Sunday, 31 August 2025

CFP for the session Session: “Knowledge in Interurban Transit. Networks, Actors, and Agencies”

 CFP for the session Session: “Knowledge in Interurban Transit. Networks, Actors, and Agencies” (Session 57) at the Conference of the European Association for Urban History in Barcelona, September, 2-5, 2026

We are calling for papers for our session: “Knowledge in Interurban Transit. Networks, Actors, and Agencies” (Session 57) at the Conference of the European Association for Urban History in Barcelona, September, 2–5, 2026.

Organizers: Heidi Hein-Kircher (Herne/Bochum) and Oliver Hochadel (Barcelona)

The urban space of the modern city was characterized by a high concentration of short-distance relations, multi-directional exchanges within and the acceleration of movement and communication. This session focusses on interurban knowledge exchange and its networks in 19th and 20th century. The “densification” within the city and the numerous social challenges were instrumental for the development of new fields of “applied urban knowledge” such as urban planning, hygiene and cultural infrastructures so that the inherent dynamic of the urban space and the production of applied urban knowledge entered a dialectic relationship.

Hence, knowledge became key for urban development. Disregarding national borders, urban reformers in different cities became increasingly aware that they were facing similar problems with respect to public health and urban planning. Many city councils reached out to other cities all over Europe or even globally in order to modernize their own city. Such solutions were sought after in the form of “best practices” from other urban contexts, which were considered as “recipes for success”. This distinctly pragmatic approach also promised to avoid errors that had been committed elsewhere, while being “late” or “backward” might turn out to be advantageous, and could be used by reformers rhetorically as political leverage to demand new technologies or urban planning concepts. Urban knowledge was permanently altered, combined, hybridized and adapted to fit the specific needs and circumstances of a city.

After the mid-nineteenth century, an interurban network emerged in Europe (and beyond) in which urban knowledge in its different forms was being constantly exchanged. The exchange of urban ideas, strategies and models for modernization needs to be addressed on a global scale.

This leads us to the central questions of our session:

Which models did cities try to follow in their reforms?

How did they inform themselves about the newest advances in, say, tuberculosis treatment or museum architecture? How was this applied urban knowledge produced, communicated and appropriated? What were the factors for success of failure?

Who were the relevant actors in this interurban knowledge exchange network?

Hence, our session calls for empirical case studies discussing the actors and their agencies as well as the created networks of interurban network of knowledge exchange in Europe and beyond.

All paper proposal should be submitted via the website https://eauh2026.confnow.eu/?pagename=extpapersubmission until October 22, 2025.

In any case, please inform us, the organizers, about your submission. And please do not hesitate to contact us for any question or doubt you might have. We plan to edit a special issue in a peer-reviewed journal based on the presentations of the session.

Contact Information

Heidi Hein-Kircher

Martin Opitz Library, Herne and Ruhr University Bochum

heidi.hein-kircher@ruhr-uni-bochum.de

Oliver Hochadel

Institución Milá y Fontanals de Investigación en Humanidades (CSIC), Barcelona

oliver.hochadel@imf.csic.es

Contact Email

heidi.hein-kircher@ruhr-uni-bochum.de

URL

https://eauh2026.confnow.eu/?pagename=extpapersubmission


CfP: Urbanities of Belonging: Emigres from East Central Europe in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Cities

 CfP: Urbanities of Belonging: Emigres from East Central Europe in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Cities, Session 42 at the EAUH 2026 Conference, 2-5 September 2026, Barcelona.

Organisers: Markian Prokopovych (Durham University) and Katalin Straner (York St John University / Newcastle University).

Keywords: urban identity, urban networks, migration, modern Europe, global

This session seeks to examine the ways in which emigres from East Central Europe found new homes in cities outside of the region and how they were linked through urban networks and emerging identities in the period between the Napoleonic Wars and the fall of the Berlin Wall. The geographical scope includes but is not limited to Europe.

https://www.eauhbarcelona2026.eu/sessions/#session42

Friday, 29 August 2025

STAND, Early Career Research Seminars 2025-2026, Call for Participants

 STAND (Historical Commission on Science, Technology and Diplomacy), Early Career Research Seminars 2025-2026, Call for Participants – Deadline 20 September 2025


This is an open call for participants for the STAND (Commission on Science,

Technology and Diplomacy) Early Career Researchers Seminar series for

2025-2026. The commission and its members examine the broad history of

science, technology and diplomacy and are looking for post-grads and early

career researchers to present during next year's online seminar series.


We are looking for researchers who address the history of science,

technology and medicine in their broad international contexts. Topics

include but are not limited to: science diplomacy, international

cooperation in fields related to science, technology and medicine, and the

transnational circulation of technoscientific and medical knowledge,

materials and expertise. Please see our website for more information on

previous presenters, and the work we do:

https://sciencediplomacyhistory.org/postgraduate-early-career-initiatives/



The seminars will run from October 2025 to ca. May 2026 usually on the

first Thursday of the month - dates tbc with organisers - and will be held

on Microsoft Teams.


Seminars last one hour and usually consist of a brief presentation followed

by Q&A. Possible formats include:


   -


   A pre-circulated work-in-progress paper (journal article draft, thesis

   chapter, book chapter etc) of 10-20 pages, using the seminar as an

   opportunity to gain feedback or suggestions for improvement.

   -


   A 20-30 minute presentation on your current research, followed by Q&A,

   discussion and feedback.

   -


   An ‘in conversation with’ session where you are paired with someone with

   similar research interests, to have a discussion on a particular topic. You

   can also use this time to raise questions to experts or individuals working

   on similar topics to you.

   -


   We welcome inquiries regarding alternative seminar formats, and

   encourage you to get in touch if you are interested!


Please send any expressions of interest to STAND.ECR@gmail.com, in an email

which includes your name, short bio and a brief summary of your research as

it pertains to the seminar. We don’t need anything further at this stage,

but please indicate what format of session you would prefer. We also

encourage you to email us if you have any questions, queries or would like

to be included in the mailing list for the seminars if you are not already.


We’re particularly looking for someone to fill our October (Thurs Oct 9th)

session - so if you have some work you want feedback on soon, please let us

know!




Deadline: 20 September 2025



Kind regards,

Alice Naisbitt and Kat Zouboulakis


*STAND Commission - Early Career Researchers*

*The STAND Commission is a Historical Commission of the DHST which examines

the broad history of science, technology and diplomacy.*


Sunday, 24 August 2025

CFA: Hormonal Bodies in Body Politics (Zeitschrift für Körpergeschichte)

 CFA: Hormonal Bodies in Body Politics (Zeitschrift für Körpergeschichte)

Guest editors: Sophia Wagemann (Charité Berlin), Xenia Steinbach (Hannover Medical School)

Deadline for proposals: September 19, 2025

Deadline for first drafts: February 27, 2026

Hormones regulate the body: they control vital physiological functions, drive growth, shape sexual development, enable or inhibit reproduction, influence psychological processes, and are often considered to be out of balance. These varied roles are fundamental to Western biomedical discourse, as well as to how many people in transatlantic societies perceive themselves and others. Concepts such as the female hormonal cycle, puberty, menopause, and andropause demonstrate how the paradigm of hormonal regulation also imposes a temporal structure on the body. As the extraction and synthesis of hormones became possible, they came to appear both immanent to and external from the body – circulating not only within it but also around it, in the form of medications such as hormone replacement therapies, psychopharmaceuticals, contraceptives, abortifacients, as well as in cosmetics and as endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the environment and everyday products. The ‘hormonal body’ thus becomes a medium of transformation and optimization, positioned between the poles of stabilization and threat – both of which may arise from internal and external sources. In this multifaceted role, the relationship between hormones and bodies has been the subject of investigation within the History of Science and Science and Technology Studies (STS) for several decades. Research in these fields has critically examined the problematic incorporation of culturally entrenched notions of masculinity and femininity, particularly in relation to so-called ‘sex hormones’, and has challenged scientific attempts to biologically fix binary gender categories with genes, hormones, and chromosomes (Fausto-Sterling 2000; Oudshoorn 1994; Richardson 2013; Satzinger 2009; Sengoopta 2006). Furthermore, scholars have explored how hormone research and the pharmaceutical industry became intertwined, showing how narratives of deficiency – most often projected onto female bodies – shaped a lucrative market for hormonal products (Stoff 2004, 2012; Ratmoko 2010; Gaudillière 2005; Nordlund 2011; Watkins 2007). Studies focusing on hormonal medications have also emphasized the precarious and risk-laden nature of hormone use (Gaudillière 2006; Nemec and Olszynko-Gryn 2022; Balz et al. 2008; Schwerin et al. 2016). Lastly, hormone-based therapies have been analyzed as essential components of gender-affirming treatments, with attention drawn to the significant barriers nonbinary and trans individuals face in accessing such medications (Preciado 2013; Nass 2023).

Building on this body of research, this Special Issue seeks to explore new modes of describing historical hormone–body relations, addressing themes such as:

- Pharmaceuticals and hormonally mediated bodies

- Historical perspectives on hormonal embodiment beyond sex hormones

- Hormones as objects that traverse bodily boundaries

- Processes of embodiment and body politics in relation to hormones

- New perspectives on hormonal temporalities

- Postcolonial and non-Western perspectives on hormone–body

intertwinings

- Histories of DSD (Differences of Sex Development) or TIN∗ (trans, inter and nonbinary) medicine and hormonal interventions

- Body–environment relations

- Praxeological approaches to hormonal bodies and their regulation

We intend to propose a Special Issue on the topic of ‘hormonal bodies,’ comprising approximately 5-7 contributions in both German and English. Contributions are welcome not only from the field of history but also from historically-oriented research in the cultural, social, media, and literary sciences.

To be considered for inclusion in our proposal for a special issue please send your abstract (about 400 words) and a short bio to Sophia Wagemann (sophia.wagemann@charite.de) or Xenia Steinbach (steinbach.xenia@mh-hannover.de) by September 19, 2025.

All submissions to Body Politics will undergo a double-blind peer review process.

Further information on the Open Access journal Body Politics can be found here: http://bodypolitics.de/en/about-the-journal/

Referenzen/References

Balz, Viola; Schwerin, Alexander; Stoff, Heiko; Wahrig, Bettina (Hg.) (2008): Precarious Matters/Prekäre Stoffe. The History of Dangerous and Endangered Substances in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte.

Fausto-Sterling, Anne (2000): Sexing the Body. Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.

Gaudillière, Jean-Paul (2005): Better Prepared than Synthesized. Adolf Butenandt, Schering AG and the Transformation of Sex Steroids Into Drugs (1930-1946). In: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 36 (4), S. 612–644.

Gaudillière, Jean-Paul (2006): Hormones at Risk. Cancer and the Medical Uses of Industrially produced Sex Steroids in Germany, 1930–1960. In: Thomas Schlich und Ulrich Tröhler (Hg.): The Risks of Medical Innovation. Risk Perception and Assessment in Historical Context. London, New York: Routledge (Routledge Studies in the Social History of Medicine, 21), S. 136–154.

Nass, Biba O. (2023): Microdosing Testosteron. Ein alternativer Beipackzettel. Berlin: Querverlag.

Nemec, Birgit; Olszynko-Gryn, Jesse (2022): The Duogynon Controversy and Ignorance Production in Post-thalidomide West Germany. In: Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online (14), S. 75–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.09.003.

Nordlund, Christer (2011): Hormones of Life. Endocrinology, the Pharmaceutical Industry, and the Dream of a Remedy for Sterility, 1930-1970. Sagamore Beach: Science History Publications.

Oudshoorn, Nelly (1994): Beyond the Natural Body. An Archaeology of Sex Hormones. New York, London: Routledge.

Preciado, Beatriz (2013): Testo Junkie. Sex, Drugs, and Biopolitics in the Pharmacopornographic Era. New York: The Feminist Press at CUNY.

Ratmoko, Christina (2010): Damit die Chemie stimmt. Die Anfänge der industriellen Herstellung von weiblichen und männlichen Sexualhormonen 1914-1938. Zürich: Chronos Verlag.

Richardson, Sarah S. (2013): Sex Itself. The Search for Male & Female in the Human Genome. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

Satzinger, Helga (2009): Differenz und Vererbung. Geschlechterordnungen in der Genetik und Hormonforschung 1890-1950. Köln: Böhlau Verlag.

Schwerin, Alexander; Stoff, Heiko; Wahrig, Bettina (Hg.) (2016): Biologics. A History of Agents Made From Living Organisms in the Twentieth Century. 3. Aufl. London, New York: Routledge (Studies for the Society for the Social History of Medicine).

Sengoopta, Chandak (2006): The Most Secret Quintessence of Life. Sex, Glands, and Hormones, 1850-1950. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

Stoff, Heiko (2004): Ewige Jugend. Konzepte der Verjüngung vom späten neunzehnten Jahrhundert bis ins Dritte Reich. Köln: Böhlau Verlag.

Stoff, Heiko (2012): Wirkstoffe. Eine Wissenschaftsgeschichte der Hormone, Vitamine und Enzyme, 1920-1970. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.

Watkins, Elizabeth Siegel (2007): The Estrogen Elixir. A History of Hormone Replacement Therapy in America. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.


CFP: Transnational approaches to the long 19th century history in East-Central Europe

 CFP: Transnational approaches to the long 19th century history in East-Central Europe



Vilnius 16.04.2026 - 17.04.2026

Application deadline: 30.11.2025

Organizers: 

Kirsten Bönker / David Feest, Nordost-Institut, Lüneburg; Povilas Dikavičius, Vilnius branch of the German Historical Institute Warsaw; Jan Musekamp, German Historical Institute Warsaw; Darius Staliūnas, Lithuanian Institute of History


The long 19th century in East-Central Europe was marked by the rise and fall of empires, the struggle for national self-determination, as well as by constitutional movements, the development of civil societies, and the emergence of modern capitalist systems. They also made their impact during the First Word War that also falls within the scope of the conference. These developments had a significant regional impact, yet at the same time, they were transnational phenomena, transcending the borders of one national group, states and empires.

This conference invites scholars to engage with the region’s history from a transnational perspective, emphasizing the interconnectedness, transfer and exchange but also the boundaries between different societies, cultures, and political systems. We seek papers that explore the various dimensions of transnationalism in the long 19th century in East-Central Europe. Possible topics include, but are not limited to:


1. Imperial expansion, imperial deflation: The expansion of the Austrian, Prussian, and Russian Empires led to the incorporation of various ethnic and linguistic groups, sparking nationalist movements and resistance. The different types of politics, including administrative centralization and cultural homogenization, within empires are a transnational topic in itself. The imperial practices of governance may also be highlighted in a comparative perspective.


2. Economic integration and trade: Scholars of economic history have maintained that the degree of economic globalization reached its peak in late 19th century. The explosion of the volume of international capital caused new relations between regional and global trade networks. Therefore, the emergence of industrial capitalism and the impact of economic policies on local communities is a crucial topic when examining East-Central Europe as a transnational space.


3. Nationalism as a transnational phenomenon: recent research has shown that the transnational approach is much better able than methodological nationalism to explain the speed of dissemination of national ideas, their appeal to the masses, the successes and failures of national movements, and the phenomenon of national indifference.


4. Cultural exchange and transfer: The transmission of ideas, artistic expression, and technological innovations across national borders is a central topic of a transnational approach to history. Intensifying research on global subjects is a way of accessing the shared history of nations and cultures, which is the primary focus of cultural transfer studies. It stresses eclecticism rather than a master script of globalization or nationalization and features a pastiche of global, local, and hybrid cultures; modernist narratives intersect with local history to create new configurations.


5. Migration and diaspora: The long nineteenth century was a time when the movement of people, ideas, and cultures across national borders advanced significantly.

Scholars have spoken of a pastiche between global, local, and hybrid cultures, where modernist narratives and local history created a new mode. Immigration was also a topic where the regulating state attempted to exercise control and surveillance and enforce its concepts of citizenship. 


6. Gender, race, and class: In the same vein, categories of self- and external description developed in a local as well as a global space. The conference aims to explore how transnational processes have affected the lives of various social groups, including women, minorities, and workers, and how they have responded to these changes.


7. Environmental history: Environmental history, as a research topic on the long 19th century in East-Central Europe, can reveal the interconnectedness of human and natural systems across national borders. The expansion of empires and the rise of industrial capitalism had profound impacts on the region’s ecosystems, climate, and natural resources, leading to deforestation, pollution, and resource exploitation.


8. Political cultures and the rise of civil societies: The long 19th century was the era of increasing civic engagement, the rise of liberal movements, of women's rights movements, of societal claims to strengthen the rule of law, etc. On the one hand, we have states that increasingly try to control their citizens, and on the other, we have an emerging civil society that often counters these very efforts. The conference aims to explore political cultures and civic engagement from a comparative perspective.


9. Border Studies: The fluidity and contested nature of borders can also offer critical insights into transnational processes.  East Central Europe is often seen as the periphery of Europe. Still, to take a perspective from this region can help us to understand the continent as a whole.


10. Technological and Infrastructure Networks: The development of railways, telegraph lines, ports and other technological innovations interconnected different regions and facilitated economic, cultural, and social exchanges.


The conference welcomes contributions from a diverse range of disciplines, including history, sociology, cultural studies, economics, and political science. We encourage papers that engage with theoretical debates and methodological innovations, such as network analysis, transnational historiography, and discourse analysis.


Accommodation and travel costs will be borne by the organizer.


To submit your paper proposal, please provide a title, an abstract of 250-300 words, and a brief biographical statement. The deadline for submissions is 30 November 2025. We are planning to publish selected papers. We look forward to receiving your proposals and engaging in a stimulating discussion about the long 19th-century history in East-Central Europe from a transnational perspective.


For more information, and to hand in your proposal, please contact Povilas Dikavičius (povilas.dikavicius@dhi.lt) as representative of the organizing committee.


Wednesday, 20 August 2025

Simon Parkin: The Forbidden Garden of Leningrad A True Story of Science and Sacrifice in a City under Siege. Sceptre, 2024 (now in paperback!)

 Simon Parkin: The Forbidden Garden of Leningrad A True Story of Science and Sacrifice in a City under Siege. Sceptre, 2024 (now in paperback!)


About this book

From the winner of the 2023 Wingate Literary Prize comes a fascinating and moving untold story of the Leningrad scientists who risked everything for the future of humanity.


In the summer of 1941, German troops surrounded the Russian city of Leningrad – now St Petersburg – and began the longest blockade in recorded history. By the most conservative estimates, the siege would claim the lives of three-quarters of a million people. Most died of starvation.


At the centre of the embattled city stood a converted palace that housed the greatest living plant library ever amassed – the world's first seed bank. After attempts to evacuate the collection failed, and as supplies dwindled, the scientists responsible faced a terrible decision: should they distribute the specimens to the starving population, or preserve them in the hope that they held the key to ending global famine?


Drawing on previously unseen sources, The Forbidden Garden of Leningrad tells the remarkable and moving story of the botanists who remained at the Plant Institute during the darkest days of the siege, risking their lives in the name of science.

Biography

Simon Parkin is an award-winning British writer and journalist. He is a contributing writer for the New Yorker and a fellow of the Royal Historical Society (RHS), and is the author of A Game of Birds and Wolves and The Island of Extraordinary Captives, which was a New Yorker Book of the Year and won the Wingate Literary Prize. He lives in West Sussex.

CFP: The Greyzone of the Green Transition

CFP: The Greyzone of the Green Transition

"The Greyzone of the Green Transition" is a conference dedicated to advancing conversations on environmental justice in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). It brings together senior, doctoral, and postdoctoral researchers, and activists committed to shedding light on the often-overlooked injustices and forms of resistance emerging in the region. Observing the overlap between post-communist legacies and green transition trajectories, the conference investigates how structural, gradual, and hidden forms of violence emerge in the context of resource struggles and environmental decline. We aim to deepen the theoretical framing of environmental injustice in the region and foster a space for collective reflection and action.

Proposals should include a title, abstract (up to 300 words), and a brief biography of the author(s) (up to 200 words). Please specify in your proposal which thematic cluster you opted for.

Location: Câmpu Cetății, Mureș County, Romania

Dates: 18 - 19 May 2026

Please submit your abstracts to grant.ecojust@ulbsibiu.ro by September 30th, 2025.

Find more details on our conference page: https://grants.ulbsibiu.ro/ecojust/greyzone-of-the-green-transition/


 

Sunday, 17 August 2025

Milena Bartlová: Dějiny českých dějin umění II. 1970–1990. Nemožnost myslet celek [History of Czech Art II. 1970–1990. The Impossibility of Thinking the Whole].

Milena Bartlová: Dějiny českých dějin umění II. 1970–1990. Nemožnost myslet celek [History of Czech Art II. 1970–1990. The Impossibility of Thinking the Whole]. Praha: UMPRUM 2025,  ISBN 978-80-88622-30-7


Publikace je druhým dílem historického vylíčení proměn akademického oboru dějiny a teorie umění v dnešní České republice a zabývá se dvaceti lety tzv. normalizace. Navazuje na první díl Dějiny českých dějin umění 1945–1969 / Dějiny umění slouží vědě o člověku (UMPRUM 2020). Na základě rozsáhlého archivního studia, čtení dobových uměleckohistorických publikací, pamětnických rozhovorů a v neposlední řadě i svých vlastních vzpomínek a zkušeností vykresluje autorka období, kdy čeští historici a historičky umění dosáhli dlouho připravovaných cílů svého oboru, avšak museli se potýkat s omezováním svobody vědeckého bádání i vysokoškolského studia a s nemožností volného cestování. Kniha poprvé představuje blízký pohled na navigování jednotlivců i celé oborové komunity v situaci napětí mezi každodenností, podvolením a vzdorem v intelektuální společnosti 70.–80. let. Tuto dobu autorka chápe jako „naši domácí postmodernu“, jež vedla k rozštěpení reality, které však neprobíhá podle konvenčního rozlišení dobra a zla. V neposlední řadě představuje kniha teoreticky podložený pokus, jak včlenit badatelský subjekt do studia soudobých dějin. Systematický i chronologický výklad nabízejí vhled do fungování infrastruktur humanitního vědeckého oboru a odhalují strategie vyrovnávání s cenzurou i dalšími omezeními. Kniha předkládá dramatické lidské příběhy rámované konfrontací s tajnou politickou policií a požadavkem na politickou konformitu prostřednictvím členství v komunistické straně. Na druhé straně zkoumá také zkušenosti autonomie a svobody na okrajích povoleného, zejména v samizdatové produkci, přičemž klade větší důraz na vnitřně svobodné jednání než na status oběti. Práce ukazuje tři roky přestavby, zvrat listopadové revoluce a překvapení následujícího roku 1990, přičemž nabízí podněty k tomu, abychom jej přestali zjednodušeně považovat za „rok nula“. Grafika Jan Čumlivski. Vychází za finanční podpory Grantové agentury ČR. Vydání české.

Milena Bartlová je profesorkou dějin umění UMPRUM, kde se po předchozí medievistické práci začala více orientovat na moderní umění a jeho teorii. Je autorkou mnoha významných knih (Co bylo Československo?, UMPRUM 2017, Retrospektiva, UMPRUM 2018). K vydání připravila výbor Baxandallových textů Inteligence obrazu a jazyk dějin umění (UMPRUM 2019). Píše také popularizační a kulturně-politickou publicistiku.

Sophie Schwarzmaier: Transnationale Expertenkulturen und Geschlechterordnungen. Józefa Joteyko zwischen Belgien und Polen 1908–1928

 Sophie Schwarzmaier: Transnationale Expertenkulturen und Geschlechterordnungen. Józefa Joteyko zwischen Belgien und Polen 1908–1928. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag 2025. ISBN 978-3-8353-5937-6

Eine Pionierin der modernen Wissenschaft zwischen West und Ost, zwischen Labor und Öffentlichkeit.


Als eine der ersten Frauen machte sich die 1866 bei Kyjiw geborene Józefa Joteyko einen Namen in der Physiologie, der Psychologie und der Pädologie. Sie forschte, lehrte, schrieb und publizierte innerhalb wie außerhalb der Universität - stieß an Grenzen und überschritt diese. Ihr Wirken in Brüssel vor dem Ersten Weltkrieg setzte sie ab 1919 in Warschau fort, der Hauptstadt des neuen polnischen Nationalstaates.

Als ambitionierte Frau in einer Männerdomäne stellte Joteyko Vorstellungen und Praktiken darüber infrage, wer Wissenschaft als Beruf ausüben darf und wie Geschlechterunterschiede wissenschaftlich zu bestimmen sind. Als Herausgeberin und Wissenschaftsorganisatorin nutzte sie internationale Zeitschriften und Institutionen sowie ein transnationales Netzwerk zwischen West- und Ostmitteleuropa. Als beratende Expertin setzte sie sich zugleich für gesellschaftliche Nationalisierungsprozesse ein, etwa mit ihren Plänen zum Aufbau einer »polnischen Schule«.

Sophie Schwarzmaier stellt Józefa Joteyko erstmals einem breiteren Publikum vor und beleuchtet dabei die Verflechtungen europäischer Wissenschaftskulturen im ersten Viertel des 20. Jahrhunderts.

Sophie Schwarzmaier, geb. 1987, studierte Kulturwissenschaften und Europäische Kulturgeschichte in Frankfurt (Oder), Paris und Łódź und promovierte an der Kulturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder). Sie arbeitet als Koordinatorin einer internationalen Graduiertenschule am Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte in Berlin.

Wednesday, 13 August 2025

OA: Amelia Bonea and Irina Nastasă-Matei (eds.): Negotiating in/visibility Women, science, engineering and medicine in the twentieth century. Manchester: Manchester University Press 2025.

 Amelia Bonea  and Irina Nastasă-Matei (eds.): Negotiating in/visibility Women, science, engineering and medicine in the twentieth century. Manchester: Manchester University Press 2025. 


Open access: https://www.manchesterhive.com/display/9781526178398/9781526178398.xml


This volume explores, from global, multilingual and intersectional perspectives, the experiences of women in science, engineering and medicine in the twentieth century. Some, like the American evolutionary biologist Lynn Margulis, were fairly visible actors in the academic and public arenas of professional science. Others, like the doctors working in secondary schools in interwar Romania or those who struggled to alleviate ‘women’s illnesses’ in famine-stricken rural areas during China’s Great Leap Forward, have been largely invisible – as medical practitioners, creators of knowledge, educators and subjects of historical inquiry. The volume investigates the nature and extent of women’s in/visibility in science, engineering and medicine in the twentieth century, seeking to document the factors that underpinned it and understand how women navigated their circumstances. When and why did women become invisible? When and how did they seek visibility? Was invisibility always a form of discrimination, exclusion and misrecognition or could it also become a strategy of resistance and survival? Drawing on hitherto-little-explored archives in Asia, Europe and North America, the contributors examine the in/visibility of women across multiple sites of medical practice, science-making, pedagogy and communication, such as the laboratory, the university, the clinic, the hospital, the home, the school and the media. They show that invisibility was the outcome of power asymmetries based on intersecting factors like gender, race, ethnicity, class, caste and age, and that women were not only present in science, engineering and medicine, but also exercised considerable agency in trying to negotiate institutional and intellectual hierarchies..



Call for Papers: Questionnaires in the History of Health and Medicine

 Call for Papers

Questionnaires in the History of Health and Medicine

International Workshop

19-20 February 2026, Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Deadline for abstract submission: 15 September 2025


We are delighted to announce a call for papers for a workshop focused on the historical use of questionnaires in the empirical fieldwork of health practitioners. Today, public health agencies routinely employ questionnaires in large population surveys to assess health trends at local, national, and global levels (e.g., the World Health Survey Plus). This workshop aims to historicize how various actors-public health officials, physicians, patients, and local residents-contributed to the development of health and medical questionnaires. This call invites scholars to examine the paper-based technologies and field methods historically used to collect and analyze data, such as house visits, field observations, and correspondence with patients. Central to the discussion will be the epistemic traditions that informed the development of questionnaires.


Today's population  surveys typically involve personalized interviews with a randomly selected sample from a target population. In this narrow sense, health surveys gained prominence in the 1930s (Johnson 2014, 5). However, if we adopt a broader definition of surveys (or enquêtes) as "one-time or regular observations on site using various instruments" (Herrnstadt and Renard 2025), we can trace historical precedents well into the early modern period.


While historians have addressed questionnaires in a general way (Midena and Yeo 2022), and highlighted their use as tools for standardizing clinical case histories (Mendelsohn and Hess 2010), questionnaires are by and large not considered key tools in the construction of  health knowledge. This perception may stem from the dominant view that medical research has primarily developed in the context of  laboratories and clinics.


Extending the existing scholarship (for example: Delmaire et al. 2021), this workshop invites contributions that examine the materials, methods, and techniques used by health practitioners to conduct survey research through questionnaires. We are particularly interested in how practitioners entered social settings-visiting homes, factories or schools, reaching out to potential participants by mail, engaging with communities, or speaking with experts-to gather empirical data.  Submissions should reflect on how questionnaire categories and conventions were constructed and/or challenged, as well as to what extent they supported or resisted quantification and standardization. We also welcome papers that explore the use of questionnaires alongside other observational tools, such as field notes, interviews, photographs, and sketches, in the production of medical knowledge.


The workshop will also critically examine how hierarchies and prejudices along racial, class-based, and gendered lines influenced the development of questionnaires. We invite reflection on how political assumptions shaped the selection of populations, the framing of questions, and the interpretation of data. Further, we seek to explore whether these methodologies aimed to address the complex, intersectional dimensions of health, including social, racial, and gendered factors.


Key questions we seek to address include but are not limited to:


  *   How did health and medical practitioners design, distribute, and evaluate their questionnaires?

  *   How did they identify, recruit, and persuade suitable interviewees?

  *   What strategies did they use to conduct interviews?

  *   What tools of field observation did they employ?

  *   How was data aggregation, and compilation facilitated?

  *   How did health actors process and analyze the data?

  *   How did ideological views and cultural hierarchies inform the collecting and processing of data?

  *   How did health actors access and utilize administrative records to supplement their findings?

  *   What role did diagrammatic, graphic or, more generally visual representation play in the processing of medical questionnaires?


The workshop will be organized by Jolien Gijbels (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) and Stephan Strunz (Technische Universität Dresden) and will be held at Vrije Universiteit Brussel on 19-20 February  2026.


The workshop will be facilitated by discussing pre-circulated papers. The workshop language will be English. Accommodation costs for all selected participants will be covered. We might have to ask participants to arrange and fund their own travel to Brussels, but we hope to be able to cover the travel costs of the participants. To this end, we will be applying for additional funding in the coming months.


Please send your abstract (max. 300 words) and a short biographical note (max. 100 words) by 15 September to Jolien Gijbels (jolien.gijbels@vub.be<mailto:jolien.gijbels@vub.be>) and Stephan Strunz (stephan.strunz@tu-dresden.de<mailto:stephan.strunz@tu-dresden.de>).


Applicants will be notified by October 1st . The deadline for the submission of the pre-circulated papers is 5 February 2025.


References


Delmaire, Léa, Pierre Nobi, and Paul-Arthur Tortosa. 2021. "Enquêtes médicales (xixe-xxie siècle)."  Histoire, médecine et santé 19: 9-21.


Herrnstadt, Martin, and Léa Renard. 2025. "Cultures globales de l'enquête." À propos, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.57086/apropos.81.


Hess, Volker, and J. Andrew Mendelsohn. 2010. "Case and Series. Medical Knowledge and Paper Technologies, 1600-1900." History of Science 48 (3-4), 287-314.


Johnson, Timothy. 2014. Handbook of Health Survey Methods. New Jersey: Wiley.


Midena, Daniel and Richard Yeo. 2022. "Towards a History of the Questionnaire." Intellectual History Review 22 (3), 503-529.


CALL FOR DOCTORAL CONTRACT APPLICATIONS: Knowledge Production and Environmental Transformations in the 19th and 20th Centuries

 CALL FOR DOCTORAL CONTRACT APPLICATIONS

Université Lumière Lyon 2 - DRED Update : 16/06/2025 1/3

Doctoral student (M/F) in Contemporary History

Knowledge Production and Environmental Transformations in the 19th and 20th Centuries

Name of the scientific manager : Katja Doose 

Type of contract : PhD contract Duration of contract: 36 months Start date of thesis: 01/12/2025 Working hours: Full time Salary: €2,200 gross per month Place of work: Université Lumière Lyon 2 - Campus Berges du Rhône 14 avenue Berthelot, 69363 Lyon cedex 07, France Laboratory : Rhône-Alpes Historical Research Laboratory (UMR 5190) Affiliated doctoral school: École doctorale Sciences Sociales Languages spoken : English or French (the thesis may be written in French or English.) Frequency of travel: occasional international area Driving licence required: NO

MORE: https://larhra.fr/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/new-call-for-doctoral-candidates-english-version.pdf

Sunday, 10 August 2025

Crossing Boundaries: Human-Animal Relationships in Tsarist Russia and the Soviet Union

 The January 2025 special issue of SEER on "Crossing Boundaries: Human-Animal Relationships in Tsarist Russia and the Soviet Union" is now online: https://muse.jhu.edu/issue/55301. 


Guest edited by Helena Holzberger and Timm Schönfelder, it features 8 articles on human-animal relations in tsarist Russia and the Soviet Union by Andreas Renner, Anton Kotenko, Matthew Adams, Vera Smirnova, Kristýna Kaucká, Anke Hilbrenner and Tatyana Bakhmetyeva. Its coverage ranges from polar bears to dogs, insects, zoo animals and wild boar.


Saturday, 9 August 2025

CFP: The Mobility of People, Ideas and Objects between the German-speaking Lands and the World beyond Europe

 CFP: The Mobility of People, Ideas and Objects  between the German-speaking Lands and the World beyond Europe - Wolfenbuettel 20.05.2026 - 22.05.2026, Deadline 15.10.2025


The 10th International Conference of FNI takes as its theme "The Mobility of People, Ideas, and Objects between the German-speaking Lands and the World Beyond Europe." By doing so, it contributes to re-evaluating the German-speaking lands’ share in the early modern entanglement of Europe with African, American, and Asian regions, polities, and cultures. Despite not building formal or informal overseas empires of relevance themselves, German countries participated in military campaigns and colonial projects, and people and social groups from this region, including women and Jews, were to be found among the missionaries, merchants, mercenaries, settlers and scholars travelling and claiming the oceans and landmasses of the world.


The conference will be an on-site event held at the Herzog August Bibliothek in Wolfenbüttel. There will be no conference fee. Graduate students can apply for travel support from the American Friends of the HAB via meplummer@arizona.edu.


We invite proposals that shed light on practices, materials, and methods from an interdisciplinary perspective, examining how the German-speaking lands contributed to the worldwide processes, notions, and networks that amount to early modern globalization. Possible topics might include, but are not restricted to


– the presence of German actors in the conquest, government, administration, and exploitation of overseas colonies of the European powers and chartered companies; colonial projects of German scholars and territories;

– the trade with goods from outside Europe to Germany and vice versa, from bulk commodities to luxury goods and collectors’ items; Germany as a market for colonial produce; the role of German merchants and companies in the trans-continental networks; German involvement in the plantation economy and slave labour;

– migration of Germans beyond Europe; the presence and the social and legal status of non-European individuals and groups in the German-speaking area;

– the intellectual and cultural impact of encountering extra-European natural environments and human cultures; the perception and evaluation of cultural, political, social, and religious differences; practices of comparing; the gathering, ordering, publication, dissemination, and reception of relevant knowledge;

– making sense of the global: developing a universal perspective (anthropology, religion, world history, etc.).


Panel proposals (three papers and a chair) and individual submissions are equally welcome. The deadline for submission is 15th October 2025. Please send your contact information, a brief bio, title, and abstract of no more than 250 words per paper to forschung@hab.de.

CfP: Water Management and Environmental Change in Central Asia and the MENA Region: Politics, society, and transnational connections since 1945

 Call for Papers - International Conference

Water Management and Environmental Change in Central Asia and the MENA Region: Politics, society, and transnational connections since 1945

University of Padua, Italy | 5-6 February 2026

The Department of Historical and Geographic Sciences and the Ancient World at the University of Padua invites proposals for papers and panels for an international conference to be held in Padua on 5–6 February 2026.

The conference will explore the history of water management and agricultural policies in the semi-arid macro-region encompassing Central Asia and the Middle East/North Africa (MENA), with a particular focus on transnational connections across this vast area.

In the wake of the Second World War, both Central Asia and the MENA region witnessed major development projects and policies related to water and land management. These initiatives led to significant economic and environmental transformations, reshaping local societies and influencing international relations.

Organized as part of the PRIN project “Water Management and Environmental Change in Central Asia: Politics, Society and Transnational Connections (1948–2020s)”, a collaboration between the University of Padua and the University of Naples “L’Orientale”, the conference seeks to bring together scholars from a variety of disciplinary backgrounds to examine the history, legacies, and current challenges of water management and land use in Central Asia and the MENA region.

A particular focus will be given to the multifaceted relationships between the socialist bloc and the Middle East. The Soviet Union pursued extensive development programs in Soviet Central Asia while also providing socialist “development aid” to Middle Eastern countries in the fields of agriculture and water policy. These efforts not only fostered new diplomatic ties but also enhanced economic cooperation between the USSR, Central and Eastern Europe, and parts of the Global South.

Topics of interest include, but are not limited to:

Historical and contemporary practices of water management and land use in Central Asia and the MENA region

Environmental history of water systems in these regions

Transnational dimensions of Soviet and post-Soviet agricultural and environmental policies, from the late Stalin era to the present

Export of infrastructural and development models (e.g., dams, irrigation systems) from Soviet Central Asia to the Middle East, Africa, South Asia, and Afghanistan, and their domestic and international implications

Water management during post-Soviet decollectivization and economic crises of the 1990s–2000s

Irrigation and water-related projects financed by international institutions such as the World Bank after 1991

Production, circulation, and contestation of scientific knowledge on irrigation, environmental degradation, and soil salinization

Interactions between local communities, state policies, and international institutions in the post-Soviet period

Environmental deterioration in the Aral Sea basin and other aquatic and agro-ecosystems

Shifting power dynamics among local administrators, scientists, and farmers across generations and gender lines

Transcalar governance of water and its role in shaping territorial transformations, especially in the context of the ongoing climate crisis

The historical, archaeological, and heritage aspects of canal systems

Political and social dimensions of current water governance, including mitigation and adaptation strategies at the community level

Archaeological investigations of historical water management systems in Central Asia and the MENA region, and their relevance for understanding present-day practices

Organizers:

Dr. Niccolò Pianciola (niccolo.pianciola@unipd.it)

Dr. Mauro Primavera (mauro.primavera@unipd.it)

Submission Guidelines:

We welcome submissions from scholars in History, Geography, Anthropology, Sociology, Political Science, Environmental Studies, Archaeology, and related fields.

English will be the working language of the conference.

Please submit a titled abstract of no more than 300 words, along with your name and institutional affiliation, to both organizers at the email addresses listed above by 15 October 2025.

Panel proposals should include three individual paper abstracts (each no more than 300 words); the presenters’ names, institutional affiliations and email addresses; and a 200-word statement outlining the panel’s overall rationale.

Funding for travel and accommodation will be available for some or all participants, depending on overall costs. Priority will be given to scholars based in Central Asia and the Middle East/North Africa, as well as to early career researchers.

For any inquiries regarding the conference or your submission, feel free to contact the organizers.

We look forward to receiving your proposals and welcoming you to Padua.

Contact Information

Dr. Niccolò Pianciola (niccolo.pianciola@unipd.it)

Dr. Mauro Primavera (mauro.primavera@unipd.it)

Wednesday, 6 August 2025

Дневники участников Гидрографической экспедиции Северного Ледовитого океана. 1910–1915 гг.

 Р.Г. Гагкуев, В.Г. Смирнов, Н.А. Кузнецов (сост.) Дневники участников Гидрографической экспедиции Северного Ледовитого океана. 1910–1915 гг. Издательство «Кучково поле Музеон», 2025. [R.G. Gagkuev, V.G. Smirnov, N.A. Kuznetsov (compiled) Diaries of the participants of the Hydrographic Expedition of the Arctic Ocean. 1910–1915. Kuchkovo Pole Muzeon Publishing House, 2025.]

В настоящем сборнике документов впервые опубликованы дневники участников Гидрографической экспедиции Северного Ледовитого океана — Бориса Владимировича Давыдова (1883– 1925), Алексея Модестовича Лаврова (1887–1942) и Николая Ивановича Евгенова (1888–1964). В ходе этой многолетней экспедиции на судах «Таймыр» и «Вайгач» был не только открыт ряд островов и обширный архипелаг к северу от полуострова Таймыр (ныне — Северная Земля), но и впервые в истории России пройден путь с востока на запад из Владивостока в Архангельск вдоль берегов Сибири, открыта эпоха мореплавания по трассе Северного морского пути. Публикуемые документы хранятся в Архиве Русского географического общества, Российском государственном архиве экономики, а также в архиве семьи Давыдовых.

Издание предназначено для историков России и Арктики, широкого круга читателей, интересующихся историей Отечества.

Monday, 4 August 2025

Website devoted to Ukrainian archaeologist, scholar of the East, and art historian Maria Viazmitina (1896–1994),

Dear friends,

I’m happy to present the fourth project of the Scientific Archive of the Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine within the “Digital Memory Storage” initiative: 💽 https://viazmitina-archive.iananu.digital/en

This time, the website is dedicated to a woman — 👠⛏️ the Ukrainian archaeologist, scholar of the East, and art historian Maria Viazmitina (1896–1994), specifically her work with the YuTAKE expedition at Nisa - one of the oldest and most important cities of the Parthian Empire, which existed from the mid-3rd century BCE to the 3rd century CE in what is now Turkmenistan. 🇹🇲

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the two groups of students who, as part of their internship at the Archive, helped organize field diaries, photographs, drawings, plans, notes, and some sets of letters - numbering pages and digitizing materials.

These were the third-year students of the History Faculty at Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University: Tetiana Vaskevych, Sviatoslav Hamalia, Yeva Hrabovets, Sofiia Klymenko, Vladyslav Kuzmenko, Kateryna Pylyponchyk, and Mykhailo Khomenko.

Also, cultural studies students from the National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy: Vladyslav Voznyi, Myroslava Hromova, Anastasiia Latypova, Denys Popov, and Diana Reskalenko.

Additional scanning of specific files was supported by archive staff Daryna Romanenko, Halyna Stanytsina, and Olha Kovalchuk.

Special thanks go to Daryna Romanenko for helping fill the site with content in incredibly short time! 🤝

I'm grateful to Valentyna Korpusova for her moral support and for her contributions dedicated to Maria Viazmitina. 🫶

This time, we created the website without a programmer, using our own skills and resources.

However, I remain deeply grateful to Volodymyr Mysak, who built the very first website-template for our projects and taught us how to work with it - and we send our deep respect and gratitude to him for his service in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. 🙏

As always, the photo session was thanks to Nika Havrysh.

We also thank Diego Thon and Iryna Glik for the website-landing page. ❤️‍🔥

All four projects are available at this link: https://archive.iananu.digital

On the site, you’ll also find my bilingual book:

“Maria Viazmitina: Archaeological Expedition to Parthia (With Selected Letters and the Scholar's article)” Kyiv: Institute of Archaeology, NAS of Ukraine, 2025. ✍️

https://viazmitina-archive.iananu.digital/mariya-vyazmitina-arheologichna-ekspedycziya-u-parfiyu/

This research was made possible through the generous support of fellowships from the Institut für die Wissenschaften vom Menschen (Austria) and Freie Universität Berlin (Germany). 🚀

 (from Oleksandra Buzko)


Thursday, 31 July 2025

Journal of Migration History: Special Issue: Histories of Knowledge

 Journal of Migration History: Volume 11 (2025): Issue 2 (Jul 2025): Special Issue: Histories of Knowledge


Article

Restricted Access

‘A Small Signpost to the Future’: Refugee Periodicals and Knowledge in Transit in Early Post-War Switzerland

Author:

Ramon Wiederkehr

Pages: 115–139Online Publication Date: 11 Jul 2025

Articles

Restricted Access

Atrocity Accounts in Transit: Prisoner Exchanges to the Americas during the Second World War

Author:

Jan Lambertz

Pages: 140–162Online Publication Date: 11 Jul 2025

Restricted Access

‘Such are the Demands of our Propaganda and our Truth’: Russian Exiles and Cold War Knowledge of the Vlasov Movement

Author:

Benjamin Tromly

Pages: 163–184Online Publication Date: 11 Jul 2025

Restricted Access

The Descendants of the Prophet Muhammad in the post-Ottoman Middle East: Knowledge Transmission in Situations of Epistemic Displacement

Author:

Barbara Henning

Pages: 185–212Online Publication Date: 11 Jul 2025

Open Access

Tracing Home: Knowledge Production in Multigenerational Palestinian Displacement

Author:

Nour A. Munawar

Pages: 213–228Online Publication Date: 11 Jul 2025


Perspectives on the History of Forecasting

 Journal Geschichte und Informatik / Histoire et informatique (vol. 24/2025) : Perspectives on the History of Forecasting


The latest issue of the journal ‘Geschichte und Informatik / Histoire et informatique’, published by the association History and Computing and edited by Vlad Atanasiu and Enrico Natale, focuses on «Perspectives on the History of Forecasting»

Using various case studies, the authors show that forecasting, i.e. the attempt to formulate predictions about the future based on an analysis of the past and to derive useful knowledge for decision-making, evolves with the technical possibilities and political priorities of historical moment. The contributions offer a rich overview of the history of forecasting from the interwar period to the present day, covering a geographical area stretching from the United States to the former USSR.

Vlad Atanasiu, Enrico Natale: Forecasting Against the Odds. Editorial

Laetitia Lenel: Erwartung und Enttäuschung. Die transatlantische Geschichte der Konjunkturprognostik in drei Akten

Marion Ronca: Die Gegenwart einholen mit Wachstumsprognosen. Von der gleichzeitigen ungleichzeitigen Entstehung der «Perspektivstudien» und der «Richtlinien der Schweizer Regierungspolitik»

Eglė Rindzevičiūtė: Bridging the Cybernetics Gap? Social Forecastingin the Late Soviet Union

Peter Keller, Georges T. Roos, Cla Semadeni: Zur Geschichte der Schweizerischen Vereinigung für Zukunftsforschung (SZF) / swissfuture

Peter Turchin, Dan Hoyer: Empirically Testing and Refining Structural Demographic Theory. A Methodological Guide

Roundtable with Sacha Zala, Eglė Rindzevičiūtė, Peter Turchin, Christian Pfister

The volume is freely accessible and can be downloaded from the publisher's website (https://www.chronos-verlag.ch/node/28856#kurztext).

Monday, 21 July 2025

Екатерина Жарова: Биология в фокусе. Естественные отделения университетов Российской империи (1830–1900).

 Екатерина Жарова: Биология в фокусе. Естественные отделения университетов Российской империи (1830–1900). Новое литературное обозрение 2025. ISBN 978-5-4448-2646-1 // Еkaterina Zharova: Biology in Focus. Natural Sciences Departments at Universities in the Russian Empire (1830–1900). New Literary Review 2025. ISBN 978-5-4448-2646-1



Аннотация: Изучение истории высшего образования в России не только дает возможность проследить генеалогию его актуальных проблем, но и позволяет взглянуть на российское общество в микрокосме. В своей монографии Екатерина Жарова рассматривает историю естественных отделений физико-математических факультетов университетов Российской империи с момента их появления в середине 1830 х годов и до начала XX века. Автора интересуют важнейшие аспекты научной жизни: организация обучения (лекции, практические занятия, экзамены), формирование профессорско-преподавательского корпуса и лабораторной базы, специализация и профессионализация. Отдельный важный аспект исследования — попытка проследить роль государства в развитии естественных наук. Анализируя влияние государственной политики на изучение и преподавание биологии, автор показывает, как на университетской жизни отразились исторические трансформации, вызванные сменой эпох — от Александра I до Николая II. Екатерина Жарова — доктор исторических наук, старший научный сотрудник СПбФ ИИЕТ РАН.

Sunday, 20 July 2025

Call for papers: Entanglements of Scale and Spheres in History

 Call for papers: Entanglements of Scale and Spheres in History: Between the Local, Regional, Global, and Planetary. University of Bielefeld, 14.11.2025 - 5.11.2025, Deadline 31.08.2025


With this conference, we invite researchers at all career stages to reflect critically on the conceptual and methodological entanglements of scales and spheres in global and entangled history. The conference deals with conceptual and methodological questions of how to write global and entangled history and cross-area-studies. In particular, it will focus on the challenge to decentralise the human gaze and world-historical time of humans, to include more-than-human perspectives. This is of special importance in times in which the planet overwrites the globe(Spivak), or in a new epoch framed as the Anthropocene.

Thinking and writing about the past and present, be it from a sociological, geographical, historical, or political perspective, is undergoing a 'planetary turn'. This turn captures how the planet — as a humanist category and as a natural space for interactions between humans, non-humans and physical processes of the Earth — is becoming the referential dimension in which scholars think and write about global and entangled history, by asking how including landscapes, climate changes, histories of oceans and volcanoes, animals, the cosmological phenomena of space and time as well as the geobiological time of the planet change our understanding of global and crossarea flows and interconnections.

The planetary turn points us to the idea of nested systems in vast timeframes and vast distances. Building on this, we are interested in the multiscalarity of historical processes, i.e., in relational, interpenetrating processes that belong to different temporal and territorial orders but are interconnected through networked relationships and persistent leverage effects. By embracing the planetary turn, we aim to critically examine it, questioning the extent to which it actually represents a new dimension of historical understanding or merely a new label for conventional ways of looking at global interconnections, non-human actors, and their interwovenness. By doing so, we invite a discussion on the historical understanding and framing of global human and anthropogenic processes and multiscalar and multicentric approaches to global and entangled history as well as their interplay. The conference aims to foster an interdisciplinary discussion on planetary thinking, materiality, human as praxis, and related topics, as they inform these methodological considerations. Theoretically oriented or case study-based papers that would speak to one or more of the following questions would be especially welcome:

- Does global/globe thinking dissolve into planetary thinking? What is the locus of encunciation of planetary thinking?

- How can (trans-)area studies relate and/or correct planetary thinking? Is it necessary to regionalize planetary thinking?

- How can non-human-centred thinking help us sharpen our multiscalar view and make it fruitful for approaches to global history?

- What forms of otherness and diverse fluid world orders does the planetary perspective make us more aware of?

- How does the local scale reflect the planetary scale?

- How are the local, regional, and global dimensions tied to the planetary scale, and how do local or regional cultural, political, and societal practices (re-)shape a 'common consciousness' (Mbembe) or at least a co-habitation of the world and deal with the multiple planetary crisis?

What does planetary responsibility and thinking in planetary dimensions mean for familiar narratives of globalisation and transregional interconnections?

We especially encourage contributions from Early Career Researchers and scholars working at disciplinary intersections: As part of the conference, an Early Career Researcher panel will be held, dedicated to showcasing new and emerging research in area studies, featuring the work of early-career scholars (defined as PhD students or post-doctoral scholars who have received their PhD since 2022). As CrossArea brings together leading scholars of area studies from throughout Germany, this is an excellent opportunity for scholars looking to make an impression and identify potential hosts for their next professional move. Those selected to present on their research will be provided with travel grants, as well as accommodation for up to two nights.

Format and Submission Guidelines:

We welcome proposals for 15-minute presentations from researchers of various disciplines engaged in conceptual and methodological dialogue on how to write multiscalar global history between the local, regional, global, and planetary. Proposals of no more than 300 words (in English or German) along with a short CV (1 page) should be sent as a single PDF to the following address by the 30th August 2025: justynaturkowska@me.com & reka.krizmanics@uni-bielefeld.de.

The conference will be held in person at Bielefeld University (hybrid participation possible on request; please indicate in your proposal). Travel and accommodation support for early career scholars and unfunded presenters may be available; please indicate your need in your application.

Important Dates:

- Deadline for submission of the papers: 30th August, 2025

- Notification of Selection: 30th September, 2025

Kontakt

Dr. Justyna Aniceta Turkowska: justynaturkowska@me.com;

Dr Réka Krizmanics: reka.krizmanics@uni-bielefeld.de;

Wednesday, 16 July 2025

Call for papers: The Prague Linguistic Circle in Geneva and Paris

Call for papers: The Prague Linguistic Circle in Geneva and Paris: Circulations and Decenterings. Fribourg, 10 - 11 September 2026


The Prague Linguistic Circle holds a clearly defined place in the historiography of the language sciences: it is recognized as an institutional and localized "hub" (Hoskovec 2011) of programmatic innovation, representing a pivotal moment in the broad transition from 19th-century philological models to the new paradigms of 20th-century linguistics. While the Circle’s European and international influence—particularly the fundamental impact of its contributions to the development of structural phonology—is well known, most of its historians and commentators have focused primarily on its specific context in Prague itself (e.g., Vachek 1966, Viel 1984, Raynaud 1990, Toman 1995, Sériot 2012). In line with a certain cliché that casts the city of Prague as a “golem-like” site of magical encounters (Ripellino 1973, Flusser 1991), the Circle and its theoretical originality are often presented as the product of syncretism, or even as the precipitate of a kind of fusion between different traditions suddenly brought together in the capital of the new Czechoslovak state.

Without seeking to challenge either the specific dynamic of the Circle’s local grounding in Prague’s modernity or its theoretical originality—especially in contrast with other centers of linguistics (Leipzig, Paris, Geneva, Copenhagen, etc.)—this conference aims instead to focus on the international integration and reception of the Prague Circle within the scientific exchange networks and channels of intellectual circulation of its time. We wish, in particular, to interrogate a certain methodological dichotomy that tends to oppose what could be called the integrative or symbiotic dimension of local contexts to the more diffuse or decentered nature of the international context.

This tension is not unique to the historiography of the Prague Linguistic Circle. It seems to be a structural feature of the system of “double legitimation,” both internal and external, that characterizes the functioning of “circles” or “schools” of thought in the humanities (Amsterdamska 1987, Puech 2015). This tension invites us to consider two approaches to the internationalization of the Prague Circle’s activities during the period of linguistic circles from the 1920s to the 1950s. Alongside a network-based or nodal model of exchanges between relatively autonomous hubs, circles, or poles, we might also consider a more concentric approach that accounts for the interweaving or overlapping of these various poles. The first perspective tends to reinforce the image of a system of diffuse communications forming more compact “nodes” between which circulations (contacts, exchanges, receptions of works, etc.) occur. The second model does not envision exchanges between distinct hubs, but rather overlaps or intersections among these circles, thus revealing forms of decentering in the practices or intellectual horizons of participants in these canonized circles or schools.


Call for papers

The conference invites reflection on the internationalization of the Prague Linguistic Circle within the Francophone world, symbolized here—without being limited to—Geneva and Paris. In particular, this conference invites us to consider the Prague Linguistic Circle in Geneva and Paris—not as an external reference point to the Genevan and Parisian contexts, but as a full-fledged agent shaping the theoretical horizons and practices of these intellectual contexts. We therefore welcome original contributions addressing scholarly and/or conceptual relations between Prague, Paris, and Geneva in the fields of language sciences, semiotics, literary studies, art history, or philosophy.

Contributions may explore circulations and decenterings between Geneva, Paris, and Prague in light of:

An interdisciplinary contextualization, seeking traces of the Prague Linguistic Circle beyond language sciences, in the exchanges and interactions that shaped or energized the intellectual contexts of Prague, Paris, and Geneva as a whole.

Archival and documentary materials relating to the activities of the Prague Circle that have been made available in recent years (Toman 1994, Troubetzkoy 2006, Havránková 2008, Čermák et al. 2012, Jakobson 2013, 2014, Havránková & Petkevič 2014, Toman 2017). The use of these materials can offer new insights into already explored themes, such as the distinctive Saussurianism of the Prague and Geneva schools (e.g., Koerner 1971: 295 ff.), or the difficult reception of Prague functionalism among French philologists (e.g., Chevalier 1997).

Well-known intersections between the Prague Circle and the Geneva School (Karcevskij), or with French linguistic networks (Tesnière, Benveniste, Martinet), as well as overlooked figures and phenomena in historiography. For example, one might investigate the place given in Prague Circle work to French-language linguistics (Bally, Grammont, Meillet, Sechehaye, Vendryes, etc.), but also to philosophy (Bergson, Lévy-Bruhl), psychology (Delacroix, Meyerson), or literary theory (Václav Černý, Thibaudet).

The role of Czechoslovak scholars or émigrés from Russia in the activities of the Société de linguistique de Paris, the Geneva Linguistics Society (which preceded, from 1941 to 1956, the Ferdinand de Saussure Circle), or the circumstances surrounding the creation of the Bratislava Linguistic Circle in 1946, and its explicit alignment with the speech-focused themes of the Geneva School (Isačenko 1948).

The broader backdrop of Russian and Ukrainian emigration (to Prague, Paris, Berlin, Geneva). The Russian and Ukrainian émigrés of the Prague Circle participated in networks of exchange and communication not structured around local institutions, but through transversal links across various émigré communities. These networks—and especially their potential importance for the history of language sciences—remain largely unstudied.

A reappraisal of well-known figures such as Jakobson, not through a diachronic lens that follows his successive affiliations with the Moscow, Prague, Copenhagen, and New York Circles, but through a synchronic lens, considering him as a key actor in an almost continuous or at least systematic dialogue between these local contexts.

Please send abstracts of maximum 500 words to patrick.flack@unifr.ch and pierre-yves.testenoire@sorbonne-nouvelle.fr

Deadline: November 30th 2025

Notification of Acceptance: January 31st 2026

Scientific Board

Sylvie Archaimbault (Sorbonne Université)

Gabriel Bergounioux (Université d’Orléans)

Lorenzo Cigana (Università San Raffaele Roma)

Anna Maria Curea (Babeș-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca)

Marina De Palo (Sapienza Università di Roma)

Claire Forel (Université de Genève)

Janette Friedrich (Sigmund Freud Universität)

Tomáš Hoskovec (Jihočeská univerzita)

Petra James (Université Libre de Bruxelles)

John Joseph (University of Edinburgh)

Christian Puech (Université Sorbonne Nouvelle)

Savina Raynaud (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milano)

Didier Samain (Sorbonne Université)

Ondřej Sládek (Masarykova univerzita)

Anne-Gaëlle Toutain (Université de Berne)

Bohumil Vykypěl (Jihočeská univerzita)

Ekaterina Velmezova (Université de Lausanne)

Klaas Willems (Ghent University)

Call for papers: Foucault at 100: Echoes and Encounters in Central and Eastern Europe

 Call for papers: Foucault at 100: Echoes and Encounters in Central and Eastern Europe 

Deadline for submission: 15 November 2025

on the address: foucault100ece@flu.cas.cz

Date and Location:

Prague (1–2 June 2026) and Warsaw (4–5 June 2026)

Host Institutions

The Institute of Philosophy of the Czech Academy of Sciences

Centre français de recherche en sciences sociales en Prague (CEFRES)

Centre de civilisation française et d’études francophones en Pologne (CCFEF)

Organizing Committee: Mateusz Chmurski, Isabel Jacobs, Jiří Růžička, Radosław Szymański, Laurent Tatarenko

Contact Email: foucault100ece@flu.cas.cz

How can a persisting and truly global interest in Foucault’s thought – from Europe to Japan, through the United States and Brazil – be explained? To become the eloquent and inventive critic of the many projects associated with the “Western” world to which he belonged, Foucault had to first grapple with the elusive outlines of modern thought. By criticizing approaches that tried to present “the subject” as a clear object of study, and instead highlighting those that sought to explore the different practices of subjectification, he made “others” understandable to the “West” – and the “West” understandable to the rest of the world. However, the relationship between Foucault’s works and the “West” – its canon and its various intellectual endeavors – is far from straightforward.

One particular place where this question can be fruitfully asked is Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), where Foucault stayed for some years at the beginning of his career (he worked on his thesis, later published as The History of Madness, in Warsaw in 1958), and where his works enjoyed lasting influence among scholars and intellectuals. The question remains open as to whether, and to what extent, Foucault’s conceptual tools can be applied beyond so-called “Western Europe”, the primary context of his reflections. Were Foucault-inspired analyses carried out in CEE liable to produce a distorted image of the region? And how might rethinking Foucault from the vantage point of CEE shift our perception on both his oeuvre and the so-called “West”? Finally, how was Foucault’s own thinking shaped by CEE thought and his encounters with the region?

Over the past thirty years, scholars both from CEE countries and those working on issues related to this area have produced numerous books, articles, and studies influenced, either primarily or partially, immediately or mediated by Foucauldian perspectives, which opened up conceptually new horizons. Many of these publications have become benchmarks in their respective disciplines (Maria Todorova, Alexei Yurchak, Stephen Kotkin, Stephen J. Collier, and many others). What were the reasons for this interest? As Foucault’s popularity in CEE coincided with major political upheavals and new challenges, could this reception be considered a search for intellectual alternatives to the political thought which supposedly undergirded previous communist regimes? Was it hoped that Foucault’s thought could provide a new social perspective? Was he supposed to inspire academics from Central Europe in their concerted retreat from Marxism-Leninism?

It appears that the vicissitudes of the reception of Foucault in the CEE context give rise to a paradox: though Foucault militated against system-building, insofar as he was cast as a promising alternative to the former keystones of social theory, he became inducted to academic textbooks as a classic of social thought even more surely than in France. Who, and with what intent, were the intellectual actors in introducing him to the academic communities in the region, by way of translations, special issues of academic journals or textbooks? Furthermore, our symposium aims to inquire about the particular modes of Foucault’s reception in CEE academia, as well as in public discourse and activism. What were the intermediaries, the channels, and the ‘stopovers’ on the way by which his thought travelled to CEE? Was it a Foucault from Paris or Berkeley, a Foucault in French, English, German, or Italian? Might it have been Rabinow’s or Agamben’s Foucault?

Whatever the reason for Foucault’s pervasive presence, it may not be an exaggeration to say that sometimes scholars from the region draw on Foucault’s ideas without even realizing it. His influence is so deeply embedded in academic discourse that some of his concepts have migrated in various fields where they are used almost uncritically. In our view, a more comprehensive reflection on Foucault’s methodologies and their application to CEE issues has yet to be thoroughly undertaken. Hegel – Foucault’s philosophical archenemy, whose influence he never entirely escaped – argued that any method worthy of the name must, to some extent, follow the activity of the object itself rather than imposing a framework upon it. Foucault, too, embraced this perspective, adapting his approach to suit the problem at hand rather than forcing reality into predetermined structures. This is a crucial lesson to keep in mind when transferring ideas and concepts from one cultural and social context to another. While such a transfer is certainly possible, the transformative work it requires is far less obvious and considerably more demanding.

In this regard, the 100th anniversary of Foucault’s birth presents a unique opportunity to reflect on past contributions, current developments, and future directions of Foucauldian approaches to CEE issues. As the event is the result of a collaborative effort between three institutions across two cities, we have decided to divide it between Prague and Warsaw. The first two days will take place in Prague, followed by a break before continuing in Warsaw. However, this division is not only spatial and temporal but also thematic. Prague will host participants presenting papers on epistemology, philosophy, gender, and aesthetics, while Warsaw will focus on discussions surrounding power, governmentality, and ethics.

We want to discuss together, for example, but not be strictly limited to, the following topics:

Critical reflections on how Foucault’s concepts (e.g., power, biopolitics, governmentality) have been applied and transformed in CEE scholarship.

Evaluations of the strengths, limitations, and effects of Foucauldian methodologies in interpreting CEE social, political and historical realities.

Methodological challenges of transferring Foucauldian concepts across different cultural and social contexts.

Prospects for future uses of Foucault’s ideas in CEE contexts: new fields, emerging issues, and conceptual adaptations.

Dialogues and intersections between Foucault’s approaches and major CEE thinkers (e.g., Gáspár Miklós Tamás, Karel Kosík, Jan Patočka, Witold Kula, Ágnes Heller, Evald Ilyenkov, Zygmunt Bauman, Julia Kristeva).

Intellectual agents and institutions that mediated Foucault’s reception: translations, academic journals, textbooks, public discourse.

How CEE intellectual traditions might challenge, supplement, or transform Foucauldian frameworks.

Foucault’s engagement with the East-West divide; Foucault and the Cold War.

The proposal should include a short abstract (200 words max.), a title, affiliation and a few lines of biography, and possibly a preference for location if papers fall into both thematic strands: Prague (epistemology, gender, and aesthetics) and Warsaw (power, governmentality, and ethics).

CFP: Theoretical and practical aspects of East European development aid to Africa during the Cold War era

 CFP: Theoretical and practical aspects of East European development aid to Africa during the Cold War era, Workshop, University of Warsaw, 20-21 November 2025

The Warsaw Centre for Global History invites colleagues to participate in a workshop exploring theoretical and practical aspects of Eastern European development aid in Africa, as well as economic cooperation between Eastern European and African countries during the Cold War era.

For most of the 20th century, Eastern Europe and Africa shared experiences of underdevelopment and aspirations to overcome it. Decolonization in Africa opened a space for Eastern European countries, which themselves had experience of dependance, to engage in development aid on the continent. Given their experience during the interwar period in overcoming underdevelopment resulting from previous subjugation to European imperial monarchies, coupled with their emphasis on national economic sovereignty, these nations could serve as an attractive and alternative model for newly independent countries with similar ambitions.

The Cold War marked the emergence of development studies as a distinct academic discipline. Scholars from Eastern and Central Eastern Europe did not lag behind in this evolution. While Western studies of dependency and underdevelopment focused primarily on the Global South, researchers from the East could also draw on empirical materials from their part of the world. For example, in Poland, historian Marian Małowist identified the roots of underdevelopment in Eastern Europe and Africa in early modern history. Specialized academic chairs and institutes were established to research development issues and provide expertise. Additionally, these institutions offered educational exchange programs for visitors from developing countries. Internationally recognized economists such as Oskar Lange and Michał Kalecki conceptualized their observations and provided expertise to governments of developing countries in the Third World.

Eastern Europeans managed their development efforts while working to overcome underdevelopment in their home countries, a fact acknowledged by their leadership. These countries could not match the volume and scope of development aid provided by the West. While they spoke the Soviet language of solidarity, domestic economic performance more than ideological factors seemed to inform their developmental initiatives. Development aid also involved some degree of competition, not only with the West but also inside the Eastern bloc. Eastern European countries generally steered clear of Soviet efforts to coordinate development initiatives in the regional framework. Instead, they engaged in what scholars refer to as "socialist bilateralism."

States played a significant role in promoting socialist development aid efforts. Communist parties influenced the geography of development aid by regulating the movement of expertise, controlling who could enter or leave their countries. In addition, East European experts were carefully selected to represent the appropriate ideological profile. Nevertheless, direct contacts with citizens of the Global South opened up opportunities for the exchange of ideas on the pitfalls of development policy in countries ruled by progressive regimes within Socialist societies that were subject to official censorship. Internal discussions among Communist Party members, meetings of their International Departments, and the proceedings of specialized international commissions provided a platform for exchanging views on development directions and models. Historians of Eastern European anti-colonial social movements recognize that, although these movements were closely linked to the state, there was still a degree of criticism directed at their countries’ excessive or insufficient development efforts in the decolonizing world. Additionally, popular culture, magazines, analyses by economic experts, press bulletins aimed at Communist party members and state apparatus, as well as journalistic accounts all contributed to disseminating knowledge about the societies and cultures of African countries. We are specifically seeking contributions based on these diverse official and unofficial documents in relation to the following problems:

1. The concept of the development

Among the key topics to be discussed is the very idea of development. Scholars agree that its origins can be traced to the late colonial era, specifically in the European colonial powers’ discourse on the so-called civilizing mission. Among the justifications of colonial rule was the responsibility to participate in the advancement of economic and social conditions of the colonized societies. By the post-World War II period, development discourse had taken a different tone, emphasizing the need to transform Africa according to patterns imposed by the West or the East.  From the economic point of view, development drew the line between the industrialized countries and resource-producing agrarian economies.

The discussants will try to answer the following questions: In what ways (if any?) did the Eastern European concept of development differ from the contemporary Western, postcolonial or Soviet, anti-imperial models? What criteria and parameters were used as determinants of development?

2. The flow of knowledge on development

We would also like to consider the flow of knowledge on development. Since the 1950s, political economy and research into the challenges faced by the developing world have reflected global tensions, diverging into two distinct approaches: one focused on pro-market developing economies and the other on those with socialist orientations. Early Western development theories, which eventually dominated the field, were informed by the experiences of the so-called first generation of newly industrialized countries - in other words developing nations – in Latin America or East Asia who had prioritized pro-market orientation. The focus of development models would evolve – from industrialization to the provision of basic needs via agriculture before the neoliberal model emerged in 1980s.

How did international debates on development resonate in Eastern European countries? Did these countries create distinct theories on development? If so, was this expertise based on first-hand contacts with the new nations in Africa and recognition of their unique conditions? Or was it an adaptation of Eastern European Marxism and their own experience in fighting against underdevelopment?

3. The rationale for providing aid

Eastern European countries used the language of solidarity to emphasise their separation from colonial legacies and their specific approach to development aid. It would be valuable to explore the relationship between the official discourse and the motivations outlined in the internal documents of political parties, official journalism, or economic analyses. Were there efforts to understand the social specifics of Africa, considering the various paths of modernization? To what extent did development policies serve as tools for securing Eastern European countries’ specific interests, such as promoting Marxism-Leninism globally, accessing African markets, or the globalization of foreign policies? Furthermore, how did the official justifications and practices of development evolve over time in connection with changes in regimes, ruling elites, and their economic priorities? Of particular importance is the relationship between Eastern European development initiatives and the political regimes of African countries. Were Marxist-governed countries, such as Mozambique, Angola, and Ethiopia, treated differently from other African nations?

4. Planning and organization of expertise

The development and organization of expertise could serve as a foundation for examining both the intentions behind state policies on cooperation with independent African countries, and the perceptual frameworks that accompany them. It would be interesting to study the practical and theoretical preparation of expert personnel travelling to Africa, whether for aid programs or profit-driven ventures. Contributions could consider programs in African studies, courses tailored to the specific needs of various fields related to Africa, language training, and health and diet counselling.

Scholars interested in attending the workshop are invited to send 300-word abstract, including the title, the current or a most recent academic affiliation and a short bio to: eeurope-africa@uw.edu.pl by September 1, 2025.

Notification of acceptance will be sent by September 15, 2025.

Organisers cover accommodation for two nights in Warsaw and travel expenses.

The working language of the conference is English.

Organisers:

prof. Marek Pawełczak, Faculty of History, University of Warsaw

dr Anna Konieczna, Centre for French Culture and Francophone Studies, University of Warsaw

dr Filip Urbański, Faculty of Political Sciences and International Studies, University of Warsaw

References

Burton, Eric, Anne Dietrich, Immanuel Harisch, i Marcia Schenck, red. Navigating Socialist Encounters. Boston, MA: De Gruyter Oldenbourg, 2021.

Decker, Corrie, i Elisabeth McMahon. The Idea of Development in Africa: A History. New Approaches to African History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Kalinovsky, Artemy M. „Sorting Out the Recent Historiography of Development Assistance: Consolidation and New Directions in the Field”. Journal of Contemporary History 56, nr 1 (2021): 227–39.

Lorenzini, Sara. Global Development: A Cold War History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.

Mark, James, i Paul Betts. Socialism Goes Global: The Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in the Age of Decolonisation. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2022.

Mark, James, Artemy M. Kalinovsky, i Steffi Marung, red. Alternative Globalizations. Bloomington Indiana: Indiana University Press. Dostęp 28 maj 2025.

Muehlenbeck, Philip E., i Natalia Telepneva, red. Warsaw Pact Intervention in the Third World. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.

Contact Information

dr Anna Konieczna

Centre for French Culture and Francophone Studies | University of Warsaw 

ul. Dobra 55 (s. 3.009)

00-312 Warszawa

www.okf.uw.edu.pl

Sunday, 13 July 2025

CFP: Ludwik Fleck and the Historiography of Science: The Theory of Thought Styles and Thought Collectives at the Centennial

Paweł Jarnicki and Mauro Condé are pleased to announce a forthcoming edited volume on Ludwik Fleck, to be published by Springer. You can find the call for papers here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rk3Q8xNf9bLu9XPG8uOufmNnkk8wLFGO/view?usp=sharing. They would be grateful if you could share it widely within your networks. We all look forward to receiving your proposals and contributions for this book. 

2026 Joint ESHS & HSS Meeting, Edinburgh, Scotland, 13-16 July 2026

 2026 Joint ESHS & HSS Meeting, Edinburgh, Scotland, 13-16 July 2026


Call for Proposals: 2026 Joint Meeting of the European Society for the History of Science (ESHS) and History of Science Society (HSS)


Title: Shifting Perspectives: Plural Worlds, Contested Sciences

Location: University of Edinburgh, Scotland

Dates: 13-16 July 2026


Organized by:

The History of Science Society (HSS)

The European Society for the History of Science (ESHS)

With support from

The British Society for the History of Science (BSHS)


Deadline for submitting proposals:   Friday 1 December 2025, 11:59 pm PST (Abstract Submission Site to come)


Link to the full Call For Proposals is available here<https://hssonline.org/page/2026cfp>


Friday, 11 July 2025

Oleksandra Buzko: Maria Viazmitina. Archaeological Expedition to Parthia.

Олександра Бузько: Марія Вязмітіна. археологічна експедиція у Парфію.Kyiv,  Видання Інституту археології НАНУ, 2025. // Oleksandra Buzko: Maria Viazmitina. Archaeological Expedition to Parthia.Kyiv,  Видання Інституту археології НАНУ, 2025.

[Українська версія нижче]

 This bilingual book, in Ukrainian and English, is the result of Oleksandra's research into the life, work, and scientific legacy of the outstanding Ukrainian archaeologist Maria Vyazmitina, based on materials from the archaeologist's personal archive at the Institute of Archaeology.

This publication is important for both Ukrainian science and world archaeology, as it allows the global scientific community to access archival materials from archaeological expeditions to Central Asia in the 20th century, highlights the contribution of Ukrainian archaeologists to this field, contributes to the study of women archaeologists in a global context, and presents a study of the archaeology of Ukraine during the Soviet period in its historical context.


----

 Ця книга-білінгва, українською та англійською, є результатом дослідження пані Олександрою життєвого і творчого шляху та наукової спадщини видатної української археологині Марії Вязмітіної, на матеріалах персонального архіву археологині в Інституті археології.

Це видання є надзвичайно важливим як для української науки,  так й для світової археології, оскільки воно робить доступними для світової наукової спільноти архівні матеріали археологічних експедицій до Середньої Азії 20 століття, висвітлює вклад наших археологів в цю наукову сферу, вносить свою лепту у дослідження теми жінок-археологинь в світовому контексті, та є дослідженням археології України радянського періоду в історичному контексті.


Sunday, 6 July 2025

CFP: ‘Power Couples? Collaborations at work and at home, c. 1750-1914’

 CALL FOR PAPERS:

‘Power Couples? Collaborations at work and at home, c. 1750-1914’ workshop

Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany

11-13 May 2026

In recent decades, there has emerged an important wave of scholarship by historians, philosophers, literary scholars, biographers, and sociologists (amongst others), which has unveiled the crucial ‘hidden’ intellectual, social, and domestic labour women have provided throughout history in helping to make the careers and public reputations of their male colleagues, family members, and partners. This scholarship has illuminated the myriad harmful ways women’s historical labour has been effaced, during their lifetimes, in the subsequent historiography, and in archival institutions. The reasons why female accomplishments have long been marginalised in public consciousness has often been discussed under the term ‘Matilda Effect’—a concept that has also gained traction in wider public discourse.

However, a key phenomenon within collaborative cultures remains strikingly under-researched: the role played by couples whose collaborations were openly acknowledged, and the impact they have had on the making of modern political, intellectual, professional, academic, and religious cultures. As such, this international workshop will bring together scholars from diverse disciplinary backgrounds and career stages to explore this phenomenon. Our focus is the period spanning the mid eighteenth century to the early twentieth century, a period marked by notable changes in women’s rights, access to education, religious thinking, means of travel and mass communication, as well as the development of modern professions, civil society, and the nation-state. In particular, the workshop is interested in historicising the roots of the term ‘power couple’. Although this term originated in Anglophone contexts in the 1980s, the preceding centuries had already seen an unprecedented growth of couples attempting to carve out new public reputations together, be this in politics and social reform, universities, religious contexts, business ownership, the arts, medicine, and across a range of other fields.

The workshop seeks to explore the following questions: 1.) How did different couples organise and maintain their collaborative work and domestic lives? 2.) How did gender, race, ethnicity, and class shape collaborative endeavours? 3.) What similarities and differences were there between queer collaborating couples and those in legal marital partnerships? 4.) How were collaborations shaped by different local, national, and global contexts? 5.) What synergies were there between different fields and networks? 6.) To what extent did couples who collaborated seek to promote greater equality in their wider, respective areas of work?

During the workshop, participants will discuss their different methodological approaches including biographical, quantitative, and digital methods, and will examine diverse source materials, such as correspondence, periodicals, publications, diaries, and photographs.

We very much welcome ‘work-in-progress’ papers and suggestions for non-traditional ways of discussing this topic. A peer-reviewed publication of the workshop’s outcomes is also planned.

The deadline for submissions of interest is 1 September 2025.

The organisers are Dr Sven Jaros (sven.jaros@geschichte.uni-halle.de) and Dr Zoe Thomas (z.thomas@bham.ac.uk). Please email both organisers by this date with a rough title and a document of approximately 250 words about what you would like to discuss at the workshop. We are currently applying for funding for travel and accommodation for participants. Please let us know if you require this to attend. We are also hoping to make elements of the workshop hybrid, although in person attendance is preferred.

Call for papers: Technological Optimism in 1970s and 1980s Popular Culture: Innovation, Creativity, Prosperity, and Freedom

 Call for papers: Technological Optimism in 1970s and 1980s Popular Culture: Innovation, Creativity, Prosperity, and Freedom - Mainz 04/2026


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


This conference seeks to explore the cultural and intellectual roots of technological optimism in the 1970s and 1980s, decades that tend to be better known for their pervasive undercurrents of pessimism about threats to the natural environment and human well-being. Nonetheless, significant technological advances continued, and transformative visions of progress gained traction, paving the way for the techno-utopianism of the 1990s. We aim to examine how the popular culture and creative expression of the era captured and amplified positive beliefs in technology’s power to foster innovation, creativity, prosperity and freedom.


Technological Optimism in 1970s and 1980s Popular Culture: Innovation, Creativity, Prosperity, and Freedom

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

John C. Wood / Thorsten Wübbena (Leibniz Institute of European History) (Leibniz Institute of European History, Mainz), 55116 Mainz (Deutschland)

15.04.2026 - 17.04.2026

Bewerbungsschluss: 11.09.2025


We invite scholars, historians, technologists and cultural critics to submit papers addressing the historical and cultural dimensions of technological optimism during this pivotal era.


Debates surrounding technology’s place in our lives are highly polarised. Its critics highlight the dangers and crises technology brings: climate change, pervasive surveillance, ever-deadlier weapons, behavioural manipulation and an alleged dehumanisation in work and private life. At the same time, there are many vehement assertions of technology’s transformative and liberating potential, whether as a solution to environmental crisis, a way to extend human possibility, a vehicle for individual expression or simply as an engine of progress generally.


While technology itself is constantly changing, the topics that it raises — and even the language in which it is debated — are far from new. Through this conference, we aim to explore the historical roots of present discussions, focusing on the 1970s and 1980s and issues such as:


- Why did optimistic beliefs in technology thrive despite the challenges of the time?

- What strategies did techno-optimists use to counter the arguments of technological pessimism?

- How did technological optimism build upon previous developments and/or shape the development of subsequent innovations?


We encourage papers that situate technological optimism within this broader historial context, connecting the period’s cultural, political, and social currents to its technological innovations.


We also hope to account for the complex geographic landscape of technological optimism and thus welcome contributions that address, for example, visions of technological optimism behind the Iron Curtain or those to be found beyond Europe and North America in the period in question. 


More detailed information about the conference’s themes, aims and topics is available at its website: https://ieg-dhr.github.io/techno_optimism/


Please submit an abstract by 11.09.2025 of no more than 500 words (references  excluded) to the organisers at digital@ieg-mainz.de for a 20-minute presentation (plus discussion), clearly  outlining your proposed paper’s focus, methodology, and relevance to the  conference theme. Include your name, institutional affiliation, and contact information with your abstract.

Call for papers: Archives of Migration. Participation, Knowledge Production and Collaboration

 Call for papers:

Archives of Migration. Participation, Knowledge Production and Collaboration

Leibniz Institute for the History and Culture of Eastern Europe (GWZO), in cooperation with the Institute of Czech Literature of the Czech Academy of Sciences and the Innsbruck University, 110 00 Praha 1 (Czech Republic)

01.12.2025 - 02.12.2025

Deadline, September 1, 2025.

URL: https://www.leibniz-gwzo.de/sites/default/files/dateien/CfP_ArchivesOfMigration-2.pdf

Thursday, 3 July 2025

Izabela Mrzygłód: Uniwersytety w cieniu kryzysu. Nacjonalistyczna radykalizacja studentów Warszawy i Wiednia w okresie międzywojennym

 Izabela Mrzygłód: Uniwersytety w cieniu kryzysu. Nacjonalistyczna radykalizacja studentów Warszawy i Wiednia w okresie międzywojennym [Universities in the shadow of a crisis: Nationalist radicalisation of students in Warsaw and Vienna in the Interwar period]. Wydawnictwo UMK 2025. ISBN:978-83-231-6067-0, DOI:https://doi.org/10.12775/978-83-231-6068-7.


Uniwersytety w cieniu kryzysu. Nacjonalistyczna radykalizacja studentów Warszawy i Wiednia w okresie międzywojennym to krytyczne spojrzenie na przeszłość dwóch uczelni Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. Autorka stawia pytanie o powód, dla którego to właśnie studenci zostali awangardą nacjonalistycznych rewolucji. Analizuje praktyki i dyskursy skrajnej prawicy, której rola rosła na polskich i austriackich uniwersytetach w międzywojniu. Wykorzystując historyczne źródła i socjologiczną wyobraźnię, sięga do emocji i aspiracji „zwykłych akademików”. Pokazuje, jak organizacje samopomocowe przekształcały się w agendy antysemityzmu, jak kultura polityczna młodych naznaczona została przemocą, a brutalne ataki na żydowskich studentów i profesorów stały się codziennością. Śledzi, jak radykalna mniejszość była coraz głośniejsza i skutecznie przyciągała milczącą większość, a postulaty wykluczenia Żydów ze wspólnoty narodowej trafiły do głównego nurtu, żeby w końcu stać się oficjalną polityką rektoratów wprowadzających getto ławkowe. Praca przybliża atmosferę kryzysu i fascynację faszyzmem, ukazuje chronologię przemocy, bada nacjonalistyczne rytuały i symbole. Zestawienie szerokiej europejskiej perspektywy z historią w skali mikro daje nowe spojrzenie na II Rzeczpospolitą, I Republikę Austriacką i prawicowy radykalizm, nie tylko międzywojenny.

CFP for the session Session: “Knowledge in Interurban Transit. Networks, Actors, and Agencies”

 CFP for the session Session: “Knowledge in Interurban Transit. Networks, Actors, and Agencies” (Session 57) at the Conference of the Europe...