category, as a category that exists only at the discourse level of the political, social and cultural signifiers. Applying Homi Bhabha’s concept of “hybridization”, we can regard the translation as an act of displacement of the cultural elements, of appropriating new signs and altering significations in a certain social space, a patchwork defined by the co-existence of the Self and the Other. This “trans-cultural” approach of the communicational space, in which the senders and receivers have interchanging roles in the networks they created, deconstructs the idea of a “national culture” and focuses on the individual and/or collective intermediates (the translators, patrons, publishing houses etc.), with their particular motivation, necessities, interests, social roles etc., with everything they brought for the appropriation and reconfiguration of “specific” contents and values. This dynamic and fluid representation of the “cultural translation” will help us overcome the linearity of the relation between two or more linguistic and cultural spaces and highlight the context, the mechanism and the agents of the exchange process of information, symbols, codes, texts etc. that produce permanent mutations for the collectivities that come in contact. The phenomenon of “cultural transfer” (described by Michael Werner and Michel Espagne as the transaction of cultural goods on the intellectual market of a given time, a two-way exchange that means reformulation, adaptation and re-ideologisation of the textual artefact) will serve us as methodological and interdisciplinary foundation for the analysis of texts and translation processes from different perspectives (of history, philology and translation studies), in order to illustrate  the way in which this artificial space called “Central Europe” positioned itself in the Pre-Modern times (1770-1830) towards an Enlightened Western world.


 


The conference aims to bring together various contributions regarding the translation process of secular texts from a historical, linguistic and translation perspective, but also from the larger approach of cultural studies (the migration of ideas, the book and manuscript circulation  within the European space).


Language of the conference: English and Romanian


For registration, please fill in the form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdlxpdpm600gAI2suntUDDNBls-ErkOX3tnTa4kZCxIOhN3yQ/viewform?usp=pp_url


Deadline for registration:  September the 30th 2021.


The results of the conference will be published in English in a collective volume printed in the first half of 2022.


This conference is supported by a grant of the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CNCS/CCCDI – UEFISCDI, project number  PN-III-P1-1.1-TE-2019-0721 within PNCDI III.


Contact Info: 

Lect. Dr. Iulia Zup (iuliazup@gmail.com), Lect. Dr. Alexandra Chiriac (axychiriac@gmail.com), Lect. Dr. Alina Bruckner (bruckner.alina@gmail.com); CS Dr. Ana Catanã-Spenchiu (anaspenchiu@gmail.com), Lect. Dr. Augustin Guriţã (augustingurita@yahoo.com)


The new issue of История, 4 (102), Культура — наука — образование: проблемы и вызовы is here. Open access (Russian with English abstracts)

 

URL: https://history.jes.su/issue.2021.2.4.4-102/?sl=ru

The present issue of the journal publishes the studies by Russian scholars that are focused on culture, science and education in civilized societies viewed in wide geographic (the West — Russia — the East) and chronological (Antiquity — Contemporaneity) contexts. The authors analyse the discussions about the classical idea of university and its influence on the formation of university communities in Western Europe and in North America, and study particular Russian educational practices seen as an incentive for the emergence of a professional community.


A number of articles is focused on the analysis of social, political or philosophical ideas and discursive concepts (and the search for their roots and ways of development) produced by one or a group of authors from the distant, or not so distant past. The scholars also pay attention to the study of relationships between people both in the context of their private lives, and their public activities within their societies, and on the level of national and international politics.


In their studies the authors of the present articles work with varied sources, offer new concepts, which would stimulate further discussions and research, employ traditional and innovative methods and approaches, reconstruct research practices of the scholars from the past that helped develop contemporary schools of research.


Issue publications 4 (102)Author(s)

Culture — Science — Education: Problems and Challenges

The Idea of University as a Discursive Political Project: an Essay on Theoretical InterpretationVladimir Gutorov / Aleksandr Shirinyants

Historian’s Apprenticeship: Students’ Educational Practices of the Departments of History at Chelyabinsk (1956—1986)Anastasia Kurasova

Emergence of the Iconographical Method in the Early Works by Mikhail RostovtzeffPavel Alipov

Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Studying Informal Ties in France during the Ancien Régime in the French Historiography (Middle 20th — Early 21st Centuries)Olga Ermakova

Experience of Historical Time Perception and Dissatisfaction with the Temporal RegimeIgor Ionov

The Past in the Matrix of Memory and Traditions of Historical WritingLorina Repina

Historico-Philosophical Component of the Narratives of Late Antiquity and Their Interpretation in the Russian Historiography of the Soviet Period (on Macrobius’ Creative Heritage)Maya Petrova

English Language Historiography of Women City Daily in the Middle of the 20th Century in the USAAlexander Zhidchenko

Methods of Describing of the Mediterranean Coast of Spain in the Geographical Work of Abu al-Fida’Irina Konovalova

Augustine on the Levels and Stages of the Individual SoulFilipp Petrov

Struggle of Soviet Pioneers with Hooligans on the Materials of “Pionerskaya Pravda” in 1950s — 1960sBoris Kupriyanov / Alexey Kudryashev

The Ideologic Evolution of the Organization “Students for a Democratic Society” in the USA in the 1960sOleg Bodrov / Ilya Khramov

Press of the Polish-Lithuanian Tatars of the 1930s on the Relations between the Polish-Lithuanian Tatars and Tatar Emigre Communities in Interwar PolandDilara Usmanova

The Works of Russian Physicians in China in the Context of Russian-Chinese Relations in the 19th — early 20th CenturiesOlga Nagornykh

Russian and Slavic Orthodoxy in the Ambassadorial Report of Arseny Sukhanov 1650Andrey Bogdanov

Varia

3D-Reconstruction of a Statue of Gudea from the Collection of the Pushkin State Museum of Fine ArtsAnastasia Iasenovskaia

The Role of Derivation Dictionaries in the Educational Practices of the European Intellectual Communities in the 13th — 15th CenturiesAleksandra Kulpina / Aleksander Rusanov

Warmian Lieges in the State of Teutonic Order in 1238—1370Sergey Denisov

Franciscan Missionaries the Alanian Guard and the Black Steed that Subdued the Pope to Yuan ChinaDinara Dubrovskaya

The Liturgy of Power. Some Aspects of the Religious Policy of Venice in Relation to the Orthodox Church in Modern AgeAlexey Yastrebov

Serbia and the Political Decision-Making Process to Support the Uprising in Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1875Denis Nikiforov

Music of the Iron Chancellor: Sketches for the Psychological Portrait of Otto von BismarckVasiliy Dudarev

Service Instructions of the Moscow Military Censorship Commission (1914—1916)Igor Bogomolov

The Batum Subsystem as a Space of the Ottoman Hegemony in Transcaucasia in 1918: Addressing the IssueVelikhan Mirzekhanov / Leonty Lannik

Poland in Soviet Foreign Policy from late 1919 to 16 July 1920Gennadij Matveev

Canada and the Search of a New Model of Sovereignty in the Far North in the 1920s — 1930s: from Effective Occupation to the Sector TheoryDmitry Volodin

Protestant Organization “Russische Bruderhilfe” and Its Role in the Creative Biography of Semyon Frank in 1930sAlexander Tsygankov / Teresa Obolevich

“Not a Structure, but an Event”: the Nazi “War of Annihilation” in the Discourse of Settler ColonialismEgor Yakovlev

“Falsifiers of History” and the Power of WordsElena Kotelenets / Mariya Lavrentyeva / Dmitry Surzhik

Coordination of Technical Assistance for Developing Countries by the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance in 1961—1967Alexey Safronov

Mikhail Lomonosov's Image in School Books of the 19th — 21th CenturiesYevgenia Lupanova


Call for papers: Historicizing ‘Therapeutic Culture’ - Towards a Material, Pragmatic, and Polycentric History of Psychologization / Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences

 

Guest editors: R. Amouroux, L. Gerber, M. Aronov, C. Jaccard (University of Lausanne).


(Article proposals in the form of a 1500-signature abstract should be sent by September 15, 2021 to the main coordinator of the special issue: remy.amouroux@unil.ch ; Full papers are expected by February 15, 2022. Authors should submit their paper electronically on ScholarOne via the submission portal on the JHBS website.)


Building on sociological accounts of the rise of a ubiquitous “therapeutic culture” in contemporary Western societies, this special issue will feature case studies that historicize and complicate this diagnosis.


To date, sociologists have been at the forefront in identifying and criticizing the advent of a “therapeutic culture” in advanced liberal societies (Rosner 2018). From Philip Rieff’s seminal book The Triumph of the Therapeutic (1966), to the Foucauldian-inspired writings of Nikolas Rose and Robert Castel on the “psychologization” of social life in Britain and France, through Eva Illouz’s (2008) pragmatic account of the emergence of a psychology-driven “emotional capitalism”, the extension of the domain of psychotherapy has been regarded as a characteristic phenomenon of the second half of the 20th century and beyond (Aubry & Travis 2015). In this period, psychotherapy-inspired discourses and practices increasingly reached beyond mental health care settings, as exemplified by the thriving editorial business of science-backed parenting books for raising an emotionally-intelligent child, the successful genre of confessional television shows, or the new attention paid to the subjectivity and happiness of employees in managing their performance. According to these social critics of varying intellectual traditions, psychotherapy evolved into a new “cultural idiom” linking the corporate workplace, the family, and the State (Illouz 2018). They thus converge in the identification of a therapeutic turn somewhere around the 1960s, involving widespread shifts in the constitution of the subject, in the relationships of individuals to traditional norms and gender roles, and in modes of government.


Despite the extent and transversality of the transformations attributed to “therapeutic culture,” generally towards an increasing individualization and depoliticization, it has not yet received in-depth attention from historians of psychology. What can empirical historical research on the “psychologization” or “psychotherapeutization” of subjectivity and social life contribute to our understanding? Was the phenomenon really as pervasive, enduring and unequivocally antagonistic to emancipatory politics and communal life, as suggested by many of the above-mentioned critical social theory works?


By gathering historical case studies, this special issue seeks to help fill this historiographic gap. We invite contributions from historians who take as their object the psy-sciences and related practical fields of activity, including psychology, psychotherapies of various kinds, psychiatry, pedagogy, education and special education, social work, criminology and the justice system, human resource management, the corporate workplace, employment and return to work policies, nursing, public health, and sports. We will privilege carefully constructed empirical case studies over abstract theoretical generalization.


Of particular interest are papers that emphasize materiality, practice, and tools in the formation, diffusion and appropriation of psychological schemes, specifying how therapeutic ontologies and epistemologies are enacted in situated and localized contexts. We are also looking for papers that engage with the differential reception of psychotherapeutic expertise, taking actors’ points of view seriously. Especially welcome are articles that investigate the ambivalent uses of psychology by workers, women, and other minoritized groups (Rutherford & Petit 2015; Harris, 2016; Wright 2008). Also encouraged are submissions that move beyond the Anglo-American-centric view of “therapeutic culture”, and approach it from a "polycentric" and international perspective (Danziger 1996; Marks 2018; Shamsadani 2018; Nehring, Madsen, Cabanas, Mills & Kerrigan 2020). History and comparative studies can provide tools to critically evaluate some of the assumptions that have shaped this category, starting with its alleged ubiquity. Attention to territories and locales would also be helpful to unpack the different approaches subsumed under the general term of “psychotherapy”, and examine the factors that have shaped their differential success or failure across time and places (Marks 2018). Finally, we invite contributions that take a history of social science perspective, and question the conditions of emergence and circulation of the therapeutic culture critique.


Under what conditions and how have psychological discourses been incorporated in key institutions of post-WWII societies? Through what practical and material means (manuals, questionnaires and other pencil-and-paper technologies, group practices, play-centred or space-based approaches) have psychotherapeutic interpretations been implemented in various social fields? What were the training paths and careers of those who could be called psychology brokers, and who were not necessarily psychologists?


How did the various actors within a field respond to the arrival of these new interpretative frameworks and techniques? For instance, how have school teachers, parents, and children perceived the addition of psychology to the existing pedagogical/disciplinary toolbox? Are there cases where psychological schemes have met with resistance, or conversely been partially appropriated by the actors? In the long run, what was the fate of these tools and frameworks? Was their influence as important as suggested by some critics of the therapeutic turn?


What is the trans-Atlantic and international relevance of the therapy culture critique? Has ("American") psychology triumphed and become a global cultural force? What paths did the process of psychologization take outside the United States, in Europe, but also in the former Soviet Union and Russia, Asia, Africa, and South America? From one region of the world to another, and from one country to another, what differences can be documented in terms of the prevailing psychotherapeutic approach, the actors involved in the dissemination of psychological interpretations, the kind of the social and political fields concerned, and the strength of the psychologization process?


Expressions of interest should be emailed as soon as possible directly to the lead guest editor (remy.amouroux@unil.ch<mailto:remy.amouroux@unil.ch>). Authors should aim to submit a 10,000–13,000 word paper, including references. Papers should be original research works, i.e. not previously published in other formats or venues. Full submissions must be received by February 15, 2022, and must be uploaded electronically to ScholarOne, using the submission portal at the JHBS website: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/jhbs


The submitting author will be prompted to indicate that this submission is for the special issue  “Therapeutic Culture.” All submissions should follow the format outlined in the journal’s Author Guidelines<https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/15206696/homepage/ForAuthors.html>. Submissions will be peer-reviewed per the standard procedures of the journal.


References :


Aubry, T., & Travis, T. (2015). Rethinking therapeutic culture. University of Chicago Press.

Castel, R. (1981). La gestion des risques. Les Éditions de Minuit.

Cabanas, E., & Illouz, E. (2019). Manufacturing happy citizens: How the science and industry of happiness control our lives. Polity.

Castel, R. (1981) La gestion des risques : de l’anti-psychiatrie à l’après-psychanalyse. Les Éditions de Minuit.

Castel, R., & Le Cerf, J.-F. (1980). (1980). Le phénomène “psy” et la société française. Vers une nouvelle culture psychologique. Le Débat, 1, 32–45.

          Le phénomène “psy” et la société française. 2. La société de relation. Le Débat, 2, 39–47.

          Le phénomène “psy” et la société française. L’après-psychanalyse (fin). Le Débat, 3, 22–30.

Danziger, K. (1996). Towards a polycentric history of psychology. Paper presented at the 26th International Congress of Psychology in Montréal, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.kurtdanziger.com/Paper%209.pdf

De Vos, J. (2013). Psychologization and the subject of late modernity. Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Füredi, F. (2004). Therapy culture: Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. Routledge.

Harris, A. P. (2016). Care and danger: Feminism and therapy culture. In A. Sarat (Ed.), Studies in Law, Politics and Society (Vol. 69, pp. 113–140). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Heywood, S. (2018). Power to children’s imaginations: May ’68 and counter culture for children in France. Strenae [Online], 13 URL : http://journals.openedition.org/strenae/1838 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/strenae.1838

Illouz, E. (2003). Oprah Winfrey and the glamour of misery: An essay on popular culture. Columbia University Press.

          (2008). Saving the modern soul: Therapy, emotions, and the culture of self-help. University of California Press.

Kelly, C. (2007). Children’s world: Growing up in Russia, 1890-1991. Yale University Press.

Lasch, C. (1978). The culture of narcissism. American life in an age of diminishing expectations. Norton.

Marks, S. (2018). Psychotherapy in Europe. History of the Human Sciences, 31(4), 3–12.

Marquis, N. (2014). Du bien-être au marché du malaise. La société du développement personnel. P.U.F.

Nehring, D., Madsen, O. J., Cabanas, E., Mills, C., & Kerrigan, D. (Eds.). (2020). The Routledge international handbook of global therapeutic cultures. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Rieff, P. (1966). The Triumph of the therapeutic: Uses of faith after Freud. Harper and Row.

Rose, N. S. (1998). Inventing ourselves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge University Press.

Rosner, R. I. (2018). History and the topsy-turvy world of psychotherapy. History of Psychology, 21(3), 177–186.

Rutherford, A., & Pettit, M. (2015). Feminism and/in/as psychology: The public sciences of sex and gender. History of Psychology, 18(3), 223–237.

Salman, S. (2019). Towards a ‘client professionalization’ process? The case of the institutionalization of executive coaching in France. Journal of Professions and Organization, 286–303.

Sennett, R. (1977). The fall of public man. Knopf.

Shamdasani, S. (2018). Towards transcultural histories of psychotherapies. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 20(1), 4–9.

          Stevens, H. (2011). De l’intervention psychosociologique au développement personnel dans l’entreprise. Esquisse d’une généalogie des relations entre management et psychologie en France. Regards Sociologiques, 41–42, 57–74.

Thomson, M. (2012). The psychological sciences and the ‘scientization’ and ‘engineering’ of society in twentieth- century Britain. In D. Schumann & B. Ziemann (Eds.), Engineering society: The role of the human and social sciences in modern societies, 1880-1980 (pp. 141–158). Palgrave Macmillan.

Vicedo, M. (2013). The nature and nurture of love: From imprinting to attachment in Cold War America. The University of Chicago Press.

Wright, K. (2008). Theorizing therapeutic culture: Past influences, future directions. Journal of Sociology, 44(4), 321–336.




Lucie Gerber,

Chercheuse F.N.S. Senior, Institut de Psychologie | Faculté des SSP | Université de Lausanne

Chercheuse associée, Institut des humanités en médecine | UNIL-CHUV

Bâtiment Geopolis | bureau 4208 | CH-1015 Lausanne

Call for Papers: Let’s Get to Work: Bringing Labor History and the History of Science Together, Thursday June 2, 2022–Saturday, June 4, 2022

 

From the labor in laboratory to the science in scientific management, the histories of labor and science are marked by intimate connections—many of which still await reflection and historical analysis. To provide a forum for productive conversation between labor historians and historians of science and to help address the pressing scholarly and political questions they share, the Science History Institute’s 2022 Gordon Cain Conference will explore the entanglements of science and labor as they have emerged around the globe between the 16th century and today.

 Call for Papers

Download the full call for papers as a PDF here: https://www.sciencehistory.org/sites/default/files/labor_and_science_call_for_papers.pdf

Plans have been made for post-conference publication of selected papers. Some financial support is available for travel and accommodation costs. Further (competitive) travel grants are available for those who plan to do research using the Science History Institute collections. Interested applicants should submit an abstract of no more than 300 words and a brief autobiographical sketch (50–100 words) by September 30, 2021.

All questions and application materials should be sent to laborandscience@sciencehistory.org.

call for papers: Professorial Career Patterns Reloaded Data, Methods and Analysis of Digital Humanities Research in the Field of Early Modern Academic History

 

Call for Papers/ Call for Data of the DFG research project “Early Modern Professorial Career Patterns – Methodological Research on Online Databases of Academic History“ (HAB Wolfenbuettel, HTWK Leipzig), Conference: 27 –28 October 2021, Pre-Workshop/Hackathon: 20 –21 October 2021


Professorial Career Patterns Reloaded Data , Methods and Analysis of Digital Humanities Research in the Field of Early Modern Academic History

The DFG research project “Early Modern Professorial Career Patterns – Methodological Research on Online Databases of Academic History“, collaboratively run by the Herzog August Library Wolfenbüttel and the Hochschule für Technik, Wirtschaft und Kultur in Leipzig, warmly invites you to participate in its concluding conference, to be held on 27-28 October 2021, alongside a preceding Hackathon, which will take place from 20-21 October 2021.


Dedicated to investigating which conditions were necessary for professors in the early modern university system to attain professional success, our project aims to test how certain scholarly career patterns can be made more visible through the use of methods borrowed from the Digital Humanities. By these means, we hope that career patterns that are well known from the abiding scholarly literature, including family dynasties and incidents of nepotism, will undergo a kind of digital reload with the aid of semantic web technologies.


Following this premise, we have modeled prosopographic data, as well as data drawn from university and scholarly histories, according to semantic web standards and FAIR data principles. We have also designed an ontology that reflects the specificities of academic life in the early modern period in German-speaking countries, and arranged the existing data accordingly. Both this model, and its relevant concepts and relations, constitute Version 0.2, which can be viewed here. Version 0.3, which is in the final stage of the development process, will address restrictions, cardinalities and intersections. We also plan to include suggestions from the concluding conference in our final results, which we hope will produce a domain ontology that can be made available to the broader research community in a universal and interoperable way by linking it to top-level ontologies, such as CIDOC-CRM oder DOLCE+DnS Ultralite (DUL).


We are interested in hearing from scholars of the early modern period, scholars working in related fields with a special interest in the Digital Humanities, and computer and information scientists, who would like to discuss the project as outlined above, alongside its accompanying vocabulary and dataset, against the backdrop of larger, methodological-theoretical questions related to the Digital Humanities. Additionally, we are seeking research data from the history of education and scholarship with which to expand the aforementioned vocabulary and dataset. This data may come from early modern prosopographically oriented research on the history of scholarship or the professorial profession, and may include topics such as patronage and network formation; the activities of learned bodies, like scientific or learned societies; teaching and research collections belonging to professors; or the strategies of academic publishing etc. The proposed data must be presented in a structured manner (e.g. Excel, CSV, XML, JSON, SQL) and should be available under an Open Data license. If you are unsure whether your data or databases are thematically and/or technically compatible with our project, please do not hesitate to contact us. Shortly before the concluding conference, we will organize a hackathon during which the proposed data will be converted into RDF format. By these means, we hope to provide researchers with the opportunity to make their data Semantic Web capable, while at the same time enabling computer and information scientists to work with the frequently heterogeneous early modern data.


The conference and hackathon will both be held online. For the conference, we invite 20-minute presentations, and plan to leave plenty of time for discussion after each paper. We hope to encourage as many submissions as possible, and will therefore also consider contributions whose authors cannot present on the days that have been earmarked for the conference, who will instead be given the opportunity to present a digital poster. Contributors to the conference as well as to the hackathon will be invited to participate in the open access publication that is planned for after the conference. Additionalfunding is available for this publication. It is our hope that the resulting volume will reflect the hybrid character of the conference, and engage with current questions concerning university and scholarly history, as well as methodological-theoretical issues in the Digital Humanities.


Proposals for both the conference and the hackathon should be submitted in the form of an abstract (max. 500 words) via EasyChair (see link below) by September 3, 2021. Successful applicants will be notified by September 7, 2021.


Conference languages German and English


Links:


https://pcp-on-web.htwk-leipzig.de/project/#en

https://pcp-on-web.htwk-leipzig.de/project/pcp-reloaded/en/


Programm

Abschlusstagung: 27.–28.10.2021

Pre-Workshop/Hackathon: 20.–21.10.2021


online event: History of Historical Science Studies in the Long 20th Century, 02.09.2021 - 03.09.2021


The historical science studies gained their modern form during the long twentieth century. The aim of this workshop is to explore the history of this field of study. The term „modern historical science studies“ should be understood as a heuristic concept, which indicates a difference from more traditional forms of history of science. The reason behind the choice of this concept is that modern historical science studies are characterized by an interdisciplinary approach to the historical objects of the sciences, whereas more traditional history of science was mainly written as an experience-based reflection by representatives of the respective scientific disciplines themselves. For example, only from the late nineteenth and especially the twentieth century, social science approaches have played an increasingly important role in the historical reflection on the sciences. The contributions to the workshop focus on practices, the circulation processes of concepts, and individual representatives of different approaches to the history of science. Hereby, also the humanities are taken into account. Furthermore, a purely ‘western’ focus will be avoided, and the historical science studies in Eastern Europe will be equally taken into account.


PROGRAMM

2 September 2021, 9 AM

9 AM: Fabian Link, Volker Remmert, Marij van Strien (Wuppertal), Welcome and Introduction


Historische Wissenschaftsforschung in und über Osteuropa hinaus / Historical Science Studies in and beyond Eastern Europe

9.30 AM: Friedrich Cain (Wien), Zur Epistemologie und Anthropologie „wissenschaftlicher Kultur“. Wissenschaftsforschung im Polen der Zwischenkriegszeit jenseits von Ludwik Fleck

10.15 AM: Coffee Break

10.45 AM: Jan Surman (Prag), History of Science in Circulations – Soviet Union 1960-1975

11.30 AM: Christian Reiß (Regensburg) / Eleyne Wenninger (Regensburg), Transatlantischer Denkverkehr. Die Übersetzung und Rezeption von Ludwik Flecks „Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache“ zwischen Deutschland, den USA und Großbritannien, 1975-1980

12.15 PM: Lunch Break


Historische Epistemologie in Frankreich / Historical Epistemology in France

2 PM: Onur Erdur (Berlin), Die epistemologische Schule von Paris

2.45 PM: Fons Dewulf (Ghent), Foucault Reading Cassirer: The History of Knowledge as a Stance of the Self

3.30 PM: Coffee Break


Geschichte der Science and Technology Studies / History of Science and Technology Studies

4 PM: Christoff Leber (München), Wissenschaft unter Beobachtung: Zum Ursprung der Science Studies im Gentechnik-Zeitalter

7 PM: Get-together on Zoom


3 September 2021, 9 AM

Historische Wissenschaftsforschung und Praktiken / Historical Science Studies and Practices

9.00 AM: Jan Potters (Antwerpen), Opening up HPS-Debates: On Reading Kuhn and the History of the Quantum

9.45 AM: Mike Rottmann (Halle) / Karena Weduwen (Bielefeld/Köln), Gelehrtes Geschehen. Ausgangspunkte einer praxissensiblen Geisteswissenschaftsgeschichte nach 1980

10.30 AM: Coffee Break


Historische Wissenschaftsforschung und Logischer Empirismus / Historical Science Studies and Logical Empiricism

11 AM: Başak Aray (Istanbul), HSS against Misappropriations of Science: Philipp Frank’s Case for Humanities in Science Teaching


Schlusskommentare und Schlussdiskussion / Concluding Remarks and Final Discussion

11.45 AM: Cornelius Borck (Lübeck), Bernhard Kleeberg (Erfurt)

13.00 PM: End


Kontakt

Fabian Link (flink@uni-wuppertal.de), Marij van Strien (vanstrien@uni-wuppertal.de), Volker Remmert (remmert@uni-wuppertal.de)


The workshop will be conducted as a Zoom meeting. The languages are English and German. We cordially invite all interested persons to participate in the workshop. Please contact Fabian Link (flink@uni-wuppertal.de) or Nina Lorbach (iz1@uni-wuppertal.de) until 28 August 2021.


Monday 19 July 2021

Call for Papers: Knowledge on the Move: Information Networks During and After the Holocaust. International Workshop at the University of Southern California, Los Angeles | APR 04, 2022 - APR 05, 2022

 


Conveners: Robin M Buller (GHI | PRO, UC Berkeley), Wolf Gruner (USC Dornsife Center for Advanced Genocide Research), Anne-Christin Klotz (GHI | PRO, UC Berkeley) 


The Pacific Regional Office of the German Historical Institute Washington and the USC Dornsife Center for Advanced Genocide Research invite proposals for their joint workshop: “Knowledge on the Move: Information Networks During and After the Holocaust.”


The movement, production, and circulation of knowledge, ideas, and information through networks of marginalized groups and across borders and boundaries have increasingly become the focus of historical research in recent decades. At the same time, scholars have worked to integrate the perspectives of Jews and other groups victimized by the Nazi regime within Holocaust Studies in order to highlight their diverse forms of agency. For instance, the study of resistance networks, subversive knowledge exchange, and transnational commemorative efforts has fostered an understanding of the Holocaust that is grounded in broader local, regional, national, transnational, and at times overlapping contexts.


“Knowledge on the Move” aims to bring together scholars who are reconsidering the Holocaust and its aftermath through the lenses of Jewish and non-Jewish information networks, broadly conceived. In a two-day workshop, scholars will present and comment on individual pre-circulated papers. This workshop aims to prompt innovative research questions regarding the information production and knowledge circulation in Europe and beyond during and after the Nazi genocide.


We welcome diverse approaches to the workshop theme that draw from a wide variety of interdisciplinary perspectives and methods. Advanced PhD candidates and early career scholars are especially encouraged to apply.


Suggested areas of focus might include (but are not limited to): 


The circulation of knowledge among victims in camps, ghettos, and in hiding

knowledge and information access and its importance for Jewish individual and group resistance

The transmission of subversive information about persecution and rescue across borders

The role of information and knowledge production from “below” in local or regional contexts

The role of passports and legal knowledge in rescue and escape

The role of the media in the production and transmission of information concerning the Holocaust

The use of rumors, coded language, humor, and other covert forms of communication

The circulation of physical objects (letters, packages, etc.) to share information during the Holocaust 

The circulation of knowledge among under-represented groups, including womxn and queer information networks

The exchange of information between Jews and non-Jews in occupied Europe

The operations and impact of resistance networks

The role of aid networks during and after the Holocaust

The dissemination and reception of early Holocaust historiography

The role of objects in commemorative efforts and the preservation of Holocaust knowledge in the aftermath of genocide

Early transnational postwar commemorative efforts

The maintenance or breaking of “silence” among Holocaust survivors


The organizers plan to publish selected papers in a special issue of a journal.


The workshop will provide presenters with an opportunity to explore the internationally unique and growing research resources found at the University of Southern California. These include the Holocaust and Genocide Studies Collection at Doheny Memorial Library with over 30,000 primary and secondary sources; a Special Collection containing the private papers of German and Austrian Jewish emigrants from the Third Reich, including the writer Lion Feuchtwanger; and the USC Shoah Foundation Visual History Archive, a digitized and fully searchable repository of over 55,000 video testimonies of survivors and other eyewitnesses of the Holocaust and other genocides. Workshop participants will be invited to participate in a scheduled optional introduction to these resources.


The German Historical Institute’s Pacific Regional Office (GHI | PRO) contributes to bringing the Pacific world into the GHI’s research agenda. It helps to broaden the scope and perspective of the GHI’s established programs in North American and transatlantic history, German and European history, and transregional and global history. 


The Pacific Regional Office aims to put an emphasis on research projects and scholarly programs that explore the interconnections of the Atlantic and Pacific worlds. At the same time, GHI | PRO takes up our institute’s long established interest in the history of migration and combines it with approaches in the history of knowledge, which has been a research focus at the GHI since 2015. GHI director Simone Lässig outlined the new concept of “migrant knowledge" in an essay (published together with Swen Steinberg 2017).


Interdisciplinary by design, the program in migrant knowledge aims to foster exchange among scholars in fields such as history, migration studies, political science, and cultural studies. It also goes beyond academia by including experts in the governmental and NGO sectors in the discussion. Please visit our blog for more information and to join the network: migrantknowledge.org.


Founded in 2014, the USC Dornsife Center for Advanced Genocide Research (previously USC Shoah Foundation Center for Advanced Genocide Research) is dedicated to advancing innovative interdisciplinary research on genocide and mass violence, focusing on transforming the way we understand the origins, dynamics, and consequences of mass violence, as well as the conditions and dimensions of resistance. The Center’s unique academic program, including a competitive international research fellowship program, interdisciplinary international conferences, and other events, attracts scholars at all levels, from all over the world, and from a multitude of disciplines. For more information, please visit https://sfi.usc.edu/cagr



Application Instructions

Papers will be pre-circulated to allow maximum time for discussions. The workshop language will be English. Please upload a brief CV and a proposal of no more than 300 words by September 15, 2021 to our online portal


Accommodations will be arranged and paid for by the conference organizers. Participants will make their own travel arrangements; funding subsidies for travel is available upon request for selected scholars, especially those who might not otherwise be able to attend the workshop, including junior scholars and scholars without university affiliation or from universities with inadequate resources. 


Please contact Heike Friedman (friedman@ghi-dc.org) if you have problems submitting your information online. All other questions pertaining to the workshop and application process can be directed to Anne-Christin Klotz (klotzan@zedat.fu-berlin.de) or Robin Buller (rmbuller@live.unc.edu).


Successful applicants will be notified in October 2021.


(Image [by the editors of hps.cesee] Lily Datz for the Telling it Forward contest, https://auburnpub.com/wocjournal/news/skaneateles/skaneateles-high-school-students-give-voice-to-holocaust-survivors-with-art-writing-projects/article_993ba8f9-7572-5f2e-9fc6-e22b63702a0f.html)


Thursday 15 July 2021

call for papers: The XV International scientific and practical conference. History of Science and Technology. Museum Studies. Moscow, December 8−9th, 2021.

 


Dear colleagues!

We invite you to take part in The XV International scientific and practical conference History of Science and Technology. Museum Studies. Moscow, December 8−9th, 2021.

2021 CONFERENCE TOPIC:

LAWS OF NATURE AND SOCIAL NORMS: INTERCONNECTION AND MUTUAL INFLUENCE IN THE PAST AND PRESENT

URL: https://polymus.ru/ru/museum/pros/conference/xv-mezhdunarodnaya-konferentsiya-istoriya-nauki-i-tehniki.-muzeynoe-delo/history-of-science-and-technology.-museum-studies/

CONFERENCE ORGANIZERS:

The Polytechnic Museum, Moscow

National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE)

Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov (MSU), Faculty of History

Institute for the History of Science and Technology named after S.I. Vavilov, Russian Academy of Sciences

Scientific and Technological Museum Promotion Association (AMNIT)

National University of Science and Technology (MISIS)

We welcome historians, sociologists, philosophers, culturologists, anthropologists, political scientists, and museum specialists whose interests include the history of science, methodology, and technology in Russia from the second half of the 19th century to the present. This year we invite you to discuss why and how laws of nature “turn” into norms, regulations and rules of society. Who is the facilitator between the rules of society and the laws of nature? How do society’s laws / norms influence nature? What aspects of social life affect the observation and study of natural laws as well as their conversion to fundamental discoveries, technology, and engineering inventions? In which cases do laws of nature / social norms stimulate a constructive, creative human activity and in which do they hinder it? How do we describe the role of creativity in engineering, academic, and entrepreneurial activity in different historical periods and in the present? What role do museums play in the comprehension and “conversion” of the laws of nature? The representation of the rules of society and laws of nature in projects and exhibitions in museums of natural science and technology museums: concrete examples and general patterns.


We offer to discuss these and other topics that will be presented as part of the conference’s sections that were suggested by our long-term and new partners: research groups and centres from leading research institutes and universities.


APPLYING FOR THE CONFERENCE

Applications are accepted until 25.09.2021.

Authors will be informed on the committee’s decision to accept or decline their thesis not latter then 15.10.2021.

We accept one application from one author. The application must include the thesis (2000 — 4000 characters). The organizing committee has the right to refuse applications that do not fit the requirements.

Apply here: https://polls.polytech.one/history-of-science-and-technic-museum-studies-xv/

The registration is free of charge. In case of a favourable epidemiological situation we plan to make some section of the conference offline in Moscow. Some sections of the Conference noted in the letter will be held online.

We plane to provide some of the sections with the simultaneous Russian-English translation.


Thesis of the speakers included in the Conference Program will be available on the Polytechnic Museum’s website during the conference. We plan to publish the issue of the Conference materials during 2022.


Contact numbers:


Organization questions

Tatiana Aleksandrovna Glushkova

(916) 008−12−05; (495) 730−54−38, ext. 11−86.

taglushkova@polytech.one

Conference Program director:

Anna Anatolyevna Kotomina

(916) 008−12−41; (495) 730−54−38, ext. 12−36.

aakotomina@polytech.one


CALL FOR PAPERS for the 4th CEENASWE conference OCCULTISM AND POLITICS IN EAST-CENTRAL EUROPE, 27 – 29 September 2021, Prague.

Since the nineteenth century, East-Central Europe has experienced rapid social, political, and economic changes, which caused transformation and transformations in local societies. Rising nationalism culminating in the Revolutionary year 1848, echoes of the Romantic movement, ongoing industrialisation, First World War, the emergence of national states and disintegration of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, later followed by the World War Two and establishment of the socialist regimes represent some of the key milestones the region went through. New sciences emerged, and local intellectuals also tried to cope with the impetuses from the discoveries in the Orient. Since the mid-nineteenth century, the rise of occultism and its further spread throughout Europe represented a peculiar reaction to some mentioned milestones. Local states dealt with these occult and esoteric movements differently, from suppression to silent support, and the movements themselves had various ideas about the meaning and aims of nations. We wish to investigate the links between the state, power, and occult and esoteric ideas, movements, and key figures more closely in this conference.


Focusing on the occultism and esotericism in East-Central Europe since the mid-nineteenth-century till now, we invite scholars to share their research which addresses the following topics:

Tensions between or calls for nationalism and/or transnationalism in the occult and esoteric movements;

Attitudes of various state bodies (republics, empires or totalitarian regimes) to occultism and esotericism, from suppression to support; 

Practising occultism or esotericism under socialist regimes;

Case studies of influential movements, persons, or ideas either originating or being adopted in East-Central Europe;

Critical reflection of the scholarship concerning occultism and esotericism in East-Central Europe.


Submission Guidelines

We accept both individual papers (20min presentation + 10 mins for discussion) and panels of three scholars maximum (90mins altogether, open panel’s format: from standard closely-related papers presentation to a discussion table – negotiable with organisers).


PAPERS

250 words abstract, together with institutional affiliation and contact details.


PANELS

STANDARD PANEL

250 words for the panel description and 150 words for each paper

DISCUSSION TABLE

250 words description of the panel and 250–400 words detailed description of the proposed questions, topics, and course of


Please, kindly submit your papers or panel via this https://forms.gle/rUSFr9AhLj7GqBzc9


Registration

There is no registration fee; however, the limiting number of participants is between

20–25, hence, please, make sure your presentation is related to the CEE region and fits the general theme well.


Preliminary Programme

Keynote lecture by Associate Prof Dr Marco Pasi (University of Amsterdam) 

Conference dinner

CEENASWE board meeting

Magical Prague trip (after the conference on 30 September)

Organisation:

Institute of Ethnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences in cooperation with Czech Association for Social Anthropology; Anthropology of Religion, Magic and Supernatural Network and European Society for the Study of Western Esotericism; The Central and Eastern European Network

Venue

The conference will take place at the representative residence of the Czech Academy of Sciences – Vila Lanna in the centre of Prague.


Pandemic Considerations

We do hope that the pandemic situation will get better during the summer, and together with ongoing vaccination and covid passes, we will be able to meet in person in Prague. In case it will not be possible, the organizers would reserve their right to turn the conference into an online form. Let us keep our fingers crossed!


Important Dates

SUBMISSION DEADLINE 30 July 2021

NOTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE 5 August 2021

DEADLINE FOR REGISTRATION 15 August 2021

Organizing Team

Dr Pavel Horák, Institute of Ethnology, Czech Academy of Sciences

Dr Karolina Maria Hess, Institute of Sociology, University of Silesia in Katowice 

Questions:

For general queries, please email us at pragueconference2021@gmail.com

The conference is kindly sponsored by the Czech Academy of Sciences by Strategy AV21 Programme “Europe and the State between civilisation and barbarism” http://statav21.cz


Monday 12 July 2021

hps.cesee will be migrating its newsletter service

 Dear Friends and Colleagues,

over the next week(s) we will be migrating our email newsletter to another service. Nothing substantial will change for you - you will be receiving emails as previously, twice a week - Monday and Thursday. So at least we hope (we are testing the options). If you do not want to receive the emails, you can unsubscribe from the new service or write to us at hps.cesee@gmail.com so that we can remove your email during the migration to the new service.

best,

yours hps.cesee

Call for papers: Dostoyevsky and Philosophy. Online, 28th and 29th of October 2021. Deadline: August 30, 2021

 

[Русский ниже]

The editors of The Interlocutor. Journal of the Warsaw School of Ideas and the Polish Academy of Sciences Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, are pleased to announce an international conference organized to mark the 200th anniversary of Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s birthday.

In the mid-twentieth century Hannah Arendt, in her discussion of one of Hermann Broch’s works, noted that contemporary prose constitutes a synthesis of poetry and philosophy. Born two hundred years ago, Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoyevsky is considered one of the forerunners of contemporary prose. This opinion is justified by the relation between his writing – which is structurally novel yet stylistically frugal – and philosophy. Dostoyevsky’s novels abound in discussions about fundamental moral and metaphysical issues, while his heroes confront philosophical dilemmas with a passion hitherto unknown in world literature. Dostoyevsky appears capable of combining philosophical dialogue and psychological drama in a way that appeals powerfully to the intellect and imagination of professional thinkers. His work was to exert a direct influence on the development of an important trend within the twentieth-century philosophy, the so-called Russian Religious Renaissance. Yet, the impact of his work went far beyond Russia. Nietzsche was deeply impressed by Dostoyevsky’s prose; diverse intellectuals, such as Zdziechowski, Camus, or Pareyson, have all written about Dostoyevsky.

The conference aims to bring together different perspectives on Dostoyevsky as a “philosophical writer.” We intend to consider, among other things, issues such as: the bilateral dynamics between philosophy and Dostoyevsky’s work, the original anthropological, historiosophical and ethical conceptions uncovered in his prose, the actuality of his diagnoses and their enduring significance for culture.

The conference will be held online and will take place on the 28th and 29th of October 2021. Conference languages will be English, Polish and Russian. We accept abstracts from scholars representing diverse fields in humanities to be submitted by August 30, 2021 (our e-mail: smazurek@ifispan.edu.pl or: noktomir@gmail.com ).Participants will receive a 30-minute slot for their presentation.

-------------------

В середине 20 века Ханна Арендт, обсуждая одно из произведений Германа Броха, заметила, что современная проза является синтезом поэзии и философии. Родившийся двести лет тому назад Федор Михайлович Достоевский, считается одним из предшественников современной прозы. Это мнение оправдывается прежде всего особым отношением его творчества – структурно новаторского, но стилистически сдержанного – к философии. Романы Достоевского полны дискуссий по фундаментальным моральным и метафизическим вопросам, а его герои борются с философскими и мировоззренческими дилеммами с невиданной в мировой литературе страстью. Достоевский, кажется, умел сочетать философский диалог и психологическую драму в пропорциях, гарантирующих исключительно сильное воздействие на интеллект и воображение профессиональных мыслителей. Его творчество оказало непосредственное влияние на развитие важнейшего течения в истории русской философии – и в то же время важного течения в истории европейской мысли двадцатого века – русского религиозно-философского возрождения. Oднако влияние Достоевского выходило далеко за пределы России – прозой Достоевского был впечатлен Ницше, позже о нем писали многие мыслители, в том числе так разные личности, как Здзеховский, Камю или Парейсон.

Целью конференции организованной редакцией журнала „The Interlocutor. Journal of the Warsaw School of Ideas” и Кафедрой Истории Философии Нового Времении и Современной Философии Института Философии и Социологии Польской Академии Наук, является взгляд на Достоевского как на «писателя-философа». Это означает рассмотрение таких вопросов, как: восприятие Достоевским европейской философии и его влияние на нее; реконструкция оригинальных антропологических, историософских и этических концепций писателя; актуальность его диагнозов и их значение для польской культуры.

Онлайн-конференция состоится 28-29 октября 2021 года на польском, русском и английском языках. К участию приглашаем представителей всех областей гуманитарных наук; желающих просим прислать темы своих выступлений вместе с тезисами до 30 августа этого года, на адрес электронной почты: smazurek@ifispan.edu.pl или noktomir@gmail.com ( Время выступления 30 минут).

Invitation to submit draft proposals for the Research Group 2023/24 to the Center for Interdisciplinary Research (ZiF)


Do you have an exceptional interdisciplinary research idea?

Do you want to join forces with international colleagues from various disciplines?

Are you looking for a time-out to focus on your research?

The ZiF, Bielefeld University’s Institute for Advanced Study, is operating internationally and supports in-terdisciplinary research projects. The proximity of the university campus creates excellent working condi-tions and facilitates contacts among scientists and scholars beyond their collaboration at the ZiF. It offers the opportunity to establish an interdisciplinary Research Group in the academic year 2023/24. For sev-eral months up to one year fellows live and work together at the ZiF. The ZiF provides funding, support by a research group coordinator, and a professional infrastructure (i. e. accommodation, conference fa-cilities).

The Research Group may be applied for in two different formats:

(1) Research Group with a duration of 10 months and a budget of 600.000 €

(2) Research Group with a duration of 5 months and a budget of 300.000 €

Please submit a draft proposal with your ideas for a Research Group (up to 5 pages) by 1 October 2021 to the

Executive Director of the ZiF

Prof. Dr Véronique Zanetti

zif-applications@uni-bielefeld.de

For more details regarding application procedures and organisation:

https://www.uni-bielefeld.de/ZiF/Foerderung/fg.html


Thursday 8 July 2021

call for papers: Die Schattenseite der Universität. Akademische Prekarität in der longue durée, ca. 1150 - 1945. 24.-25. März 2022, Universität Düsseldorf. Deadline 15.08.2021

 


Seit sich Mitte des 12. Jahrhunderts in Bologna erstmals dauerhaft “universitates scholarum” in Europa etablieren konnten, stand immer auch die Frage im Raum, wer diesem Personenkreis angehören konnte, welche Voraussetzungen daran geknüpft waren und welche Bedingungen das mit sich brachte. Spätestens mit der Institutionalisierung eines meritokratischen Anspruchs wurde eine wettbewerbliche Selektion derjenigen, die diese Zugehörigkeit anstrebten, möglich; sie war und blieb aber keinesfalls die einzige Möglichkeit, Ab- und Ausgrenzungen vorzunehmen. Andere Selektionsfaktoren traten stets dazu. Sobald und solange die Zugehörigkeit zum universitären System attraktiv war, bildeten sich so drei Gruppen - die der sicher darin Inbegriffenen, die der sicher davon Ausgeschlossenen und die derjenigen, die unsicher ein- oder ausgeschlossen waren. Deren Status war meist nicht nur in Bezug auf die Zugehörigkeit zur Universitas, sondern auch in anderer Hinsicht sozial oder ökonomisch prekär - wobei sich beides gegenseitig verursachen wie auch wechselseitig bedingen oder verstärken konnte. Wer waren aber diejenigen, die so auf der Schattenseite des universitären Betriebs landeten? Wie groß war ihre Zahl, wie wichtig waren sie für die Abläufe, das Funktionieren und Weiterbestehen des Systems? Welche Wege führten in die Prekarität hinein und welche wieder hinaus?

Die Konkurrenz um die – zwar stetig ausgeweiteten, aber immer begrenzten – Ressourcen, die gesamtgesellschaftlich für Tätigkeiten einer ‚gelehrten‘ Natur bereitgestellt wurden, führte dementsprechend zu Konflikten. Diese dienten der Demarkation einer universitären Sphäre derer, die von ihrer Bildung leben konnten. Dabei wurde einerseits immer darüber verhandelt, wer qualifiziert sei, eine dazu zugehörige Tätigkeit auszuüben. Andererseits wurde ausgehandelt, wie eine solche Qualifizierung erlangt werden konnte, welche Tätigkeiten in dieses beruflich-soziale Feld fielen, und wie sich unter diesen Bedingungen sozialer Status, wenn nicht gar Aufstieg, erreichen und behaupten ließ. Nicht zuletzt war auch die Beanspruchung der Deutungsmacht für all diese Streitfragen stets umstritten. Eine Kategorie, die dabei nicht außer Acht gelassen werden darf, ist die des Geschlechts. Waren Frauen oft bereits von einer formalisierten Bildung ausgeschlossen, wurden sie in der Gelehrtenwelt vor allem als Randerscheinungen und Ausnahmephänomene wahrgenommen.


Während sich die Universitäts- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte mit wenigen Ausnahmen vor allem der Sonnenseite der Universität gewidmet hat, sollen hier explizit die Verlierer:innen, die Ausgeschlossenen und Marginalisierten des akademischen wissenschaftlichen Betriebs in Europa zwischen Hochmittelalter und Hochmoderne in den Blick genommen werden. Dabei wollen wir untersuchen, ob und inwieweit Prekarität zum universitären Betrieb systemisch notwendig hinzu trat. Die epochenübergreifende Perspektive erlaubt es in besonderer Weise, Kontinuitäten und Brüche herauszuarbeiten; der besondere Fokus auf Nord- und Mitteleuropa, besonders den Raum des (ehemaligen) Heiligen Römischen Reichs, nimmt Rücksicht auf Traditionslinien und lässt systemische Vergleiche zu.


Wir freuen uns auf Vorschläge für Beiträge, die sich mit einer oder mehreren der folgenden Fragen beschäftigen oder eigene Themen einbringen:


- In welchem Verhältnis stehen Erwerbsarbeit und Tätigkeit an einer Universität?


- Wie werden Qualifikationen verhandelt? Welche Inklusions- und Exklusionsmechanismen sind zu beobachten? Welche gruppenspezifischen Marginalisierungen sind zu erkennen?


- Welchen Einfluss hat die universitäre Tätigkeit auf andere Lebensbereiche (z.B. Mobilität, Familiengründung)?


- Wie wird akademische Prekarität in der Öffentlichkeit thematisiert und wie wird sie politisch verhandelt?


- Wie schlägt sich die Prekarität in der akademischen Wissensproduktion nieder? Welchen Einfluss haben individuelle Lebenssituationen auf das (Nicht-)Entstehen von Wissen?


- Wie ist das Verhältnis von akademischer Lehre und prekären Arbeitsverhältnissen der Lehrenden?


- Welche ökonomischen Konsequenzen hat die akademische Prekarität?


Zur Bewerbung bitten wir um entsprechende Abstracts (im Umfang von maximal 500 Wörtern) für Vorträge von 20 Minuten und einen kurzen Lebenslauf (maximal 150 Wörter), die bis zum 15.08.2021 an Tobias Winnerling (tobias.Winnerling@uni-duesseldorf.de) oder Joëlle Weis (weis@hab.de) eingesandt werden können.


Die Tagung wird am 24. und 25. März 2022 an der Universität Düsseldorf stattfinden. Eine Publikation der Beiträge ist vorgesehen.


Kontakt

tobias.Winnerling@uni-duesseldorf.de, weis@hab.de



CENTAURUS, vol. 63, issue 2, incl. The Material Culture and Politics of Artifacts in Nuclear Diplomacy,

Volume 63, Issue 2

CENTAURUS: The journal of the European Society for the History of Science

——

The latest issue of Centaurus is now available online (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/16000498/2021/63/2).

——

Volume 63, Issue 2

CONTENTS:

Special Issue: The Material Culture and Politics of Artifacts in Nuclear Diplomacy

Guest editors: Maria Rentetzi and Kenji Ito

Objects are considered powerful tokens of complexity in diplomatic encounters and of asymmetry in international relations. Focusing on the nuclear history of the second half of the twentieth century, this special issue stresses the importance of material culture in Diplomatic Studies of Science and Technology, a new research strand in Science and Technology Studies. We collectively theorize the role of objects in diplomatic exchanges and that of diplomacy in constituting the materiality of nuclear things.


– Maria Rentetzi and Kenji Ito, 'The material culture and politics of artifacts in nuclear diplomacy' [Open access]


– Toshihiro Higuchi and Jacques E. C. Hymans, 'Materialized internationalism: How the IAEA made the Vinča Dosimetry Experiment, and how the experiment made the IAEA'


– Matthew Adamson, 'Orphaned atoms: The first Moroccan reactor and the frameworks of nuclear diplomacy'


– Lif Lund Jacobsen, Irina Fedorova, and Julia Lajus, 'The seismograph as a diplomatic object: The Soviet–American exchange of instruments, 1958-1964'


– Kenji Ito, 'The scientific object and material diplomacy: The shipment of radioisotopes from the United States to Japan in 1950'


– Clara Florensa, 'A nuclear monument the size of a football field: The diplomatic construction of soil nuclearity in the Palomares accident (Spain, 1966)'


Articles


– Alberto Bardi, 'Scientific interactions in colonial, multilinguistic, and interreligious contexts: Venetian Crete and the manuscript Marcianus latinus VIII.31 (2614). A preliminary study'


– James Brannon, 'The Sphere of Anthony Ascham: Sources for the earliest-known English-language cosmography based on Sacrobosco's De Sphaera'


– Steffen Ducheyne and Jip van Besouw, 'Readers of the first edition of Newton's Principia on the relation between gravity, matter, and divine and natural causation: British public debates, 1687–1713'


– Kari Tove Elvbakken and Helle Margrete Meltzer, 'Research, knowledge, and policy on goitre and iodine in Norway (1850–2016)' [Open access]


Essay review


– Oana Matei, 'Recipes and thrift in early modern and modern knowledge'


Book reviews


– Alan C. Bowen and Francesca Rochberg.  Hellenistic astronomy: The science in its contexts  (Leiden: Brill, 2020), review by Victor Gysembergh


– Richard Dunn, Silke Ackermann and Giorgio Strano. Heaven and earth united: Instruments in astrological contexts (Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2018), review by Matthieu Husson


– Crippa, Davide. The impossibility of squaring the circle in the 17th century: A debate among Gregory, Huygens and Leibniz (Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser, 2019), review by Douglas Jesseph


– Ann Blair and Kaspar Greyerz. Physico-theology: Religion and science in Europe, 1650–1750 (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2020), review by John Henry


– Efthymios Nicolaïdis (ed.). Greek alchemy from late antiquity to early modernity (Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 2018), review by Anne-Laurence Caudano


– Annette Lykknes and Brigitte Tiggelen (eds). Women in their element: Selected women's contributions to the periodic system (Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific, 2019), review by Ana Carneiro


– Scerri, Eric. The periodic table: Its story and its significance (2nd ed.) (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2020), review by Geoff Rayner-Canham


– Nieto-Galan, Agustí. The politics of chemistry: Science and power in twentieth-century Spain (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2019), review by Santiago Guzmán Gámez


– Pimentel, Juan. Fantasmas de la ciencia española (Madrid, Spain: Marcial Pons Historia/Fundación Jorge Juan, 2020), review by John Slater


– Warwick Anderson, Ricardo Roque, and Ricardo Ventura Santos (eds). Luso-tropicalism and its discontents: The making and unmaking of racial exceptionalism (New York, NY: Berghahn, 2019), review by Luc Berlivet


– Jenkins, Bill. Evolution before Darwin: Theories of the transmutation of species in Edinburgh, 1804–1834 (Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press, 2019), review by José Carlos Sánchez-González


– Jürgen, Renn. The evolution of knowledge: Rethinking science for the Anthropocene (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020), review by Stephen Gaukroger


– Gaukroger, Stephen. Civilization and the culture of science: Science and the shaping of modernity, 1795–1935 (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2020), review by Roger Smith


– Carla Bittel, Elaine Leong, and Christine von Oertzen (eds). Working with paper: Gendered practices in the history of knowledge (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2019), review by Bonnie G. Smith


– Smith, Roger. The sense of movement: An intellectual history (London, UK: Process Press, 2019), review by Teresa Álvarez


– Mayer, Andreas. The science of walking: Investigations into locomotion in the long nineteenth century (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2020), review by Roger Smith


Various


– Ana Simões and Maria Paula Diogo, 'Mapping the ESHS community: A brief summary'


Monday 5 July 2021

Engliš Karel: Tož poslouchejte, jak jsme budovali republiku [Listen, how we built the Republic]. Brno: Muni 2021. ISBN: 978-80-210-9867-1

 


Soubor úsměvných historek vypovídá o první republice, její politické a společenské atmosféře. Karel Engliš popisuje mnohé významné osobnosti politického života, například Tomáše Garrigua Masaryka, Antonína Švehlu, či Jana Malypetra, i řadu událostí první republiky s vtipem a elegantním nadhledem. Kniha vychází v roce 2021, kdy si připomínáme šedesát let od úmrtí profesora JUDr. Karla Engliše (1880–1961), zakladatele a prvního rektora Masarykovy univerzity, blízkého spolupracovníka Tomáše Garrigua Masaryka, šestinásobného ministra financí, guvernéra Národní banky Československé, rektora Univerzity Karlovy, vědce, univerzitního profesora, politika, národohospodáře, filosofa a člověka, který se rád smál.



Jacek Wachowski: Transakty. Między sztuką, nauką i technologią. Nowe strategie performowania wiedzy [Trans/Acts: Between arts, science and technology. New strategies of performing knowledge]. Cracow: universitas 2021. ISBN: 978-83-242-3661-9

 

Opis książki:

Jacek Wachowski – teoretyk performansu i widowisk; profesor zwyczajny w Katedrze Teatru i Sztuki Mediów na Wydziale Antropologii i Kulturoznawstwa UAM. Zajmuje się badaniem performansów posttechnologicznych, a także nowych strategii komunikacyjnych w środowiskach transhumanistycznych i posthumanistycznych. W kręgu jego zainteresowań pozostaje również filozofia nauki i metodologia badań transdyscyplinarnych. 

 

Transakty – ekscentryczne prace artystów, tworzone wspólnie z inżynierami i naukowcami – prowokują do pytań podstawowych: Jak są skonstruowane? Jakie pełnią funkcje? W jakich relacjach pozostają do sztuki, nauki i technologii? Jak zmieniają nasze przyzwyczajenia poznawcze? Odpowiedzi na te pytania prowadzą do wniosku, że w transaktach nie chodzi wyłącznie o prowokacje. Tworzą one nowy paradygmat, który umożliwia powstawanie praktyk społecznych opierających się na modelu partycypacyjnym, i podważają instytucjonalno-hierarchiczny sposób wytwarzania wiedzy, podtrzymywany przez uniwersytety i korporacyjne laboratoria. 

 

Transakty można czytać na wiele sposobów. To błyskotliwy i zwięzły – choć równocześnie gęsty i nasycony – przewodnik teoretyczny, zachęcający do dyskusji i podsuwający nowe koncepcje pozwalające okiełznać zjawiska współczesnej kultury nadmiaru oraz sproblematyzować ograniczoną społeczną refleksyjność związaną z wieloma obszarami uprawiania nauki (…) Równocześnie można tę książkę traktować jako katalog przykładów działań z ostatniego półwiecza, które problematyzowały przemiany kultury i – zgodnie z przekonaniem o performatywnym charakterze nowej wiedzy – wskazywały rozwiązania, czerpiąc z rozwoju paradygmatu art and science. (…) Nawet jeśli tytułowe transakty z perspektywy kulturowego mainstreamu są zjawiskiem marginalnym, a powstające za ich sprawą depozyty są – jak ujmuje to Autor – „bazami wiedzy niepraktycznej, ekscentrycznej, osobliwej”, to jednak kumulują w sobie zmiany i otwarcie na przyszłość. Są laboratoriami, w których wydarza się to, co dla przyszłości kultury być może najważniejsze. Za sprawą Transaktów zyskujemy okazję, by do nich zajrzeć w towarzystwie kompetentnego przewodnika. Nie mam wątpliwości, że ta książka w obecnych i przyszłych dyskusjach o relacjach nauki, kultury i technologii stanowić będzie istotny punkt odniesienia.

[Z recenzji prof. SWPS dr hab. Mirosława Filiciaka]


Wstęp


1. Sztuka, nauka, technologia… A więc co?


1.1. Transdyscyplinarność


1.2. Akty – działania


1.3. Trans/Akty


2. Cechy transaktów


2.1. Medialność


2.2. Proliferacja


2.3. Hipertekstualność


2.4. Futurologiczność


2.5. Warunki konieczne i wystarczające do powstania transaktów


3. Nadwyżki wiedzy i informacji


3.1. Faza wstępna: w stronę społeczeństwa informacyjnego


3.2. Faza rozwinięta: społeczeństwo nadprodukcji wobec wyzwań demokracji


4. Depozyty wiedzy


5. Krótka historia depozytów wiedzy


6. Depozyty i performowanie wiedzy


7. Modele transaktów


7.1. Depozyty koncepcyjne – performanse


7.2. Depozyty koncepcyjne – instalacje


7.3. Depozyty produktowe – performanse


7.4. Depozyty produktowe – instalacje


7.5. Depozyty kontekstowe – performanse


7.6. Depozyty kontekstowe – instalacje


7.7. Wnioski


8. Depozyty – w stronę nowego paradygmatu


8.1. Sieć – spłaszczenie hierarchii


8.2. Alternatywny obieg wiedzy


8.3. Depozyty – wnioski


9. Nowy paradygmat – czyli o technologicznej opresyjności


10. Transakty: projekty przyszłości?


Zakończenie


Bibliografia


Indeks nazwisk



Thursday 1 July 2021

Online event (Polish): Wykład dr Vadzima Anipiarkoua: Między społeczeństwem i władzą: Instytut Historii w Mińsku na tle protestów politycznych na Białorusi w roku 2020, 15.07.2021, 11:15

 


Obecna sytuacja polityczna na Białorusi skłoniła Uniwersytet Europejski Viadrina we Frankfurcie nad Odrą do pomocy białoruskim studentom i wykładowcom oraz do pomnażania wiedzy o tym kraju. Centrum Interdyscyplinarnych Studiów o Polsce zaprosiło w związku z tym historyka dr. Vadzima Anipiarkoua do wygłoszenia wykładu na kolokwium naukowym online. Białoruski naukowiec opowie o wydarzeniach z grudnia 2020 roku, kiedy na tle masowych protestów w Mińsku straciło pracę 15 pracowników Instytutu Historycznego Białoruskiej Akademii Nauk, czyli ok. 20 procent całego zespołu naukowego.


Rejestracja pod adresem klodnicki@europa-uni.de


Call for articles (Forum Historiae) 1/2022: Mining and processing of minerals in Central Europe from the Middle Ages to the 20th century from the perspective of environmental history

 

Téma: 

Mining and processing of minerals in Central Europe from the Middle Ages to the 20th century from the perspective of environmental history

Zostavovatelia: 

Karol Hollý and Pavel Hronček

Abstrakt: 

The issue aims to explore the diverse impacts and consequences of the mining and processing of minerals on the environment (landscape) in the history of Central Europe. Our ambition is to examine changes in the environment in a broader social context. We welcome both case studies and comprehensive analysis of environmental and mining regulation policies; studies of the state and private sector approach to these activities. Manuscripts devoted to theory and methodology are welcome as well.

• New research methods: archival research in relation to computer modelling of the historical landscape; digital humanities approaches.

• Mining and urban history: the emergence of new places in mining localities, changes in the architectural character of the original settlements.

• Impact of mining:, devastation, pollution, restoration and development of the environment.

• Mineral processing and the environment: impact on air quality, waste disposal methods, etc.

• Discussions on the mining and processing consequences in public and professional discourse: conservation versus economic argumentation.

• Methods of eliminating environmental damage; the influence of the nature conservationists activism and public pressure and the responses of miners and mining and processing companies.

• Impact of mining on landscape changes: destruction and cultivation, new species of vegetation, changes in the species composition of forests, changes in the river network, the emergence of new water channels, roads, etc.

The use of computer modelling is welcome.

We accepted only original unpublished manuscripts.


Termín odovzdania: 

30th November 2021

Príspevky: 

Language: English

Length: 15 to 35 standard pages (1800 characters per page)

Style: submissions must follow the “Style Manual for the Authors” (http://www.forumhistoriae.sk/en/dokument/instructions-authors) (manuscripts that do not comply will be rejected or returned upon receiving for correction)

Submit manuscripts to (both) email addresses:

karolholly@gmail.com

phroncek@gmail.com

CFP: Hierarchies of Territory: Precedence and Interrelationship between Regions in Russian Space, 1700-1991. Higher School of Economics in Moscow, October 11-13, 2021.

 The International Research Laboratory “Russia’s Regions in Historical Perspective” invites you to take part in the international conference “Hierarchies of Territory: Precedence and Interrelationship between Regions in Russian Space, 1700-1991”, to be held at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow, October 11-13, 2021.

The Russian Federation today consists of over 80 federal units (sub”ekty federatsii), including republics, kraia, autonomous okrugs, oblasts, and so forth. Each of these forms of territorial organization has its own standing and place within the state hierarchy.  But this represents just the most basic level of the state’s territorial organization. Each of these units in turn forms part of larger conglomerations or groupings of territories, such as federal or military districts, economic macroregions, or archbishoprics, as well as less determinate political-cultural entities such as the North, the South, Siberia, the Volga Region, and so forth, all of which occupy their own distinct niches within official and popular conceptions of the national area.  The variety of these spatial formations and the different ways of “reading” Russian territory that they represent appear all the more striking when one considers the complex historical legacies that inform them. Even past spatial forms that are no longer visible today nonetheless remain deeply resonant and influential.  


None of these ways of representing territory, past or present, is autonomous.  Instead, each plays a role and has its assigned place within structures of meaning. As such, they reflect the reality that Russian space, like the territory of all states, is organized according to a range of hierarchies that together define the socio-political, economic, and cultural ordering of the state. It’s worth noting that the very understanding of region as a territorial entity is itself fundamentally relational. Put differently, no region can exist on its own. Every region is the product of likenesses, contrasts, and/or connections, real or imagined, with at least one other region. In a basic sense, there can be no North without a South, no center without a periphery. Europe would not be Europe without Asia, and so on.  


Building from this conceptual foundation, our conference aims to explore the history of how different definitions of territory and the relations between them emerged and developed within Russian space over the preceding three centuries, taking into account the shifting effects of political and economic power as well as cultural values that defined this long period.  We are especially interested in examining the factors that influenced how and why a given region might be seen to be higher or lower or of greater or lesser importance within the different imperial and national hierarchies that characterized Russian space during the imperial and Soviet eras, tracing the dynamics that shaped how these various hierarchies formed, evolved, changed, or, conversely, endured across time even through periods of otherwise momentous political and cultural-historical transformation.  


Topics To Be Discussed Include: 


Political, economic, and socio-cultural factors influencing the elaboration of territorial hierarchies and the related dynamics of region-building and region-defining.

The relative status of territories within the real and imagined geographies of the Russian Empire and the USSR.  The meaning of mental maps and the ordering and representation of territorial space that defines these political forms.

The process of naming regions – both formally and informally – and how the politics of nomenclature influences regional perceptions and structures as well as policies affecting regional development. The effects of naming on the relative importance and/or marginal status of a given region or territory of the state. 

The narratives of power (variously defined) that justify territorial hierarchies. The role of regions within power discourses, and their linkages with the distribution of symbolic capital and economic resources within state space.

The influence of social and political practices on the formation and reinforcement of regional hierarchies; competition between regions to achieve greater status or to counteract marginalization

Concerns with territorial status as reflected in the practices of regional description in the 18th-20th centuries; the visualization of territorial hierarchies in the imperial and Soviet periods

The conference will include a young scholars’ section open to graduate student participants from Russian universities. Two weeks prior to the conference selected participants will submit their papers to a panel consisting of one or more expert commentators.  The work of the section will then consist of close discussion and feedback on these papers between students and commentators.  

The working languages ​​of the conference will be Russian and English. 


The conference organizers are:


Ekaterina Boltunova (HSE)

Willard Sunderland (University of Cincinnati, USA; HSE)

Prospective participants are invited to submit the following application materials to the conference organizers:


A brief description of your proposed conference paper (250-300 words)

A short CV (no more than 2 pages in length), including contact information.

The conference will be held according to a hybrid format. We expect to be able to invite Russia-based researchers to attend the conference in person in Moscow. Due to ongoing Covid restrictions, however, it is likely that we will only be able to host our international colleagues online. 


The organizers intend to cover travel and accommodation expenses for most participants who will attend the meeting in Moscow. Please indicate your interest in financial support in your application.


Following the conference, we plan to publish a selection of the papers as a volume of collected essays or in a special issue of a refereed journal. 


The deadline for applications for the conference as well as the young scholars’ section is August 1, 2021.


Please send the application materials indicated above to our Laboratory Manager Ms. Natalia Beresneva at regionalhist@hse.ru 


Contact Email: 

regionalhist@hse.ru

URL: 

https://www.hse.ru/en/rrh/announcements/480912051.html


Studia z Historii Filozofii Vol 12, No 1 (2021) (open access)

URL: https://apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/szhf/issue/view/2082/showToc

Table of Contents

ARTICLES

The Problem of Weakness of Will in the Philosophy of Leibniz in the Context of Early Modern Indeterministic Freedom Theories

Anna Szyrwińska-Hörig

PDF (POLISH)

7-24

Perception of Leibniz in Russian Historiographical Thought

Yury Rashatko

PDF (POLISH)

25-39

The Problematic Nature of Andreas Osiander’s Preface Ad Lectorem to Nicolaus Copernicus’s De revolutionibus

Marek Słotysiak

PDF (POLISH)

41-67

Stanisław Lisiecki and Platonic Concept of “the Transmigration of Souls”

Adrian Habura

PDF (POLISH)

69-94

The Nature of Scientific Cognition in the Thought of Marian Borowski

Dariusz Barbaszyński

PDF (POLISH)

95-111


East Central Europe, Volume 51 (2024): Issue 1 (Mar 2024): Special Issue: Biopolitics, socialism and the democratization of healthcare. Case studies from state-socialist Hungary,

 East Central Europe, Volume 51 (2024): Issue 1 (Mar 2024): Special Issue: Biopolitics, socialism and the democratization of healthcare. Cas...