Monday, 18 November 2019

Nikolay Ssorin‐Chaikov (2019): "Reassembling history and anthropology in Russian anthropology," Social Anthropology 27(2): 320-351.

Abstract

This two‐part overview of contemporary Russian anthropology focuses in detail on the work of several scholars and situates it in the changing landscape of Russian academia. The main issue I address is the debated academic identity of anthropology as ‘historical science’ as it is officially classed in Russia. Proceeding in a case‐study manner, I aim to re‐conceptualise the relationship between anthropology and history from the point of view of the anthropology of time, not merely by historicising anthropology but also by anthropologising history. I ask what temporal frameworks underscore the relationship between anthropology and history as it is thought about by the scholars I explore.

Institutional Access:

Ssorin‐Chaikov, N. (2019), Reassembling history and anthropology in Russian anthropology: part I. Soc Anthropol, 27: 320-335. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12628
Ssorin‐Chaikov, N. (2019), Reassembling history and anthropology in Russian anthropology: part II. Soc Anthropol, 27: 336-351. doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12627

No comments:

Post a Comment

Wojciech Baran: ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฎ ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜… ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—ถ̂๐˜ ๐—›๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ (๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿด–๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฌ). ๐—˜́๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—ฒ́๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—พ๐˜‚๐—ฒ

 Wojciech Baran: ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฎ ๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐˜… ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—•๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ผ๐—ถ̂๐˜ ๐—›๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ (๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿด–๐Ÿญ๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฏ๐Ÿฌ)...