Thursday, 31 July 2025

Journal of Migration History: Special Issue: Histories of Knowledge

 Journal of Migration History: Volume 11 (2025): Issue 2 (Jul 2025): Special Issue: Histories of Knowledge


Article

Restricted Access

‘A Small Signpost to the Future’: Refugee Periodicals and Knowledge in Transit in Early Post-War Switzerland

Author:

Ramon Wiederkehr

Pages: 115–139Online Publication Date: 11 Jul 2025

Articles

Restricted Access

Atrocity Accounts in Transit: Prisoner Exchanges to the Americas during the Second World War

Author:

Jan Lambertz

Pages: 140–162Online Publication Date: 11 Jul 2025

Restricted Access

‘Such are the Demands of our Propaganda and our Truth’: Russian Exiles and Cold War Knowledge of the Vlasov Movement

Author:

Benjamin Tromly

Pages: 163–184Online Publication Date: 11 Jul 2025

Restricted Access

The Descendants of the Prophet Muhammad in the post-Ottoman Middle East: Knowledge Transmission in Situations of Epistemic Displacement

Author:

Barbara Henning

Pages: 185–212Online Publication Date: 11 Jul 2025

Open Access

Tracing Home: Knowledge Production in Multigenerational Palestinian Displacement

Author:

Nour A. Munawar

Pages: 213–228Online Publication Date: 11 Jul 2025


Perspectives on the History of Forecasting

 Journal Geschichte und Informatik / Histoire et informatique (vol. 24/2025) : Perspectives on the History of Forecasting


The latest issue of the journal ‘Geschichte und Informatik / Histoire et informatique’, published by the association History and Computing and edited by Vlad Atanasiu and Enrico Natale, focuses on «Perspectives on the History of Forecasting»

Using various case studies, the authors show that forecasting, i.e. the attempt to formulate predictions about the future based on an analysis of the past and to derive useful knowledge for decision-making, evolves with the technical possibilities and political priorities of historical moment. The contributions offer a rich overview of the history of forecasting from the interwar period to the present day, covering a geographical area stretching from the United States to the former USSR.

Vlad Atanasiu, Enrico Natale: Forecasting Against the Odds. Editorial

Laetitia Lenel: Erwartung und Enttäuschung. Die transatlantische Geschichte der Konjunkturprognostik in drei Akten

Marion Ronca: Die Gegenwart einholen mit Wachstumsprognosen. Von der gleichzeitigen ungleichzeitigen Entstehung der «Perspektivstudien» und der «Richtlinien der Schweizer Regierungspolitik»

Eglė Rindzevičiūtė: Bridging the Cybernetics Gap? Social Forecastingin the Late Soviet Union

Peter Keller, Georges T. Roos, Cla Semadeni: Zur Geschichte der Schweizerischen Vereinigung für Zukunftsforschung (SZF) / swissfuture

Peter Turchin, Dan Hoyer: Empirically Testing and Refining Structural Demographic Theory. A Methodological Guide

Roundtable with Sacha Zala, Eglė Rindzevičiūtė, Peter Turchin, Christian Pfister

The volume is freely accessible and can be downloaded from the publisher's website (https://www.chronos-verlag.ch/node/28856#kurztext).

Monday, 21 July 2025

Екатерина Жарова: Биология в фокусе. Естественные отделения университетов Российской империи (1830–1900).

 Екатерина Жарова: Биология в фокусе. Естественные отделения университетов Российской империи (1830–1900). Новое литературное обозрение 2025. ISBN 978-5-4448-2646-1 // Еkaterina Zharova: Biology in Focus. Natural Sciences Departments at Universities in the Russian Empire (1830–1900). New Literary Review 2025. ISBN 978-5-4448-2646-1



Аннотация: Изучение истории высшего образования в России не только дает возможность проследить генеалогию его актуальных проблем, но и позволяет взглянуть на российское общество в микрокосме. В своей монографии Екатерина Жарова рассматривает историю естественных отделений физико-математических факультетов университетов Российской империи с момента их появления в середине 1830 х годов и до начала XX века. Автора интересуют важнейшие аспекты научной жизни: организация обучения (лекции, практические занятия, экзамены), формирование профессорско-преподавательского корпуса и лабораторной базы, специализация и профессионализация. Отдельный важный аспект исследования — попытка проследить роль государства в развитии естественных наук. Анализируя влияние государственной политики на изучение и преподавание биологии, автор показывает, как на университетской жизни отразились исторические трансформации, вызванные сменой эпох — от Александра I до Николая II. Екатерина Жарова — доктор исторических наук, старший научный сотрудник СПбФ ИИЕТ РАН.

Sunday, 20 July 2025

Call for papers: Entanglements of Scale and Spheres in History

 Call for papers: Entanglements of Scale and Spheres in History: Between the Local, Regional, Global, and Planetary. University of Bielefeld, 14.11.2025 - 5.11.2025, Deadline 31.08.2025


With this conference, we invite researchers at all career stages to reflect critically on the conceptual and methodological entanglements of scales and spheres in global and entangled history. The conference deals with conceptual and methodological questions of how to write global and entangled history and cross-area-studies. In particular, it will focus on the challenge to decentralise the human gaze and world-historical time of humans, to include more-than-human perspectives. This is of special importance in times in which the planet overwrites the globe(Spivak), or in a new epoch framed as the Anthropocene.

Thinking and writing about the past and present, be it from a sociological, geographical, historical, or political perspective, is undergoing a 'planetary turn'. This turn captures how the planet — as a humanist category and as a natural space for interactions between humans, non-humans and physical processes of the Earth — is becoming the referential dimension in which scholars think and write about global and entangled history, by asking how including landscapes, climate changes, histories of oceans and volcanoes, animals, the cosmological phenomena of space and time as well as the geobiological time of the planet change our understanding of global and crossarea flows and interconnections.

The planetary turn points us to the idea of nested systems in vast timeframes and vast distances. Building on this, we are interested in the multiscalarity of historical processes, i.e., in relational, interpenetrating processes that belong to different temporal and territorial orders but are interconnected through networked relationships and persistent leverage effects. By embracing the planetary turn, we aim to critically examine it, questioning the extent to which it actually represents a new dimension of historical understanding or merely a new label for conventional ways of looking at global interconnections, non-human actors, and their interwovenness. By doing so, we invite a discussion on the historical understanding and framing of global human and anthropogenic processes and multiscalar and multicentric approaches to global and entangled history as well as their interplay. The conference aims to foster an interdisciplinary discussion on planetary thinking, materiality, human as praxis, and related topics, as they inform these methodological considerations. Theoretically oriented or case study-based papers that would speak to one or more of the following questions would be especially welcome:

- Does global/globe thinking dissolve into planetary thinking? What is the locus of encunciation of planetary thinking?

- How can (trans-)area studies relate and/or correct planetary thinking? Is it necessary to regionalize planetary thinking?

- How can non-human-centred thinking help us sharpen our multiscalar view and make it fruitful for approaches to global history?

- What forms of otherness and diverse fluid world orders does the planetary perspective make us more aware of?

- How does the local scale reflect the planetary scale?

- How are the local, regional, and global dimensions tied to the planetary scale, and how do local or regional cultural, political, and societal practices (re-)shape a 'common consciousness' (Mbembe) or at least a co-habitation of the world and deal with the multiple planetary crisis?

What does planetary responsibility and thinking in planetary dimensions mean for familiar narratives of globalisation and transregional interconnections?

We especially encourage contributions from Early Career Researchers and scholars working at disciplinary intersections: As part of the conference, an Early Career Researcher panel will be held, dedicated to showcasing new and emerging research in area studies, featuring the work of early-career scholars (defined as PhD students or post-doctoral scholars who have received their PhD since 2022). As CrossArea brings together leading scholars of area studies from throughout Germany, this is an excellent opportunity for scholars looking to make an impression and identify potential hosts for their next professional move. Those selected to present on their research will be provided with travel grants, as well as accommodation for up to two nights.

Format and Submission Guidelines:

We welcome proposals for 15-minute presentations from researchers of various disciplines engaged in conceptual and methodological dialogue on how to write multiscalar global history between the local, regional, global, and planetary. Proposals of no more than 300 words (in English or German) along with a short CV (1 page) should be sent as a single PDF to the following address by the 30th August 2025: justynaturkowska@me.com & reka.krizmanics@uni-bielefeld.de.

The conference will be held in person at Bielefeld University (hybrid participation possible on request; please indicate in your proposal). Travel and accommodation support for early career scholars and unfunded presenters may be available; please indicate your need in your application.

Important Dates:

- Deadline for submission of the papers: 30th August, 2025

- Notification of Selection: 30th September, 2025

Kontakt

Dr. Justyna Aniceta Turkowska: justynaturkowska@me.com;

Dr Réka Krizmanics: reka.krizmanics@uni-bielefeld.de;

Wednesday, 16 July 2025

Call for papers: The Prague Linguistic Circle in Geneva and Paris

Call for papers: The Prague Linguistic Circle in Geneva and Paris: Circulations and Decenterings. Fribourg, 10 - 11 September 2026


The Prague Linguistic Circle holds a clearly defined place in the historiography of the language sciences: it is recognized as an institutional and localized "hub" (Hoskovec 2011) of programmatic innovation, representing a pivotal moment in the broad transition from 19th-century philological models to the new paradigms of 20th-century linguistics. While the Circle’s European and international influence—particularly the fundamental impact of its contributions to the development of structural phonology—is well known, most of its historians and commentators have focused primarily on its specific context in Prague itself (e.g., Vachek 1966, Viel 1984, Raynaud 1990, Toman 1995, Sériot 2012). In line with a certain cliché that casts the city of Prague as a “golem-like” site of magical encounters (Ripellino 1973, Flusser 1991), the Circle and its theoretical originality are often presented as the product of syncretism, or even as the precipitate of a kind of fusion between different traditions suddenly brought together in the capital of the new Czechoslovak state.

Without seeking to challenge either the specific dynamic of the Circle’s local grounding in Prague’s modernity or its theoretical originality—especially in contrast with other centers of linguistics (Leipzig, Paris, Geneva, Copenhagen, etc.)—this conference aims instead to focus on the international integration and reception of the Prague Circle within the scientific exchange networks and channels of intellectual circulation of its time. We wish, in particular, to interrogate a certain methodological dichotomy that tends to oppose what could be called the integrative or symbiotic dimension of local contexts to the more diffuse or decentered nature of the international context.

This tension is not unique to the historiography of the Prague Linguistic Circle. It seems to be a structural feature of the system of “double legitimation,” both internal and external, that characterizes the functioning of “circles” or “schools” of thought in the humanities (Amsterdamska 1987, Puech 2015). This tension invites us to consider two approaches to the internationalization of the Prague Circle’s activities during the period of linguistic circles from the 1920s to the 1950s. Alongside a network-based or nodal model of exchanges between relatively autonomous hubs, circles, or poles, we might also consider a more concentric approach that accounts for the interweaving or overlapping of these various poles. The first perspective tends to reinforce the image of a system of diffuse communications forming more compact “nodes” between which circulations (contacts, exchanges, receptions of works, etc.) occur. The second model does not envision exchanges between distinct hubs, but rather overlaps or intersections among these circles, thus revealing forms of decentering in the practices or intellectual horizons of participants in these canonized circles or schools.


Call for papers

The conference invites reflection on the internationalization of the Prague Linguistic Circle within the Francophone world, symbolized here—without being limited to—Geneva and Paris. In particular, this conference invites us to consider the Prague Linguistic Circle in Geneva and Paris—not as an external reference point to the Genevan and Parisian contexts, but as a full-fledged agent shaping the theoretical horizons and practices of these intellectual contexts. We therefore welcome original contributions addressing scholarly and/or conceptual relations between Prague, Paris, and Geneva in the fields of language sciences, semiotics, literary studies, art history, or philosophy.

Contributions may explore circulations and decenterings between Geneva, Paris, and Prague in light of:

An interdisciplinary contextualization, seeking traces of the Prague Linguistic Circle beyond language sciences, in the exchanges and interactions that shaped or energized the intellectual contexts of Prague, Paris, and Geneva as a whole.

Archival and documentary materials relating to the activities of the Prague Circle that have been made available in recent years (Toman 1994, Troubetzkoy 2006, Havránková 2008, Čermák et al. 2012, Jakobson 2013, 2014, Havránková & Petkevič 2014, Toman 2017). The use of these materials can offer new insights into already explored themes, such as the distinctive Saussurianism of the Prague and Geneva schools (e.g., Koerner 1971: 295 ff.), or the difficult reception of Prague functionalism among French philologists (e.g., Chevalier 1997).

Well-known intersections between the Prague Circle and the Geneva School (Karcevskij), or with French linguistic networks (Tesnière, Benveniste, Martinet), as well as overlooked figures and phenomena in historiography. For example, one might investigate the place given in Prague Circle work to French-language linguistics (Bally, Grammont, Meillet, Sechehaye, Vendryes, etc.), but also to philosophy (Bergson, Lévy-Bruhl), psychology (Delacroix, Meyerson), or literary theory (Václav Černý, Thibaudet).

The role of Czechoslovak scholars or émigrés from Russia in the activities of the Société de linguistique de Paris, the Geneva Linguistics Society (which preceded, from 1941 to 1956, the Ferdinand de Saussure Circle), or the circumstances surrounding the creation of the Bratislava Linguistic Circle in 1946, and its explicit alignment with the speech-focused themes of the Geneva School (Isačenko 1948).

The broader backdrop of Russian and Ukrainian emigration (to Prague, Paris, Berlin, Geneva). The Russian and Ukrainian émigrés of the Prague Circle participated in networks of exchange and communication not structured around local institutions, but through transversal links across various émigré communities. These networks—and especially their potential importance for the history of language sciences—remain largely unstudied.

A reappraisal of well-known figures such as Jakobson, not through a diachronic lens that follows his successive affiliations with the Moscow, Prague, Copenhagen, and New York Circles, but through a synchronic lens, considering him as a key actor in an almost continuous or at least systematic dialogue between these local contexts.

Please send abstracts of maximum 500 words to patrick.flack@unifr.ch and pierre-yves.testenoire@sorbonne-nouvelle.fr

Deadline: November 30th 2025

Notification of Acceptance: January 31st 2026

Scientific Board

Sylvie Archaimbault (Sorbonne Université)

Gabriel Bergounioux (Université d’Orléans)

Lorenzo Cigana (Università San Raffaele Roma)

Anna Maria Curea (Babeș-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca)

Marina De Palo (Sapienza Università di Roma)

Claire Forel (Université de Genève)

Janette Friedrich (Sigmund Freud Universität)

Tomáš Hoskovec (Jihočeská univerzita)

Petra James (Université Libre de Bruxelles)

John Joseph (University of Edinburgh)

Christian Puech (Université Sorbonne Nouvelle)

Savina Raynaud (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano)

Didier Samain (Sorbonne Université)

Ondřej Sládek (Masarykova univerzita)

Anne-Gaëlle Toutain (Université de Berne)

Bohumil Vykypěl (Jihočeská univerzita)

Ekaterina Velmezova (Université de Lausanne)

Klaas Willems (Ghent University)

Call for papers: Foucault at 100: Echoes and Encounters in Central and Eastern Europe

 Call for papers: Foucault at 100: Echoes and Encounters in Central and Eastern Europe 

Deadline for submission: 15 November 2025

on the address: foucault100ece@flu.cas.cz

Date and Location:

Prague (1–2 June 2026) and Warsaw (4–5 June 2026)

Host Institutions

The Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences

Centre français de recherche en sciences sociales en Prague (CEFRES)

Centre de civilisation française et d’études francophones en Pologne (CCFEF)

Organizing Committee: Mateusz Chmurski, Isabel Jacobs, Jiří Růžička, Radosław Szymański, Laurent Tatarenko

Contact Email: foucault100ece@flu.cas.cz

How can a persisting and truly global interest in Foucault’s thought – from Europe to Japan, through the United States and Brazil – be explained? To become the eloquent and inventive critic of the many projects associated with the “Western” world to which he belonged, Foucault had to first grapple with the elusive outlines of modern thought. By criticizing approaches that tried to present “the subject” as a clear object of study, and instead highlighting those that sought to explore the different practices of subjectification, he made “others” understandable to the “West” – and the “West” understandable to the rest of the world. However, the relationship between Foucault’s works and the “West” – its canon and its various intellectual endeavors – is far from straightforward.

One particular place where this question can be fruitfully asked is Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), where Foucault stayed for some years at the beginning of his career (he worked on his thesis, later published as The History of Madness, in Warsaw in 1958), and where his works enjoyed lasting influence among scholars and intellectuals. The question remains open as to whether, and to what extent, Foucault’s conceptual tools can be applied beyond so-called “Western Europe”, the primary context of his reflections. Were Foucault-inspired analyses carried out in CEE liable to produce a distorted image of the region? And how might rethinking Foucault from the vantage point of CEE shift our perception on both his oeuvre and the so-called “West”? Finally, how was Foucault’s own thinking shaped by CEE thought and his encounters with the region?

Over the past thirty years, scholars both from CEE countries and those working on issues related to this area have produced numerous books, articles, and studies influenced, either primarily or partially, immediately or mediated by Foucauldian perspectives, which opened up conceptually new horizons. Many of these publications have become benchmarks in their respective disciplines (Maria Todorova, Alexei Yurchak, Stephen Kotkin, Stephen J. Collier, and many others). What were the reasons for this interest? As Foucault’s popularity in CEE coincided with major political upheavals and new challenges, could this reception be considered a search for intellectual alternatives to the political thought which supposedly undergirded previous communist regimes? Was it hoped that Foucault’s thought could provide a new social perspective? Was he supposed to inspire academics from Central Europe in their concerted retreat from Marxism-Leninism?

It appears that the vicissitudes of the reception of Foucault in the CEE context give rise to a paradox: though Foucault militated against system-building, insofar as he was cast as a promising alternative to the former keystones of social theory, he became inducted to academic textbooks as a classic of social thought even more surely than in France. Who, and with what intent, were the intellectual actors in introducing him to the academic communities in the region, by way of translations, special issues of academic journals or textbooks? Furthermore, our symposium aims to inquire about the particular modes of Foucault’s reception in CEE academia, as well as in public discourse and activism. What were the intermediaries, the channels, and the ‘stopovers’ on the way by which his thought travelled to CEE? Was it a Foucault from Paris or Berkeley, a Foucault in French, English, German, or Italian? Might it have been Rabinow’s or Agamben’s Foucault?

Whatever the reason for Foucault’s pervasive presence, it may not be an exaggeration to say that sometimes scholars from the region draw on Foucault’s ideas without even realizing it. His influence is so deeply embedded in academic discourse that some of his concepts have migrated in various fields where they are used almost uncritically. In our view, a more comprehensive reflection on Foucault’s methodologies and their application to CEE issues has yet to be thoroughly undertaken. Hegel – Foucault’s philosophical archenemy, whose influence he never entirely escaped – argued that any method worthy of the name must, to some extent, follow the activity of the object itself rather than imposing a framework upon it. Foucault, too, embraced this perspective, adapting his approach to suit the problem at hand rather than forcing reality into predetermined structures. This is a crucial lesson to keep in mind when transferring ideas and concepts from one cultural and social context to another. While such a transfer is certainly possible, the transformative work it requires is far less obvious and considerably more demanding.

In this regard, the 100th anniversary of Foucault’s birth presents a unique opportunity to reflect on past contributions, current developments, and future directions of Foucauldian approaches to CEE issues. As the event is the result of a collaborative effort between three institutions across two cities, we have decided to divide it between Prague and Warsaw. The first two days will take place in Prague, followed by a break before continuing in Warsaw. However, this division is not only spatial and temporal but also thematic. Prague will host participants presenting papers on epistemology, philosophy, gender, and aesthetics, while Warsaw will focus on discussions surrounding power, governmentality, and ethics.

We want to discuss together, for example, but not be strictly limited to, the following topics:

Critical reflections on how Foucault’s concepts (e.g., power, biopolitics, governmentality) have been applied and transformed in CEE scholarship.

Evaluations of the strengths, limitations, and effects of Foucauldian methodologies in interpreting CEE social, political and historical realities.

Methodological challenges of transferring Foucauldian concepts across different cultural and social contexts.

Prospects for future uses of Foucault’s ideas in CEE contexts: new fields, emerging issues, and conceptual adaptations.

Dialogues and intersections between Foucault’s approaches and major CEE thinkers (e.g., Gáspár Miklós Tamás, Karel Kosík, Jan Patočka, Witold Kula, Ágnes Heller, Evald Ilyenkov, Zygmunt Bauman, Julia Kristeva).

Intellectual agents and institutions that mediated Foucault’s reception: translations, academic journals, textbooks, public discourse.

How CEE intellectual traditions might challenge, supplement, or transform Foucauldian frameworks.

Foucault’s engagement with the East-West divide; Foucault and the Cold War.

The proposal should include a short abstract (200 words max.), a title, affiliation and a few lines of biography, and possibly a preference for location if papers fall into both thematic strands: Prague (epistemology, gender, and aesthetics) and Warsaw (power, governmentality, and ethics).

CFP: Theoretical and practical aspects of East European development aid to Africa during the Cold War era

 CFP: Theoretical and practical aspects of East European development aid to Africa during the Cold War era, Workshop, University of Warsaw, 20-21 November 2025

The Warsaw Centre for Global History invites colleagues to participate in a workshop exploring theoretical and practical aspects of Eastern European development aid in Africa, as well as economic cooperation between Eastern European and African countries during the Cold War era.

For most of the 20th century, Eastern Europe and Africa shared experiences of underdevelopment and aspirations to overcome it. Decolonization in Africa opened a space for Eastern European countries, which themselves had experience of dependance, to engage in development aid on the continent. Given their experience during the interwar period in overcoming underdevelopment resulting from previous subjugation to European imperial monarchies, coupled with their emphasis on national economic sovereignty, these nations could serve as an attractive and alternative model for newly independent countries with similar ambitions.

The Cold War marked the emergence of development studies as a distinct academic discipline. Scholars from Eastern and Central Eastern Europe did not lag behind in this evolution. While Western studies of dependency and underdevelopment focused primarily on the Global South, researchers from the East could also draw on empirical materials from their part of the world. For example, in Poland, historian Marian Małowist identified the roots of underdevelopment in Eastern Europe and Africa in early modern history. Specialized academic chairs and institutes were established to research development issues and provide expertise. Additionally, these institutions offered educational exchange programs for visitors from developing countries. Internationally recognized economists such as Oskar Lange and Michał Kalecki conceptualized their observations and provided expertise to governments of developing countries in the Third World.

Eastern Europeans managed their development efforts while working to overcome underdevelopment in their home countries, a fact acknowledged by their leadership. These countries could not match the volume and scope of development aid provided by the West. While they spoke the Soviet language of solidarity, domestic economic performance more than ideological factors seemed to inform their developmental initiatives. Development aid also involved some degree of competition, not only with the West but also inside the Eastern bloc. Eastern European countries generally steered clear of Soviet efforts to coordinate development initiatives in the regional framework. Instead, they engaged in what scholars refer to as "socialist bilateralism."

States played a significant role in promoting socialist development aid efforts. Communist parties influenced the geography of development aid by regulating the movement of expertise, controlling who could enter or leave their countries. In addition, East European experts were carefully selected to represent the appropriate ideological profile. Nevertheless, direct contacts with citizens of the Global South opened up opportunities for the exchange of ideas on the pitfalls of development policy in countries ruled by progressive regimes within Socialist societies that were subject to official censorship. Internal discussions among Communist Party members, meetings of their International Departments, and the proceedings of specialized international commissions provided a platform for exchanging views on development directions and models. Historians of Eastern European anti-colonial social movements recognize that, although these movements were closely linked to the state, there was still a degree of criticism directed at their countries’ excessive or insufficient development efforts in the decolonizing world. Additionally, popular culture, magazines, analyses by economic experts, press bulletins aimed at Communist party members and state apparatus, as well as journalistic accounts all contributed to disseminating knowledge about the societies and cultures of African countries. We are specifically seeking contributions based on these diverse official and unofficial documents in relation to the following problems:

1. The concept of the development

Among the key topics to be discussed is the very idea of development. Scholars agree that its origins can be traced to the late colonial era, specifically in the European colonial powers’ discourse on the so-called civilizing mission. Among the justifications of colonial rule was the responsibility to participate in the advancement of economic and social conditions of the colonized societies. By the post-World War II period, development discourse had taken a different tone, emphasizing the need to transform Africa according to patterns imposed by the West or the East.  From the economic point of view, development drew the line between the industrialized countries and resource-producing agrarian economies.

The discussants will try to answer the following questions: In what ways (if any?) did the Eastern European concept of development differ from the contemporary Western, postcolonial or Soviet, anti-imperial models? What criteria and parameters were used as determinants of development?

2. The flow of knowledge on development

We would also like to consider the flow of knowledge on development. Since the 1950s, political economy and research into the challenges faced by the developing world have reflected global tensions, diverging into two distinct approaches: one focused on pro-market developing economies and the other on those with socialist orientations. Early Western development theories, which eventually dominated the field, were informed by the experiences of the so-called first generation of newly industrialized countries - in other words developing nations – in Latin America or East Asia who had prioritized pro-market orientation. The focus of development models would evolve – from industrialization to the provision of basic needs via agriculture before the neoliberal model emerged in 1980s.

How did international debates on development resonate in Eastern European countries? Did these countries create distinct theories on development? If so, was this expertise based on first-hand contacts with the new nations in Africa and recognition of their unique conditions? Or was it an adaptation of Eastern European Marxism and their own experience in fighting against underdevelopment?

3. The rationale for providing aid

Eastern European countries used the language of solidarity to emphasise their separation from colonial legacies and their specific approach to development aid. It would be valuable to explore the relationship between the official discourse and the motivations outlined in the internal documents of political parties, official journalism, or economic analyses. Were there efforts to understand the social specifics of Africa, considering the various paths of modernization? To what extent did development policies serve as tools for securing Eastern European countries’ specific interests, such as promoting Marxism-Leninism globally, accessing African markets, or the globalization of foreign policies? Furthermore, how did the official justifications and practices of development evolve over time in connection with changes in regimes, ruling elites, and their economic priorities? Of particular importance is the relationship between Eastern European development initiatives and the political regimes of African countries. Were Marxist-governed countries, such as Mozambique, Angola, and Ethiopia, treated differently from other African nations?

4. Planning and organization of expertise

The development and organization of expertise could serve as a foundation for examining both the intentions behind state policies on cooperation with independent African countries, and the perceptual frameworks that accompany them. It would be interesting to study the practical and theoretical preparation of expert personnel travelling to Africa, whether for aid programs or profit-driven ventures. Contributions could consider programs in African studies, courses tailored to the specific needs of various fields related to Africa, language training, and health and diet counselling.

Scholars interested in attending the workshop are invited to send 300-word abstract, including the title, the current or a most recent academic affiliation and a short bio to: eeurope-africa@uw.edu.pl by September 1, 2025.

Notification of acceptance will be sent by September 15, 2025.

Organisers cover accommodation for two nights in Warsaw and travel expenses.

The working language of the conference is English.

Organisers:

prof. Marek Pawełczak, Faculty of History, University of Warsaw

dr Anna Konieczna, Centre for French Culture and Francophone Studies, University of Warsaw

dr Filip Urbański, Faculty of Political Sciences and International Studies, University of Warsaw

References

Burton, Eric, Anne Dietrich, Immanuel Harisch, i Marcia Schenck, red. Navigating Socialist Encounters. Boston, MA: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2021.

Decker, Corrie, i Elisabeth McMahon. The Idea of Development in Africa: A History. New Approaches to African History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Kalinovsky, Artemy M. „Sorting Out the Recent Historiography of Development Assistance: Consolidation and New Directions in the Field”. Journal of Contemporary History 56, nr 1 (2021): 227–39.

Lorenzini, Sara. Global Development: A Cold War History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.

Mark, James, i Paul Betts. Socialism Goes Global: The Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in the Age of Decolonisation. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2022.

Mark, James, Artemy M. Kalinovsky, i Steffi Marung, red. Alternative Globalizations. Bloomington Indiana: Indiana University Press. Dostęp 28 maj 2025.

Muehlenbeck, Philip E., i Natalia Telepneva, red. Warsaw Pact Intervention in the Third World. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.

Contact Information

dr Anna Konieczna

Centre for French Culture and Francophone Studies | University of Warsaw 

ul. Dobra 55 (s. 3.009)

00-312 Warszawa

www.okf.uw.edu.pl

Sunday, 13 July 2025

CFP: Ludwik Fleck and the Historiography of Science: The Theory of Thought Styles and Thought Collectives at the Centennial

Paweł Jarnicki and Mauro Condé are pleased to announce a forthcoming edited volume on Ludwik Fleck, to be published by Springer. You can find the call for papers here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rk3Q8xNf9bLu9XPG8uOufmNnkk8wLFGO/view?usp=sharing. They would be grateful if you could share it widely within your networks. We all look forward to receiving your proposals and contributions for this book. 

2026 Joint ESHS & HSS Meeting, Edinburgh, Scotland, 13-16 July 2026

 2026 Joint ESHS & HSS Meeting, Edinburgh, Scotland, 13-16 July 2026


Call for Proposals: 2026 Joint Meeting of the European Society for the History of Science (ESHS) and History of Science Society (HSS)


Title: Shifting Perspectives: Plural Worlds, Contested Sciences

Location: University of Edinburgh, Scotland

Dates: 13-16 July 2026


Organized by:

The History of Science Society (HSS)

The European Society for the History of Science (ESHS)

With support from

The British Society for the History of Science (BSHS)


Deadline for submitting proposals:   Friday 1 December 2025, 11:59 pm PST (Abstract Submission Site to come)


Link to the full Call For Proposals is available here<https://hssonline.org/page/2026cfp>


Friday, 11 July 2025

Oleksandra Buzko: Maria Viazmitina. Archaeological Expedition to Parthia.

Олександра Бузько: Марія Вязмітіна. археологічна експедиція у Парфію.Kyiv,  Видання Інституту археології НАНУ, 2025. // Oleksandra Buzko: Maria Viazmitina. Archaeological Expedition to Parthia.Kyiv,  Видання Інституту археології НАНУ, 2025.

[Українська версія нижче]

 This bilingual book, in Ukrainian and English, is the result of Oleksandra's research into the life, work, and scientific legacy of the outstanding Ukrainian archaeologist Maria Vyazmitina, based on materials from the archaeologist's personal archive at the Institute of Archaeology.

This publication is important for both Ukrainian science and world archaeology, as it allows the global scientific community to access archival materials from archaeological expeditions to Central Asia in the 20th century, highlights the contribution of Ukrainian archaeologists to this field, contributes to the study of women archaeologists in a global context, and presents a study of the archaeology of Ukraine during the Soviet period in its historical context.


----

 Ця книга-білінгва, українською та англійською, є результатом дослідження пані Олександрою життєвого і творчого шляху та наукової спадщини видатної української археологині Марії Вязмітіної, на матеріалах персонального архіву археологині в Інституті археології.

Це видання є надзвичайно важливим як для української науки,  так й для світової археології, оскільки воно робить доступними для світової наукової спільноти архівні матеріали археологічних експедицій до Середньої Азії 20 століття, висвітлює вклад наших археологів в цю наукову сферу, вносить свою лепту у дослідження теми жінок-археологинь в світовому контексті, та є дослідженням археології України радянського періоду в історичному контексті.


Sunday, 6 July 2025

CFP: ‘Power Couples? Collaborations at work and at home, c. 1750-1914’

 CALL FOR PAPERS:

‘Power Couples? Collaborations at work and at home, c. 1750-1914’ workshop

Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany

11-13 May 2026

In recent decades, there has emerged an important wave of scholarship by historians, philosophers, literary scholars, biographers, and sociologists (amongst others), which has unveiled the crucial ‘hidden’ intellectual, social, and domestic labour women have provided throughout history in helping to make the careers and public reputations of their male colleagues, family members, and partners. This scholarship has illuminated the myriad harmful ways women’s historical labour has been effaced, during their lifetimes, in the subsequent historiography, and in archival institutions. The reasons why female accomplishments have long been marginalised in public consciousness has often been discussed under the term ‘Matilda Effect’—a concept that has also gained traction in wider public discourse.

However, a key phenomenon within collaborative cultures remains strikingly under-researched: the role played by couples whose collaborations were openly acknowledged, and the impact they have had on the making of modern political, intellectual, professional, academic, and religious cultures. As such, this international workshop will bring together scholars from diverse disciplinary backgrounds and career stages to explore this phenomenon. Our focus is the period spanning the mid eighteenth century to the early twentieth century, a period marked by notable changes in women’s rights, access to education, religious thinking, means of travel and mass communication, as well as the development of modern professions, civil society, and the nation-state. In particular, the workshop is interested in historicising the roots of the term ‘power couple’. Although this term originated in Anglophone contexts in the 1980s, the preceding centuries had already seen an unprecedented growth of couples attempting to carve out new public reputations together, be this in politics and social reform, universities, religious contexts, business ownership, the arts, medicine, and across a range of other fields.

The workshop seeks to explore the following questions: 1.) How did different couples organise and maintain their collaborative work and domestic lives? 2.) How did gender, race, ethnicity, and class shape collaborative endeavours? 3.) What similarities and differences were there between queer collaborating couples and those in legal marital partnerships? 4.) How were collaborations shaped by different local, national, and global contexts? 5.) What synergies were there between different fields and networks? 6.) To what extent did couples who collaborated seek to promote greater equality in their wider, respective areas of work?

During the workshop, participants will discuss their different methodological approaches including biographical, quantitative, and digital methods, and will examine diverse source materials, such as correspondence, periodicals, publications, diaries, and photographs.

We very much welcome ‘work-in-progress’ papers and suggestions for non-traditional ways of discussing this topic. A peer-reviewed publication of the workshop’s outcomes is also planned.

The deadline for submissions of interest is 1 September 2025.

The organisers are Dr Sven Jaros (sven.jaros@geschichte.uni-halle.de) and Dr Zoe Thomas (z.thomas@bham.ac.uk). Please email both organisers by this date with a rough title and a document of approximately 250 words about what you would like to discuss at the workshop. We are currently applying for funding for travel and accommodation for participants. Please let us know if you require this to attend. We are also hoping to make elements of the workshop hybrid, although in person attendance is preferred.

Call for papers: Technological Optimism in 1970s and 1980s Popular Culture: Innovation, Creativity, Prosperity, and Freedom

 Call for papers: Technological Optimism in 1970s and 1980s Popular Culture: Innovation, Creativity, Prosperity, and Freedom - Mainz 04/2026


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


This conference seeks to explore the cultural and intellectual roots of technological optimism in the 1970s and 1980s, decades that tend to be better known for their pervasive undercurrents of pessimism about threats to the natural environment and human well-being. Nonetheless, significant technological advances continued, and transformative visions of progress gained traction, paving the way for the techno-utopianism of the 1990s. We aim to examine how the popular culture and creative expression of the era captured and amplified positive beliefs in technology’s power to foster innovation, creativity, prosperity and freedom.


Technological Optimism in 1970s and 1980s Popular Culture: Innovation, Creativity, Prosperity, and Freedom

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John C. Wood / Thorsten Wübbena (Leibniz Institute of European History) (Leibniz Institute of European History, Mainz), 55116 Mainz (Deutschland)

15.04.2026 - 17.04.2026

Bewerbungsschluss: 11.09.2025


We invite scholars, historians, technologists and cultural critics to submit papers addressing the historical and cultural dimensions of technological optimism during this pivotal era.


Debates surrounding technology’s place in our lives are highly polarised. Its critics highlight the dangers and crises technology brings: climate change, pervasive surveillance, ever-deadlier weapons, behavioural manipulation and an alleged dehumanisation in work and private life. At the same time, there are many vehement assertions of technology’s transformative and liberating potential, whether as a solution to environmental crisis, a way to extend human possibility, a vehicle for individual expression or simply as an engine of progress generally.


While technology itself is constantly changing, the topics that it raises — and even the language in which it is debated — are far from new. Through this conference, we aim to explore the historical roots of present discussions, focusing on the 1970s and 1980s and issues such as:


- Why did optimistic beliefs in technology thrive despite the challenges of the time?

- What strategies did techno-optimists use to counter the arguments of technological pessimism?

- How did technological optimism build upon previous developments and/or shape the development of subsequent innovations?


We encourage papers that situate technological optimism within this broader historial context, connecting the period’s cultural, political, and social currents to its technological innovations.


We also hope to account for the complex geographic landscape of technological optimism and thus welcome contributions that address, for example, visions of technological optimism behind the Iron Curtain or those to be found beyond Europe and North America in the period in question. 


More detailed information about the conference’s themes, aims and topics is available at its website: https://ieg-dhr.github.io/techno_optimism/


Please submit an abstract by 11.09.2025 of no more than 500 words (references  excluded) to the organisers at digital@ieg-mainz.de for a 20-minute presentation (plus discussion), clearly  outlining your proposed paper’s focus, methodology, and relevance to the  conference theme. Include your name, institutional affiliation, and contact information with your abstract.

Call for papers: Archives of Migration. Participation, Knowledge Production and Collaboration

 Call for papers:

Archives of Migration. Participation, Knowledge Production and Collaboration

Leibniz Institute for the History and Culture of Eastern Europe (GWZO), in cooperation with the Institute of Czech Literature of the Czech Academy of Sciences and the Innsbruck University, 110 00 Praha 1 (Czech Republic)

01.12.2025 - 02.12.2025

Deadline, September 1, 2025.

URL: https://www.leibniz-gwzo.de/sites/default/files/dateien/CfP_ArchivesOfMigration-2.pdf

Thursday, 3 July 2025

Izabela Mrzygłód: Uniwersytety w cieniu kryzysu. Nacjonalistyczna radykalizacja studentów Warszawy i Wiednia w okresie międzywojennym

 Izabela Mrzygłód: Uniwersytety w cieniu kryzysu. Nacjonalistyczna radykalizacja studentów Warszawy i Wiednia w okresie międzywojennym [Universities in the shadow of a crisis: Nationalist radicalisation of students in Warsaw and Vienna in the Interwar period]. Wydawnictwo UMK 2025. ISBN:978-83-231-6067-0, DOI:https://doi.org/10.12775/978-83-231-6068-7.


Uniwersytety w cieniu kryzysu. Nacjonalistyczna radykalizacja studentów Warszawy i Wiednia w okresie międzywojennym to krytyczne spojrzenie na przeszłość dwóch uczelni Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. Autorka stawia pytanie o powód, dla którego to właśnie studenci zostali awangardą nacjonalistycznych rewolucji. Analizuje praktyki i dyskursy skrajnej prawicy, której rola rosła na polskich i austriackich uniwersytetach w międzywojniu. Wykorzystując historyczne źródła i socjologiczną wyobraźnię, sięga do emocji i aspiracji „zwykłych akademików”. Pokazuje, jak organizacje samopomocowe przekształcały się w agendy antysemityzmu, jak kultura polityczna młodych naznaczona została przemocą, a brutalne ataki na żydowskich studentów i profesorów stały się codziennością. Śledzi, jak radykalna mniejszość była coraz głośniejsza i skutecznie przyciągała milczącą większość, a postulaty wykluczenia Żydów ze wspólnoty narodowej trafiły do głównego nurtu, żeby w końcu stać się oficjalną polityką rektoratów wprowadzających getto ławkowe. Praca przybliża atmosferę kryzysu i fascynację faszyzmem, ukazuje chronologię przemocy, bada nacjonalistyczne rytuały i symbole. Zestawienie szerokiej europejskiej perspektywy z historią w skali mikro daje nowe spojrzenie na II Rzeczpospolitą, I Republikę Austriacką i prawicowy radykalizm, nie tylko międzywojenny.

Wednesday, 2 July 2025

Guilherme Fians, Bernhard Struck, and Claire Taylor: Postcards, Translators and Esperanto Pioneers. An Alternative History of International Communication

 Guilherme Fians, Bernhard Struck, and Claire Taylor: Postcards, Translators and Esperanto Pioneers. An Alternative History of International Communication. University of London Press 2025. ISBN: 9781914477881


Esperanto has a rich and multifaceted history. Yet little is known about how ordinary Esperanto speakers used the language in its early decades. What happened to a language, created in a specific time and context, when it travelled to different places and contexts? At a time when steamships, international postal services and the telephone were setting the pace of the early twentieth century’s wave of globalisation, what role did languages play in this increasingly international and internationalist scenario?

This book begins to answer these questions by examining the archives of John Beveridge (1857–1943), a Scottish clergyman who became the founder of the Scottish Esperanto Federation and a key figure in this transnational speech community. It delves into Beveridge’s numerous letters and postcards to show how he made use of this constructed language to build transnational networks across Europe.

The book is also the first to focus on women in a constructed language movement and discusses how Beveridge’s daughters, Lois and Heather, played core roles through attending international Esperanto conferences and translating books into Esperanto. In exploring how the Beveridge family mobilised Esperanto as an internationalist tool, the book shows how languages and media help shape the ways in which we build our worlds through words, providing an alternative, “marginal” approach to early twentieth-century globalisation.

Crossing Boundaries: Human-Animal Relationships in Tsarist Russia and the Soviet Union

 The January 2025 special issue of SEER on "Crossing Boundaries: Human-Animal Relationships in Tsarist Russia and the Soviet Union...