Monday, 28 April 2025

Aksonova, Natalia – Chlaňová, Tereza – Velychko, Hanna (ed.) Історико-культурний феномен Української господарської академії в Подєбрадах [The historical and cultural phenomenon of the Ukrainian Economic Academy in Poděbrady].

 Aksonova, Natalia – Chlaňová, Tereza – Velychko, Hanna (ed.) Історико-культурний феномен Української господарської академії в Подєбрадах [The historical and cultural phenomenon of the Ukrainian Economic Academy in Poděbrady]. Praha: Karolinum 2025. ISBN: 978-80-246-6017-2


OPEN ACCESS: https://doi.org/10.14712/9788024660172


Konferenční sborník Історико-культурний феномен Української господарської академії в Подєбрадах (Historicko-kulturní fenomén Ukrajinské hospodářské akademie v Poděbradech) představuje aktuální studie věnované problematice ukrajinské emigrace v meziválečném Československu, a zvláště Ukrajinské hospodářské akademii v Poděbradech. Studie jsou ve většině založeny na výzkumu dobových periodik a archivních materiálů a přinášejí celou řadu nových pohledů na tuto komplexní problematiku, která tvoří významnou část ukrajinsko-českých vztahů. Pozornost je věnována nejen peripetiím založení akademie a jejího působení v meziválečném Československu, ale zaměřuje se i na různé aspekty činnosti této vzdělávací instituce a jednotlivé významné osobnosti. Řada studií téma Ukrajinské hospodářské akademie přesahuje a věnuje se širším otázkám a aspektům existence ukrajinské emigrace.


Sunday, 27 April 2025

CFP: Magical Realism and Surrealism in Central and Eastern European Graphic Art between 1945 and 1990

 CFP:  Magical Realism and Surrealism in Central and Eastern European Graphic Art  between 1945 and 1990 -  Szolnok, Damjanich János Museum, Hungary , 04.12.2025 - 05.12.2025, Deadline: 30.04.2025

During the decades of the socialist era (1945-1990), graphic art flourished in Central and Eastern European countries that were under Soviet influence. While reproduction techniques in art were supported by the cultural policy of the socialist state for ideological reasons, graphic art experienced a new renaissance globally. However, one underexplored aspect of this period’s art history is the tendency in graphic art, which did not associate itself neither with the official state art nor fully embraced avant-garde formal experimentations. Instead, it represented an alternative modernism, reflecting a third way approach. It was an intellectual attitude often characterized by escapism, a deep engagement with the use of traditional graphic techniques and the alignment with the pictorial traditions of medieval graphics (for example, echoing Dürer). It emphasized the appreciation of craftsmanship, figurative, narrative and allegorical imagery, and the reinterpretation of Renaissance and Baroque iconographic types. An additional feature of this graphic art was the anachronistic incorporation of post-war scientific achievements and technical machinery related to space exploration and Cold War weaponry into a classicising, mythological milieu.

The conference welcomes papers that contextualize these parallel artistic tendencies within the wider framework of Central and Eastern European graphic art. It is important to give a definite outline of those tendencies of the region that are closely related to surrealism and magic realism. Although these archaic, narrative or metaphorical representations have often been described in art history as apolitical, their esoteric or escapist vision and their frequently self-ironic or grotesque qualities can be interpreted as subtle critiques of their time.We invite papers addressing the following themes in relation to Central and Eastern European graphic art of the period 1945-1990:Surrealist and magic realist tendencies in graphic art of the period

Modern reinterpretations of the classical and Christian mythology (for example, the temptation of St Anthony)

Homage to the old masters such as Dürer, Bosch or Bruegel

Visual traditions and worldviews of folklore as a source for alternative modernism

Hybrid anachronisms: the integration of technical achievements and contemporary political references into traditional iconographic frameworks

The conference gives an occasion to present the outcomes of the research project, funded by the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund, which examines the oeuvre of three Hungarian graphic artists, Margit Ágotha (1938-2015), Mihály Gácsi (1926-1987) and Csaba Rékassy (1937-1989) and outlines their broader historical context. These artists, active primarily between 1960 and 1980 within the socialist art scene, worked extensively with graphic techniques. Rékassy was an exceptional master of engraving, while Margit Ágotha and Mihály Gácsi were experts in relief printing. All three of them were frequently engaged with biblical and mythological themes, often reinterpreting them in contemporary contexts. Rékassy was particularly drawn to ancient mythology, illustrating Ovid’s Metamorphosis, while also interested in space exploration and astronomy; Margit Ágotha created cosmological compositions in the manner of medieval popular engravings, and Gácsi reimagined biblical stories, often alluding to Cold War anxieties in his dystopian visions of the future. Members of our research team will present comparative studies of these artists at the conference.

Conference format: hybrid (in person or online)

Conference languages: Hungarian, English

Location: Szolnok, Damjanich János Museum, Hungary

Date: 4-5 December 2025.

Abstracts (max. 2,000 characters) for 20-minute presentations in Hungarian or English should be submitted to Nándor Szebenyi szebenyi@djm.hu by 30 April 2025.

Notifications of acceptance will be announced by 31 May 2025.

Accommodation in Szolnok will be provided for conference speakers.

We welcome both in person and online participations, please indicate your preference in the application.

Selected proceedings from the conference will be published in a digital format in 2026.

[Image: Mihály Gácsi Noah, 1975 (linocut, 250 x 350 mm, inv.No.: DM 84.13.1.)]

Wednesday, 23 April 2025

CfP: Mathematics and Language A historical Perspective

 Czech Society for History of Science and Technology (SDVT) and

Czech Mathematical Union (JČMF)

cordially invite you to an interdisciplinary workshop

Mathematics and Language

A historical Perspective

Call for contributed papers

Dates: Thursday 12 June 2025 (sessions during the day and social dinner)

Friday 13 June 2025

Venue: Faculty of Education, Masaryk University, Poříčí 538/31, Brno CZ, room 37

With its variety of symbolism and specific terminology in its various branches, mathematicians seem to

speak different languages. That mathematics in itself is a language is generally accepted, since it has

been viewed as the language of nature since the early modern period. Closer to our days, it was a

mathematical language that underlined the development of programming languages. Mathematics

teaching in the late twentieth century even had the function of teaching proper ways of expressing

one’s ideas; and the linguistic metaphors go even further: in order to use (apply) mathematics, we may

speak of translating the real-life problem into mathematics and after tackling the problem

mathematically, we interpret the results. There are many intrinsic connections between mathematics

and language, but they form but one link between the two.

In different cultures, from Ancient to Modern times, mathematics was done differently. Studying

mathematical practices in the different cultures has long been a topic that inspired philosophers and

historians of mathematics. Studying the different practices leads to erosion of the belief that

mathematics is universal. Mathematics is done by people who have their specific background,

purposes, and ways of expressing themselves. Opening the field of mathematical practice and studying

mathematical culture in different land and in different languages is a playground for historians of

mathematics: mathematics is local and mathematical results relevant for the particular period of time.

An intriguing connection between mathematics and language arises with the issue of translation and

speaking other languages. The language of communication became an issue in the context of

internationalism around 1900. Keen to communicate with their colleagues from other countries

directly, mathematicians developed symbolic languages, discarding the use of ordinary language in

mathematics. At the same period of time, many mathematicians became interested in a language that

would be easy to learn, even though it would be a foreign language for everybody. Esperanto was

embraced by several mathematicians of the time.

While in the nineteenth century, practising mathematics in a certain language was an issue connected

with national revival, stemming from romanticism, in the twentieth century, the language in which

mathematics was written also revealed political choices. The number and choice of official languages

at an international congress depended also on the countries allowed to participate in the congresses.

There are many other issues that connect the two areas, mathematics and language, in the methods of

study, in mutual interactions between mathematics and linguistics, including the problem of translation

and transcription of Ancient mathematics and the meta-debates involved in that issue as well as

practical considerations of translation. The two-day workshop seeks to bring together scholars who

would like to present their work in this perspective.

Invited speakers:

Frédéric Metin (CNRS and INSPÉ Bourgogne, France)

Elías Fuentes Guillén (CAS Prague, Czechia)

We invite scholars to send abstracts of their proposed talks (between 200 and 500 words) to

hdurnova@ped.muni.cz by Thursday 1 May 2025. Notification of acceptance by 10 May 2025.

Topics include, but are not limited to the history of:

o Mathematics as language.

o Mathematics practised in different languages.

o Geometry in Engineering, Nomography and other outdated disciplines ,

o Translating mathematics.

Selected papers may be published in a special issue of the journal History of Sciences and Technology

https://dvt-journal.cz/en/ (ISSN 0300-4414 print, 2788-3485 online).

Conference fee: EUR 30 or CZK 600, payable on site or through bank transfer.

Contact e-mail: hdurnova@ped.muni.cz

Looking forward to seeing you in Brno!

Helena Durnová (Brno) & Jan Kotůlek (Ostrava)

This workshop is a part of the series Mathematics and Society,

https://math-and-society.webnode.page/

Sunday, 20 April 2025

Hubert Mazur: Historia na dotyk. Działalność edukacyjna polskich archiwów państwowych w zakresie współpracy ze szkołami (1919-2018) [Touching the history. Educational activities of Polish state archives in cooperation with schools (1919-2018)].

 Hubert Mazur: Historia na dotyk. Działalność edukacyjna polskich archiwów państwowych w zakresie współpracy ze szkołami (1919-2018) [Touching the history. Educational activities of Polish state archives in cooperation with schools (1919-2018)]. Kraków: wydawnictwo UP 2025. ISBN 978-83-68260-85-4


Monografia stanowi pierwsze w polskiej nauce tak kompleksowe i pogłębione opracowanie zagadnienia praktycznej realizacji funkcji edukacyjnej archiwów państwowych w kontekście ich współpracy ze szkołami. Nowatorskie ujęcie tematu, poparte szeroką analizą źródeł i praktyk, czyni z publikacji istotny wkład w rozwój archiwistyki oraz pedagogiki. Autor ukazuje archiwa jako instytucje aktywnie uczestniczące w procesie edukacyjnym i społecznym, przekraczające tradycyjne ramy swojej działalności. Praca inspiruje do refleksji nad aktualnym stanem i perspektywami funkcjonowania polskich archiwów państwowych, zwracając uwagę na ich rosnącą rolę w kształtowaniu świadomości historycznej i obywatelskiej.

Peter Urbanitsch: "... das Schulwesen ist und bleibet allzeit ein Politicum ..." Aspekte zur cisleithanischen Bildungsgeschichte 1848‒1918

 Peter Urbanitsch: "... das Schulwesen ist und bleibet allzeit ein Politicum ..." Aspekte zur cisleithanischen Bildungsgeschichte 1848‒1918. Vienna: ÖAW 2025. ISBN 978-3-7001-9417-0

1848 setzte ein umfassender Modernisierungsprozess des Bildungswesens in der Habsburgermonarchie ein, dessen Auswirkungen bis in die Gegenwart erkennbar sind. Entsprechend dem liberal-aufklärerischen Ethos sollte das Bildungsniveau gehoben, der Einfluss der Kirche verringert, die Urteilsfähigkeit gestärkt, das eigenständige Denken angeregt und der Jugend ein an Kaiser und Reich orientierter Patriotismus eingeimpft werden. Die Vermittlung praktischer Kenntnisse sollte das wirtschaftliche Fortkommen ermöglichen. Das Reichvolksschulgesetz von 1869 brachte einen entscheidenden Aufschwung für das Primärschulwesen. Unmittelbar vor dem Ersten Weltkrieg wurden fast alle Volksschulkinder in der Muttersprache unterrichtet. Das Sprachenproblem spielte auch im höheren Schulwesen eine wichtige Rolle. Nicht allen Nationalitäten stand ein kompletter Bildungsweg „von der Wiege bis zur Bahre“ zur Verfügung. Die Gymnasien waren dem neuhumanistischen Bildungsideal verpflichtet. Dagegen trugen die Realschulen und die berufsbildenden Schulen den Erfordernissen eines neuen, von Naturwissenschaften und Technik geprägten Weltbildes Rechnung. Auch die Universitäten und anderen Hohen Schulen folgten diesem Trend. In vielen Fächern wurden Spitzenleistungen erzielt. Allerdings konnten nur sehr wenige junge Männer, und sehr spät und in noch geringerer Zahl junge Frauen, eine sekundäre oder tertiäre Bildungsanstalt besuchen. Umso bedeutsamer war das von der Zivilgesellschaft getragene, breit gefächerte Volksbildungswesen. Zwar wurden nicht überall die bereits 1848 formulierten Ziele erreicht, dennoch schufen die von Staat, Ländern, Gemeinden, Interessenvertretungen und der Zivilgesellschaft gesetzten Maßnahmen eine feste Basis zur Bewältigung der neuen Herausforderungen auch nach dem Ende der Habsburgermonarchie.


Tatiana Efrussi: Hannes Meyer: Soviet Architect.

 Tatiana Efrussi: Hannes Meyer: Soviet Architect. Life and Work in the USSR, 1930-1936. Vernon Press 2025. ISBN: ‎ 9798881901813


Swiss architect and urban planner, the second director of the Bauhaus Dessau, Hannes Meyer, spent about six years in the USSR-from 1930 to 1936. This book presents the first in-depth study of Hannes Meyer's activities during the years of early Stalinism. There is a global interest in this architect's legacy today, but his work can hardly be understood without a closer examination of the key chapter in his career.

This book is an attempt to challenge the usual Western-centered perspective and explore not only what Meyer could bring to the Soviet Union but also what he sought to learn there and how this interaction influenced his work and thinking. The somewhat provocative title underscores this thesis. A detailed reconstruction of his professional activities during this period was made possible through archival research in several countries (Russia, Germany, Austria, and Switzerland) and field trips across Russia. In the end, the narrative offers a glimpse into the Soviet architectural context of the 1930s-networks, hierarchies, behavioral strategies, theories, and interpretations of major polemical concepts such as "proletarian architecture" and "socialist realism." Among the projects for "socialist cities," Meyer was commissioned to create the urban plan for the capital of the Jewish Autonomous Region in the USSR-Birobidzhan. The dedicated book chapter explores his involvement in the search for a distinct Soviet "Jewish style."

Hannes Meyer, the most controversial of the architects associated with the Bauhaus, was passionately involved in politics, and available documents indicate his desire to become a "Soviet architect" at all costs. The research allows us to view Meyer not only as a victim but also as an actor in the early Stalinist system based on violence.

Dr. Tatiana Efrussi is an architecture and art historian as well as an artist. She was born in Moscow and is currently based in Paris. Since 2010, she has been researching the influence of political ideas on architectural practice and urban realities in both Soviet and German contexts in the 20th century. In 2011, she graduated from the Department of Art History of the Moscow State Lomonosov University with a paper on connections between Bauhaus and the USSR. As a researcher at the Museum of the Moscow Architectural Institute (MARKhI), she curated the exhibition 'Bauhaus in Moscow' in 2012. Her doctoral research dedicated to Hannes Meyer's life in the USSR during the early Stalinist period was supported by the Ernst Ludwig Ehrlich Scholarship Fund. She defended her in 2020 at the Department of Architectural Theory and Design, University of Kassel in Germany. In parallel, Efrussi continued her art practice and studies and, in 2021, graduated from the Beaux-Arts de Paris school.From 2018 to 2019, Efrussi collaborated with the 'Bauhaus Imaginista' project, initiated by Marion von Osten and Grant Watson. In 2019-2020, she worked as a research consultant for the traveling exhibition 'The City of Tomorrow', curated by Ruben Arevshatyan and Georg Schölhammer. Efrussi has published essays on topics including Hannes Meyer, the Bauhaus, Soviet architecture, and contemporary Russian urbanism in scholarly collections and magazines in Russia, Germany, and Switzerland.

Wednesday, 16 April 2025

CFP: History of Knowledge - Lund 10/2025

 CFP: History of Knowledge - Lund 10/2025, deadline 01.05.2025



-----


In November 2023, the first ever international History of Knowledge Conference was organized in Porto, bringing together experts from a wide range of historical research fields. Following this successful event, the Lund Centre for the History of Knowledge (LUCK) is proud to host the second international History of Knowledge Conference on 8–10 October, 2025.


In recent years, the history of knowledge has been established as a vibrant field within historical scholarship. The History of Knowledge Conference aims to gather scholars from different backgrounds to continue to develop the field of history of knowledge and inspire international collaboration.


History of Knowledge Conference

------------


The Lund Centre for the History of Knowledge (LUCK) will host the second international History of Knowledge Conference on 8–10 October, 2025.


We welcome papers and panels on any period, region and topic, as long as they are clearly related and relevant to the history of knowledge. However, we particularly encourage the submission of papers and panels that tie in with one or several of the six research focus areas at LUCK:

- history of the humanities

- everyday knowledge

- early modern knowledge societies

- postwar knowledge societies

- knowledge and education

- digitisation, historical scholarship and circulation of knowledge

and/or the submission of papers and panels that

- contribute to further developing (empirically, methodologically, theoretically or otherwise) the analytical concepts that have been crucial in shaping the history of knowledge as a field (these include, for example, the circulation of knowledge, knowledge actors, knowledge institutions, forms of knowledge, infrastructures of knowledge, formats of knowledge, knowledge societies, orders of knowledge and hierarchies of knowledge).


Keynote Speakers:

Robert Darnton (Harvard University): Title TBA

Susanne Schmidt (Berlin): Title TBA


More information: https://newhistoryofknowledge.com/2025/02/17/the-history-of-knowledge-conference/.

Nicoleta Roman , Beatrice Zucca Micheletto (eds.) Women, Migration and the Exchange of Knowledge from the Sixteenth to the Twenty-first Century: Connecting Europe, Reintegrating the East

 Nicoleta Roman , Beatrice Zucca Micheletto (eds.) Women, Migration and the Exchange of Knowledge from the Sixteenth to the Twenty-first Century: Connecting Europe, Reintegrating the East. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan 2025. ISBN 978-3-031-73981-1

About this book

This book examines female migration between Eastern and Western Europe from the sixteenth to the twentieth century. Bringing together contributions from scholars working in diverse disciplines, the book focuses on the social, economic, and cultural exchanges between migrants and the inhabitants of their host countries, arguing that women were central to these interactions due to their commercial, artisanal, and intellectual skills. The chapters shed light on the various roles and professions that women undertook when migrating across Europe, providing case studies of governesses, domestic servants and caregivers, traders and merchants, doctors and scholars, and emphasising how these roles shaped their identities. The authors illustrate how social mobility was engendered by skilled migration and academic mobility, whilst also illuminating the prejudices and challenges that faced women as they attempted to integrate into their new host societies alongside their families. Taking a comparative approach to explore the experiences of migrants across a range of countries in Europe, and over a vast period from the Habsburg, Ottoman, and Russian Empires up until today, this collection provides insights into the long history of migration between Eastern and Western Europe.

Nicoleta Roman is a researcher at the ‘Nicolae Iorga’ Institute of History of the Romanian Academy and at New Europe College- Institute for Advanced Study, both in Bucharest, Romania. Her research interests revolve around social and economic history, gender and the history of women and children in (pre)modern Romania and Southeastern Europe.

Beatrice Zucca Micheletto is a researcher in the Department of Cultures, Politics and Society  at the University of Turin, Italy where she teaches Economic History of Migration. Her research focuses on economic and social history, women and gender history, migration history and labour history of early modern and modern Europe inItaly and France.

Sunday, 13 April 2025

CHORUS & hps.cesee global book talk: Soviet SCI_BERIA

 CHORUS & hps.cesee global book talk: Soviet SCI_BERIA. Thursday, April 24, 10:00 am ET / 16:00 CET / 17:00 Kyiv, Zoom.

ABOUT THIS EVENT

Virtual platforms CHORUS (Colloquium for the History of Russian and Soviet Science) & HPS.CESEE (History of Science in Central, Eastern, and Southeastern Europe) are inviting you to the forthcoming discussion of a new book on the history of Soviet science cities. Katja Doose and Ivan Boldyrev will join Ksenia Tatarchenko to comment on her recent book: Soviet SCI_BERIA: The Politics of Expertise and the Novosibirsk Scientific Center [1], in a discussion moderated by Slava Gerovitch.

Thursday, April 24, 10:00 am ET / 16:00 CET / 17:00 Kyiv, Zoom.

The meeting is free and open to the public. To receive the Zoom link, please register here: https://forms.gle/cikxo7tqhDXwSh7b9 or write to hps.cesee@gmail.com.

[1] Soviet SCI_BERIA: The Politics of Expertise and the Novosibirsk Scientific Center. London: Bloomsbury Academic 2024.

“At first glance, the Novosibirsk Scientific Center, or Akademgorodok, appears as an outlier in academic excellence. This 'science city' is renowned for a preeminent university, dozens of research institutes, and a thriving technopark. At home, it is an emblem of Russian innovation; abroad, it is often portrayed as a potential threat, a breeding ground of cyber soldiers. Though Siberia has been the main source of post-1991 Russian carbon revenues, its soviet history and cold war legacy of internationalism demonstrates that territorial and scientific dimensions interlocked the moment the Siberian Branch of the Soviet Academy of Sciences was created in 1957.

Drawing on a wide range of previously unexplored archives, Soviet SCI_BERIA focuses on how the post-Stalinist Siberia was redefined and represented through the ideal of rational development, the late socialist innovation practices, and the relationship between experts and the state. It offers a fresh insight into the transition from Soviet to post-Soviet Akademgorodok. In doing so, Tatarchenko not only fosters a conversation between history, area studies, and science studies but also sheds new light on Soviet modernity and the limits of its transformative projects.”

Participants

Ivan Boldyrev is a philosopher and an historian of ideas, with interests in economics, German idealism, sociology of knowledge, and critical theory. He currently works as assistant professor of history and philosophy of economics at the Radboud University Nijmegen. His most recent publications are (co-edited, with Till Düppe) Economic Knowledge in Socialism, 1945-1989, Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy. Duke University Press, 2019, and Die Ohnmacht des Spekulativen: Elemente einer Poetik von Hegels “Phänomenologie des Geistes.“ Wilhelm Fink, 2021. More information https://ivanboldyrev.net/about.html

Katja Doose is an environmental historian and a historian of science for Russia and the Soviet Union at the University of Lyon and Fribourg. Her research focuses on the history of Russian and Soviet earth science and the experiences of human-nature interactions from the late 19th to the 20th century. She is currently working on her book manuscript entitled "White Coal for white gold. An environmental history of glacier studies in Central Asia". She leads the SNF project "Myths of equality. A gendered history of science in Central Asia, 1870-1970" (2024-2027).  More information: https://www.unifr.ch/directory/en/people/334449/232f7

Ksenia Tatarchenko is a specialist in late Soviet history and the Cold War history of computing and AI. She has taught in the United States, Switzerland, and Singapore, and works currently at the John Hopkins University in Baltimore. She received her Ph.D. from the History of Science Program, History Department, Princeton University (2013). Her dissertation “A House with the Window to the West: The Akademgorodok Computer Center, 1958-1993” was awarded the Charles Babbage Institute 2012-2013 Erwin & Adelle Tomash Fellowship. Her publications include “Algorithm’s Cradle: Commemorating al-Khwarizmi in the Soviet History of Mathematics and Cold War Computer Science,” Osiris 38, 2023, pp. 286-304 and (co-edited, with Grégory Dufaud) Les vies de la science sous le socialisme tardif, 1945-1991. Special issue of Cahiers d’histoire russe, est-européenne, caucasienne et centrasiatique 63/1, 2022. More information: https://smu-sg.academia.edu/KseniaTatarchenko

Slava Gerovitch teaches history of mathematics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). He holds two PhDs: one in philosophy of science (from the Institute for the History of Natural Sciences and Technology in Moscow) and one in history and social study of science and technology (from MIT's Science, Technology and Society Program). He has written extensively on the history of Soviet mathematics, cybernetics, cosmonautics, and computing. He is the author of From Newspeak to Cyberspeak: A History of Soviet Cybernetics (2002), Voices of the Soviet Space Program (2014), and Soviet Space Mythologies (2015). More information: https://web.mit.edu/slava/homepage

Stephan Rindlisbacher. Borders in Red: Managing Diversity in the Early Soviet Union.

Stephan Rindlisbacher. Borders in Red: Managing Diversity in the Early Soviet Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2025.  ISBN: 978-1-5017-8053-0.


Borders in Red shows how Lenin and his Bolshevik leadership embraced the nationality question as a way of managing diversity and institutionalized it as a means of governance. Stephan Rindlisbacher uses the making of national borders as a lens through which to examine the Bolsheviks' fundamental shift from proletarian internationalism to ethnonational federalism sui generis. Comparing how party and state managed issues of national diversity in the core regions of Soviet federalism—Ukraine, the South Caucasus, and Central Asia—Rindlisbacher provides insights into their policymaking and into the roots of current territorial conflicts.

President Putin has condemned Lenin's nationality policy to be a historical mistake, and with its war against Ukraine, Russia has tried to revise borders that date back to the early days of the Soviet state. However, Borders in Red shows that the Soviet Republics were not arbitrarily divided by leaders like Stalin or Khrushchev. They were the result of long-lasting debates involving politicians, experts, and people from the border regions. The developing Soviet order was a product of trial and error.

CFP: Aristokratie und Naturwissenschaft - Prag 06/2025

 CFP: Aristokratie und Naturwissenschaft - Prag 06/2025


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Die DGGTB lädt am 22.06.2025 zu ihrer 33. Jahrestagung in das Nationaltechnische Museum Prag ein. Das Tagungsthema widmet sich der Rolle der Aristokratie in der Entwicklung der Naturwissenschaften.


Aristokratie und Naturwissenschaft

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geschichte und Theorie der Biologie e. V. (DGGTB), 170 78 Prag (Czech Republic)

22.06.2025

Bewerbungsschluss: 30.04.2025


Ob als aktive Forscher, begeisterte Sammler oder großzügige Förderer wissenschaftlicher Institutionen und Entdeckungsreisen die Aristokratie prägte die Wissenschaften auf vielfältige Weise. Die Tagung lädt zu Vorträgen ein, die sich mit der Bedeutung adeliger Netzwerke, Schirmherrschaften und Sammlungen für die Wissensproduktion befassen und die Auswirkungen dieser Faktoren auf wissenschaftliche Debatten und Praktiken untersuchen.


Zentrale Fragestellungen können sein:


1. Adelige als Forscher Forscher als Adelige

Zahlreiche Adelige engagierten sich aktiv in der Forschung und leisteten bedeutende Beiträge zur Entwicklung der verschiedenen wissenschaftlichen Disziplinen. Gleichzeitig wurden viele Forscher aufgrund ihrer herausragenden Leistungen in verschiedenen Ländern in den Adelsstand erhoben. zwischen Aristokratie und Wissenschaft wirft interessante Fragen auf: Wie lässt sich dieses Phänomen anhand konkreter Beispiele untersuchen? Welche relevanten prosopographischen Analysen existieren zu diesem Thema? Welche spezifischen Merkmale und Besonderheiten sind in diesem Kontext hervorzuheben?


2. Förderung, Mäzenatentum, Schirmherrschaft

Viele Adelsfamilien traten als bedeutende Förderer der Wissenschaft und Forschung in Erscheinung. Ihre Rolle war häufig nicht nur symbolisch, sondern auch von praktischer Bedeutung. Welche bemerkenswerten Beispiele lassen sich in diesem Zusammenhang anführen? Welches Ausmaß und welche Relevanz hatten sie in der jeweiligen Wissenschaftspolitik? Darüber hinaus stellt sich die Frage, welche Traditionslinien bis in die Gegenwart erkennbar sind.


3. Sammlungen und Institutionen

Durch die Förderung des Adels konnten bedeutende Sammlungen, insbesondere an königlichen Höfen, sowie Institutionen, die inzwischen Tradition haben, gegründet werden. Wie ist dieser Zusammenhang historisch zu bewerten? Welche Rolle spielten diese Sammlungen beispielsweise für die spätere museale Praxis? In welcher Weise wurden sie wissenschaftlich aufgearbeitet und bearbeitet?


4. Reisen und Entdeckungen

Dank ihrer finanziellen Ressourcen nahmen Adelige im 19. Jahrhundert an den Welt und Entdeckungsreisen teil, was der Wissenschaft in vielerlei Hinsicht zugutekam. Dabei sind jedoch bei der Überführung von Objekten auch grundlegende ethische Fragen aufgeworfen worden. Wie lässt sich der Beitrag des Adels zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte in diesem Kontext analysieren?


5. Ökonomisierung der Erkenntnisse

Der Großgrundbesitz stellte einen spezifischen Rahmen für das Testen, Entwickeln und Implementieren neuer neuer Arbeitsmethoden dar. Besonders in der Landwirtschaft und im Forstwesen wurden rationalisierte Methoden erprobt und angewandt. Welche Traditionslinien lassen sich hier in einer historischen Perspektive erkennen? Wie gestaltete sich der Austausch von Informationen und Erfahrungen, und welche Relevanz haben diese , und welche Relevanz haben diese Aspekte in der heutigen Zeit? Aspekte in der heutigen Zeit?


6. Tradition und Weltanschauung

Durch ihre überwiegend konservative Position in der Politik und ihre öffentliche Amtsausübung konnten Adelige maßgeblich die weltanschaulichen Debatten und Positionierungen ihrer Zeit beeinflussen. Welchen Einfluss hatten diese Einstellungen auf die Einführung und Durchsetzung neuer Denkrichtungen, wie der Evolutionstheorie?


Zur Bewerbung: Besonders erwünscht sind Beiträge, die mehrere Aspekte des Themas zusammenführen. Die Tagungssprachen sind Deutsch und Englisch. Für die Tagung sind für die einzelnen Vorträge im Umfang von 15 bis 20 Minuten mit anschließender Diskussion (5 bis 10 Minuten) vorgesehen.


Themenvorschläge im Umfang von ca. 2 000 Zeichen (inkl. Leerzeichen) werden bis zum 30. April 2025 erbeten an: Dr . Karl Porges, Friedrich Schiller Universität Jena, E Mail: karl.porges@uni jena.de (Postanschrift: Am Steiger 3, 07743 Jena). Bitte teilen Sie auch einige kurze Angaben zu Ihrer Person (Funktion, Wirkungsstätte) mit. Die Rückmeldung über die Annahme oder Ablehnung des Vorschlags erfolgt voraussichtlich bis zum 15. Mai 2025.


Die Beiträge der Jahrestagung können nach Begutachtung im 29. Band der Verhandlungen zur Geschichte und Theorie der Biologie (Springer-Verlag) veröffentlicht werden.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

karl.porges@uni-jena.de

Wednesday, 9 April 2025

call for papers: Vladimír Karbusický (1925–2002): An Academic at the Crossroads of Disciplines and Ideologies

 call for papers: Vladimír Karbusický (1925–2002): An Academic at the Crossroads of Disciplines and Ideologies


The year 2025 marks the centennial of the birth of Czech musicologist and ethnologist Vladimír Karbusický (1925–2002). Karbusický’s active and prolific career spanned several decades and reflected the changing landscape and the paradoxes of Czechoslovak socialist-era social sciences and humanities. In the 1950s, Karbusický began as a folklorist in the newly established Academy of Sciences and participated in a large ideologically influenced research project focused on the mining region around Kladno. The Khrushchev thaw allowed him to seek inspiration in trends outside the Eastern Block, and Karbusický began to establish himself in international scholarly networks. His interests ranged from musicology to aesthetics, folklore, semiotics, history, sociology, and philosophy. This period ended with the invasion of Czechoslovakia and the publication of his iconoclastic book on Lenin’s theory of reflection. The situation made Karbusický emigrate to West Germany where he was appointed a professor at the University of Hamburg. After the fall of socialism in 1989, he regularly returned to his home country and established collaborations with Czech institutions.

Following Karbusický’s career footsteps and using him as an example, we invite scholars to join us in exploring some of the pertinent issues of the twentieth-century social sciences and humanities in Central Europe. We would like to focus on the following themes:

Karbusický, his life and work;

Interdisciplinarity between musicology, ethnology, and beyond;

Clashes between individual ambitions and the socialist institutions;

The many guises of politics in socialist-era scholarship;

The crossing of the Iron Curtain and the growing internationalization in the social sciences after the 1950s; and

Émigré scholars and their relationships to their home countries.

Conference dates: November 7–8, 2025

Conference venue: Musicological Library of the Institute of Art History, Czech Academy of Sciences, Puškinovo náměstí 9, 160 00 Prague

Submission guidelines: Please send your abstract of max. 1800 characters/250 words to Matěj Kratochvíl (kratochvil@eu.cas.cz) and Václav Kapsa (kapsa@udu.cas.cz) by May 30, 2025. You will be notified about the selection of submissions in June 2025. We expect the final papers to be 20 minutes long. The language of the conference will be English.

The conference is organized by the Institute of Ethnology and the Institute of Art History of the Czech Academy of Sciences.

Download pdf here (https://www.eu.avcr.cz/export/sites/eu/.content/files/cfp_karbusicky.pdf).

online seminar in environmental history of Eastern Europe and Eurasia with Rikki Brown giving a talk about Georgian winemaking

 The next ESEH online seminar in environmental history of Eastern Europe and Eurasia will take place on April 15, 16:00 CET, with Rikki Brown giving a talk about Georgian winemaking and Daniela Ana as a discussant. Please register to get the Zoom-link and invite others who might be interested https://forms.gle/epGRgzg9umrqywW38


CFP: Between Tradition and Innovation: Universities as Places of Knowledge from the Middle Ages to the Foundations of Modern Knowledge Societies

 CFP: Between Tradition and Innovation: Universities as Places of Knowledge from the Middle Ages to the Foundations of Modern Knowledge Societies - Praha, 11/2025


Universities have always been central hubs of knowledge production, dissemination, and transformation. From their emergence as scholastic institutions in the Middle Ages, they have constantly navigated the tension between tradition and innovation. In this dynamic process of continuity and change, universities have played a crucial role in shaping intellectual progress while simultaneously being influenced by profound social, political, and technological transformations.


A particular emphasis is placed on European universities in the Middle Ages and the Early Modern period, epochs of profound transformation that laid the foundations for modern knowledge societies. Also welcome are contributions dealing with later periods.

The Atelier Héloïse Workshop in Prague explores the challenges universities face as actors in knowledge spaces, situated at the intersection of tradition and innovation. The focus lies on understanding the factors that have shaped universities as centres of intellectual exchange, institutional adaptation, and global networking. The workshop examines how universities and their members have responded to external challenges and opportunities, whether through successful adaptation or failed strategies.


Incorporating insights from digital history, the workshop also aims to explore how new digital tools and methods can deepen our understanding of the historical development of universities and their impact on knowledge societies.


Among other things, contributions are welcome dealing with:

1) Universities as centres of knowledge (intellectual practices, knowledge production, changes in the structure of knowledge, the ways of communicating knowledge to students, developing methodologies)

2) Universities within social, political, and technological transformations and their reaction to these processes (successful or failed adaptations, the causes of both these phenomena, etc.)   

3) Ways of knowledge dissemination and circulation (literary production, other types of dissemination via various media, correspondence, etc.)


Submission Guidelines

If you are interested in participating in the event, please submit a paper proposal in English by 15th May 2025 to cisar-brown@hiu.cas.cz. Your submission should include a 300–500 word abstract and a brief CV (maximum one page); you will be notified about the result by the end of June. The conference will be in English. The organising committee reserves the right to select papers.


Selected papers may be considered for publication in an edited volume.


We look forward to your submissions and an engaging discussion on the historical trajectories of universities as knowledge spaces!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr Lucy Císař Brown: cisar-brown@hiu.cas.cz

Sunday, 6 April 2025

Bartłomiej Perlak, Grzegorz Strauchold, Jerzy Korczak, Rafał Nowakowski: Od izolacji do resocjalizacji. 100 lat historii więziennictwa w niepodległej Polsce [From isolation to rehabilitation. 100 years of prison history in independent Poland]

 Bartłomiej Perlak, Grzegorz Strauchold, Jerzy Korczak, Rafał Nowakowski: Od izolacji do resocjalizacji. 100 lat historii więziennictwa w niepodległej Polsce [From isolation to rehabilitation. 100 years of prison history in independent Poland]. Wroclaw: WUW 2025. ISBN 9788322939130


Więzienia i kara pozbawienia wolności towarzyszą społeczeństwom od starożytności, jednak sposób ich wykonywania zmieniał się z upływem czasu. Polski system penitencjarny przeszedł fundamentalne zmiany po odzyskaniu przez Rzeczpospolitą niepodległości po zaborach.

7 i 8 lutego 1919 roku Naczelnik Państwa Józef Piłsudski wydał dwa dekrety o organizacji więziennictwa w odrodzonej  Polsce. Na ich podstawie określono kompetencje Służby Więziennej, która została poddana rygorom wojskowym, a więzienia trafiły pod zarząd Ministerstwa Sprawiedliwości. Od tego momentu system penitencjarny przeszedł długą drogę, podlegając zmianom wynikającym z przemian ustrojowych przed i po drugiej wojnie światowej.

Od izolacji do resocjalizacji. 100 lat historii więziennictwa w niepodległej Polsce to książka, która szczegółowo ukazuje tę transformację. Autorzy analizują zmiany w przepisach prawa oraz ideologiczne przekształcenia, które wpływały na funkcjonowanie instytucji penitencjarnych. Opisują stosowany pierwotnie, tradycyjny model izolacyjno-represyjny oraz rosnącą stopniowo rolę resocjalizacji.

Dzięki interdyscyplinarnemu podejściu, łączącemu historię, prawo i socjologię, powstało studium, które kompleksowo omawia problematykę więziennictwa i wykonywania kary pozbawienia wolności w Polsce w XX wieku. Jest ono także próbą znalezienia odpowiedzi na pytanie o przyszłość polskiego więziennictwa, dążącego do równowagi między karą a resocjalizacją.

Książka Od izolacji do resocjalizacji. 100 lat historii więziennictwa w niepodległej Polsce. Wybrane aspekty to zestaw artykułów naukowych poświęconych różnym aspektom funkcjonowania systemu więziennictwa w Polsce po roku 1918. Jest to udany zbiór, przybliżający meandry funkcjonowania więziennictwa na ziemiach polskich w XX wieku. Każdy z tekstów przyczynia się do poszerzenia stanu wiedzy o uwarunkowaniach polityki penitencjarnej w omawianym okresie oraz czynnikach wpływających na jej formułę. Od prezentacji warunków architektoniczno-urbanistycznych do praktycznego funkcjonowania systemu więziennictwa w okresie II wojny światowej i w latach Polskiej Rzeczypospolitej Ludowej.

Z recenzji prof. dr. hab. Piotra Mickiewicza,

Uniwersytet Gdański

Monografia pod redakcją J. Korczaka, R. Nowakowskiego, B. Perlaka i G. Straucholda nie jest jedynie kolejną publikacją na temat historii więziennictwa w Polsce w ciągu ostatnich 100 lat. Ma ona szczególny walor poznawczy, gdyż prezentuje w ujęciu interdyscyplinarnym zarówno historyczny, jak i polityczny, społeczny, kulturowy oraz prawny wymiar polityki penitencjarnej na ziemiach polskich. Publikacja, która prezentuje dorobek teoretyków i praktyków, doskonale oddaje dynamikę zmian wywołanych kolejnymi transformacjami ustrojowymi i wydarzeniami wojennymi, ilustrując jednocześnie potężne wyzwania, jakie procesy te postawiły przed służbą więzienną i samymi osadzonymi. Jest to wciągająca lektura nie tylko dla historyków, ale również prawników, socjologów i wszystkich czytelników zainteresowanych problematyką polskiego więziennictwa.

Z recenzji dr. hab. Macieja Cesarza,

Uniwersytet Wrocławski

Call for Papers: Masterclass "Truth Politics between Science and Society (1960s– today)"

  Call for Papers: Masterclass "Truth Politics between Science and Society (1960s– today)"

Where: University of Erfurt, Germany

When: July 10, 2025

Deadline for submissions: April 30, 2025


In light of a dwindling public trust in science (Oreskes 2019) and ambiguous calls for a ‘return to truth’ (Cain et al. 2019), understanding the relationship between science and a democratic public, the delineation of appropriate scientific practices, and how to reconcile conflicting interpretations of reality seems to be more relevant than ever. From 1960s counterculture to the 1990s Science Wars and up to todays’ (sometimes even official governmental) anti-intellectualism, academic, political, and epistemological debates have been closely interlinked. With a focus on the Science Wars, the masterclass aims to map and historicize the shifting epistemological landscapes from an international perspective informed by methods of Historical and Political Epistemology.

The masterclass is part of the workshop “Truth Politics between Science and Society. Political Epistemologies of the 1990s Science Wars” (July 8-9, 2025). It will be led by Jamie Cohen-Cole (George Washington University), Bernhard Kleeberg (Erfurt University), and Anja Laukötter (Friedrich Schiller University Jena). We invite early career researchers (Master and PhD students) to explore historical debates at the nexus of truth, science, and society.

In line with the perspective of Historical and Political Epistemology, the following questions might be worth considering:

- What were the socio-political effects of deploying scientific concepts, rhetorics, and arguments (e.g. truth, objectivity, rationalism, the scientific method, academic freedom) in particular historical contexts?

- What kind of political and social imaginations about the future of science and the (democratic) public informed these different positions?

- What kinds of subjectivities and narratives about science and society were re-/asserted?

In particular, we invite paper proposals with an international and transnational perspective on the reception of the Science Wars and related debates, as well as similar struggles that played out in different academic cultures and national contexts. Moreover, the role of new channels of communication and media, and how they shaped debates in public-academic arenas represent an important topic to explore.

We invite early career researchers to send a short CV, and a 300-word abstract of their research to forschungsstelle.wahrheit@uni-erfurt.de. The deadline for submission is April 30, 2025. Applicants will be notified of the acceptance of their proposal by mid-May. Accepted participants are required to send in their full paper (about 20 pages) by June 16, 2025. All papers will be pre-circulated and constitute compulsory reading for the masterclass.

The masterclass is jointly organized by the research center “Politics of Truth/Political Epistemologies” at the University of Erfurt, the Lumina Quaeruntur project "'Images of science' in Czechoslovakia 1918-1945-1968”, Masaryk Institute and Archives of the CAS Prague, and the GWMT-working group “Political Epistemologies of Central and Eastern Europe” (PECEE). The masterclass will take place at the University of Erfurt, Germany. We will cover travel and accommodation costs for accepted participants.

Organizing Committee:

Martin Babička, D.Phil., Institute of Contemporary History, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague

Johanna Hügel, History of Science, University of Erfurt

Erik Kaiser, M.A., History of Science, University of Erfurt

Meike Katzek, M.A., History of Science, University of Erfurt

Prof. Dr. Bernhard Kleeberg, History of Science, University of Erfurt

Dr. Jan Surman, Masaryk Institute and Archives of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague

Call for papers: Gender, nature and ecology. (Re)thinking the trajectories of ecofeminism from a transnational European perspective

 Call for papers: Gender, nature and ecology. (Re)thinking the trajectories of ecofeminism from a transnational European perspective, for European Journal of Women's Studies

Ecofeminism, which emerged in the mid-1970s and 1980s as a field of transnational thought and activism, seems to have been redeveloped over the last decade in response to the ecological crisis. France has witnessed a kind of ‘ecofeminism boom’ to which the publication of Émilie Hache’s anthology Reclaim, recueil de textes écoféministes (2016) made a prominent contribution. Ecofeminist approaches have also (re)gained attention in Germany (Gottschlich/Hackfort/Schmitt/von Winterfeld 2022; Holland-Cunz 2014), in Belgium (Zitouni, 2019; Grandjean, 2024), in Spain (Mediavilla and Echavarren, 2021; Puelo, 2017), as well as in Southeastern Europe (Đurđević and Marjanić, 2024). This non-exhaustive overview reveals that despite this spread of literature, which has undoubtedly enabled Anglophone traditions to be historicised and discussed, the transnational and micro-regional circuits of the production and reception of European ecofeminism are still relatively undocumented.

This issue is an invitation to rethink ecofeminism from European perspectives and perspectives from ‘Europe Otherwise’ or ‘Europe as a creolized space’ (Boatcă, 2020). We invite submissions that examine the ways in which ecofeminist theory is currently discussed in Europe, and how, in this pluralistic context, the respective traditions of ecofeminist thought, and politics are constituted, re-articulated, criticised and transformed.

We welcome abstracts that address any of the following, or other related questions:

1.

Articulations of the concepts of nature and gender

● What are the theoretical challenges and reformulations of the concept of nature? How do they avoid the naturalisation of social structures while accounting for an adequate understanding of the materiality of the non-human world?

● Does ecofeminism renew existing theoretical debates on the concepts of nature, gender and ecology? Conversely, what are the debates and tensions brought to light by the theoretical categories employed in ecofeminist writings?

● How are colonial dimensions of the ecological disaster reflected in various ecofeminist traditions and what are the remaining open questions and blind spots?

2.

Inter-/transnational trajectories

● Can we observe and investigate interests in ecofeminism in differentiated ways across European contexts?

● In what ways and via which trajectories have local forms of ecofeminism been construed?

● How does the production, circulation and reception of ecofeminism in different contexts shape or transform ecofeminist theorisations? And, on the other hand, how can we understand the absence of ecofeminist circulation in some other contexts?

● How is ecofeminism theorised, conceptualised and discussed in academic fields such as gender studies, philosophy or political science and in various national and linguistic traditions?

3.

Practices and strategies of translation

● Does ecofeminism engage in specific translation practices and strategies? And if so, what do translations do to ecofeminism? Are there selections, absences, misunderstandings (Bourdieu, 2002) or even ‘betrayals’?

● Beyond textual translations, are there any circulations or transfers of debates, theories, concepts between academics, civil society activists and practitioners, and policy makers?

Abstracts should be submitted no later than Monday, 14 April 2025 to: gender.nature.ecology@gmail.com

Authors of the selected abstracts will be notified by Monday, 5 May 2025.

Full articles should be submitted online to https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ejw no later than Friday, 31 October 2025.

All articles will be subject to the Journal’s customary peer review process. Articles should be prepared according to the guidelines for submission on the inside back cover of the print journal or at https://journals.sagepub.com/author-instructions/EJW.

Wednesday, 2 April 2025

Occupations and the occupied: Agency, expertise, and patronage in wartime and postwar political cartographies. Thematic issue of Geografiska Annaler

Occupations and the occupied: Agency, expertise, and patronage in wartime and postwar political cartographies. Thematic issue of Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, Volume 107, Issue 1 (2025). Edited by Steven Seegel.

Full issue: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rgab20/107/1?nav=tocList

Seegel, S. (2025). Introduction: ‘Occupations and the occupied: agency, expertise, and patronage in wartime and postwar political cartographies’. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 107(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2025.2458905

Seegel, S. (2025). ‘Rescuing Ukrainian agency, expertise, and patronage: on the historical cartography of Ukraine and maps in times of war’. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 107(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2025.2458907

Megginson, T. (2025). ‘What belongs to the Czechoslovak nation’: geographers’ and mapmakers’ visions of Czechoslovakia before the Paris Peace Conference. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 107(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2025.2461778

Nekola, P. (2025). Genuine inquiry and human agency under occupation: lessons from the history of geographic and cartographic reasoning. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 107(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2025.2462290

Svatek, P. (2025). Academic cartography in Vienna 1939–1945: actors, funders and political context. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 107(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.2025.2461772


Call for papers: Historical Perspectives on Infant Care and Child Education

Call for papers:  Historical Perspectives on Infant Care and Child Education. Emmi Pikler, Infant Homes, and the Politics of Child Welfare in 20th Century Hungary


The Conference is organized in collaboration with CEU Democracy Institute,

Österreichische Kulturforum Budapest and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute, Kriegsforschung.

This conference aims to foster interdisciplinary dialogue on the historical and political

dimensions of infant care, child welfare, and family policies in 20th-century Hungary. The

conference will examine the political, social, cultural, and gender dynamics that shaped child-

rearing practices and state interventions in family life. Understanding the professionalization

of childcare requires examining developments from WWI to the present day. This allows for

an examination of the diverse political and ideological regimes that have shaped the childcare

field, as well as the memory politics that continue to influence its trajectory. In this way,

particular emphasis is placed on the life and work of Emmi Pikler (1902–1984), a doctor and

childcare specialist who influenced the evolution of infant care in post-WWII Hungary and

established a highly successful international organization. Although Pikler was one of the most

influential childcare experts in socialist Hungary, her life and work remain largely unexplored

from an interdisciplinary perspective.


We invite researchers, historians, sociologists, psychologists, child welfare and care

professionals to examine the historical development of infant and child care in Hungary, with

a particular focus on Emmi Pikler’s work and the role of infant homes (csecsemőotthonok) in

shaping child protection policies and the care of young children by families. The objective is

to illuminate how child protection systems were shaped by social necessities and political

aspirations, offering invaluable insights into the contemporary challenges in child welfare

policy. Presentations that explore the political implications of child welfare policies, the

interplay between government and society in child welfare, care, and protection, and the impact

of ideologies on childcare systems are highly encouraged.


We welcome proposals that address, but are not limited to, the following topics:


Emmi Pikler’s Contributions and Political Context

Examination of Emmi Pikler’s work in the broader political and social context of 20th-century

Hungary, including her influence on national child welfare and child protection policies and

the support or resistance from political actors. The role of the „Lóczy” in sheltering the hidden

infants of political prisoners in the 1950s.


The Functioning of Infant Homes and State Intervention

Historical analysis of how infant homes (csecsemőotthonok) were established and operated,

focusing on the political motivations behind state intervention in family and child welfare,

including the role of public institutions and the changing structure of out-of-home care of

children from dominantly family-based foster care to institutional care.


Child-Rearing Ideologies

Exploration of how political ideologies (such as nationalism, socialism, or conservatism),

traditions, and beliefs shaped child-rearing practices, especially concerning state-supported

institutions for infant care and family-based care of young children.


Health and Welfare Policies in a Political Lens

Investigating the intersection between child health policies, welfare programs, and broader

political agendas. How have political regimes from post-WWI Hungary to the present

influenced healthcare, education, and welfare reforms for children and families?


Nation-Building and Childcare

The role of child-rearing practices and child protection policies in nation-building efforts,

including how children were seen as future citizens and how infant care became part of political

discourse on national strength and identity.


Women’s Roles and Gender Politics

The role of women, particularly mothers and caregivers, in the political discourse surrounding

family and childcare. How did gender politics intersect with state policies on child welfare, and

what have been the expectations placed on women influencing current policies and practices?

How have professional and academic women influenced perceptions, policies, and practices,

with particular attention to research and programs related to children, families, and women's

roles?


The Politics of Poverty and Child Neglect

The state’s approach to dealing with child poverty and neglect including political debates

around state, community versus family, and parental responsibility for children’s welfare and

well-being. How did social class and political ideologies shape policies towards impoverished

families and orphaned or abandoned children?


Comparative Political Perspectives

Comparative studies of how political regimes in Hungary and other European countries

influenced establishing and managing infant homes and broader childcare policies.


Submission Guidelines

We invite individual papers or panel discussions. Proposals should include:

● Full name, institutional affiliation, and contact information of the presenter(s)

● Title of the presentation or panel

● Language of submission: Hungarian OR English

● A 300-word abstract outlining the research topic, methodology, and key findings or

arguments

● Any specific AV or other technical requirements


All proposals should be sent to Mária Herczog (herczogmaria@me.com), Andrea Pető

(petoa@ceu.edu) and Fanni Svégel (svegelfanni@gmail.com) as one Word (doc) or PDF file.

Panel proposals should be sent as one merged file.


Deadline for abstract submission: 1 May, 2025

Notification of acceptance: 15 June, 2025

Submission of papers: September 15, 2025

Conference dates: October 6-8, 2025, at CEU DI


For more information, see the project page (https://democracyinstitute.ceu.edu/emmi-pikler).


Aksonova, Natalia – Chlaňová, Tereza – Velychko, Hanna (ed.) Історико-культурний феномен Української господарської академії в Подєбрадах [The historical and cultural phenomenon of the Ukrainian Economic Academy in Poděbrady].

 Aksonova, Natalia – Chlaňová, Tereza – Velychko, Hanna (ed.) Історико-культурний феномен Української господарської академії в Подєбрадах [T...