Showing posts with label Romania. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Romania. Show all posts

Wednesday, 9 September 2026

New book in open access: 𝙄𝙣 𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙛𝙚𝙘𝙩 𝙍𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙖𝙣: 𝙉𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙎𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙩𝙮, 𝙍𝙖𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝘿𝙚𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙎𝙤𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙎𝙚𝙡𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙞𝙣 𝙈𝙤𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙣 𝙍𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙖 by Marius Turda

 New book in open access: 𝙄𝙣 𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙋𝙚𝙧𝙛𝙚𝙘𝙩 𝙍𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙖𝙣: 𝙉𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙖𝙡 𝙎𝙥𝙚𝙘𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙘𝙞𝙩𝙮, 𝙍𝙖𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝘿𝙚𝙜𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙎𝙤𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙡 𝙎𝙚𝙡𝙚𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙞𝙣 𝙈𝙤𝙙𝙚𝙧𝙣 𝙍𝙤𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙖 by Marius Turda 


Exploring debates on Romanian national character and race from the 1880s to the 1950s, Turda’s study demonstrates how racism and eugenics shaped policies of ethnic purification under the Antonescu regime. It argues that the Holocaust in Romania targeted both Jews and Roma as part of a broader biopolitical nationalism, and that the eugenic ideal of the “perfect” Romanian remained embedded in communist visions of the “new man” and “perfect” society. 

Read more and preorder your copy here: https://www.aup.nl/en/book/9789048573608/in-search-of-the-perfect-romanian

Wednesday, 10 June 2026

Call for papers: Nourishing the Socialist Bloc: Food, Health, and Environment after 1945

 Call for papers: Nourishing the Socialist Bloc: Food, Health, and Environment after 1945

26–27 November 2026

‘George Barițiu’ Institute of History & Romanian Academy of Sciences, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

[https://sites.google.com/view/nutripol-statesocialism/news]

Sunday, 8 December 2024

online event: George Andrei: "Dreaming of the “English Indies”: Civilizing Missions, Racial Hygiene, and the Origins of Romanian Forestry Institutions"

 More environmental histories from ESEH regions! The last seminar of the year, on December 18, 16.00 CET, will take us on a journey through Romanian forests...


Dr. George Andrei will give a seminar on "Dreaming of the “English Indies”: Civilizing Missions, Racial Hygiene, and the Origins of Romanian Forestry Institutions". Q&A will follow.


Link for the registration: [https://kth-se.zoom.us/meeting/register/u5YsfuisrTorHNzS7ObtMhpFMy0vbkubP9vx](https://kth-se.zoom.us/meeting/register/u5YsfuisrTorHNzS7ObtMhpFMy0vbkubP9vx?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR2Vv5dmB6LCD5YLllOTiv2nawP_3GU3WRkF27f5Sp0p6omgnArwvXvFKiI_aem_PySDzfbukwKKCDuQawv6zw)

More about the seminar series: [https://eseh.org/envhistoday-webinars/](http://eseh.org/envhistoday-webinars/environmental-history-today-webinars-2023/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTAAAR3FEx4YkrL3tAy-Wzu3Xwzsi03y9gJmsBG8JEJI9W_32QcAqFUjWAKFPYg_aem_wF4ni8WFNM1Uf4H_uE1fLw)

Sunday, 27 October 2024

cfa: (Re)Gendering Science: Policies, Practices and Discourses in Socialist Context and Beyond

 ❗️❗️❗️Open call for papers: 

📌History of Communism in Europe no. 16/2025

(Re)Gendering Science: Policies, Practices and Discourses in Socialist Context and Beyond

✒️Coordinators: dr. Irina Nastasa-Matei & dr. Luciana Jinga 

This call for papers invites contributors for a special issue of the scientific journal History of Communism in Europe, focusing on the relationship between women and science in socialist contexts. We aim to explore how women engaged with science both within national contexts (in Eastern Europe, Central Asia, or the Global South), and in transnational contexts (whether within the framework of socialist movements and organizations or through academic networks and scientific collaborations that included women from socialist countries and/or took place in these regions).

Image: Raluca Ripan and her students

Photo credits: Dolgozó nő [The Working Woman], 1960

URL: https://www.iiccmer.ro/publicatii/2024/open-call-for-papers-history-of-communism-in-europe-no-16-2025/

Monday, 18 December 2023

CfP: "Humanitarian and Development Aid during the Cold War

 CfP: "Humanitarian and Development Aid during the Cold War" March 21-22, 2024, Bucharest, ROMANIA Organizer: New Europe College, Institute for Advanced Studies Interested participants should send abstracts of 600 words, in English or French, and short CVs to mia.jinga@gmail.com and dalia.bathory@gmail.com by Friday, February 2nd, 2024. The authors of accepted proposals will be informed by February 9th, 2024. https://rohumaid.wordpress.com/home-2/news/ .

Thursday, 17 November 2022

hps.cesee article alert


Lukić, Dejan. "Science Education and Bureaucratization of Fieldwork: Creating a Geological Collection in Nineteenth-Century Serbia." Journal for the History of Knowledge 3, no. 1 (2022): 5, pp. 1_12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55283/jhk.11713 .


Hîncu, A., Baghiu, Ş. Existentialism, existentialists, and Marxism: From critique to integration within the philosophical establishment in Socialist Romania. Stud East Eur Thought (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-022-09514-w .


Baumann, Fabian. "Nationality as Choice of Path: Iakov Shul´gin, Dmitrii Pikhno, and the Russian-Ukrainian Crossroads." Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, vol. 23 no. 4, 2022, p. 743-771. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/kri.2022.0062.

Rohde, Martin. "Ukrainian "National Science" from a Spatial Perspective: How the Hutsul Lands Were Mapped." Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, vol. 23 no. 4, 2022, p. 773-801. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/kri.2022.0056.

Thursday, 22 July 2021

Call for Papers: Re-Configuring “Central” Europe in Its Way towards Modernity. Language, Knowledge and Ideology Transfer through Translations of Secular Texts in Pre-Modern Times (1770-1830). November the 5th-6th 2021, online.

 


Aim: The conference aims to bring together interdisciplinary contributions from various fields of research (philology, history, translation studies), regarding the translation process of secular texts in Central-Europe in the time-frame 1770-1830.


Format:


A section with key-note speakers that aims to enlarge the general theoretical framework, through contributions regarding the process and mechanism of translation in the time-frame 1770-1830.

Keynote Speakers:


C.S. I Dr. Eugenia Dima, Iaşi


Prof. Dr. Eugen Munteanu, Iaşi


Prof. Dr. Alin Mihai Gherman, Alba-Iulia


Specialized sections that will focus on particular aspects and case studies, reflecting the central theme. Focus points: linguistics, history and translation studies.

Theoretical concept: This conference aims to open  the concept of translation to an interdisciplinary approach rooted in the new methodological horizon propagated by the postcolonial studies and cultural anthropology, because the old descriptors that defined the history of culture, such as “influence”, “reception”, “acculturation”, “amalgamation”, “assimilation”, “diffusion” etc can no longer be applied in their traditional sense defined by the comparative studies, but are opened now to revision under the principles and methodology of the cultural anthropology and by a “constructivist” school of thought that regards the “cultural difference” as a relative, fluid and unstable category, as a category that exists only at the discourse level of the political, social and cultural signifiers. Applying Homi Bhabha’s concept of “hybridization”, we can regard the translation as an act of displacement of the cultural elements, of appropriating new signs and altering significations in a certain social space, a patchwork defined by the co-existence of the Self and the Other. This “trans-cultural” approach of the communicational space, in which the senders and receivers have interchanging roles in the networks they created, deconstructs the idea of a “national culture” and focuses on the individual and/or collective intermediates (the translators, patrons, publishing houses etc.), with their particular motivation, necessities, interests, social roles etc., with everything they brought for the appropriation and reconfiguration of “specific” contents and values. This dynamic and fluid representation of the “cultural translation” will help us overcome the linearity of the relation between two or more linguistic and cultural spaces and highlight the context, the mechanism and the agents of the exchange process of information, symbols, codes, texts etc. that produce permanent mutations for the collectivities that come in contact. The phenomenon of “cultural transfer” (described by Michael Werner and Michel Espagne as the transaction of cultural goods on the intellectual market of a given time, a two-way exchange that means reformulation, adaptation and re-ideologisation of the textual artefact) will serve us as methodological and interdisciplinary foundation for the analysis of texts and translation processes from different perspectives (of history, philology and translation studies), in order to illustrate  the way in which this artificial space called “Central Europe” positioned itself in the Pre-Modern times (1770-1830) towards an Enlightened Western world.


 


The conference aims to bring together various contributions regarding the translation process of secular texts from a historical, linguistic and translation perspective, but also from the larger approach of cultural studies (the migration of ideas, the book and manuscript circulation  within the European space).


Language of the conference: English and Romanian


For registration, please fill in the form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdlxpdpm600gAI2suntUDDNBls-ErkOX3tnTa4kZCxIOhN3yQ/viewform?usp=pp_url


Deadline for registration:  September the 30th 2021.


The results of the conference will be published in English in a collective volume printed in the first half of 2022.


This conference is supported by a grant of the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization, CNCS/CCCDI – UEFISCDI, project number  PN-III-P1-1.1-TE-2019-0721 within PNCDI III.


Contact Info: 

Lect. Dr. Iulia Zup (iuliazup@gmail.com), Lect. Dr. Alexandra Chiriac (axychiriac@gmail.com), Lect. Dr. Alina Bruckner (bruckner.alina@gmail.com); CS Dr. Ana Catanã-Spenchiu (anaspenchiu@gmail.com), Lect. Dr. Augustin Guriţã (augustingurita@yahoo.com)


Monday, 22 February 2021

Olga Stefan (Ed.) Salva-Vișeu 1948: Atunci și Acum [Salva-Vișeu 1948: Then and now]. Asociația Reciproca 2020

 

[Romanian below, ToC, English/Romanian, even lower]

Salva-Vişeu 1948: Then and Now is based on a family archive of photographs taken in that year by Clement Stefan on the Salva-Vişeu railway site. Interviews with former workers and vintage documents, accompanying these unique images, provide a broad perspective on the impact that the railroad construction has had on the local community. While predominantly a historical and sociological publication, Salva-Vişeu 1948: Then and Now also argues for a prioritization of railways on the state and regional level, and reinvestment in the sustainable transport.

Project webpage: http://salvaviseu1948-acum.ro/

Project facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Salva-Vi%C8%99eu-1948-Atunci-%C8%99i-Acum-114241987090630/

--------------

Salva-Vișeu 1948: Atunci și Acum se bazează pe o arhivă familială de fotografii realizate în acel an de Clement Stefan pe șantierul căii ferate Salva-Vișeu. Însoțind aceste imagini inedite, interviuri cu foști lucrători și documente de epocă oferă o perspectivă largă a impactului pe care construirea căii ferate l-a avut asupra comunității. În timp ce este o înregistrare istorică și sociologică semnificativă, Salva-Vișeu 1948: Atunci și Acum propune, de asemenea, o prioritizare a căilor ferate pe agenda de stat și regională, și reinvestirea în transporturi durabile.

-------ToC

Harta liniei ferate Salva-Vișeu / Map of the Salva-Viseu railroad


Despre Clement Ștefan / About Clement Stefan O arhivă de fotografii de familie ne duce prin deceniile trecute / An archive of family photos that takes us back through the decades de / by Olga Ștefan


Arhiva de fotografii și carneţel de notiţe de Clement Ștefan / Archive of photographs and notebook by Clement Stefan


Articole din presa vremii despre șantierul Salva-Vișeu / Period Articles about the Salva-Viseu Construction site


CIA Report


Scurt istoric al linei Salva-Vișeu / A short history of the Salva-Viseu line de / by Valer Simion Cosma


Interviuri / Interviews

Dumitru Ganea

Isidor Curtuiuș

Ion Bumbu

Gavrilă Cilean

Ivan Ilie

Jenel Heilpern


Index

Monday, 30 November 2020

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Thematic Issue: Social Borrowings and Biological Appropriations, Edited by Christopher Donohue

 

URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/studies-in-history-and-philosophy-of-science-part-c-studies-in-history-and-philosophy-of-biological-and-biomedical-sciences/special-issue/10ZWMKJVFB8

Editorial Open access Social borrowings and biological appropriations: Special issue introduction

Christopher Donohue

Inhibition and metaphor of top-down organizationResearch article Open access Inhibition and metaphor of top-down organization

Roger Smith 

Transfer of Lamarckisms and emerging ‘scientific’ psychologies: 19th – early 20th centuries Britain and France Research article Open access Transfer of Lamarckisms and emerging ‘scientific’ psychologies: 19th – early 20th centuries Britain and France

Snait B. Gissis

 Subversive affinities: Embracing soviet science in late 1940s RomaniaResearch article Open access Subversive affinities: Embracing soviet science in late 1940s Romania

Marius Turda 

 Race science in Czechoslovakia: Serving segregation in the name of the nationResearch article Open access Race science in Czechoslovakia: Serving segregation in the name of the nation

Victoria Shmidt

 Issues of biopolitics of reproduction in post-war GreeceResearch article Open access Issues of biopolitics of reproduction in post-war Greece

Alexandra Barmpouti 

Resurecting raciology? Genetic ethnology and pre-1945 anthropological race classificationResearch article Open access Resurecting raciology? Genetic ethnology and pre-1945 anthropological race classification

Richard McMahon 

Monday, 23 November 2020

ANTI-JEWISH QUOTAS: CENTRAL EUROPE AND BEYOND; ONLINE CONFERENCE November 23-24

organized  by the Nationalism Studies Program and Jewish Studies Program at  Central European University (Budapest/Vienna) and the Tom Lantos  Institute (Budapest)

3.00 to 6.00 PM (CET), November 23, 2020

and

3.00 to 6.15 PM (CET), November 24, 2020

In  1920, the Hungarian parliament introduced an anti-Jewish quota for  admission to universities, thus making Hungary the first country in  Europe to pass antisemitic legislation in the post-World War I period.  On the occasion of the hundredth anniversary of the so-called ‘numerus  clausus law’, we are organizing an international conference to examine  the history of restrictive ethnic and racial quotas in the first half of  the twentieth century.

The conference aims to explore the  ideologies of quota regimes and the ways they have been justified,  implemented, challenged and remembered. We will discuss the historical  origins of quotas, the moral, legal and political arguments developed by  their supporters and opponents; the domestic and international debates  surrounding anti-minority quotas; as well as the consequences – both  intended and unintended – of their implementation. Particularly  attention is paid to the role played by the Hungarian ‘numerus clausus’,  not only as a model for other restrictive quotas, but also as a  touchstone in the larger debates about liberalism, the “Jewish  Question,” and the “Refugee Question” in the interwar period.

The  conference will take place on Zoom on November 23 - 24, 2020 between  3.00 to 6.15 PM (CET). All participants must register online here (https://tom-lantos-institue.events.idloom.com/anti-jewish-quotas-central-europe-and-beyond). Registration closes at midnight CET on Thursday 19th November 2020.

AGENDA

Monday, November 23 3pm – 6pm CET

3:00 – 3:15         Welcoming Remarks

Michael L. Miller (CEU), Anna-Mária Bíró (Tom Lantos Institute)

3:15 – 4:00         Keynote Address

Mária M. Kovács (1953-2020)

The Hungarian Numerus Clausus: Ideology, Apology and History

Introductory remarks by András Kovács (CEU)

Keynote address to be read by Luca Váradi (CEU)

4:00 – 6:00         Anti-Jewish Quotas: A Central European Perspective

Chair: Máté Rigó (Yale-NUS College; Imre Kertész Kolleg)

Jeremy King (Mount Holyoke College)

National Autonomy, Quotas, and a Classificatory Dilemma in Late Imperial Austria

Grzegorz Krzywiec (Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw)

Anti-Jewish  Quotas and their Radicalization in Interwar Poland. Towards a  Reconsideration of the Fascist Appeal in East Central Europe

Natalia Aleksiun (Touro College, New York; Gerda Henkel Fellow, Jena University)

Jewish Response to the Numerus Clausus in Interwar Poland

Andreas Huber (University of Vienna)

The Anti-Semitic Pact: How German National and Catholic Elites Fought for a Numerus Clausus at Austrian Universities after 1918

Tuesday, November 24 3pm- 6:15pm CET

3:00 – 4:00         Anti-Jewish Quotas, Antisemitic Violence

Chair: Laura Almagor (The University of Sheffield)

Roland Clark (University of Liverpool)

Rioting for Quotas in Transnational Perspective

István Pál Ádám (Selma Stern Zentrum für Jüdische Studien, Berlin-Brandenberg) (20 min)

Anti-Jewish Incidents in Interwar Hungary and the Numerus Clausus Debate

4:00 – 6:00         The Numerus Clausus: Hungarian Jewish Perspectives

Chair: Éva Kovács (Vienna Wiesenthal Institute)

Linda Margittai (University of Szeged)

Numerus Clausus in the Southlands, 1941-1944: Implementation of Ethnic Discrimination in Higher Education

Ágnes Kelemen (Masaryk Institute and Archives of the Czech Academy of Sciences) (20 minutes)

Rebels Against the Numerus Clausus: The Emigration of Hungarian Jewish Youth

Judith Szapor (McGill University, Montreal)

'A Path to Zionism' or 'Loyalty to the Nation'? The Impact of the Numerus Clausus on Jewish Identity in 1920s Hungary


Michael L. Miller (CEU)

A Foreign Relations Fiasco?  The Hungarian Numerus Clausus Law and Weimar Germany

6:00 – 6:15       Concluding Reflections

Monday, 16 November 2020

Zoltan Rostas, Irina Nastasa-Matei: Rediscovering Eastern-European Universities. Perspectives from the interwar period. Bucharest: Pro Universitaria 2020. ISBN: 978-606-26-1240-5

URL: http://www.prouniversitaria.ro/carte/rediscovering-eastern-european-universities-perspectives-from-the-interwar-period#

Introduction: http://www.prouniversitaria.ro/carte/rediscovering-eastern-european-universities-perspectives-from-the-interwar-period/rasfoire/


Table of contents 

Irina NASTASĂ-MATEI, Zoltán ROSTÁS 

INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 7 

Emilian GHELASE 

STRUCTURES UNDER PRESSURE .......................................................................... 11 

Zoltán PÁLFY 

A NEW NATIONAL ELITE ON OLD ACADEMIC GROUNDS: LAW STUDENTS OF THE CLUJ UNIVERSITY IN THE INTERWAR PERIOD .............. 22 

Andrei Florin SORA 

A PROBLEMATIC STATUS: THE BUCHAREST SCHOOL OF GOVERNANCE, 1919-1940 ............................................................................. 45 

Dragoş SDROBIŞ 

“THE LEFT” AND “THE RIGHT”: POLITICAL EXTREMISM AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CLUJ IN THE 1930S ......................................................... 69

Alina BRANDA 

“WORKS AND LIVES”. ON A ROMANIAN EDUCATIONAL PROJECT ...................... 85

Zoltán ROSTÁS 

A NEWCOMER IN THE UNIVERSITY: THE ROMANIAN SOCIOLOGY THE FORMATION AND FIRST CRISIS OF THE SOCIOLOGICAL SCHOOL OF BUCHAREST....................................................................................105 

Theodora-Eliza VĂCĂRESCU

NO RECOGNITION OF THEIR OWN: WOMEN IN ROMANIAN SOCIOLOGY, 1925-1944 ....................................................................................125 

Ionuţ BUTOI 

FOR A SOCIAL HISTORY OF DIDACTIC PRACTICES FROM INSIDE THE UNIVERSITY: THE GUSTI EXPERIENCES IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE INTERWAR PERIOD ................................................................................158

Irina NASTASĂ-MATEI 

ACADEMIC EVENT OR POLITICAL INTEREST? THE GERMAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF SOCIOLOGY (BUCHAREST, 1939) ...............................................180 

Rucsandra POP 

ROMAN JAKOBSON’S INFLUENCE ON MIHAI POP’S THINKING AND CAREER .....................................................................................195 

Sabrina LAUSEN 

WHAT ABOUT THE NEIGHBOURS? STUDENTS, PATRIOTS, NATIONALISTS – POLISH STUDENT FRATERNITIES AND THEIR POLITICAL EDUCATION IN INTERWAR POLAND ................................................215 

Zosia TRĘBACZ 

ŻYDOWSKA STRZECHA AKADEMICKA (JEWISH ACADEMIC THATCH) - FOUNDATION, ACTIVITY AND POLITICAL RELATIONS. CONTRIBUTION TO THE HISTORY OF JEWISH STUDENTS IN INTERWAR WARSAW ....................228 

Georgeta NAZARSKA 

WOMEN PIONEERS IN BULGARIAN SCIENCE (1920-1950s): BIOGRAPHY TRIPTYCH .......................................................................................243 

Liana GALABOVA 

BULGARIAN THEOLOGICAL FACULTY (1923-1950) AS PART OF RUSSIANBULGARIAN CULTURAL COOPERATION IN ACADEMIC SCHOLARSHIP AND CLERICAL VOCATIONAL TRAINING ............................................................253 

ABSTRACTS ..................................................................................................................263 

LIST OF AUTHORS ........................................................................................................273

Thursday, 22 October 2020

Eszter Gantner, Heidi Hein-Kircher, Oliver Hochadel (eds.) Interurban Knowledge Exchange in Southern and Eastern Europe, 1870–1950. New York: Routledge 2020. ISBN 9780367333294

URL & Preview: https://www.routledge.com/Interurban-Knowledge-Exchange-in-Southern-and-Eastern-Europe-18701950/Gantner-Hein-Kircher-Hochadel/p/book/9780367333294

BOOK DESCRIPTION

Around 1900 cities in Southern and Eastern Europe were persistently labeled "backward" and "delayed." Allegedly, they had no alternative but to follow the role model of the metropolises, of London, Paris or Vienna. This edited volume fundamentally questions this assumption. It shows that cities as diverse as Barcelona, Berdyansk, Budapest, Lviv, Milan, Moscow, Prague, Warsaw and Zagreb pursued their own agendas of modernization. In order to solve their pressing problems with respect to urban planning and public health, they searched for best practices abroad. The solutions they gleaned from other cities were eclectic to fit the specific needs of a given urban space and were thus often innovative. This applied urban knowledge was generated through interurban networks and multi-directional exchanges. Yet in the period around 1900, this transnational municipalism often clashed with the forging of urban and national identities, highlighting the tensions between the universal and the local.
This interurban perspective helps to overcome nationalist perspectives in historiography as well as outdated notions of "center and periphery." This volume will appeal to scholars from a large number of disciplines, including urban historians, historians of Eastern and Southern Europe, historians of science and medicine, and scholars interested in transnational connections.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction: Searching for Best Practices in Interurban Networks
Eszter Gantner, Heidi Hein-Kircher and Oliver Hochadel
Part I: Building a Modern City: Networks in Urban Planning
1. The Ghetto and the Castle: Modern Urban Design and Knowledge Transfer in Historic Prague Before and After 1918
Cathleen M. Giustino
2. In Search of Best Practices Within the Confines of the Russian Empire: The Port City of Berdyansk
Igor Lyman and Victoria Konstantinova
3. Travelling Architecture: Géza Maróti’s Art Between the Regional and the Global
Eszter Gantner
4. The Exchange of Urban Planning Theory and Practice Along the Austro-Hungarian Periphery: Zagreb as a Case Study
Tamara Bjažic Klarin
Part II: Aiming at the Healthy City: Experiments with Best Practices
5. Learning from Smaller Towns: Moscow in the International Urban Networks, 1870–1910
Anna Mazanik
6. Best Practices from a Polish Perspective: Improving Health Conditions in Lviv Around 1900
Heidi Hein-Kircher
7. Improving Health in a Mediterranean City: Barcelona and the European Network (1931–1937)
Celia Miralles Buil
Part III: The New Urban Space: Experiences and Institutions
8. A Discourse of Modernity?: Warsaw’s Press on Urban Poverty (1880s–1910s)
Clara Maddalena Frysztacka
9. Going East: Gustave Loisel and the Networks of Exchange Between Zoological Gardens Before 1914
Oliver Hochadel
10. Architectural Conversations Across Europe’s Borderlands: Transnational Exchanges Between Barcelona and Bucharest in the 1920s
Lucila Mallart
11. In the Driver’s Seat of Modern Urbanization: A Case Study of Automotive Development in the Emerging City of Barcelona, c.1900–1950
Barry L. Stiefel
12. Crossing the Iron Curtain: Milan’s Museum of Technology and Transnational
Exchanges Before and After World War II
Elena Canadelli
Afterword: Goodbye to Center and Periphery
Cor Wagenaar

EDITORS BIOGRAPHY

Eszter Gantner (1971–2019) was a research fellow at the Herder Institute for Historical Research on East Central Europe from 2013 through 2019.
Heidi Hein-Kircher is head of the department "academic forum" at the Herder Institute for Historical Research on East Central Europe in Marburg, Germany.
Oliver Hochadel is a historian of science and a tenured researcher at the Institución Milá y Fontanals de Investigación en Humanidades (CSIC, Barcelona).

Thursday, 15 October 2020

Środowisko studenckie w krajach bloku sowieckiego 1945–1990 [The Student Milieu in the Soviet Bloc Countries 1945–1990], red. Kamil Dworaczek i Krzysztof Łagojda, Wrocław–Warszawa: IPN 2020, 664 s., ISBN druk 978-83-8098-991-7

URL: https://ipn.gov.pl/pl/publikacje/ksiazki/106841,Srodowisko-studenckie-w-krajach-bloku-sowieckiego-19451990.html

Spis tresci: http://tiny.cc/6f0zsz
Prezentowany tom stanowi pokłosie międzynarodowej konferencji „Środowisko studenckie w krajach bloku sowieckiego 1945–1989” zorganizowanej w dniach 29 XI – 1 XII 2016 r. we Wrocławiu. Powyższa problematyka spotkała się z olbrzymim zainteresowaniem badaczy z całego świata, na konferencję nadesłano blisko 80 zgłoszeń. Ostatecznie wzięło w niej udział 58 naukowców z 19 krajów, m.in. Polski, Rosji, Stanów Zjednoczonych, Białorusi, Albanii, Wielkiej Brytanii, Bułgarii i Serbii. Tak zróżnicowana reprezentacja prelegentów dała sposobność spojrzenia na wiele zagadnień badawczych z perspektywy różnych krajów. W naszym zamyśle było odnalezienie wspólnych zjawisk obecnych w ruchach studenckich w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej, choć w równym stopniu zależało nam na uchwyceniu specyfiki społeczności studenckiej w poszczególnych państwach. Warto podkreślić niedostatek tego rodzaju badań komparatystycznych, i to nie tylko w odniesieniu do środowiska studenckiego. Mamy nadzieję, że konferencja i niniejsza książka choć w niewielkim stopniu przyczynią się do wypełnienia tej luki.

Thursday, 8 October 2020

Journal of Early Modern History, Volume 24 (2020): Issue 4-5 (Sep 2020): Special Issue: Circulation of People

Full URL: https://brill.com/view/journals/jemh/24/4-5/jemh.24.issue-4-5.xml

  • Introduction: Objects, Circuits, and Southeastern EuropeBy: Michał Wasiucionek, pp. 303–316
  • Open AccessGarments, Signatures, and Ottoman Self-Fashioning in the Imperial Periphery: Moldavian Voyvode Ştefan Tomşa II and Ottomanization in the Early Seventeenth CenturyBy: Michał Wasiucionek, pp. 317–340
  • Open AccessA Wallachian Boyar in Emperor Joseph II’s CourtBy: Constanţa Vintilă-Ghiţulescu, pp. 341–362
  • Open Access“Turkish” Textiles in South-Eastern and East-Central Europe in the Early Modern Period: The Evidence of Transylvanian Customs AccountsBy: Mária Pakucs-Willcocks, pp. 363–382
  • Open AccessFrance in the Levant: Trade and Immaterial Circulations in the “Long Eighteenth Century”By: David Celetti, pp. 383–406
  • Open AccessPopular Luxury in Southeastern Europe in the Long Eighteenth Century: A Case-Study of Italian Ceramics and Ottoman Greek ClientsBy: Artemis Yagou, pp. 407–429
  • Open AccessAfterwordBy: Hedda Reindl-Kiel, pp. 430–436
  • Reviews

Monday, 21 September 2020

Călin Cotoi, Inventing the Social in Romania, 1848-1914: Networks and Laboratories of Knowledge. Leiden: Brill 2020. ISBN: 978-3-506-70489-4



URL: https://brill.com/view/title/57646

In Inventing the Social in Romania, 1848–1914, Călin Cotoi brings to life several ‘obscure’ anarchists, physicians, public hygienists and reformers roaming the borderlands of Europe and Russia. 
The book follows individuals, texts, projects, sometimes even bacteria, traveling, meeting, colliding, writing and talking to each other in surprising places, and on changing topics. All of them navigated the land, sometimes finding unexpected loopholes and shortcuts in it, and emerged in different and unexpected parts of the social, political or geographical space. 
Using materials ranging from anarchists’ letters, to social-theoretical debates and medical treatises, Călin Cotoi points to the larger theoretical and historical issues involved in the local creation of the social, its historicity, and its representability.

Călin Cotoi (Calin Cotoi)  is Professor at University of Bucharest, Department of Sociology. He has published monographs and articles on the history of social sciences, history of medicine, political anthropology, and social theory.

Thursday, 10 September 2020

HPS.CESEE open access DISSERTATIONS (CEU 2019-2020)

  • Mézes Ádám: Doubt and diagnosis : medical experts and the returning dead of the southern Habsburg borderland. Budapest : Central European University, 2020: http://www.etd.ceu.edu/2020/mezes_adam.pdf

The dissertation interprets the vampire as a case of extraordinary knowledge production on the margins of the known world. I directed the focus at experts entrusted to apply their specialized knowledge on diagnosing the vampiric attack and on regulating the unruly dead. Throughout the first half of the eighteenth century, these expertsserved various social groups: local communities, administrative-judicial structures, aristocratic circles, the republic of letters and aulic political spheres. Thus, historical sources produced on vampires unveil actors, interests and intense negotiations about what is ‘normal’ death and decay, about who is an expert, and what is proof. I argue that knowledge production is social, political, and bears the mark of the environment where it was produced.


  • Kelemen, Ágnes Katalin: Peregrination in the age of the Numerus Clausus : Hungarian Jewish students in interwar Europe. Budapest : Central European University, 2019: http://www.etd.ceu.edu/2020/kelemen_agi.pdf
This dissertation investigates the dynamics between academic antisemitism, Jewish social mobility and Jewish migration through the case study of the “numerus clausus exiles” – as Jewish students who left interwar Hungary due to the antisemitic numerus clausus law (Law XXV of 1920) were called by contemporaries and historians. After a conceptual and historiographic introduction in the first chapter embedding this work in the contexts of Jewish studies, social history and exile studies; interwar Hungarian Jewish peregrination is examined from four different aspects in four chapters based on four different types of sources. In the second chapter an analysis of contemporary Hungarian (Jewish and non-Jewish) discourses is based on pro-Horthy, Conservative, Liberal, Social Democratic, assimilationist Jewish and Zionist press. It is argued that peregrination from Hungary was in the general press recognized as a mostly Jewish phenomenon, caused by the restriction of Jewish access to Hungarian universities, rather than a voluntary movement motivated by thirst for knowledge. In the meantime, the plight of émigré students became a central topic in Jewish press because a new Hungarian Jewish community of fate and identity was built on the support mechanism for numerus clausus exiles. Based on a database of over 1000 Hungarian medical and engineering students enrolled in universities abroad between 1920 and 1938 – Czechoslovakia, the First Austrian Republic, Weimar Germany and Fascist Italy – that the dissertation’s author constructed; the third chapter analyzes the social background of émigré students – most of whom were Jewish. In this way the case is made that studying abroad was a phenomenon of lower middleclass Jewish youth’s upward social mobility through education rather than an escape route reserved for privileged Jews. Ego documents written and edited (in most cases even published) by numerus clausus exiles provide the source base for the fourth chapter which reconstructs their own narratives on their peregrination. The prevalence of interpreting their student migration as exile from the Hungarian homeland unfolds both from autobiographies and memoirs written decades later and from letters sent while studying abroad, albeit with important individual variations. Based on digital databases, the fifth chapter follows up the career and life trajectories of students after their studies abroad. Four basic patterns are distinguished among the biographies of the over 1000 subjects: the most successful ones emigrated to the Western world usually through step-migration through Weimar Germany and did not return to Hungary. Few numerus clausus exiles immigrated to Palestine, however, they played important roles in the higher education and scholarship of Mandate Palestine and later of the State of Israel. Most numerus clausus exiles were forced to return to Hungary in the late 1930s due to the spread of hostility towards foreign Jews across Europe. They belong to two main groups, namely Shoah victims and Shoah survivors. The latter were likely to stay in Hungary for the rest of their lives after liberation, their experience with emigration notwithstanding, because they received opportunities for career advancement earlier denied to them and many believed this was also a chance to redeem Hungary from inequalities and injustices through Socialism. At the same time, quite a few numerus clausus exiles were put on show trials in the Stalinist period due to their past abroad and many more got disillusioned by the discrepancies between the ideal of Communism and the reality of State Socialism. Finally, it is argued in the final conclusions that this study speaks to the larger questions of how a minority can respond to discrimination and how individual initiatives from below can develop into communal agency based on solidarity.

  • Hincu, Adela-Gabriela: Accounting for the "social" in state socialist Romania, 1960s-1980s: contexts and genealogies. Budapest : Central European University, 2019: http://www.etd.ceu.edu/2019/hincu_adela-gabriela.pdf
This dissertation reconstructs the contexts and genealogies of scientific thought on the “social” in state socialist Romania in the 1960s–1980s. New ideas and practices of observing, analyzing, and intervening in the social realities of socialist society emerged beginning in the early 1960s, originally in debates over the canonical disciplines of Marxist-Leninist social science (historical materialism, scientific socialism, and Marxist sociology). These were further developed by Marxist revisionist and humanist Marxist thought on the relationship between individuals and society in socialism, which decentered the collectivist ethos characteristic of “dogmatic” Marxism-Leninist philosophy for most of the 1950s. Made possible by the Marxist humanist breakthrough of the early 1960s, Marxist-Leninist sociology was subsequently established as a separate discipline at the Academy of Social and Political Sciences and at the University of Bucharest. Institutional and intellectual constraints and possibilities were differently configured in these two contexts. For the case of the Academy of Social and Political Sciences, the dissertation emphasizes the dynamic between local, transnational, and global frameworks of knowledge production, and the role of Eastern bloc cooperation in the field of sociology in particular. In the Romanian context, the interplay between local and transnational frames of reference resulted in studies of the social structure of socialist society that sought to rework concepts of everyday Marxism-Leninism—as formulated in party pronouncements and translated into the planning of knowledge production in the social sciences. The most notable among these was the concept of “social homogenization.” Developed since the second half of the 1960s, through to the qualitative turn of the late 1970s, and into the 1980s, its history illustrates the interplay between legitimization and criticism characteristic of Marxist-Leninist sociology. Several student cohorts were trained at the University of Bucharest between 1965, when the sociology department was first established, through to 1977, when the department was disbanded, and in a very restricted sense until the end of the 1980s. As taught at the university, sociology drew on Marxist, interwar, and Western sociological sources. This idiosyncratic intellectual blend underpinned large-scale empirical research on the two main sociological issues of social development (especially in relation to industrialization and urbanization) and scientific management (in relation to social planning). By outlining the context of sociology as practiced at the university alongside oral history accounts by sociology students trained at the time, generational, intellectual, and existential fault lines come to the fore beneath a commonly shared understanding of sociology as an apolitical science of “social engineering” with roots in the interwar period. The second part of the dissertation proposes a “reverse genealogy” of three themes which became part of the imaginary of postsocialist intellectual thought on the social: participation, equality, and welfare. It explores how the three intellectual, institutional, and generational contexts identified in the first part of the dissertation played out in sociological research on mass culture, women’s emancipation, and the quality of life in the 1960s–80s.

  • Szamosi, Barna: The legacy of eugenic discourses in the history of Hungarian medicine. Budapest : Central European University, 2019: http://www.etd.ceu.edu/2019/szamosi_barna.pdf

In my dissertation I explore the legacy of eugenics in the history of Hungarian medicine. In this project I analyze how gender, race/ethnicity, and class play role in shaping medical concerns. And how do medical sciences contribute to empowerment in different historical periods. I was initially interested in how geneticists are producing knowledge about Roma people within Europe and more specifically in Hungary. I started my work with one very narrow question in mind: whether these works contribute to the geneticization of race/ethnicity as Troy Duster, Jonathan Kahn, Dorothy Roberts, Carolyn M. Rouse and many other scholars claim, and if yes, in what ways they do. I was interested in contemporary medical genetic discussions but I was aware that this discourse has continuities with the medical genetic discussions of the socialist period. In order to explore the commonalities and differences between these two, I did 35 interviews with medical geneticists and biologists who take part in research, teaching, or genetic counseling. These were in-depth semi-structured interviews in which I asked about their specific fields, about the continuities that they see with socialist medical aims regarding reproduction, how they see the role of race/ethnicity, gender, and class in shaping genetic concerns, and how would they describe the social relevance of their work. In the interviews I inquired how they view their work in relation to eugenics and their replies pointed towards connections between their work and the eugenic arguments of the early twentieth century. Thus, I became interested in the comparative analysis of eugenic thinking in the Hungarian medical discourse in two historically distant periods. Specifically, the early 1900s and 1910s when eugenics entered the Hungarian medical discourse with the present medical genetic concerns closely connected with the socialist medical practice. Medical genetics as a discipline emerged in the 1960s as a result of biotechnological developments. In the Hungarian literature medical genetic studies were first published around the end of the 60s. Institutions, that incorporated medical genetic knowledge to aid reproductive decision making such as genetic counseling institutes, were established in the 70s. Among the early concerns the degeneration of the population appeared similarly to the early eugenic discourse thus I think it is possible to establish connections between these two. In the early medical genetic publications of the 1970s the main concern was the possible transmission of ’bad’ genes for the future generations and the role that medical genetics could play to avoid that outcome. Their focus was on the female body but explicitly racial or ethnic concerns were not present in genetic argumentation until the early 1980s, although ethnicity based medical studies have appeared in the 1960s and 70s. The aim of population genetic works is to compare the genetic structure of Roma and non-Roma Hungarians in order to design screening panels that would improve the management of their healthcare. I think regarding these medical efforts one of the question to look at is how genetic knowledge empowers people at the intersection of the social categories of gender, class, race/ethnicity? In what ways do geneticists molecularize these social categories? And what are the possible ethical consequences of this practice?

  • Lukic, Dejan: A strong class of serious scholars: the power dynamics of knowledge production in the earth science. Budapest : Central European University, 2019: http://www.etd.ceu.edu/2020/lukic_dejan.pdf

This dissertation examines the social and political factors that conditioned the establishment of the earth sciences in Serbia during the long nineteenth century. It presents the development of scientific circles, institutions, and practices on the European periphery and analyses the power dynamics that stood behind them. At the beginning of the nineteenth century, Serbia was an Ottoman province that was striving to become an independent nation state, in which it ultimately succeeded in 1878. Science was in Serbia intrinsically dependent on the process of state-building and the formation of state elites, in which scholars became the carriers of the process of the transformation of society. The formation of scientific circles, their recognition in Serbian society, and the establishment of institutional, educational, and research practices depended on their successful embeddedness in the contemporary political, intellectual, and social networks. This study exemplifies how notions of expertise and epistemic fields were constructed in the earth sciences, and how scholars divided research and responsibilities among themselves. Through the examination of personal notes, diaries, correspondence, and scientific publications, I have identified the power dynamics and strategies that led some of them to achieve the status of experts, recognised as such either by their colleagues, or by the state administration. In this respect, I have given special attention to the role that state and politics had on the dynamics of these circles, as well as to the role international scientific networks played in the recognition of their expertise. Particular focus is given to the careers of Jovan Žujović and Jovan Cvijić, who established scientific circles around them. Žujović became the primary organiser of scientific research in mineralogy, petrography, geology, palaeontology, and seismology by mobilising his students to study abroad and conduct research in earth sciences. The expansion of the circle led to the creation and division of separate scientific sub-disciplines in which scholars established their expertise. Through the interaction with international scientific networks, these scholars were looking for recognition and affirmation of Belgrade as a new international scientific centre. In this endeavour, Jovan Cvijić turned out to be the most successful. Because of his pragmatically chosen topics, he managed to distinguish himself both internationally and in Serbian public opinion. Both Žujović and Cvijić managed to assert themselves as the founding figures of Serbian science, yet that role depended on their social and political capital as much as it did on their academic capital. Science was strongly embedded in social and political processes and its development was conditioned by successful interaction across multiple social networks.

Monday, 10 August 2020

Włodzimierz Borodziej, Ferenc Laczó, Joachim von Puttkamer (eds.): The Routledge History Handbook of Central and Eastern Europe in the Twentieth Century Volume 3: Intellectual Horizons. New York: Routledge 2020. ISBN 9781138301658



Intellectual Horizons offers a pioneering, transnational and comparative treatment of key thematic areas in the intellectual and cultural history of Central and Eastern Europe in the twentieth century.
For most of the twentieth century, Central and Eastern European ideas and cultures constituted an integral part of wider European trends. However, the intellectual and cultural history of this diverse region has rarely been incorporated sufficiently into nominally comprehensive histories of Europe. This volume redresses this underrepresentation and provides a more balanced perspective on the recent past of the continent through original, critical overviews of themes ranging from the social and conceptual history of intellectuals and histories of political thought and historiography, to literary, visual and religious cultures, to perceptions and representations of the region in the twentieth century. While structured thematically, individual contributions are organized chronologically. They emphasize, where relevant, generational experiences, agendas and accomplishments, while taking into account the sharp ruptures that characterize the period.
The third in a four-volume set on Central and Eastern Europe in the twentieth century, it is the go-to resource for understanding the intellectual and cultural history of this dynamic region.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
Włodzimierz Borodziej and Joachim von Puttkamer
1 Spatial configurations: regional intellectual imageries in twentieth-century Central and Eastern Europe
Diana Mishkova
2 Thinking dangerously: political thought in twentieth-century East Central Europe
Balázs Trencsényi
3 A history of fiction in twentieth-century Central and Eastern Europe
John Neubauer, with Endre Bojtár and Guido Snel
4 Writing history in twentieth-century Eastern Europe
Maciej Górny
5 Nationalization vs. secularization: the Christian churches in East Central Europe
John Connelly
6 Visual cultures: tele-visions
Anikó Imre

EDITOR(S)

Biography

Włodzimierz Borodziej is Professor of History at Warsaw University, Poland.
Ferenc Laczó is Assistant Professor of History at Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
Joachim von Puttkamer is Professor of Eastern European History at Jena University, Germany and Co-Director of the Imre Kertész Kolleg, Germany.

URL: https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-History-Handbook-of-Central-and-Eastern-Europe-in-the-Twentieth/Borodziej-Laczo-Puttkamer/p/book/9781138301658

Arkadiusz S. Więch: Della Croce. Życie i działalność Stanisława Krzyżanowskiego (1865-1917) [Della croce: Life and work of Stanisław Krzyżanowski (1865-1917)].

Arkadiusz S. Więch: Della Croce. Życie i działalność Stanisława Krzyżanowskiego (1865-1917) [Della croce: Life and work of Stanisław Krzyżan...