Monday, 18 November 2019

Nikolay Ssorin‐Chaikov (2019): "Reassembling history and anthropology in Russian anthropology," Social Anthropology 27(2): 320-351.

Abstract

This two‐part overview of contemporary Russian anthropology focuses in detail on the work of several scholars and situates it in the changing landscape of Russian academia. The main issue I address is the debated academic identity of anthropology as ‘historical science’ as it is officially classed in Russia. Proceeding in a case‐study manner, I aim to re‐conceptualise the relationship between anthropology and history from the point of view of the anthropology of time, not merely by historicising anthropology but also by anthropologising history. I ask what temporal frameworks underscore the relationship between anthropology and history as it is thought about by the scholars I explore.

Institutional Access:

Ssorin‐Chaikov, N. (2019), Reassembling history and anthropology in Russian anthropology: part I. Soc Anthropol, 27: 320-335. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12628
Ssorin‐Chaikov, N. (2019), Reassembling history and anthropology in Russian anthropology: part II. Soc Anthropol, 27: 336-351. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12627

No comments:

Post a Comment

Jan Surman and Tomáš W. Pavlíček (eds.) Scientific Internationalism in Cold War Central and Eastern Europe

 Jan Surman and Tomáš W. Pavlíček (eds.) Scientific Internationalism in Cold War Central and Eastern Europe. The Age of Reciprocity. New Yor...