Wednesday, 11 February 2026

Humanistyka w PRL-u [Humanities in Polish People's republic]

 Humanistyka w PRL-u [Humanities in Polish People's republic]. Thematic issue of Teksty Drugie. Teoria literatury, krytyka, interpretacja 2025.


OPEN ACCESS: https://rcin.org.pl/ibl/dlibra/publication/284353/edition/247608?language=pl#structure 



Wybór zaproponowanego tematu wiąże się z doświadczeniem kryzysu humanistyki we współczesnym świecie społecznym, a także z rolą humanistyki w kulturze, węziej zaś w nauce. O tym, że humanistyka we wszystkich tych obszarach ludzkiego świata jest w kryzysie, nie trzeba przekonywać. Choć od wielu lat prowadzone są badania w ramach krytycznych studiów nad uniwersytetem, głównie w obszarze uniwersytetów zachodnich, to jednak nie dają one nadziei na pozytywne koncepcje humanistyki. Właśnie dlatego warto zgłosić propozycję, by okrężną być może drogą próbować zarysować możliwe oraz zrealizowane wizje polskiej humanistyki powojennej. Wcielane w życie z porażkami, sukcesami lub tylko z częściowo pozytywnymi skutkami koncepcje humanistyki, które ze względu na określone warunki kulturowe i polityczne nie mogły być wdrożone, albo były, lecz zostały zapomniane lub zdewaluowane, a dziś mogłyby się okazać inspirujące ze względu na sposób ich ukształtowania i odziaływania na społeczny obieg wiedzy humanistycznej. \


CFP: Experiences and Perspectives of Female Patients

 CFP: Experiences and Perspectives of Female Patients: Body, Health and Disease across Europe (1450-1750), Trento (Italy), 30.03.2027 - 31.03.2027, Deadline:  30.03.2026


Object: Up to two-day international conference with a view to producing a peer-reviewed special issue with selected papers that will be submitted to the leading academic journal "Annali dell’Istituto storico italo-germanico in Trento" / "Jahrbuch des italienisch-deutschen historischen Instituts in Trient". The conference will be the concluding event of the research project titled "The Role of Gender in Medical Care. The Case of the Imperial Habsburg Family (16th–17th Centuries)" (Marie Skłodowska-Curie Project num. 101202043; https://gendmedhab.fbk.eu/).

Location and date: Italy, Italian-German Historical Institute of Trento, 30–31 March 2027.

Organizing committee: Alessandra Quaranta and Elena Taddei.

Subject fields: History of Medicine; History of the Body; Gender Studies; History of Knowledge Transfer; Social, Cultural, and Intellectual History; History of Emotions; Early Modern Europe.

Languages of the conference: English, German, and Italian.


In the last thirty years, the nexus between the social history of medicine and gender studies has often yielded studies on female healers. Inquiries into fascinating figures of female medical agents who operated in the medieval and early modern periods have illuminated their engagement in health care within the domestic context and beyond. By dealing with ill bodies, caring for sick family members, administering remedies, and washing and bandaging sores, women developed manual and technical competences, refined specialist know-how in pharmacy production, and observed the effects of materia medica upon the body. Recent historiography has also stressed that nursing was not an exclusively female terrain, thus recalibrating the roles of men and women in medical assistance within the household. The care of sick children was a shared responsibility between both fathers and mothers, who devoted effort, time, and emotion to sick and dying children, took turns sitting at their bedside, and comforted and kept them calm. Men were also involved in the experimentation of home-made medicines and in the compilation of domestic medical manuscripts that recorded the preparation of medicaments.


By contrast, the roles of women as patients and consumers of medical services have represented an under-researched topic thus far. While most works address this theme in general terms, neglecting a gender perspective, a few significant exceptions have been produced. These reconstruct not only pains and suffering of ill women but also their insights into the body and its mechanisms of healing. Building on this relevant but limited literature, the conference aims to amplify the spectrum of women who were confronted with everyday ailments, serious diseases, and the related therapies, interacting with a variety of (male and female) figures, both specialists and non-specialists, in relation to their health status.


The conference will be the occasion to bring to light a broader spectrum of female patients’ voices. These are hard-to-reach witnesses as the principal historical documents available are male-physician centred sources. Medical treatises and the published collections of medical letters and consultations aimed at enhancing the reputation of the author as practitioner and scholar, tending to obscure, undermine, or counterfeit the opinions of patients in general, and those of women in particular. These works were thus filtered by the pen of the writing physicians and their scholarly discourse. Furthermore, the direct witnesses of female patients, which are contained in family letters or recorded in the context of forensic medicine, have to be used with caution, as the way in which women talked about their health issues depended on different factors and circumstances as well as the self-image that women intended to convey according to the relationship with their interlocutors. Female witnesses were influenced by the discrepancy of social status between the women interrogated and the judges within tribunals, the hierarchical family structure of the early modern period, and the rigid social norms related to the physical and intellectual modesty that women were expected to comply with at that time.


Through an exploration of women’s experiences with and understandings of their own healthy and ill bodies, the conference endeavours to illuminate the roles of female patients within medical visits and their ability to influence their dynamics. Specifically, it scrutinizes women’s attitudes towards the attending physicians, their opinions on diagnoses and therapeutics, and their approaches to the (male) traditional conceptualisations of the body, health, and disease, as well as their emotional responses to illness, recovery, and physicians’ decisions. We are especially keen to refer to a wide range of early modern players and contexts. The investigation extends to a variety of socio-cultural settings—hospitals and charity facilities, municipal health boards, criminal or inquisitorial trials, monastic contexts, noble residences, court environments, literary and artistic circles—and focuses on female voices from the diverse European social strata. A comparison with the male perspective is also encouraged.


We welcome contributions focusing on one or more of the themes outlined below (depending on the historical sources utilized) or exploring analogous subjects:

- Female patients and the medical marketplace: which medical practitioners did women turn to and for what pathologies? What criteria did they adopt in their choices? What disputes, quarrels or tensions between female patients and their healers are attested?

- Cross-gender medical visits: what were the interactions between female patients and the attending male physicians and how did their interplay influence the outcomes of medical visits? Did women agree with the diagnostic assessments and therapeutic approaches of medical specialists and how did they respond to these?

- The relationships between female and male family members in regard to health issues: what importance did men attribute to the health of their female family members and to what extent did men contribute to preserve their good health status? Did fathers, brothers, and husbands seek to prevaricate their female family members in the negotiations with the doctors or, rather, did they encourage women to interact with the attending doctors and express their opinions?

- Women facing difficult childbirths and surgical operations.

- Women’s medical cultures, readings, and understandings of the female body and its pathologies, also in comparison with male medical perspectives or male non-professional standpoints.

- The networks of cultural, religious, and scientific relationships by way of which women apprehended medical notions and developed medical interpretations.

- The manner in which diseases were faced by women belonging to noble and wealthy households, ruling families, the lower classes, or religious orders: what were their emotional responses to illness and treatment? What kind of relationship did women have with their ill or enfeebled body?

- The representations and meanings of female physical or mental/spiritual illness in European literary texts, religious works, and visual arts.

- The consideration of illness in social terms: were ill women penalized or stigmatized and why? Was illness a disadvantage for women in terms of social and/or professional integration?

- The identities of women as healers and patients: relationships, potential overlapping or differences between the two roles.

- The topoi of the women’s physical weakness and their consequent precarious health, as historically produced by traditional male medicine, revisited through a female perspective.


Practical details

We are now inviting proposals for 20-minute-long unpublished papers in English, German, or Italian that address one or more of the themes indicated in our argument description, or similar issues, relating to European territories during the period 1450–1750.


Please send your contribution proposal in a single document, including the following details:

- name, surname, and affiliation of the author

- (provisional) title (and subtitle, if applicable) of the contribution

- abstract of the contribution (maximum 1,500 characters, including spaces)

- 5 keywords

- short bio-note (maximum 10 lines)


Please add your Academic curriculum vitae, including a list of the five most significant publications (maximum one page).


Please send one PDF-file by 30 March 2026 to the following email address: femalepatients@fbk.ue. Our responses will be transmitted by 30 May 2026.


Thank you for considering our invitation, and we look forward to the possibility of welcoming you to our conference.


With best regards,

Alessandra Quaranta and Elena Taddei (aquaranta@fbk.eu; elena.taddei@uibk.ac.at)


Tuesday, 10 February 2026

DEADLINE APPROACHING: Epistemic Passages: Knowledge in Translation, GWMT annual conference

  The board of the Society for the History of Science, Medicine, and Technology (GWMT) invites you to the 2026 annual conference in cooperation with the Masaryk Institute and Archives of the Czech Academy of Sciences, the Faculty of Social Sciences of Charles University and the Prague department of the Leibniz Institute for the History and Culture of Eastern Europe (GWZO).


The conference will take place 9–11 September 2026 in Prague and will focus on the theme:


Epistemic Passages: Knowledge in Translation


Taking the opportunity of convening in a city that over centuries experienced has the positive as well as the negative aspects of the encounter of different cultures, confessions, ideologies, or nations, the GWMT annual conference will focus on scholarly translation practices and their consequences. While translation is usually associated with so-called natural languages, our conference will extend beyond this to include knowledge moving across time, space, ideologies, religions and confessions, technical and media environments or between scholars and laypeople.


We want to focus on the dynamics of knowledge in transit and its interrelations with the settings it traverses and/or newly creates as it travels. How does knowledge become rewritten and reconceptualized to new contexts after years of being forgotten in dusky libraries? How does it change when it is appropriated into new confessional, social or ideological contexts? How does it change while travelling from discipline to discipline (as, e.g. from medicine to the humanities or vice versa)? How do scholars rewrite the knowledge of laypeople – and how do non-academics transform academic knowledge into one that is accessible for them and their networks? How does (academic) knowledge change when it is applied into practice? How is translation of knowledge technically mediated and informed?


Not only practices, but also specific understandings of translation are consequential. Assumed universality of scholarly knowledge, that only changed its attire while in transit, with facts or theories supposedly travelling without changing their content through languages, cultures, or disciplinary dialects, has long informed the politics of science’s propagation and popularisation, prioritising the academic content of communicated science over its potential to be understood by the non-academic public. Various linear models of how knowledge travels across languages and cultures underlie the modernisation-theory-based approaches to the “spread” and “communication” of science, linking thus science’s history with its present.


Therefore, the conference equally asks about the different modes of understanding translation and scholarly thinking about translation (termed ‘translation knowledge’ by Lieven D’hulst and Yves Gambier) and their repercussions. Which different ‘translation knowledges’ exist in different disciplines and how do they change over time? Which different vocabularies of translation exist, and how do they resonate with those in other fields and disciplines? Which consequences do different ‘translation knowledges’ have for the understanding of science in science-reflexive disciplines (philosophy, history, sociology of science, etc.)? How do changes of ‘translation knowledge’ impact the politics of science, science communication, discussions on technology acceptance, or the involvement of laypeople into the knowledge production labelled as citizen science? Which new conceptual or technical tools are developed, or old tools adjusted, to accommodate the changes to ‘translation knowledge’?


We welcome applications for entire panels as well as individual contributions. Presentations should not exceed 20 minutes in length. Sections consist of either four presentations or three presentations with commentary and last 120 minutes, including discussion. Applications for round-tables – a discussion-oriented format focusing on a common theme, consisting of up to five speakers and a moderator, allowing at least 60 minutes for general discussion – are explicitly encouraged. Please submit abstracts of approximately half a page in length using our submission form. For sections, a short introduction to the section should be submitted in addition to the abstracts of the individual presentations. If of equal quality, sections that span academic generations will be given preference. While the preference will be given to the applications that relate to the overall topic, we will accept applications on all topics of history of medicine, science, and technology.


Languages of the conference will be English and German.


Please submit proposals by 15 February 2026, using the online submission form on the GWMT website (www.gwmt.de). Please note: This is an in-person conference; exceptions are only possible for accessibility purposes.


Monday, 9 February 2026

CFP: 2nd edition of Asynchronous Histories Summer School

 Dear Colleagues,

we would like to kindly invite you to the 2nd edition of Asynchronous Histories Summer School which will be held in Warsaw 31 August - 4 September 2026:

 

https://ihpan.edu.pl/en/cfp-asynchronous-histories-summer-school/

 

The Asynchronous Histories Summer School aims to explore regions and moments in history marked by the coexistence of asynchronous sociopolitical tendencies and processes. These conditions often reveal paradoxical outcomes when seemingly well-established actors and mechanisms are put into practice. The absence—or inefficiency—of "The Great Synchronizer," whether imperial order, centralized state apparatus, or the power of capital, has, in various periods and regions, created fertile grounds for blending the old and the new in unequal and unexpected ways.

 

Rather than viewing this coexistence of asynchronicities as a static phenomenon, we understand it as a dynamic and intricate process. In such situations, old forms may act as tools paving the way for new developments, while new forms may consolidate old arrangements, laws, and privileges. This interplay also triggers epistemological challenges, as research tools developed in global centres often fail to yield productive results when applied to these complex settings. This is why it is both challenging and indispensable to abandon normative definitions of phenomena and states of affairs in favour of listening to local actors, whose diversity ultimately calls into question apparently universal models and descriptions of reality—models that, in practice, are deeply rooted in Western centres.

 

In adopting such a perspective, we draw inspiration from several contemporary intellectual currents that seek to develop thinking in this direction. First, Reinhart Koselleck’s concept of multiple temporalities enables us to discern the non-linear character of time in human societies. Second, postcolonial and subaltern narratives continually challenge Western epistemic frameworks that remain incongruent with large parts of the world beyond capitalist centers. Third, alternative conceptions of modernity pave the way for rethinking the modern project as a plural rather than a singular phenomenon.

 

By understanding asynchronicity in such ways, we aim to encourage a rethinking of the past through this powerful umbrella tool. We invite early-career scholars from all areas of the humanities and social sciences to join us in a shared intellectual exploration.

 

Among the distinguished lecturers for the second edition are:

 

Franz Fillafer - Austrian Academy of Sciences

Augusta Dimou – University of Leipzig

Helge Jordheim - University of Oslo

Karen Lauwers - University of Helsinki

Rosario Lopez – University of Málaga

Jani Marjanen – University of Helsinki

Banu Turnaoglu – University of Cambridge, Sabancı University

Oliver Zajac – Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava

Tomasz Zarycki - University of Warsaw

 

Organizing Institutions: 

Institute of Applied Social Sciences, University of Warsaw

The German Historical Institute, Warsaw

The Gabriel Narutowicz Institute of Political Thought, 

 

in partnership with

Tadeusz Manteuffel Institute of History of the Polish Academy of Sciences

The History of Concepts Group

 

Organizing Comittee: Anna Gulińska, Bartłomiej Błesznowski, Jan Krakowian, Piotr Kuligowski

 

We welcome submissions from PhD students. Advanced MA students and early career postdocs (up to two years post-defence) are also encouraged to apply.

 

How to Apply?

 

Please submit the following materials by May 31, 2026:

• a short CV (maximum two pages).

• a concise description of your research interests (up to 1,000 words).

Send your application to ahss.warsaw@gmail.com

 

The participation fee is 150 EUR or 650 PLN. In justified cases, this fee may be reduced.

 

Sunday, 8 February 2026

CFP: Mathematics & Language: A Historical Perspective workshop

 Join the Mathematics & Language: A Historical Perspective workshop, part of the Math & Society workshop series, in Brno, Czechia, on 4–5 June 2026.

Invited speakers: Amirouche Moktefi (Tallin) and Kateřina Trlifajová (Prague). 

We're inviting abstracts (200–500 words) on topics including  mathematics as language, translations, mathematical practices and cultural, mathematical symbolism, nomography and other outdated disciplines.

Deadline: 1 May 2026

More: https://math-and-society.webnode.page/

Friday, 6 February 2026

CFA: Special Issue: "Popularisation: An Entangled History of Science and Religion"

 Special Issue: "Popularisation: An Entangled History of Science and Religion"


Guest Editors: Dr. Elena Schaa and Annika Kraft


The popularisation of academic knowledge continuously shapes the way we make sense of the societal and natural world. Consequently, the societal function of religion as the main system of meaning-making changed. Since the professionalisation of the sciences (including the humanities and social sciences) in the 19th century, popularisation has made the specialised knowledge produced at diGerent academic institutions and ventures available to a wider audience. For religion, the professionalisation of the sciences has largely been described in terms of secularisation or disenchantment. While much has been written on the replacement of religion including the refutation of such a thesis, little has been said about the many ways science and religion have been and continue to be entangled. Recent research has shed light on the way religion may serve as a medium to make sense of academic knowledge or the lack thereof (Grieser 2015), communicate knowledge (De Cruz 2020, Schrempp 2012), critique science (Schaa 2024), or shape the pursuit of new knowledge (Borrelli 2015). In the case of popularisation religion is both the object of boundary-work and a resource to make scientific knowledge meaningful.

Building on this research, the Special Issue seeks to explore the entangled history of science and religion in the case of science popularisation, by addressing themes such as but not restricted to: [1] religion as a medium for popularisation of academic knowledge, [2] popularisation as a practice of worldview making, and [3] popularisation of academic knowledge shaping the concept of religion/s. We invite historical case studies with diGerent foci on academic disciplines, media, or practices that elucidate/examine popularisation as a key aspect of the entangled history of science and religion. In return, the contributions elucidate popularisation as a key term for science-and-religion studies. The special issue will shed new light on how religion forms the societal role science plays in shaping historical and imagined realities of modern societies through popularisation.

We intend to propose a Special Issue on the topic of ‘popularisation,’ comprising approximately 5-7 contributions in German, English and possibly French or Italian. We welcome contributions that deepen our understanding of the entangled history of science and religion by bringing case studies in conversation with reflection on popularisations. Please send an abstract of up to 300 words along with a brief bio, to Elena Schaa schaae@tcd.ie or Annika Kraft annika.kraft@uni-muenster.de by March 1st 2026 .

We do not yet have a place for the special issue, but we are in conversation with an open-access journal, which will subject all contributions to a double-blind peer review process.


Literature

Asprem, Egil (2016), ‘How Schrödinger’s Cat Became a Zombie. On the Epidemiology of Science-Based Representations in Popular and Religious Contexts.’, In: Method and Theory in the Study of Religion 28, 113-140.

Borrelli, Arianna (2019) ‘Poetic Imagination in Scientific Practice: Grand Unification as Narrative Worldmaking’, In Johannsen, D., Kirsch, A., Kreinarth, J., Narrative Cultures and the Aesthetics of Religion (Leiden: Brill), 314–344.

De Cruz, H. (2020), ‘Awe and Wonder in Scientific Practice: Implications for the Relationship Between Science and Religion’, In: Fuller, M., Evers, D., Runehov, A., Sæther, KW., Michollet, B. (eds) Issues in Science and Theology: Nature – and Beyond, , (Cham: Springer).

Gladigow, Burkhard (1995) ‘Europäische Religionsgeschichte’, In: Kippenberg, H. G., Luchesi, B., Lokale Religionsgeschichte. Marburg: diagonal-Verlag, 21-42.

Grieser, Alexandra (2015), ‘Imaginationen des Nichtwissens: Zur Hubble Space Imagery und den Figurationen des schönen Universums zwischen Wissenschaft, Kunst und Religion’, In Traut, L.

and Wilke, A. (eds), Religion – Imagination – Ästhetik: Vorstellungs- und Sinneswelten in Religion und Kultur, (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht), 451–486.

Schaa, Elena (2024), A Medium of Cultural Critique and a Framework for Interpretation: Religion in Werner Heisenberg's Popular Writings , (Trinity College Dublin).

Schrempp, G. (2012), The Ancient Mythology of Modern Science: A Mythologist Looks (Seriously) at Popular Science Writing , (Montreal, Ithaca: McGill-Queen’s University Press).

Wednesday, 4 February 2026

Experts in Transition: Political Epistemologies of 1980s–2000s East Central Europe

July 9–10, 2026, Institute of Contemporary History, Ljubljana

Deadline March 15, 2026.


Research on experts and expertise in state socialism has developed, in recent years, from national case studies embedded in overarching accounts of “Cold War expertise,” to transnational histories of knowledge production, to a renewed appreciation for thick descriptions of the political, social, and epistemological contexts of expertise as developed in and for the purposes of socialism. In particular, work in social history and the history of labor, the history of science, and intellectual history has been addressing the role of experts in the political economy and class structure of socialist countries in the region. This has also inspired efforts to revisit the conceptual and theoretical approaches to expertise with the insight of the historical legacies of anti-capitalist political epistemologies from East Central Europe. At the same time, new research has focused on the 1980s and 1990s as part of broader processes of transformation, combining perspectives on the shifts in global capitalism and the development of international expertise with accounts of political, economic, and social change on the semi-peripheries and theories of elite transformation. Taking stock of this scholarship and uniting approaches developed by the Marie Skłodowska-Curie research project “Trans/Socio: Transnational Sociology and Concepts of Social Expertise in Eastern Europe, 1970s–2000s” (Institute of Contemporary History, Ljubljana) and the project “Political Epistemologies of Central and Eastern Europe” (PECEE), the “Experts in Transition” conference explores expertise at the end of state socialism in East Central Europe from three interconnected perspectives. Focusing on socialist experts, the experts of transition, and expertise after the end of socialism, we examine different understandings of the expert and the role of expertise through periods of transformation.

1. Who were the socialist experts and what were they experts of?

The workshop will inquire into what types of experts and kinds of expertise were engendered by socialism specifically, whether or not historical actors would have described the particular configuration of material determinations, social relations, and images of science that they were engaged in as “socialist expertise.” This involves reconstructing the political epistemologies of the 1980s from a historically grounded understanding of the functioning of socialism at the level of institutions and practices, including in terms of processes of class formation among the intelligentsia. We are interested in how the very role of the expert and the concept of expertise were developed from socialist positions and in relation to Marxist epistemology, and ask what were the state supported, socially recognized, as well as informal types of expertise stemming from the context of state socialism—its economy, politics, and society.

2. Who were the experts of transition? 

The workshop aims to revisit the debate over the role of experts in the late socialist and postsocialist periods by looking beyond economic expertise in the context of the global consolidation of neoliberalism, which has largely dominated research on experts in transition, and turning to social expertise in particular, but not exclusively. By looking at how expertise about social transformations has been constructed in socialism from as early as the 1950s and how it developed politically into the 1980s, the workshop aims to tease out the divergent understandings of social change, social inequality, and social justice already present before the transitions to liberal democracy and market economy in the region. We ask what was the accumulated knowledge regarding the “social costs” of economic and political transformation, and how this knowledge was mobilized over the 1980s and 1990s. This includes discussions about limited social mobility, lack of political engagement among the youth, poverty and social exclusion, or gender inequality, among others. We explore the extent to which these informed policy making in the late socialist and postsocialist periods, and how state expertise was established, challenged, and reconstituted in the process.

3. What happened to expertise on socialism since 1989?

Finally, the workshop is concerned with what became of the expertise specific to socialism after 1989—in terms of individual biographies of experts, the shifting “geographies of expertise” from centers to peripheries, the institutional and non-institutional continuities in cultures of expertise, and the ebb and flow of critical expertise, particularly Marxist. At the same time, it looks at the kind of expertise developed in and for transition. On the one hand, this means recognizing how the political epistemologies engendered by the decades-long practice of socialism endured and were repurposed after socialism, in different configurations, with different framings, and at different speeds across disciplines and topics of expertise. On the other hand, it involves asking how radical rupture was instrumentalized in the 1990s to establish new fields and networks of expertise, in explicit opposition to the political epistemologies of socialism. This includes questions about the transnational embeddedness of experts from the late socialist and postsocialist periods, how epistemic inequality was perceived and negotiated beyond the national contexts, in regional, transregional, and global contexts, and the beginnings of long-standing debates about the role of local and foreign expertise in East Central Europe.

The workshop aims to bring together early career scholars (including PhD students) and established researchers interested in exploring the questions of experts and expertise in transition in East Central Europe along these broadly defined lines. Possible topics include, but are not limited to:

-         case studies of individual experts in all areas of science;

-         specific debates around concepts, theory, social, and scientific practice;

-         inequality research during and after socialism.

-         the role of experts and expertise in policy making;

-         the interplay between local, transnational, and international expertise;

-         perspectives on transition as a concept and process up to the early 2000s.

The workshop will take place on July 9–10, 2026, at the Institute of Contemporary History in Ljubljana. To apply, please send the title and abstract (up to 500 words) of your proposed presentation, together with a short bio, to adela.hincu@inz.si and pecee.initiative@gmail.com. The deadline for submissions is March 15 and the program will be finalized at the beginning of April. Participants without institutional resources will be offered support within the limit of available funding.

The workshop is funded by the European Union through the Marie Skłodowska-Curie research project “Trans/Socio: Transnational Sociology and Concepts of Social Expertise in Eastern Europe, 1970s–2000s” at the Institute of Contemporary History (Ljubljana); the Chair of History of Science, Faculty of Philosophy of the University of Erfurt (Germany); the Leibniz Institute for the History and Culture in Eastern Europe (Germany); the Faculty Center for Transdisciplinary Historical and Cultural Studies at the University of Vienna (Austria); and the Lumina Quaeruntur fellowship “Images of science” in Czechoslovakia 1918-1945-1968” at the Masaryk Institute and Archives of the Czech Academy of Sciences (Prague).



Call for Papers: Socialist Techno-Optimism and Governance of Economic Development, 1955–1991

Call for Papers: Socialist Techno-Optimism and Governance of Economic Development, 1955–1991

Slavic-Eurasian Research Center at Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

September 15–16, 2026

The Slavic-Eurasian Research Center at Hokkaido University and the Institute of Contemporary History in Ljubljana, in collaboration with the Institute of Contemporary History of the Czech Academy of Sciences, invite proposals for a dual workshop devoted to two interconnected themes: techno-optimism, understood as positive expectations about the transformative power of science and technology, and knowledge-driven models of economic governance and environmental management under state socialism.

The first part of the workshop examines socialist techno-optimism as a discursive, cultural, and epistemic formation. It explores how expectations surrounding science and technology emerged, circulated, and were contested in official, sanctioned, and unofficial discourses, as well as in popular culture. Socialist techno-optimism was articulated through narratives of the Scientific-Technical Revolution, automation, and computing as symbols of a transformed future, while simultaneously generating skepticism and irony. Particular attention is given to popular science magazines, science fiction, film, television, and visual media that both promoted socialist futurisms and exposed their contradictions. These cultural forms blurred the boundaries between imagination and reality and sustained hopes for technological progress even amid growing systemic disillusionment.

The second part of the workshop addresses socialist technocracy as a key approach to governing economic development between 1955 and 1991 and, increasingly, environmental processes. It treats socialist technocracy as a historically specific alignment of expertise, institutions, and political authority that rendered economic processes legible, measurable, and open to algorithmic governance and management. This part explores the role of planning, cybernetics, environmental management, and consumption policies in strategies of socialist development. Contributions analyze how these approaches informed economic reform and modernization within socialist states, structured development models introduced in the Global South, and connected domestic economic management with international development agendas. By integrating conceptual, institutional, and empirical perspectives, this part of the workshop situates socialist technocracy within Cold War debates on economic development, expertise, and democracy, and highlights its lasting impact on post-socialist political economies and contemporary discussions of technocratic decision making.

The organizers welcome paper proposals that engage these themes from conceptual, institutional, and empirical perspectives, with particular interest in contributions on Asian socialisms, as well as comparative, transnational, and globally connected approaches. Proposals should consist of an abstract of up to 300 words and a short biographical paragraph. Please note that the organizers are unable to cover travel or accommodation costs. Selected papers are planned for publication in a peer-reviewed edited volume. Abstracts and biographical notes should be submitted by February 28, 2026, to ivan.sablin@inz.si.


Augusta Dimou: Contesting Copyright. A History of Intellectual Property in East Central Europe and the Balkans. CEU Press 2026

Augusta Dimou: Contesting Copyright. A History of Intellectual Property in East Central Europe and the Balkans. CEU Press 2026. ISBN 9789633866146


The creative sector, including the cultural industry, is key for today’s economy. Copyright has the capacity to fix the roles and tasks of the actors involved and determine the direction of cash flows within this sector. The study of the evolution of copyright helps understand and adjust the regulation and commercialization of creative labor. Augusta Dimou provides a thoroughly researched, interdisciplinary and comparative study of the historical development of copyright regimes in three countries – Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, and Bulgaria. She examines the function and significance of copyright in the institutionalization, development, and regulation of modern culture in East Central Europe and the Balkans during the diverse political regimes of the modern era, and at the interface between the various nationalization and globalization processes of the 20th century.


Author

Augusta Dimou

Augusta Dimou specializes in the Modern History of East and Southeast Europe from a comparative, transnational perspective. She is Privatdozentin at the Institute for the Study of Culture of the University of Leipzig and has held academic positions at the University of Ioannina, Humboldt University in Berlin, IOS-Regensburg and GWZO in Leipzig. She has been a fellow at Maison des Sciences de l’ Homme (Paris), IWM (Vienna), FRIAS (Freiburg), CAS (Sofia) and New Europe College (NEC) in Bucharest.

Sunday, 1 February 2026

online event: Animals In and Beyond Wartime

 online event: Animals In and Beyond Wartime


How does war shape the lives of animals, ecosystems, and the natural world?

We invite you to consider this question and reflect on life and resilience with leading scholars, including Dr. Tanya Richardson, Dr. Arita Holmberg, Olha Matsko, and Dr. Julia Malitska, as part of the 𝘙𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘜𝘬𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦’𝘴 𝘌𝘯𝘷𝘪𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵: 𝘞𝘢𝘳, 𝘌𝘤𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘥𝘦, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘉𝘦𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘥 international seminar series.

𝗔𝗻𝗶𝗺𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝗜𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗕𝗲𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝗪𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲

𝟭𝟮 𝗙𝗲𝗯𝗿𝘂𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲

𝟭𝟬 𝗮.𝗺. 𝗠𝗦𝗧 (𝗘𝗱𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗼𝗻) / 𝟭𝟮 𝗽.𝗺. 𝗘𝗦𝗧 (𝗧𝗼𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗼) / 𝟭𝟴:𝟬𝟬 𝗖𝗘𝗧 (𝗪𝗮𝗿𝘀𝗮𝘄) / 𝟭𝟵:𝟬𝟬 𝗘𝗘𝗧 (𝗞𝘆𝗶𝘃)

𝗢𝗻𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗼𝗻𝗹𝘆 | 𝗥𝗲𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗱

Read the discussion abstracts, learn more and register: https://www.ualberta.ca/en/canadian-institute-of-ukrainian-studies/projects/seminar-series-rethinking-ukraines-environment/animals-in-and-beyond-wartime.html

__________

Hosted by the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies (CIUS), this international seminar series is a joint initiative of the EnvHistUA Research Group and CIUS, with further support from the Centre for Baltic and East European Studies (Södertörn University), Center for Governance and Culture in Europe (University of St. Gallen), and the European Society for Environmental History (ESEH). 




Call for Papers: Subverting Hierarchies through Women’s Intellectual History in Eastern Europe in the Long Twentieth Century

 Call for Papers: Subverting Hierarchies through Women’s Intellectual History in Eastern Europe in the Long Twentieth Century



Call for Papers

for a special journal issue to be submitted to History of European Ideas

Subverting Hierarchies through Women’s Intellectual History in Eastern Europe in the Long Twentieth Century

Editors: Isidora Grubački (Institute of Contemporary History, Ljubljana), Zsófia Lóránd (University of Vienna), Emily Steinhauer (independent scholar)



Call for Papers (download):  WIH CfP (https://inz.si/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/WIH-CfP_final_L.pdf)



In Eastern Europe, the long twentieth century—the period roughly between the 1890s and the 2000s—was marked by struggles for women’s rights, abruptly changing gender regimes, and a maelstrom of diverse as well as often monolithically dominant –isms. In these various contexts, women intervened into various male-centered discourses from a women-centered position, while writing, thinking, and arguing about processes of emancipation, education, (forced) modernization, the break with the traditional rural community, and many other themes which speak not only toward European but global processes too. As a recent collection of texts and contexts from the history of feminism and women’s rights in East Central Europe has shown, women’s interventions in the public sphere encompassed topics including war, sexuality, and the politicization of motherhood, to name only three.[1] Yet, women from Central and Eastern Europe still remain marginal in the fields of European and global intellectual history, falling between the cracks of studies on the Western part of the Northern hemisphere, but also those, still largely male-dominated, of Central and Eastern Europe and even of the Global South. This omission means that the contributions of women from Eastern and Central Europe remain largely absent—not only in relation to the experience of the decades-long emancipation project of real existing socialism, but also in terms of longer-term negotiations with other ideologies such as agrarianism, nationalism, and anarchism, as well as the ways in which identity and belonging have been shaped by migration and shifting borders in this post-imperial space. These dynamics make the region specific and relevant as a region on a global scale.



This special journal issue examines women’s intellectual history in Central and Eastern Europe throughout the long twentieth century. However, rather than merely addressing an existing gap, it seeks to challenge and redefine the field as such by engaging with carefully selected case studies of women’s political thought in the region. The inclusion of women from Central and Eastern Europe into intellectual historical investigations means revisiting the gender of who produces intellectual discourses worthy of attention, from where they can speak, and through which fora (i.e. type of sources) they communicate. In this context, rethinking the methodology of intellectual history from the perspective of Eastern and Central European women can help us think about research in intellectual history beyond the traditionally practiced methods. Even more importantly, this also means thinking beyond traditionally used sources, a call articulated for decades by intellectual historians of women’s thought.



This journal issue identifies and hence engages with two major tasks. Women’s intellectual history must reflect upon the existing power-structures that have shaped the interpretation of material and so canonized some texts and dismissed others, namely on the basis of gender and region. Archival sources must be brought back into the methodological framework of intellectual history. This also means opening up the field to new genres of texts, as well as new understandings of text- and knowledge-production, such as the collaborative processes behind textual genesis. In this context, this collection of articles contributes to the ongoing scholarly effort to challenge the hierarchy of gender while additionally seeking to subvert two enduring hierarchies that have traditionally shaped intellectual history: hierarchies of regions and hierarchies of sources.



We invite papers focusing on women’s thought from / in Eastern and Central Europe (including émigré histories) in the long twentieth century (1890–2000) that engage with methods and approaches from intellectual history and the history of political thought.



Please send proposals, which include an abstract (max. 1 page) with a short bibliography (including references to theory and methods) of your planned paper and a short CV, by April 17, 2026, to the following address: heressee.zeitgeschichte@univie.ac.at



Contributors will receive a longer concept paper which outlines the intellectual scope of the special journal issue as well as further practical guidance. An initial online meeting of all contributors and editors is scheduled for mid-June 2026 and will provide the opportunity to workshop papers before the deadline for finished papers: October 15, 2026.



[1]Zsófia Lóránd, Adela Hîncu, Jovana Mihajlović Trbovc, and Katarzyna Stańczak-Wiślicz, eds., Texts and Contexts from the History of Feminism and Women’s Rights: East Central Europe, Second Half of the Twentieth Century (Budapest–New York: Central European University Press, 2024).

Call for Papers: Socialist Techno-Optimism and Governance of Economic Development, 1955–1991

 Call for Papers: Socialist Techno-Optimism and Governance of Economic Development, 1955–1991

Slavic-Eurasian Research Center at Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan

September 15–16, 2026

The Slavic-Eurasian Research Center at Hokkaido University and the Institute of Contemporary History in Ljubljana, in collaboration with the Institute of Contemporary History of the Czech Academy of Sciences, invite proposals for a dual workshop devoted to two interconnected themes: techno-optimism, understood as positive expectations about the transformative power of science and technology, and knowledge-driven models of economic governance and environmental management under state socialism.

The first part of the workshop examines socialist techno-optimism as a discursive, cultural, and epistemic formation. It explores how expectations surrounding science and technology emerged, circulated, and were contested in official, sanctioned, and unofficial discourses, as well as in popular culture. Socialist techno-optimism was articulated through narratives of the Scientific-Technical Revolution, automation, and computing as symbols of a transformed future, while simultaneously generating skepticism and irony. Particular attention is given to popular science magazines, science fiction, film, television, and visual media that both promoted socialist futurisms and exposed their contradictions. These cultural forms blurred the boundaries between imagination and reality and sustained hopes for technological progress even amid growing systemic disillusionment.

The second part of the workshop addresses socialist technocracy as a key approach to governing economic development between 1955 and 1991 and, increasingly, environmental processes. It treats socialist technocracy as a historically specific alignment of expertise, institutions, and political authority that rendered economic processes legible, measurable, and open to algorithmic governance and management. This part explores the role of planning, cybernetics, environmental management, and consumption policies in strategies of socialist development. Contributions analyze how these approaches informed economic reform and modernization within socialist states, structured development models introduced in the Global South, and connected domestic economic management with international development agendas. By integrating conceptual, institutional, and empirical perspectives, this part of the workshop situates socialist technocracy within Cold War debates on economic development, expertise, and democracy, and highlights its lasting impact on post-socialist political economies and contemporary discussions of technocratic decision making.

The organizers welcome paper proposals that engage these themes from conceptual, institutional, and empirical perspectives, with particular interest in contributions on Asian socialisms, as well as comparative, transnational, and globally connected approaches. Proposals should consist of an abstract of up to 300 words and a short biographical paragraph. Please note that the organizers are unable to cover travel or accommodation costs. Selected papers are planned for publication in a peer-reviewed edited volume. Abstracts and biographical notes should be submitted by February 28, 2026, to ivan.sablin@inz.si.


Thursday, 29 January 2026

Petr Pavlas, Lenka Řezníková, Lucie Storchová (eds.) Cognitive Metaphors and Encyclopaedic Knowledge: Exploring Semantic Transformations in Early Modernity

Petr Pavlas, Lenka Řezníková, Lucie Storchová (eds.) Cognitive Metaphors and Encyclopaedic Knowledge: Exploring Semantic Transformations in Early Modernity. Praha: Filosofický časopis a Filosofia, 2025 ISBN: 978-80-7007-810-5 


Special Issue of The Philosophical Journal 1/2025. OPEN ACCESS: https://filcasop.flu.cas.cz/images/PDF_NA_WEB/MC_2025_01/FC-2025-1-special-issue.pdf


Metaphors in science, philosophy, and the arts are fundamental to the history of thought, serving not only to simplify complex matters but also to foster invention, speculation, and theory. Among other functions, they played an important role in the emergence of modern ideas of the encyclopaedia and encyclopaedism, thereby contributing to programs of universal knowledge, general education, and, more recently, open science. While conceptual history is widely recognised as crucial and has been thoroughly studied, the history of metaphors has so far remained in the background. This publication aims to bring it to the forefront.


Petr Pavlas, Lenka Řezníková, Lucie Storchová: Editorial

Alessandro Nannini: Georgics of the Mind: Cultivation of the Self as Agriculture in the Early Modern Age

Petr Pavlas: From Circle to Book: The Evolution of Metaphors and the Birth of Early Modern Encyclopaedism

Lenka Řezníková: The Metaphor of Harmony in Early Modern Knowledge Organisation: Comeniusʼ Pansophy Caught between Aesthetics and Mechanics

Lucie Storchová: Metaphors of the Human Heart and Their Epistemological Shifts after 1600: A Case Study in Changes in Wittenberg Natural Philosophy and Discourses of Power

Martin Žemla: See, Hear, Taste: Sensory Metaphors and Their Use before and in Paracelsianism

Márton Szentpéteri: Metaphors of Universal Architecture and the Architecture of Vanities in Miklós Bethlen’s Works






Wednesday, 28 January 2026

Call for Papers: The Role of Academies in the Co-Evolution of Science and the State

 Call for Papers: The Role of Academies in the Co-Evolution of Science and the State

The European Academies' Research Initiative, EARI, is organising a workshop on "The Role of Academies in the Co-Evolution of Science and the State", to take place at the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina in Halle (Saale) on 4-6 November 2026. The EARI Steering Committee is issuing a call for papers for presentation at this event. Details: https://www.leopoldina.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Dokumente/2026_Call_for_papers_EARI_Workshop.pdf

Interested researchers are called to submit an abstract of no more than 500 words and short academic CV by 1 April 2026 to Christiane.Diehl@leopoldina.org.

Applicants will be notified of acceptance by 30 April 2026.

A limited number of travel grants for junior researchers will be available.


Kontakt

Dr. Christiane Diehl

christiane.diehl@leopoldina.org


[Image: Pressebild 61572, Versammlung in der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Berlin, der ehemaligen Hauptstadt der DDR, Deutsche Demokratische Republik. https://www.ddrbildarchiv.de/info/ddr-fotos/versammlung-akademie-wissenschaften-berlin-ehemaligen-hauptstadt-ddr-deutsche-demokratische-republik-61572.html)



Sunday, 25 January 2026

𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐚 𝐂𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐞𝐚 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞

 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐡 𝐄𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐚 𝐂𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐞𝐚 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞, annually organized by Ceraneum, 𝐰𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐛𝐞 𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐝 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞

Uniwersytet Łódzki, 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐝, 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐌𝐚𝐲 𝟕 𝐭𝐨 𝟗, 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔.

If you have a keen interest in the 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐟𝐨𝐨𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐞, of Late Antiquity, Byzantium, and the medieval Slavs, this is an event you won't want to miss!

The conference will take place in a hybrid format, allowing participants to join both in person and online, and it will delve into a diverse range of thematic areas, including the 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐟𝐨𝐨𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐞.

𝐃𝐫. 𝐂𝐡𝐫𝐲𝐬𝐬𝐚 𝐁𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐛𝐨𝐮 from the Ephorate of Antiquities of Chania, Hellenic Ministry of Culture, and 𝐃𝐫. 𝐄𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐨𝐭𝐨𝐬-𝐉𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐬 from the University of Glasgow, will be the plenary speakers.

Please submit your proposals for panels or round tables, including the list of confirmed speakers, as well as individual submissions, 𝐛𝐲 𝐅𝐞𝐛𝐫𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝟐𝟖, 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔, to colloquia.ceranea@uni.lodz.pl

For more details and application forms, click on the following link: https://www.ceraneum.uni.lodz.pl/colloquia-ceranea

Conference of Junior Scholars in East European Studies

Call for Papers: 33. Tagung Junger Osteuropa-Expert*innen / 33rd Conference of Junior Scholars in the Field of East European Studies (JOE)

The annual Conference of Junior Scholars in East European Studies will take place from 11-13 June 2026 in Hamburg. The conference aims to bring together scholars from various disciplines with a focus on Eastern Europe, namely advanced students, PhD candidates, and young scholars who have already completed their doctoral research. The conference encourages all participants to present and discuss their research projects with other prospective scholars and qualified professionals. The conference provides an overview of current research projects on East Central and Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia in the German-speaking area. It enables interdisciplinary exchange and networking among young scholars.


We look forward to receiving your project outlines from the humanities and the social sciences, from law, economics, and related disciplines.

In addition, proposals for panels consisting of three thematically coherent contributions may be suggested. Contributions can be submitted in German and English. Passive knowledge of the German language is necessary as there will be no simultaneous interpretation.


The conference is organized by the German Association for East European Studies (DGO), dem Institute for Slavic Studies along with the professorship for History of Eastern Europe at the University of Hamburg, the professorship for History of Eastern and Central Eastern Europe at the Helmut Schmidt University / University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg, and the Northeast Institute at the University of Hamburg (IKGN). The costs for accommodation and catering are covered by the organizers. Travel expenses will not be refunded.


Suggestions for individual projects:


An abstract of 400 words max. relating the research question, findings, theoretical ap-proach and method;

Five keywords to summarize the thematic focus along with a designation of the region and period of research;

Information about the status of the research project and its institutional affiliation.

Suggestions for panels:


A summary of 200 words max. including the title, topic, and target of the panel;

Abstracts and information on the individual texts (as above);

Five keywords to summarize the thematic focus along with a designation of the region and period of research;

A panel should consist of three speakers and represent at least two different institutions. A chair will be provided by the organizers.

Please send your applications by 15 February 2026 to joe-tagung@dgo-online.org


Selection decisions will be communicated by early March 2026.


In case of acceptance, participants will have to submit a German or English-language paper (3.000 words max.) by 11 May 2026. It will be made accessible to the other participants prior to the conference.


Unfortunately, projects that have already been presented cannot be considered.


CFP: Democracy on the Edge: Science, Technology and Political Promise in Central and Eastern Europe, Panel at EASST 2026

 We invite submissions to the combined-format open panel:

Democracy on the Edge: Science, Technology and Political Promise in Central and Eastern Europe

EASST 2026 – Combined Format Open Panel (CB212), September 8-11, 2026, Kraków


Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) has long lived “on the edge” of empires, political cultures, economic systems, and ways of knowing. Today it again occupies a liminal position within global sociotechnical transformations—from energy transitions to digitalisation. Through a panel discussion and two paper-based workshops, Democracy on the Edge invites researchers from and beyond CEE to examine forms of life, value, and sociotechnical imaginaries at the edge.

Here, the edge functions both as metaphor and method: a site of instability, friction, and creativity with which to interrogate implicit norms of sociotechnical progress. The sessions draw on STS scholarship linking political cultures and institutions with science and technology (Sheila Jasanoff on co-production; Yaron Ezrahi on democracy and imagination; Kaushik Sunder Rajan and Adriana Petryna on citizenship), while engaging concepts deeply rooted in CEE experience—imitation, precarity, performance, and development.

We invite empirical (historical and contemporary) and theoretical contributions that reflect on transitions, the role of computing in CEE pasts and futures, and the (often failed or suspended) promises shaping regional imaginaries. Central themes include, but are not limited to:

1989 ↔ 2025: cyclical transitions, generational imaginaries, constitutional moments

Infrastructure: political, scientific, and technological layering over time

Geography and identity: borders, peripheries, rescaled belongings

Materialities of transition: from energy grids to neural networks

Temporal edges: anticipation, delay, suspension

The panel is open to scholars at all career stages. While grounded in Central and Eastern Europe, we encourage contributions that place CEE in comparative or global perspective, especially with other regions that share elements of the ‘democracy on the edge’ identity in today’s rapidly transforming techno-political realities, from Taiwan to India to the United States. 

Please note that, in order to make the paper-based workshops successful, accepted contributors are expected to share a draft of their paper with panel participants in advance of the conference. 

Abstracts due February 28, 2026. Panel details and submission link:https://nomadit.co.uk/conference/easst2026/p/18260

We look forward to your submissions and to collectively exploring what it means to study democracy, science, and technology from the edge—without assuming the centre knows best.

Best regards,

Panel organizers:

Tadeusz Józef Rudek (Jagiellonian University)

Margarita Boenig-Liptsin (ETH Zürich)

Aleksandra Wagner (Jagiellonian University)

Sebastian Pfotenhauer (Technical University of Munich)

Anna Lytvynova (ETH Zürich)

Oliwia Mandrela (Jagiellonian University)

Alexander Wentland (Technical University of Munich)

Monika Wulz (Leuphana University)


Wednesday, 21 January 2026

Miroslav Vodrážka: Systémově zneužitá a zneužívající Československá psychiatrie v Soft-sovětském stylu (1948-1989) [Systemically abused and abusive Czechoslovak psychiatry in the Soft-Soviet style (1948-1989)].

 Miroslav Vodrážka: Systémově zneužitá a zneužívající Československá psychiatrie v Soft-sovětském stylu (1948-1989) [Systemically abused and abusive Czechoslovak psychiatry in the Soft-Soviet style (1948-1989)]. Muzeum paměti XX.století , Ústav pro studium totalitních režimů 2025. ISBN: 978-80-53066-04-4

Tato kritická studie dokládá na základě konkrétních dobových příkladů, že pojem „zneužívání psychiatrie“ je třeba definovat a pojímat v širším slova smyslu, a to zejména z hlediska jeho realizace v rámci totalitárního systému. Zároveň je i historickým příspěvkem k problému vyrovnání se s minulostí.

Dosavadní úzké chápání pojmu redukuje problém pouze na zneužívání odborných lékařských znalostí či tzv. „chybných diagnóz“, terapeutických postupů, účelových teorií a využívání lékařů-psychiatrů, kteří se stávali nástroji perzekuce vůči oponentům režimu. To ale nepostihuje a zejména nevysvětluje komplexně historický problém zneužívání československé psychiatrie v soft-sovětském stylu v letech 1948–1989, včetně otázky, proč se i někteří přední psychiatři stávali agenty Státní bezpečnosti a někteří z nich byli přímo řízeni sovětskou tajnou službou KGB.

Tuesday, 20 January 2026

New publication: Translation Studies before ‘Translation Studies’. Nothing happened?

 Translation Studies before ‘Translation Studies’. Nothing happened?

Edited by Kathryn Batchelor and Iryna Odrekhivska

UCL Press

Free download: https://bit.ly/4nglVku



*******************************************     

Translation Studies before ‘Translation Studies’ challenges the established historical narratives of ‘translation studies’ by showcasing some of the rich traditions of debate, research and theorising that happened around the world in the centuries prior to the supposed beginnings of the discipline. The volume includes selected extracts by scholars and translators from the ‘nothing happened’ period. Beginning in Ancient Rome, the volume moves through Medieval China and India, Early Modern Europe, the 18th and 19th centuries in Europe, Africa, Asia, the Arab World and South America, before concluding with 20-century extracts from countries such as Brazil, Ukraine, Poland, China, Netherlands and Slovakia.



The extracts are accompanied by contextualising essays that explore the ideas presented in the context of their time, as well as providing a link between these writers and the concepts of post-1972 translation studies. All of the extracts were originally written in languages other than English and most make their debut here in English translation, amplifying the accessibility and significance of these previously overlooked contributions.


Call for panelists: Designing Progress: Arts, Sciences, and the State in Twentieth-Century CESEE

Call for panelists: Designing Progress: Arts, Sciences, and the State in Twentieth-Century CESEE, Call for panelists for a section at ASEEES 2026 in Chicago, November 12-15, 2026 (https://aseees.org/convention/2026-annual-convention/).


The history of the 'Long 20th Century' in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe (CESEE) is often recounted through the prism of shifting borders and ideological ruptures. However, one consistent theme emerges throughout these decades: an unwavering belief in the transformative power of scientific rationality. From post-1918 reconstruction to technocratic dreams in the 1960s, science was not just an area of study, but also a guarantor of progress and a cornerstone of state legitimacy. At the same time, periods of political upheaval and reconstruction unsettled traditional borders within knowledge regimes and systems, allowing novel forms of cooperation and interchange to emerge. Notably, the prospect of becoming architects of modernity brought artists and scientists together in this period, as they cooperated and competed for epistemic primacy. While this history is mostly written from the perspective of the influence of new scientific discoveries on the arts, we posit that the exchange was frequently mutual and produced durable results, albeit sometimes only allowing exchange within short-lived 'trading zones'. It is these cross-fertilisations, collaborations and exchanges that our panel will focus on.

The panel will explore the evolving relationship between broadly defined sciences and arts, and the state, from interwar national experiments to post-war socialist transformations. Our aim is to examine how science — ranging from social physics and hygiene to cybernetics and nuclear physics — interacted with various artistic and literary fields. We are particularly interested in situations in which scientists and artists worked together, and in the interactions that occurred in these interdisciplinary spaces. 

Topics might include, but are not limited to:

- artistic-scientific collaborations in pursuit of efficiency, from interwar industrial management to the 1960s' fascination with systems theory and automated governance (architecture, urbanism, psychotechnics, etc.);

- architecture for science, from laboratory design to "big science" infrastructures (university campuses, "science cities", nuclear research facilities, etc.);

- imagining the future at the intersection of art, literature and science;

- interdisciplinary projects for the betterment of the state and its citizens (e.g. lifestyle planning, urbanism and aesthetics). 

- Arts, sciences and state security (e.g. camouflage research, propaganda and medical visual communication);

- Propagandistic exhibitions of science (e.g. hygiene and space exploration);

- Artists as scientists and scientists as artists.

Please send abstracts of 2,000 characters or less, to Jan Surman (surman@mua.cas.cz) and Michaela Šmidrkalová (smidrkalova@mua.cas.cz) by February 20, 2026. Please feel free to contact us with informal inquiries beforehand.

Sunday, 18 January 2026

CfP “The Long Bohemian Reformation, European Universities, and Scholarly Disputations.”

 CfP for the XV International Symposium on the Bohemian Reformation and Religious Practice: “The Long Bohemian Reformation, European Universities, and Scholarly Disputations.” Prague, 18–19 June 2026,  deadline January 31, 2026.


From the 14th century onward, European universities increasingly became key players in ecclesiastical reform. Academically trained scholars participated in Church councils, shaped theological discourse, and often played central roles in reformist movements. The Bohemian Reformation was deeply embedded in this academic environment—including Jan Hus and Jerome of Prague and later generations within the Unity of the Brethren and the Comenian circle.

For many key figures of the Bohemian Reformation, academic disputation – and the broader tradition of learned argumentation – was central to their intellectual activity. Its influence extended not only beyond the university setting – as in the debates on the Four Articles of Prague at the Council of Basel – but also beyond the Bohemian Reformation itself, as exemplified by the Leipzig Disputation and the Marburg Colloquy.

The symposium aims to investigate the intersections between the Bohemian Reformation and academic institutions, encompassing also its subsequent receptions. Particular emphasis will be placed on the role of scholarly disputations and intellectual traditions that contributed to the shaping of reformist thought.

The symposium’s broad scope accommodates both papers focused directly on the Bohemian Reformation as well as contributions in which the Bohemian Reformation forms one part of a larger mosaic.

Suggested topics include but are not limited to:

- Disputations concerning ecclesiastical, reformist, and religious issues related to the Long Bohemian Reformation

- Academic controversies, arguments, and rhetoric surrounding the Long Bohemian Reformation

- Underexplored or little-known textual sources of university and gymnasium origin related to the Long Bohemian Reformation

- Comparative analysis of surviving university and gymnasium manuscripts and prints related to the Long Bohemian Reformation with those from German, French, or British contexts

- Academic texts as sources for writings by reformist figures

- Negative stances toward universities and gymnasia in the writings of representatives of the Long Bohemian Reformation

- The role and manifestations of disputation in promoting reformist ideas within the Bohemian context

- Links of specific universities, academies, gymnasia, and gymnasia illustria to the Bohemian Long Reformation

- The impact of curriculum developments on the Bohemian Reformation (e.g. the influence of Melanchthon’s educational reforms via members of the Unity of the Brethren and Bohemian Protestants who studied in Wittenberg or Geneva)

- The significance of academic education among reformist figures

- Reception of the Bohemian Reformation at universities in the 19th and 20th centuries

- Links between the (Prague) university reform/reformers and other late medieval and early modern reform movements (e.g., monastic movements, lay reform).

Submission Guidelines:

Please send:

- Title and abstract (approximately 200–300 words)

- Institutional affiliation and contact details

to bohemian.reformation@gmail.com by 15 February 2026.

Applicants will be notified of the selection results by the end of February 2026.

Important Information:

Dates of the symposium: 18–19 June 2026

Location: Prague, Czech Republic; Academic Conference Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Husova 4a.

Languages: English, French

Fees: There is no fee for participation in the symposium.

Publication of contributions: A thematic volume based on the symposium is under consideration and depends on the submitted paper proposals. Selected speakers might be invited to submit articles for peer review.

Organisation: Department for the Study of Ancient and Medieval Thought, Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences

Scientific board of the Symposium: Luigi Campi, Petra Mutlová, Petr Pavlas, Ota Pavlíček, Dan Török

Scientific board of the BRRP platform: Eva Doležalová, Michal Van Dussen, Kateřina Horníčková, Peter Morée, Petra Mutlová, Ota Pavlíček, Pavel Soukup, Vladimír Urbánek, Hana Vlhová-Wörner

For further information, please contact bohemian.reformation@gmail.com.

Kontakt

bohemian.reformation@gmail.com




CFP: The History of Agrochemicals and International Development: Knowledge, Politics, and Business, 1940s to the Present

 Workshop: The History of Agrochemicals and International Development: Knowledge, Politics, and Business, 1940s to the Present

Date and place of the workshop: 6 November 2026, European University Institute, Florence, Italy


In the decades following World War Two, the use of chemicals in agriculture (natural and synthetic pesticides, fertilizers, fungicides, herbicides, disinfectants, etc.) dramatically increased in many parts of the world. In the 1950s and 1960s, these substances became central to visions of agricultural modernization, international development, and rural economic progress. Their widespread application also reshaped ecosystems and raised concerns about environmental and public health effects. 

The goal of this workshop is to explore how agrochemicals have influenced the relationship between scientific knowledge, international development agendas and approaches, and national political priorities in different regions of the world. Furthermore, it aims to investigate the role of business companies and other non-governmental actors in shaping strategies for and against the use of agrochemicals. We invite contributions that analyze how agrochemicals have interacted with human and natural environments in specific localities. We are equally interested in how these interactions have been debated, legitimized, or contested within scientific communities, development organizations, and national and international politics. 

 

Workshop Themes

We welcome contributions from the fields of history and the social sciences working with historical approaches on topics including, but not limited to:

1. Knowledge about agrochemicals 

Production and circulation of scientific knowledge on pesticides, fertilizers, and other agrochemicals

Expert networks and agricultural research institutions

The role of universities, laboratories, and industry in shaping understandings of agrochemical risks and benefits

2. Agrochemicals and international development

Agrochemicals in development programs, in both the Global South and Global North

Cold War geopolitics, economic development, and science 

International organizations and associations promoting or regulating the use of agrochemicals

3. Environmental and health consequences of postwar agricultural development

Ecological transformations linked to chemical-intensive agriculture and forestry

Public health debates, toxicology, and environmental activism

Long-term assessments of chemical exposure in rural and forest environments

We welcome contributions covering topics from across the globe, particularly those that investigate issues related to gender, race, and class from social history, environmental history, multispecies history, and/or interdisciplinary approaches.

This event aims to bring together scholars at various career stages who are investigating the history of agriculture, environmental governance, international development, and rural development. The outcome of the conference will be a peer-reviewed edited volume. Contributors will be asked to pre-circulate papers based on original empirical research. 

This event is part of the research project “Chemical Crossroads: Agrarian Transitions, Pesticide Controversies, and International Governance, 1940–1970,” which is funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (www.chemicalcrossroads.com). The project will be able to cover parts of travel expenses and accommodation costs for participants (two nights of accommodation and travel in economy class). Participants are expected to arrive on Thursday, November 5, and stay until Saturday, November 7. The workshop will take place on Friday, November 6, and will end with dinner.

 

Timeline

Deadline for proposal submission: 16 March 2026

Interested participants are invited to submit a proposal consisting of an abstract of approximately 500 words and a short CV (max. one page).   Please send submissions to both Elife Biçer-Deveci, elife.bicer@graduateinstitute.ch, and Viktor Blum, viktor.blum@eui.eu.

Notification of acceptance: 20 April 2026

Deadline for pre-circulated papers: 18 October 2026

Accepted participants are expected to submit a full paper of approximately 5,000 words in advance of the conference.

 

Workshop organizers:

Elife Biçer-Deveci, Geneva Graduate Institute

Amalia Ribi Forclaz, Geneva Graduate Institute 

Corinna Unger, European University Institute

Grzegorz Konat, Gavin Rae (eds.). Exploring the Ideas of Tadeusz Kowalik: Crises, Transformations and Alternatives.

 Grzegorz Konat, Gavin Rae (eds.). Exploring the Ideas of Tadeusz Kowalik: Crises, Transformations and Alternatives. Palgrave Macmillan 2025.

This book explores the ideas of Tadeusz Kowalik, demonstrating their continued relevance in the modern world, particularly with regard to his work on capitalism and socialism. Providing insight into his life, economic ideas and political activities, it also examines his engagement with the work of Rosa Luxemburg, Michał Kalecki and Oskar Lange. By highlighting his analysis of contemporary issues, the book establishes a link between his work on political economy and public sector reform, particularly in relation to the health system and pensions.

The book also examines Kowalik’s analysis of different economic systems and the structural transformation of twentieth-century economies. It will be of interest to students and researchers of political economy and the history of economic thought.

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-032-09283-0

Wednesday, 14 January 2026

CFP: Solidarity with Nature: Envisioning the Ecological Heritage of World Socialism

SOCIALIST ANTHROPOCENE IN THE VISUAL ARTS CONFERENCE

Solidarity with Nature: Envisioning the Ecological Heritage of World Socialism

Sainsbury Art Centre, University of East Anglia

21 - 22 May 2026

Deadline for proposals: 11 February 2026

www.sava.earth 

 


The progressive ecological heritage of socialism is routinely overshadowed by a prevalent emphasis on the billowing pollution of its smokestack industrialization and consistently occluded through the eco-catastrophist filter imposed on its environmental legacies by residual Cold War thinking. Rising environmental awareness from the 1960s saw socialist states make declarative commitments to the protection of nature, perceptible in ambitious environmental legislation, international scientific cooperation and the establishment of mass societies for the defence of natural heritage. Non-state forms of socialist environmentalism also emerged, with an ecological consensus bringing together radical currents of dissident environmentalism, alternative and faith-based eco-circles, as well as proponents of ecocentric worldviews at the confluence of ecosocialism and ancestral beliefs. This conference asks how socialist art history could be unlocked as a repository of this ecological heritage, explores the role of art practitioners in environmental movements and considers how experimental art practices performed beyond-human solidarities and expanded the system’s ecological horizons.


 


The notion of the Socialist Anthropocene encapsulates the system’s reconfiguration of the natural environment. As an ecocritical tool, it also paves the way for the non-deterministic reassessment of the capacious relation to nature of a geopolitical order that around 1980 saw a third of the world population living under various denominations of socialism. The geographies of world socialism extend from Vietnam to Cuba and from Albania to Mozambique, but also connotate the sites of multifarious infusions, interrelations and interactions with situated knowledges, traditions and beliefs that enlighten the system’s approach to planetarity. The SAVA Conference on Solidarity with Nature investigates how historical artworks portrayed the activities of official associations for nature protection, organized hiking groups and workers’ recreation in natural settings and how the progressive heritage of ecocentric attitudes and practices under socialism is reenvisioned in contemporary art. In what ways has the critique of the productivist ethos of developmentalism been articulated in the visual arts and how did ecology become a field for liberatory struggles? Also considered is how art practice was entwined with the rise of environmental consciousness around 1968 and embedded in the ecological activism of late socialism, and to what extent it articulated the entanglement of environmental and decolonial agendas. A further line of inquiry addresses artistic engagement with eco-utopianisms, varieties of eco-spiritualism and Indigenous nature practices, as well as the implications of the extension of socialist solidarity to more-than-human realms from the botanical and the zoological to the geological. 


 


Proposals are sought for 30 minute papers within and beyond the fields of environmental art history, ecocritical art theory and contemporary art practice that push the boundaries of interdisciplinary debate around attitudes and practices towards the natural world under socialism. Submissions are encouraged which foreground the ecological potentialities of African, Latin American and Asian socialisms, explore conjunctures of socialism and environmentalism in Pan-Africanism, Third Worldism and the Non-Alignment Movement, and engage with the ecocentric heritages of Eastern European, Baltic and Central Asian socialisms from ecocritical and decolonial perspectives. 


 


Topics might include but are not limited to:


Beyond scientific socialism; degrowth socialism and solar communism; socialist environmental holism; socialist cultures of self-sufficiency and repair; welfare socialism; planetary epistemologies of socialist science; Ujamaa and Afro-centric eco-socialisms; eco-conceptualism  

Eco-utopian socialism; socialist hippies and eco-communes; eco-socialist sisterhood; socialist vegetarianism; eco-spiritual socialisms 

Beyond-human heritage of socialism; depicting biodiversity and extinctions; artistic engagements with socialist zoos; hunting under socialism; socialist safaris; nature reserves; interspecies performances

Arboreal socialism; botanical acclimatization; transborder plant migrations; astrobotany; biocultural interconnectedness with rivers, lakes, forests, mountains, oceans and steppes

Eco-activisms; environmental consciousness in the socialist insurrections of 1968; eco-feminism; artist involvement with the environmental protests of 1989 from Eco-glasnost in Bulgaria to the Nevada-Semipalatinsk movement in Kazakhstan; Indigenous activism against socialist developmentalism

Ecological aspects of socialist artworlds; artist colonies as vehicles of nature encounter; ecocritical exhibitions; mail art as site for the dissemination of ecological thought

 


The conference is organised within the framework of the Socialist Anthropocene in the Visual Arts (SAVA), a European Research Council (ERC) / UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) supported research project led by Principal Investigator Dr. Maja Fowkes at the School of History and Art History, University of East Anglia. www.sava.earth 


 


Proposal Submissions


Please send a 250 word abstract and a short biography to: sava@uea.ac.uk.


Deadline for submissions: Wednesday 11 February 2026.


Support for travel and accommodation costs is available.


For further enquiries, please contact Natalia Pavlovicova: N.Pavlovicova@uea.ac.uk.

Contradictions, VIII (2024): Marxism and Psychoanalysis in Central and Eastern Europe

 Contradictions, VIII (2024):  Marxism and Psychoanalysis in Central and Eastern Europe, is online: https://kontradikce.flu.cas.cz/en/current-issue


english-language issue

Content

Editorial Jiří Růžička and Šimon Wikstrøm Svěrák

 

Studies

Sára Bagdi, Gergely Csányi, All Against All. Freudo-Marxists, Adlerian-Marxists, Social Democrats, and Communists on Depth Psychology in Hungary Between the Two World Wars

Florian Ruttner, The Historical Group, Psychoanalysis, and the Nazi Menace

Inxhi Brisku, Unravelling the Criticism. Socialist Albania’s Examination of Freudian and Neo-Freudian Theories

Nico Graack, “Where are These (Neo-)Marxists?”. Žižek’s Lacanian Theory of Ideology and the Repression of Political Economy 

 

Translations

Karel Teige’s Introduction to Modern Painting and Záviš Kalandra’s The Achievement of André Breton, introduced by Jana Ndiaye Beránková

Jana Ndiaye Beránková, “We Should Dream!” Karel Teige and Záviš Kalandra’s Realms of Freedom

Karel Teige, Introduction to Modern Painting. On the Exhibit of the Group of Czech      Surrealists in the Mánes Exhibition Hall, Prague, January—February 1935

Záviš Kalandra, The Achievement of André Breton. Notes on the Czech Publication of    Breton’s Communicating Vessels

 

In Memoriam

Peter Steiner, introduced by Roman Kanda, Václav Černý’s Parrhesia

    Roman Kanda, Introduction

    Peter Steiner, Václav Černý’s Parrhesia 

 

Reviews

Jakub S. Beneš, Recovering the Emancipatory Side of Zionism?

Krzysztof Katkowski, Sovereignty Against… Whom? Catalan Marxist Tradition as a         Challenge

 

czech- and slovak-language issue

Obsah

Slovo úvodem Jiří Růžička a Šimon Wikstrøm Svěrák 

 

Studie

Lenka Vojtíšková, Odcizení subjektu, cizota karnevalu. Setkávání marxismu a psychoanalýzy v raném díle Julie Kristevy

Kristýna Dziková, Ondřej Slačálek, Česká iliberální levice. Formování metapolitických pozic

Jana Jetmarová, Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui. Bolivijská dekoloniální teorie a praxe

 

Překlady

Otto Fenichel s úvodem Romana Telerovského, O psychoanalýze jako zárodku budoucí dialekticko-materialistické psychologie

Roman Telerovský, „Věčný reptal“. Otto Fenichel a jeho platforma sociologické psychoanalýzy / psychoanalytické sociologie

Otto Fenichel, O psychoanalýze jako zárodku budoucí dialekticko-materialistické psychologie

 

Materiály

Šimon Wikstrøm Svěrák (ed.), Pražské přednášky o psychoanalýze

 

Recenzní esej

Juraj Halas, Teória ekonomickej moci kapitálu



Sunday, 11 January 2026

Karol Sanojca, Barbara Techmańska (eds.) Instytut Historyczny Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego i jego pracownicy we wspomnieniach wychowanków, współpracowników, przyjaciół

Karol Sanojca, Barbara Techmańska (eds.) Instytut Historyczny Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego i jego pracownicy we wspomnieniach wychowanków, współpracowników, przyjaciół [The Historical Institute of the University of Wrocław and its employees in the memories of students, colleagues, and friends]. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego 2025. 


OA: https://wuwr.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/final_techmanskasanojca_instytut-uwr.pdf


Instytut Historyczny Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego to miejsce prowadzenia badań naukowych i kształcenia kolejnych pokoleń studentów. Jubileusz osiemdziesięciolecia działalności środowiska historycznego na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim stał się impulsem do stworzenia syntetycznego i zarazem bogatego w szczegóły obrazu jego rozwoju, osiągnięć, a także znaczenia. Niniejsza publikacja, pod redakcją Karola Sanojcy i Barbary Techmańskiej, to wyjątkowy zbiór tekstów ukazujących Instytut jako żywy organizm — tworzony przez ludzi, ich pasje, osiągnięcia i codzienną pracę.

Przeszłość Instytutu Historycznego opowiedziana została przez tych, którzy go tworzyli i nadal tworzą. Nauka splata się tu z pamięcią o miejscu i ludziach, a wspomnienia malują żywy portret miejsca, dla wielu będącego drugim domem. Autorzy tekstów prowadzą czytelnika przez dzieje Instytutu, ukazując nie tylko zmiany organizacyjne, lecz przede wszystkim sylwetki wybitnych historyków. Ich pasje, ideowe spory, decyzje i codzienna praca stanowią fundament akademickiej wspólnoty i siłę napędową przemian. Osobiste wspomnienia wychowanków, współpracowników i przyjaciół są pełne refleksji, emocji oraz pamięci o codzienności, która współtworzyła tożsamość Instytutu.

Opracowanie łączy rzetelność naukową z przystępnym stylem, dzięki temu kierowana jest do wszystkich, którzy chcą zrozumieć, jak powstaje wiedza o przeszłości i jak wpływa ona na kształtowanie kultury oraz wspólnej pamięci. Szeroki wachlarz poruszanych wątków pokazuje, że działalność Instytutu wykracza daleko poza akademickie mury. Książka to hołd dla środowiska naukowego, które przez lata budowało prestiż wrocławskiej humanistyki.


ISIH Conference 2026: Order and Disorder in Global Intellectual History

 ISIH Conference 2026: Order and Disorder in Global Intellectual History


International Society for Intellectual History Conference 2026



Order and Disorder in Global Intellectual History     


Sabancı University, 18-20 September 2026

Call for Papers


ISIH 2026: Order and Disorder in Global Intellectual History

Date: 18–20 September 2026

Venue: Istanbul Policy Center, Sabancı University

Address: Bankalar Caddesi No: 2, Minerva Han, 34420 Karaköy, İstanbul, Türkiye


Background and Aims

Across the globe today, political and legal orders are unsettled by democratic backsliding, constitutional regression, ideological polarisation, and the rise of authoritarianism. This instability invites us not only to interpret present crises but also to reflect on how order and disorder have been conceptualised across time, space, and traditions.


The 2026 Conference of the International Society for Intellectual History (ISIH) invites participants to examine how historical actors, including political thinkers, jurists, reformers, revolutionaries, literati, and religious scholars, imagined, contested, and redefined order in moments of rupture and transformation.  They turned to cosmology, medicine, law, and politics as models of balance and development, shaping their visions of stability and change. The conference aims to examine these visions through the lenses of intellectual history and the history of political thought, highlighting how order was understood as something to be secured or restored, and disorder as either collapse or renewal. Bringing these historical perspectives into dialogue with the present, the conference aims to shed new light on today’s challenges of disorder and the search for sustainable political and legal orders in the future.

We encourage papers that explore the meanings and uses of “order” and “disorder” in intellectual history from the early modern period to the present. No fixed definition of these terms will be assumed, and they should be taken in their broadest sense. Topics might include historical debates about the sources and maintenance of order, reflections on instability or transformation as drivers of intellectual traditions, or alternative visions of order and disorder as tools for understanding change.

The conference will bring together scholars from diverse regions and traditions to examine how competing visions of order have emerged, clashed, and evolved. We particularly welcome contributions on how concepts of justice, legitimacy, and authority have been constructed, destabilised, or rethought, how global and local encounters reshaped ideas of sovereignty and constitutionalism, and how historical precedents have been mobilised to address contemporary crises.


Themes

Possible themes for papers include, but are not limited to:

Intellectual Histories of (Dis)order: How concepts such as crisis, revolution, anarchy, and fragmentation have been understood and mobilised in political and legal discourse, and how “order” itself has acquired shifting semantic layers across different linguistic, disciplinary, and social contexts.

Ideologies and Order: How competing ideologies imagined, described, and defined order and disorder, and how these visions structured political, social, and intellectual life across contexts.

Legal Orders and Normative Innovation: How disorder generated urgency for constitution-making and legal reform; how it prompted reflection on the relationship between order and the rule of law; and how law functioned both as a method of ordering society and as an opening to alternative constitutional futures.

Empire, Civilisation, and International Order: Legal and political thought in service of managing imperial pluralism and domination, from the rhetoric of the “civilising mission” to the alternative orders envisioned by colonised, semi-colonised, or imperial actors. Particular attention will be given to the role of international law and theories of global order.

Knowledge and Classification: How intellectuals have imposed order on knowledge, turning epistemic disorder into new methods, disciplines, and systems. From early modern strategies for managing “information overload” to modern projects of systematisation, practices of classification reveal how ordering knowledge has been inseparable from ordering society.

Medicine and the Body Politic: Medical metaphors that cast order as health and disorder as illness, decadence, or decay. Figures such as the “sick man of Europe” and the “sick man of Asia” illustrate how political crisis was framed through lifespans and pathological analogies, linking cure, reform, revolution, and reordering.


Confirmed Keynote Speakers

Daniel Margócsy (University of Cambridge)

Martti Koskenniemi (University of Helsinki)

Ayşe Zarakol (University of Cambridge)


General Guidelines

Submission Guidelines:

We invite proposals for:

Individual papers (max. 300 words)

Thematic panels (max. 500 words, with 3–4 paper abstracts)

Please include a short CV or biographical note (max. 2 pages).

Send all proposals to:  isih26.sr@sabanciuniv.edu

Timeline:

15 February 2026: Deadline for abstract submissions

15 April 2026: Notification of accepted participants

July 2026: Registration deadline

August 2026: Final programme published


Registration fee:

The conference fee is £100. Reduced rates and fee waivers are available to PhD candidates and early-career scholars through the bursary scheme below.


Bursaries:

The ISIH is pleased to offer a limited number of bursaries for travel (up to £500 from Europe and the Middle East, up to £800 from North America, and up to £1,000 from the rest of the world) as well as waived conference fees for PhD candidates and early career scholars (within 3 years of PhD completion). Please include a brief “statement of need” explaining limited access to institutional or other funding when submitting your proposal.


Publication opportunity:

Selected participants will be invited to submit manuscripts for individual articles or thematic special issues based on their contributions to the ISIH’s peer-reviewed journal, Intellectual History Review.


 Organizing Committee:

Banu Turnaoğlu Açan (Sabancı University; University of Cambridge)

Abdurrahman Atçıl (Sabancı University)

Egas Moniz Bandeira (University of Erlangen–Nuremberg)

Franz Fillafer (Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna)

Kerem Gülay (Koç University)

Ayşe Ozil (Sabancı University)


For more information on the application process, please check the conference website: https://fass.sabanciuniv.edu/en/ISIH


Przemysław Witkowski: Narratives, Political Representation, and Extremism in Polish Anti-Science Movements. "Plandemic," "Depopulation," and "The Free People"

Przemysław Witkowski: Narratives, Political Representation, and Extremism in Polish Anti-Science Movements. "Plandemic," "Depopulation," and "The Free People". Brill 2026.


Based on a wide range of empirical material, the book examines the narratives, political activity and extremist connections of Polish movements challenging the scientific consensus (anti-vaccination and 5G movements) and their connections with Russia. The author traces the roots of the conspiracy narratives related to vaccines, 5G and COVID-19, the channels of their spread and their penetration into mainstream politics, providing a unique opportunity to trace the radicalisation of their supporters. As a result, this publication is a unique work in which the described examples constitute an applicable analysis for researchers of conspiracy narratives related to medicine in other countries.


Wednesday, 7 January 2026

Marxism and Psychoanalysis in Central and Eastern Europe.

 New Volume of Contradictions Now Available!


We are pleased to announce the publication of a new volume of Contradictions, dedicated to Marxism and Psychoanalysis in Central and Eastern Europe.


As with last year, the Czech and English issues are published separately.

You can browse the contents here: https://kontradikce.flu.cas.cz/en/current-issue


Both Issue No. 1 and Issue No. 2 are now available for purchase online.

Arianna Borrelli and Helena Durnová (eds.): Computing Cultures: Knowledges and Practices (1940–1990).

Arianna Borrelli and Helena Durnová (eds.): Computing Cultures: Knowledges and Practices (1940–1990). Lüneburg: Meson press 2025. ISBN: 978-3-95796-273-7


OA: https://meson.press/books/computing-cultures/


Highlighting the diverse and fragmentary nature of the so-called “digital turn,” this volume offers a glimpse into the landscape of different computing cultures which emerged side by side between the 1940s and the 1990s, at times sharing some features, yet remaining essentially independent from each other. Some of these cultures disappeared, some thrive until today, but understanding all through their knowledges and practices, interconnections and broader historical context, is essential to deal critically with the visions and dreams, fears and tensions characterizing digital practices in today’s knowledge societies.


The Editors

Arianna Borrelli is a historian and philosopher of natural philosophy and modern science working at the Käte-Hamburger-Kolleg “Cultures of Research,” RWTH Aachen, where her research focuses on reconstructing the variety of cultures of computer-aided research. She has a special interest for the interplay of scientific knowing and the tools mediating it and has worked on medieval mathematical cosmology, early modern meteorology and mechanics, as well as quantum theories from their early days up to the present. She is currently President of the DHST/DLMPST Commission for History and Philosophy of Computing (HaPoC) and her recent publications include: A. Hocquet, F. Wieber, G. Gramelsberger, A. Borrelli et al. 2024. Software in science is ubiquitous yet overlooked. Nature Computational Science 4: 465–8; A. Borrelli. 2023. Aristotelianism, Chymistry and Mechanics in Early Seventeenth-century Europe. In: D. Verardi (ed.). Aristotelianism and Magic in Early Modern Europe, Bloomsbury, 105–44.

  

Helena Durnová teaches history of mathematics and computing as well as a course on history of science and technology at Masaryk University in Brno, Czechia. She has written on history of computing in Czechoslovakia in the 1950s and 1960s, including early programming practices there. She is interested in the intimate connections at the intersection of computing, mathematics, and language. She is also working on history of mathematics education in Czechoslovakia and together with Petra Antošová, Danny Beckers, Snezana Lawrence, is preparing the book A History of Mathematics Education in Czechoslovakia. Ideologies and Practices. to be published in the Springer series History of Mathematics Education.


Yearbook of the Institute of East-Central Europe vol. 23 no. 4,. Thematic issue Intellectual history, historical narratives,and applied history. OA

Yearbook of the Institute of East-Central Europe vol. 23 no. 4,. Thematic issue Intellectual history, historical narratives,and applied history. Open access, English


OA: https://ies.lublin.pl/rocznik/riesw/2025/4/


Artykuł

From the editors: Intellectual history, historical narratives, their institutionalisation, and applied history frameworks

Sławomir Łukasiewicz | Oleksandr Avramchuk




The Soviet system, the Soviet state, and Western expertise on the USSR before and after 1991

Mark Kramer


Richard Pipes’ advice on Russia for policymakers

Jonathan Daly


Pragmatic idealism and academic autonomy: Stephen P. Duggan and the American model of international education, 1919–1946

Anna Mazurkiewicz


Legend and fascination, geopolitics and deterrence: Intellectual myths and neoteric French policy towards Russia

Jędrzej Piekara


The decolonisation trap and the quest to reclaim a “kidnapped” Europe

Oleksandr Avramchuk


The Cold War origins of the Russian “Nazi” accusation against Ukraine: Soviet propaganda, Western memory, and historical knowledge

Kai Struve


Constructing the past, justifying the war: The analysis of selected Vladimir Putin speeches (2021–2024)

Dagmara Moskwa


Shaping the knowledge of Polish and other Central European immigration in the US in the 21st century: Reflections on the margins of the books by Carl J. Bon Tempo and Hasia Diner, Immigration: An American History, and Nancy Foner, One Quarter of the Nation: Immigration and the Transformation of America

Anna Fiń


Prometheanism and its “incarnations”

Zaur Gasimov


Émigré scholars as “agents of Westernisation”? Comparative reflections on the cases of Poland and Germany

Kai Johann Willms


The name “White Russia” and the origins of Belarusian studies in the West after 19451

Anton Saifullayeu


Remembering Radio Free Europe – Voices of Witnesses and Participants

Beata Białobrzewska



Humanistyka w PRL-u [Humanities in Polish People's republic]

 Humanistyka w PRL-u [Humanities in Polish People's republic]. Thematic issue of Teksty Drugie. Teoria literatury, krytyka, interpretacj...