Saturday, 8 November 2025

100th anniversary of Zygmunt Bauman's birth (1925-2017).

We are pleased to invite you to the upcoming seminar in the "Polish Marxism" series, taking place on Wednesday, November 19, 2025, at 4:00 PM CET.

The date of the seminar is symbolic, as it marks the 100th anniversary of Zygmunt Bauman's birth (1925-2017). While Bauman was one of the most famous Polish sociologists, and his works on “liquid modernity” became a canon of postmodernist philosophy, his earlier works still remain in the shadows in mainstream academic discussions, causing confusion and controversy around the biography of the celebrated scholar. This seminar is an attempt to reconcile the young and the old Bauman, devoted communist and postmodernist critic. We will discuss how Bauman’s early engagement in the socialist projects of “solid” modernity can reframe our thinking about his later postmodernist works. We will explore questions about the utopian hopes that underlie Bauman’s early Marxist works, the role of Jewish roots in the complex formation of his identity, and the special place of human freedom in his later thought. Following the approach developed in our seminars, we will reflect on Bauman as someone shaped by the specific conditions of the development of Polish Marxism and who was its major contributor. We hope that during this seminar, we can all gather to listen, discuss, and enjoy Bauman’s (post)modernist polyphony.

The discussion will move chronologically, starting from the presentation of Bauman’s biographer, Izabela Wagner. We will then focus more on the content of Bauman’s Marxist sociology. Finally, we will finish with the panel of later Bauman’s works:

• prof. Izabela Wagner: Once Upon a Time.... (exactly 100 years ago) was born Zygmunt • • • Bauman: the puzzled story of a man trapped between his Master Status, and Identity

• prof. Jarosław Kilias — East European Marxist Sociology: An Unrealized Project and a Utopia

• Panel discussion - In search of human freedom and dignity: late Bauman's thought - prof. Adam Chmielewski, prof. Matt Dawson, dr Jack Palmer. Moderator: prof. Sławomir Czapnik

Further details of the presentations and biographies of the invited guests will be announced in the coming days.

The event will be held online via the Zoom platform: https://uw-edu-pl.zoom.us/j/94400425428?pwd=RSvRF1wE5I8HBe3ZJpDbyoExbSzfbA.1


Wednesday, 5 November 2025

CFP: Social and Humanities Research in/on Central and Eastern Europe: Envisioning Futures from a Tumultuous Present

 In 2025, TOPOS, the journal for philosophy and cultural studies, celebrates its 25th anniversary. To mark the occasion, the editorial team and the Department of Social Sciences at the European Humanities University will organize an on-site conference titled “Social and Humanities Research in/on Central and Eastern Europe: Envisioning Futures from a Tumultuous Present,” which will take place on December 12-13, 2025, in Vilnius.


Social and Humanities Research in/on Central and Eastern Europe: Envisioning Futures from a Tumultuous Present

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

European Humanities University, 01126 Vilnius (Lithuania)

12.12.2025 - 13.12.2025

Bewerbungsschluss: 10.11.2025


We want to take this anniversary as an opportunity for joint reflections on the state of social and humanities research into the region of Central and Eastern Europe, and of that region’s significance to exemplarily bundle questions in social and cultural studies. We plan several conference panels devoted to the following questions:


What are the main challenges in academic knowledge production about Central and Eastern Europe today? Which trends do you observe?

How do you see the role of academic journals as platforms for the exchange of knowledge (given the rising importance of various digital platforms – YouTube, etc.)? Do journals have a particular significance in and for the region? Which possibilities do you see for collaboration and exchange between different journals focusing on the region?

How does academic work in the humanities and social sciences refer to, and react to, the mass migration of researchers due to war, repressions, etc., or of outright political violence against them? How does the particular potential to resist oppression traditionally ascribed to humanities scholarship present itself under today’s circumstances?

Knowledge production in Central and Eastern Europe has historically struggled to enter international debates and dialogue on matters related to the region.  What is the situation of this asymmetry today?  How can the marginalization of voices from the region be overcome?


After the conference, we envision publishing a special Forum section in a 2026 TOPOS issue presenting and continuing the panel discussions.


Working language – English


We cordially invite everyone interested to participate in the conference. To apply, please fill out the form at this link: https://forms.gle/K6hhib2pTpzYnaC46


The application deadline is 10 November 2025.


The outcome of the proposal review process will be communicated by November 15.


The conference is free of charge.


Tatsiana Astrouskaya, : Cultural Dissent in Soviet Belarus (1968–1988). Intelligentsia, Samizdat and Nonconformist Discourses (Rusian language translation)

 Татьяна Островская: Культура и сопротивление. Интеллигенция, инакомыслие и самиздат в советской Беларуси (1968–1988). Перевод с английского Ибатуллин Роберт. Новое литературное обозрение 2025. ISBN 978-5-4448-2682-9 [= Tatsiana Astrouskaya, : Cultural Dissent in Soviet Belarus (1968–1988). Intelligentsia, Samizdat and Nonconformist Discourses]


Аннотация: Книга Татьяны Островской посвящена диссидентским идеям и дискурсам, которые циркулировали в среде беларусской советской интеллигенции — как в самиздате и неподцензурных зарубежных публикациях, так и в официально издаваемой литературе, имевшей не меньшее значение для передачи неконвенциональных образов культуры и идентичности. Охватывая широкий спектр интеллектуальных дискурсов, автор акцентирует внимание прежде всего на феномене и практиках нонконформизма и культурного инакомыслия, а не на собственно политических формах сопротивления. Идейное наследие и деятельность беларусских интеллектуалов впервые в историографии рассматриваются в наднациональной перспективе: Т. Островская прослеживает их связи как с русской и украинской интеллигенцией, так и с беларусским эмигрантским сообществом. Хронологические рамки исследования лежат между событиями, относившимися к Пражской весне и ее насильственному подавлению, изменившими представление советских интеллектуалов о себе и социалистическом строе, и 1988 годом, когда инакомыслие в Беларуси переросло в открытое политическое движение. Татьяна Островская — историк, PhD, научный сотрудник Гердеровского института в Марбурге, Германия.


Save the date: The Making of the Humanities XII (Torun 2026)

In 2026, the twelfth Making of the Humanities conference will be hosted by Nicolaus Copernicus University, in Torun, Poland, October 7-9, 2026.


Under the title “The Structure of Humanistic Revolutions,” this conference will seeks to critically explore the transformations that have shaped the history of the humanities. Drawing inspiration from Thomas Kuhn’s seminal work “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” we will engage in a reflective analysis of how “revolutions” within humanistic disciplines have been conceptualized, contested, and institutionalized over time.


Please note that although we invite submissions that explore this theme, we remain open to abstracts addressing other subjects as well.


Deadline for all submissions: April 19, 2026.

Notification of acceptance: June 1, 2026.


More information about submitting abstracts and panels is available at the conference webpage: https://mohxii.umk.pl/pages/home/


Monday, 3 November 2025

online event/book presentation: Naum Trajanovski “A History of Macedonian Sociology: In Quest for Identity”

 online event: Naum Trajanovski will present his book with the title “A History of Macedonian Sociology: In Quest for Identity”. INZ Ljubljana and zoom, Wednesday, November 12, 2025, at 11 AM CET


You are kindly invited to a new lecture in the History on the Edge series, which will take place on Wednesday, November 12, 2025, at the INZ premises or via the ZOOM link: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/85093074535?pwd=chFdSCgScVg8fw1djh3bVz8h9gqWtm.1 .

This time, the lecture will take place at 11 a.m., but if you join us in person, you’re welcome to come for coffee 20 minutes before the lecture begins.

Naum Trajanovski will present his book with the title “A History of Macedonian Sociology: In Quest for Identity”. The lecture will be held in English.

A History of Macedonian Sociology: In Quest for Identity

The book A History of Macedonian Sociology: In Quest for Identity is the first English-language monograph about the institutional development of sociology in (North) Macedonia. It maps and discusses the contexts, goals, and merits of the pioneering attempts for sociological research in the interwar period, early post-war educational and publishing politics, the institutionalization of sociology in socialist Macedonia in the course of the 1960s, its cross-national exchanges, as well as its major trajectories and debates up until the present days. Against the backgrounds of the political and intellectual histories of Yugoslav and post-Yugoslav Macedonia, it argues that the development of the sociological activities, themes, and arguments is entwined with the Macedonian nation- and state-building.

The History on the Edge lecture on the book will provide an overview of the main arguments concerning the various historical phases of Macedonian sociology, with a particular focus on their embeddedness within the Yugoslav/post-Yugoslav contexts.

online event: Paweł Jarnicki: O hipotezie, że Thomas Kuhn splagiatował Ludwika Flecka [On the hypothesis that Thomas Kuhn plagiarised Ludwik Fleck],

 online event: Paweł Jarnicki: O hipotezie, że Thomas Kuhn splagiatował Ludwika Flecka [On the hypothesis that Thomas Kuhn plagiarised Ludwik Fleck], 21.11.2025, 11.30, Zoom 


21 listopada o godzinie 11.30 na posiedzeniu ogólnopolskiego seminarium Filozoficznych problemów wiedzy organizowanym przez Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN, Politechnikę Warszawską oraz Uniwersytet Warszawski opowiem „O hipotezie, że Thomas Kuhn splagiatował Ludwika Flecka”. W skrócie: Będzie o rzadko formułowanej pisemnie i wprost hipotezie, że Thomas Samuel Kuhn, pisząc "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" (1962), splagiatował teorię stylów i kolektywów myślowych Ludwika Flecka sformułowaną w "Entstehung und Entwicklung eiener wissenschafltlichen Tatsache" (1935). Przedstawię dowody poszlakowe i argumenty, które uzasadniają podjęcie bardziej szczegółowych badań, które pozwolą tę hipotezę odrzucić lub potwierdzić, i powiem, jak wyobrażam sobie taki projekt badawczy.

Spotkanie odbędzie się na platformie ZOOM, podajemy szczegóły logowania:

link do spotkania: https://zoom.us/j/98272534200?pwd=5mpmlZNBA3jG2PCyhatqFq2USuOIhs.1


Identyfikator spotkania: 982 7253 4200

Kod dostępu: 267234.


Sunday, 2 November 2025

CfP Praktyka teoretyczna // Theoretical Practice 4/2026 - Terapia szokowa” a narodziny peryferyjnego kapitalizmu akademickiego w Polsce (1990-1999) // “Shock Therapy” and the Birth of Peripheral Academic Capitalism in Poland (1990-1999)

CfP Praktyka teoretyczna // Theoretical Practice 4/2026 - Terapia szokowa” a narodziny peryferyjnego kapitalizmu akademickiego w Polsce (1990-1999) // “Shock Therapy” and the Birth of Peripheral Academic Capitalism in Poland (1990-1999)

Redaktorki/redaktorzy:

Krystian Szadkowski

Język numeru:

polski

Termin nadsyłania abstraktów:

31.11.2025

Termin nadsyłania artykułów:

31.03.2026

Planowana data publikacji:

grudzień 2026

1 stycznia 1990 roku zainaugurował w Polsce kryzysową dekadę. Był to moment rozpoczęcia prześnionej ekonomicznej wojny domowej: wypowiedzianej zorganizowanym robotnikom, instytucjom publicznym i społeczeństwu. Wprowadzony wówczas „plan Balcerowicza”, program zamrożenia płac, uwolnienia cen, wymienialności waluty, liberalizacji handlu oraz rozpędzonej prywatyzacji majątku państwowego w Polsce, połączony ze skrajną polityką oszczędności – „terapią szokową” – na trwałe zmienił życie milionów ludzi. Lata dziewięćdziesiąte w Polsce, upłynęły w cieniu tej wojny domowej i jej konsekwencji. Stawka była wysoka – chodziło o niedopuszczenie do masowej rewolty robotniczej mogącej w przyszłości podważyć fundamenty nowego systemu. Miał on nosić od teraz znamiona „naturalności” i „ahistoryczności”. Kapitalizm nie kładzie jednak kresu historii, tak jak nie odstępuje od wojny – jest ich kontynuacją z wykorzystaniem innych narzędzi i metod. Tego samego przekonania byli twórcy polskich reform. Już w 1993 roku, spoglądając na efekty działań, które pozbawiły pracy i środków do życia miliony polskich pracowników wszystkich sektorów Leszek Balcerowicz stwierdził: „Wielka reforma gospodarcza w trudnych czasach może być przyrównana do wojny, tyle że prowadzonej innymi środkami”. Faktycznym celem tych działań było „wytrwać” i utrzymać bezwzględny kurs pacyfikacji klasy robotniczej.

W tym numerze chcemy opowiedzieć tą historię na specyficznym i dotąd słabo zbadanym gruncie - narodzin kapitalistycznych stosunków w peryferyjnym systemie akademickim rozważanych na tle specyfiki lat dziewięćdziesiątych w ogarniętej „odgórną” wojną klasową neoliberalnej Polsce. Przekształcenia sektora nauki i szkolnictwa wyższego zachodzące w tym okresie miały decydujące znaczenie dla stabilizacji nowej peryferyjnej pozycji kraju w globalnym podziale pracy, jak również dla usankcjonowania społecznego konsensusu wokół nowego i szybko „znaturalizowanego” porządku kapitalistycznego. I na odwrót. Stabilizacja peryferyjnej kondycji Polski włączonej w sieć nowych stosunków gospodarczo-politycznych określiła trwale możliwości rozwojowe systemu nauki i szkolnictwa wyższego. „Terapia szokowa” stanowi zatem klucz do zrozumienia peryferyjnego kapitalizmu akademickiego.

Cios wymierzony w szkolnictwo wyższe i naukę miał wywrzeć głębokie konsekwencje. Obszary te doświadczyły znacznie drastyczniejszych niż pozostałe składowe sektora publicznego cięć już skromnych środków budżetowych. O ile w większości sektorów administracji publicznej i gospodarki mieliśmy do czynienia z redukcjami na poziomie średnio jednej trzeciej, o tyle w nauce i szkolnictwie wyższym w 1990 roku wyparowała ponad połowa wszystkich środków publicznych – wyrwy tej nie dało się też wypełnić środkami prywatnymi. Gdy spojrzymy na statystyki zwolnień w 1990 roku, sektorami w największym stopniu redukującymi zatrudnienie nie były wcale gwałtownie prywatyzowane przemysł ciężki czy górnictwo, ale właśnie nauka i szkolnictwo wyższe, gdzie z dnia na dzień zatrudnienie straciło blisko 40% pracowników technicznych i administracyjnych czy badaczy i nauczycieli akademickich – wiele opuściło uczelnie migrując zagranicę czy odpływając do przedsiębiorstw. Balcerowicz, w trakcie jednego ze spotkań komisji budżetowych, miał stwierdzić, że „nauka i kultura muszą wyżywić się same”. Było to o tyle niemożliwe, że przemysł i państwo jako stali partnerzy socjalistycznej nauki ulegali właśnie równoległej dezintegracji.

Jako całość sektor określono jako nieefektywny, zacofany i ostatecznie wsobny (autarkiczny), zorientowany przede wszystkim na zaspokajanie potrzeb odchodzącego systemu polityczno-gospodarczego. Co więcej, socjalistyczne szkolnictwo wyższe i nauka miały być obszarami, w których zakorzenił się stary typ człowieka – homo sovieticus, na bazie którego nie sposób było budować nowego systemu gospodarczo-politycznego. Wojna wypowiedziana nauce i szkolnictwu wyższemu w Polsce była w tym kontekście świadomą i wykalkulowaną decyzją rządzących – i w konsekwencji pogłębiła jedynie peryferyjną pozycję nie tylko sektora, ale i całego kraju. W wąsko zakrojonym neoliberalnym imaginarium nie było miejsca na suwerenny rozwój w oparciu o wiedzę i naukę. Przepisem na sukces miała być imitacja i import zachodnich technologii i ideologii.

Ideologicznym narzędziem zmiany w nauce był dobrze dziś znany język „doskonałości naukowej” i „nauki na światowym poziomie”. Komentując pierwsze lata transformacji sektora nauki w 1994 roku, przewodniczący Komitetu Badań Naukowych, instytucji odpowiedzialnej za politykę i finansowanie badań, prof. Witold Karczewski podsumował obraną przez siebie ścieżkę następująco: „Polska zastosowała raczej ciężkie ‘Darwinowskie’ podejście dając (już w 1991 roku) niemal nic, albo bardzo mało środków budżetowych miernym “badawczym Lewiatanom”, oraz ponad 60% wszystkich dostępnych środków mniej więcej 30% instytucji badawczych znajdujących się na szczycie listy rankingowej (stworzonej w trybie peer-review przez samych naukowców)”. Nawet tak nierówna dystrybucja środków nie pomogła najlepszym. Konkurencja o zawsze zbyt małe środki (od tego momentu, stały element krajobrazu polskiej nauki), ograniczonych w nieproporcjonalny do innych sektorów sposób, skutkowała wytworzeniem w polskim środowisku naukowym specyficznych mechanizmów obronnych. Inspirowany darwinizmem społecznym dyskurs „naukowej doskonałości” wydawał się być jedyną szansą na uzasadnienie możliwości otrzymania choćby skromnego finansowania. Poza stworzeniem tego toksycznego dyskursu konkurencji, który szybko obrócił się przeciwko niemu samemu – środowisko akademickie nie było zdolne niemal do żadnej masowej, zorganizowanej formy oporu przeciwko wypowiedzianej mu wojnie.

Poddając rozkładowi tkankę badań naukowych, „terapia szokowa” w sposób dotkliwy naruszyła jednocześnie kruchą równowagę na polskim uniwersytecie. Nie tylko dążąc do usunięcia z uczelni publicznych tych obszarów nauki, które związane były bezpośrednio z interesami państwa i partii, ale również w celu wygaszenia rozbudowanej sfery instytutów badawczo-rozwojowych, powiązanych z odchodzącym w niepamięć i prywatyzowanym przemysłem. Zadaniem, które stanęło przed nową władzą, było przecież szybkie umasowienie sektora szkolnictwa wyższego. Choć jeszcze w 1990 roku Janusz Grzelak, podsekretarz stanu w Ministerstwie Edukacji Narodowej, uzasadniał konieczność ograniczenia naboru na studia ze względu na kłopoty kadrowe (w efekcie masowego „drenażu mózgów” z sektora za granicę i do prywatnych przedsiębiorstw), lokalowe (znajdująca się w opłakanym stanie infrastruktura połączona z rosnącymi czynszami i eksmisjami uczelni) i brak miejsc w akademikach (które to miejsca na początku lat dziewięćdziesiątych były postrzegane jako warunek możliwości realnego studiowania), taka troska szybko ustąpiła bezwzględnemu rozszerzaniu dostępu kosztem jakości nauczania i materialnych warunków umożliwiających studiowanie. Paląca konieczność przeprowadzenia tego procesu nie wynikała jednak z chęci demokratyzacji dostępu do wysokiej jakości edukacji wyższej, ale z rosnących potrzeb kadrowych tworzonej na gorąco peryferyjnej gospodarki kapitalistycznej, podłączanej na siłę do nowego centrum. Wiele wysiłku włożono w zaprojektowanie nowych programów kształcenia ekonomii, która w Polsce do dziś pozostaje skansenem ekonomii neoklasycznej, wzbudzającej uśmiechy politowania nawet wśród najskrajniejszych neoliberalnych ekonomistów z Zachodu. Nie chodziło jednak o postępy w nauce, a o tworzenie armii posłusznych funkcjonariuszy kapitalizmu. Z tego powodu rdzeń umasowienia tworzyło rozwinięcie kształcenia z zakresu ekonomii, zarządzania, filologii obcych oraz pedagogiki (absorbujących łącznie blisko 40% populacji wszystkich studentów już w latach dziewięćdziesiątych).

Inną stroną tego procesu było stopniowe zanikanie materialnej infrastruktury wspierającej studiowanie. Niszczejące akademiki i stołówki, których kosztami remontów starano się obciążać studiujących, zamykane czy dziko prywatyzowane kluby studenckie, wszystko to składało się na ruiny, na których przyszła na świat nowa figura studenta-pracownika. Odarty z czasu wolnego, z własnej kultury, ze środków pozwalających na koncentrację na studiowaniu, student-pracownik zmuszany był do poszukiwania sposobów na utrzymanie się przy życiu – od prekarnych form zatrudnienia po wakacyjną emigrację zarobkową czy lumpenprzedsiębiorczość.

Wbrew pozorom „terapia szokowa” nie pozostawała jednak bez odpowiedzi. Intensywność protestów w latach dziewięćdziesiątych przeciwko wprowadzanym reformom była znacznie większa niż ta odnotowywana jeszcze do niedawna w Polsce. Również w sektorze nauki i szkolnictwa wyższego mieliśmy do czynienia zarówno z cichym, jak i zorganizowanym oporem, a niekiedy również z działaniami ofensywnymi. Miały one jednak specyficzne oblicze. Ton ruchowi studenckiemu we wczesnych latach dziewięćdziesiątych w Polsce nadawało Niezależne Zrzeszenie Studenckie – organizacja zrodzona ze strajków okupacyjnych lat osiemdziesiątych, stanowiąca studenckie ramie „Solidarności”. Na poziomie ideologicznym była to paradoksalna mieszanka związku zawodowego studentów, broniącego ich interesów materialnych, organizacji antykomunistycznej, jak również gorliwych krzewicieli kapitalizmu i zwolenników urynkowienia publicznego szkolnictwa wyższego. Na pierwszy rzut oka wydaje się to materializacją sprzeczności. Sprzeczność ta wpisana jest jednak w całokształt oporu akademickiego i studenckiego lat dziewięćdziesiątych. Życzenie pogłębiania stosunków kapitalistycznych w sektorze wyrażane przez niektórych protestujących odejdzie w niepamięć dopiero wraz z wystąpieniami jednoznacznie lewicowego w swym programie „Stowarzyszenia na rzecz Bezpłatnej Edukacji” z drugiej połowy interesującej nas dekady. Przez całe dziesięciolecie mogliśmy jednak obserwować ciche, codzienne akty oporu i solidarności: praktyki studenckiej odmowy pracy.

Wszystko to złożyło się na krajobraz, w którym uformował się współczesny peryferyjny kapitalizm akademicki w Polsce. Próbując zmierzyć się z jego historią, postaramy się odmalować również jego współczesne kontury.

***

Do publikacji w numerze będziemy rozważać wyłącznie teksty świadomie stosujące marksistowską krytykę ekonomii politycznej (strukturalnego dostosowania, przejścia do kapitalizmu, kapitalistycznego systemu-świata, nauki i szkolnictwa wyższego), krytyczną analizę wydarzeń protestacyjnych czy marksistowską krytyczną analizę dyskursu i mierzące się z materiałem źródłowym z interesującej nas dekady.

Abstrakty należy przesyłać na adres: praktykateoretyczna@gmail.com

Przykładowe tematy:

Narodziny studenta-pracownika;

Produkcja studenckiej podmiotowości w warunkach akumulacji pierwotnej;

Sprzeczności umasowienia szkolnictwa wyższego;

Rola organizacji międzynarodowych w transformacji nauki i szkolnictwa wyższego;

Społeczny darwinizm w dyskursie o nauce, jej finansowaniu i ewaluacji;

Studencki i akademicki opór wobec polityki oszczędności;

Historie mówione protestów w nauce i szkolnictwie wyższym okresu transformacji;

Wywłaszczenie studenckich dóbr wspólnych.


CFP: Of Those Who Stand in the Shadows – Family, Friends, Organizations, and Their Significance in the Biographies of Scholars, April 23–24, 2026, Toruń, Poland

CFP: Of Those Who Stand in the Shadows – Family, Friends, Organizations, and Their Significance in the Biographies of Scholars, April 23–24, 2026, Faculty of History, Nicolaus Copernicus University,  Toruń, Poland


The world of science has traditionally been dominated by the image of scholars, most often men, presented as monumental figures — conducting research, engaging in social activities, or pursuing other interests, yet detached from ordinary everyday life. In such portrayals, these individuals are primarily researchers and representatives of their disciplines. They are only secondarily “flesh-and-blood” individuals, to the extent necessary to illustrate their achievements. This traditional image, however, is undeniably distorted. First, one cannot be a scholar without being a human being. After all, it is our humanity, experiences, and interests that largely determine which research areas a scholar chooses to explore. Secondly, behind almost every scholar stands a person “in the shadows” — most often a wife/husband or partner — whose quiet dedication, care for the home, children, and daily matters allows the researcher to “detach from the mundane and wander among the stars.” At the proposed conference, we aim to examine the figures and roles of these quiet heroines and heroes. We are convinced that giving a voice to and drawing attention to those who are usually invisible will contribute to a better understanding of how the world of science functions, in all its dimensions. A second, equally interesting area of exploration is the issue of marginalization. It is often observable that men are credited with a greater role in joint research than their partners, even when their contributions are equal. Apart from close family members, other individuals, institutions, or organizations (whether social or governmental) often stood in the shadows of scholars and may have influenced their academic paths, research choices, or the execution of their work. For this reason, although we intend to focus primarily on individual figures, we also welcome reflections on institutional influences. We have deliberately chosen not to impose chronological restrictions on the conference. While we are aware that most presentations will likely focus on the 20th century, we hope that previously invisible figures from other eras will also emerge. Suggested areas of reflection include: 

• The figure of the wife/partner (husband/partner) supporting the scholar. 

• The influence of the wife/partner (husband/partner) on the scholar’s work environment. 

• The image of family in scholars’ egodocuments (memoirs, letters, etc.). 

• Women’s participation in joint research and its perception by the academic community. 

• Friends and acquaintances influencing scholars’ work and life. 

• The influence of institutions/organizations on a scholar’s career and research activities. 

The suggested topics are, of course, only examples. 

The organizers are open to all other issues related to the central theme of the conference. Please submit your participation form (attached below) to the following email address by December 31, 2025: egodokumenty@umk.pl. Notification of acceptance will be sent by the end of January 2026, and the conference program will be published in March 2026. The conference fee is 300 PLN, payable to the account number. 45 1160 2202 0000 0000 3174 8579 with the note “egodokumenty” and the participant’s name by February 28, 2026. The primary language of the conference is Polish; however, we also welcome papers in English. Sincerely, Dr. Janusz Bonczkowski Dr. Hab. Hadrian Ciechanowski Conference Secretary: Lic. Weronika Zimoch


Application Form Of Those Who Stand in the Shadows – Family, Friends, Organizations, and Their Significance in the Biographies of Scholars April 23–24, 2026 Faculty of History, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bojarskiego 1, 87-100 Toruń, Poland 

Name and Surname: 

Academic Degree/Title: 

Affiliation: Email: Phone (optional): 

Title of Presentation: Abstract (max. approx. 200 words): 

Participation: online/stationary 

Saturday, 1 November 2025

online event: Albert Venger: Ukrainian intellectuals - medievalists in the first half of the twentieth century

 online event: Albert Venger: Ukrainian intellectuals - medievalists in the first half of the twentieth century // "IB\HW" Альберт Венгер. «Українські інтелектуали - медієвісти в першій половині ХХ ст.», Saturday, November 8, 2025, at 9 AM CET

“Історичний вебінар\Historical webinar”, рубрика «Історіографічні дослідження. На службі Кліо», презентують вебінар за участі дослідника України модерної доби, усної та інтелектуальної історії, кандидата історичних наук Альберта Венгера.

Join Zoom Meeting: 

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/86567938528?pwd=qp6aaCA93CJzvJsNVGkFv3r1yZdafL.1

У доповіді розглянемо траєкторії академічних біографій трьох поколінь українських медієвістів. Митрофан Бречкевич, перша половина академічної кар’єри якого випала на імперські часи, а друга на радянські. Миколи Пакуля який закінчив університет у пізньоімперські часи, як вчений сформувався у радянський час. Михайло Лойберг – медієвіст який здобув радянську освіту та розпочав наукові дослідження у 1940-х рр.

8 листопада 2025. Мова українська.

Wednesday, 29 October 2025

Jacek Małczyński, Aleksandra Kil-Matlak, Wolska Dorota eds.: The Humanities Laboratory. From Design to Archaeology.

Jacek Małczyński, Aleksandra Kil-Matlak, Wolska Dorota eds.: The Humanities Laboratory. From Design to Archaeology. Peter Lang 2025. ISBN: 9783631921074


Summary

This book explores the epistemic status and potential of humanities laboratories. It investigates the history of such laboratories, while contributing to debates on designing contemporary forms of labs. The book traces the trend for laboratories in the humanities since the mid-nineteenth century, outlining a multitude of projects across diverse times and spaces.

We are interested in what makes humanities laboratories different from their scientific relatives. Can a humanities lab and those investigating natural sciences even be considered as related? Or should the relationship between them be seen transversally, outside of the opposition between the humanities and the natural and formal sciences?

We argue that the humanities laboratory should not be based on the idea of mimesis and imitate a scientific lab, but rather operate according to the principle of mimicry. Only in this way can the humanities fulfil their self-critical function.

ToC: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PWcclmyJZQkxUQH-q_x0VROwJGH_ZD6V/view?usp=sharing



Tuesday, 28 October 2025

Call for Papers: Female Voices, Media, and Modes of Communication in Theology and Philosophy

 Call for Papers: Female Voices, Media, and Modes of Communication in Theology and Philosophy


Online Talk Series New Voices (March–May 2026)

Female Voices, Media, and Modes of Communication in Theology and Philosophy


The New Voices on Women in the History of Philosophy network<https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/projects/new-voices-on-women-in-the-history-of-philosophy/>, which is open to early-career researchers in the broadest sense, is hosted by the Center for the History of Women Philosophers and Scientists in Paderborn. The objective of New Voices is to establish a forum and network for international early-career researchers in the field of female philosophers, scientists, and writers in the history of philosophy, and to promote their work.

In the winter of 2026, the New Voices Talk Series will once again embrace a spirit of collaboration. This joint project represents a partnership between three universities: the University of Paderborn, the Saint Joseph University of Beirut, and the University of Lorraine.

Please find here the Call for Papers:


Overview

Women have long contributed to the development of theology and philosophy, yet their voices have often been marginalized, mediated through restrictive frameworks, or silenced altogether. At the same time, women have consistently found innovative means of expression — from letters, diaries, and poetry to public lectures, activism, and today’s digital platforms — to engage in theological and philosophical discourse.

This seminar approaches communication not only as a neutral means of expression, but also as a form of power: the choice of medium, style, and platform can grant authority, negotiate legitimacy, or challenge dominant structures. From early modern women writing in private correspondence to contemporary digital influencers shaping theological debates, the act of communication becomes a way to establish intellectual presence, resist exclusion, rethink society, or reshape normative traditions.

The rise of digital culture has introduced new dynamics. Social media, for example, can amplify women’s perspectives and create alternative networks of recognition, while also enabling ideologically charged phenomena — such as the “tradwife” movement — that recast debates about gender, religion, and philosophy. Situating such case studies within longer histories of women’s communicative practices allows us to explore continuities, ruptures, and tensions between tradition, innovation, and the struggle for authority.

The seminar thus invites critical reflections on the interplay of gender, communication, and power, considering both historical trajectories and contemporary challenges. Contributions may address individual thinkers, broader cultural movements, or theoretical frameworks that illuminate how female voices have engaged with and transformed theological and philosophical discourse.


We welcome contributions that address, but are not limited to, the following areas of inquiry:


  *   Historical trajectories: The presence, erasure, and recovery of women’s voices in theology and philosophy across different periods and traditions.

  *   Concepts and reforms: The main ideas, beliefs, and intellectual movements that have influenced or could influence changes in religious or philosophical thought and institutions, emphasizing both actual and potential transformative impacts.

  *   Modes of expression: Rhetorical, literary, artistic, and digital strategies used by women to engage in theological and philosophical discourse (e.g., letters, poetry, diaries, essays, public lectures, online platforms).

  *   Status and authority: The institutional position of women within theological and philosophical communities, including questions of ordination, academic recognition, and intellectual authority.

  *   Media and digital culture: The role of contemporary media and social media as spaces where women articulate theological and philosophical positions, challenge traditional frameworks, or cultivate new audiences.

  *   Case studies of mediated ideologies: Analyses of specific phenomena such as the “tradwife” movement, online religious influencers, or digital feminist theologies, and their implications for women’s voices in theological and philosophical debates, with particular attention to how such discourses often become enclosed within self-referential discursive circuits that function less as platforms for genuine voices than as performative reproductions of existing ideological constellations, thereby constraining rather than expanding the horizons of women’s participation.

  *   Intersectional approaches: How race, class, sexuality, and cultural context shape and complicate women’s theological and philosophical communication.

  *   Contemporary challenges and opportunities: The ongoing negotiation of women’s authority in theological and philosophical discourse in light of feminist, postcolonial, and queer critiques.



Submission Guidelines


  *   Abstract: 250–300 words

  *   Short Bio: 100 words

  *   Deadline for Submission: 01.12.2025

  *   Notification of Acceptance: January 2026

  *   Submission Email: Katia Raya Rami katia.raya@usj.edu.lb<mailto:katia.raya@usj.edu.lb>



Seminar Details


  *   Format: Online

  *   Duration: 1h30

  *   Presentation Length: 45 minutes, followed by discussion

  *   Date: Tuesday, 17-18h30 (Paris/Berlin time) from March to May 2026



This call for papers is open to an academic audience with expertise or research interests in theology, philosophy, gender studies, history of ideas, religious studies, and media or communication theory. It will be of particular relevance to scholars examining the intersections of gender, discourse, and authority, as well as those investigating the historical mediation and contemporary reconfiguration of women’s voices within theological and philosophical traditions. By foregrounding interdisciplinary approaches, the series seeks to convene researchers who critically interrogate the structural, rhetorical, and technological conditions under which women’s intellectual contributions are articulated, transmitted, and received.

This seminar aims to foster dialogue, exchange, and critical reflection on the ways female voices and communicative practices have shaped — and continue to shape — theological and philosophical thought.



Dr. Marguerite El Asmar Bou Aoun, Assistant Professor and Coordinator of the Research Unit on the Religious Phenomenon, Saint Joseph University of Beirut (USJ).

Dr. Daniel Fischer, Associate Professor in Modern History at the University of Lorraine (INSPE/CRULH).

Dr. Jil Muller, Deputy Head of the Center for the History of Women Philosophers and Scientists, and Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Paderborn University (HWPS/UPB).

Dr. Katia Raya, Associate Professor at the School of Engineering of Beirut (ESIB) at Saint Joseph University of Beirut (USJ).


Dr. Jil Muller

Assistant Professor, Post-doc Researcher

Philosophy Department, Paderborn University:

https://www.uni-paderborn.de/person/91668

Deputy Head and Researcher at the Center for the History of Women Philosophers and Scientists:

https://historyofwomenphilosophers.org/about/team/

Chair: Prof. Dr. Ruth Hagengruber


Universität Paderborn

Raum TP 8.1.45 // Tel.: 05251 60-5034

Technologie Park 8

33100 Paderborn

Germany


hybrid conference "History of science among historical sciences" (Polish)

  Zapraszamy na konferencję „Historia nauki wśród nauk historycznych”

🗓️ 4 grudnia 2025 r.

🏛️ Pałac Staszica, Instytut Historii Nauki PAN oraz w trybie online

W programie – wystąpienia i dyskusje poświęcone miejscu historii nauki wśród innych dyscyplin historycznych, jej tożsamości oraz współczesnym metodom badawczym.

🧩 Organizatorzy:

Sekcja Historii Nauki i Techniki Komitetu Nauk Historycznych PAN

oraz Instytut Historii Nauki PAN

Program konferencji:

🕚 11.00 – Otwarcie konferencji

prof. Iwona Arabas (Instytut Historii Nauki PAN)

prof. Jaromir Jeszke (Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza)

🕥 11.15 – Sesja I

🎙️ prof. Wojciech Wrzosek (UAM)

Historia nauki jako dyscyplina historyczna.

🎙️ prof. Leszek Zasztowt (UW)

Czy historia nauki jest jedynie częścią historii kultury?

Historia nauki a historia społeczna i antropologia. Kilka uwag.

🎙️ prof. Tomasz Falkowski (UAM)

Historia nauki i pytanie o kryteria jej tożsamości.

🎙️ prof. Wiktor Werner (UAM)

Jak cyfrowe metody badawcze mogą zmienić historiografię nauki?

Możliwości, zagrożenia, problemy.

💬 12.15–13.00 – Dyskusja

🕐 13.00 – Sesja II

🎙️ prof. Maciej Górny (Instytut Historii PAN)

Postkolonializm, transfer wiedzy i Europa Środkowo-Wschodnia.

Czy perspektywa postkolonialna przystaje do historii nauki w tej części świata?

🎙️ dr Alexej Lochmatow (Uniwersytet Hebrajski w Jerozolimie)

Między ekspansją i „wspaniałą izolacją”: Historia nauki wśród nauk historycznych.

🎙️ dr Jan Surman (Instytut Masaryka i Archiwum Czeskiej Akademii Nauk)

Historia nauki: co zrobić z dyscypliną, która się sama zdekonstruowała?

🎙️ dr Katharina Kreuder-Sonnen (Universität zu Köln)

Historical matters: Materiality and the history of science in modern Polish history.

💬 14.00–14.45 – Dyskusja

🕓 14.45–15.00 – Zakończenie konferencji

prof. Iwona Arabas (IHN PAN)

prof. Jaromir Jeszke (UAM)

📍 Miejsce: Sala A27, Pałac Staszica, ul. Nowy Świat 72, Warszawa

💻 Udział online: prosimy o kontakt na adres ihn@ihnpan.pl, aby uzyskać dane dostępowe


Wednesday, 22 October 2025

Biographical dictionary of teachers of Judaism in Galicia

 Biographical dictionary of teachers of Judaism in Galicia


Serdecznie zachęcamy do zapoznania się ze "Słownikiem biograficznym nauczycieli religii mojżeszowej w Galicji", który przygotował zespół pod kierunkiem dr Alicji Maślak-Maciejewskiej z Instytut Judaistyki Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego w ramach grantu finansowanego przez Narodowe Centrum Nauki pt. „Religia mojżeszowa” jako przedmiot szkolny w Galicji (konkurs Sonata 14, 2018/31/D/HS3/03604) 

Sprawdźcie możliwości tej bazy https://nrm.project.uj.edu.pl/biogramy

Sunday, 19 October 2025

Historical Science at the University of Chernivtsi: Research, Professional Training, and Prominent Figures

 Історична   наука    в   Чернівецькому   університеті:   наукові   дослідження,   фахова  підготовка,  визначні  постаті.  До  150-річного  ювілею  Чернівецького  національного  університету  імені  Юрія  Федьковича  :  монографія  /  за  ред.  О. Добржанського. Riga, Latvia : Baltija Publishing, 2025. // Historical Science at the University of Chernivtsi: Research, Professional Training, and Prominent Figures: Monograph / Edited by O. Dobrzhanskyi. Riga, Latvia : Baltija Publishing, 2025. 592 р.


OPEN ACCESS: http://baltijapublishing.lv/omp/index.php/bp/catalog/book/635


HISTORICAL SCIENCE IN THE AUSTRIAN PERIOD

O. Dobrzhanskyi, M. Chuchko

 PDF

PECULIARITIES OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF HISTORICAL STUDIES DURING BUKOVYNA’S INCLUSION IN ROMANIA

I. Piddubnyi

 PDF

UNDER IDEOLOGICAL PRESSURE: THE FACULTY OF HISTORY DURING THE SOVIET PERIOD

O. Rusnak, O. Sych, M. Yurii

 PDF

UNIVERSITY HISTORICAL SCHOLARSHIP IN INDEPENDENT UKRAINE: OVERCOMING PAST CONCEPTS, THEMATIC DIVERSITY, AND INTEGRATION INTO THE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC COMMUNITY

M. Hlibishchuk, H. Skoreiko, N. Khrystan

 PDF

THE FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF BUKOVYNIAN STUDIES AS A SEPARATE RESEARCH FIELD

O. Dobrzhanskyi, H. Piddubnyi, H. Skoreiko, M. Chuchko

 PDF

ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH

M. Ilkiv

 PDF

ETHNOLOGICAL STUDIES

D. Vorotniak, O. Kozholianko

 PDF

MEDIEVAL STUDIES: PECULIARITIES OF FORMATION AND DEVELOPMENT

B. Bodnariuk, N. Khrystan

 PDF

RESEARCH ON THE HISTORY OF THE FIRST

V. Fisanov, M. Hlibishchuk

 PDF

POLISH STUDIES

O. Dobrzhanskyi, V. Makar, Yu. Makar, V. Strutynskyi

 PDF

CANADIAN STUDIES

V. Makar, Yu. Makar, O. Sych

 PDF

HISTORY OF THE UKRAINIAN COSSACKS

T. Kovalets, H. Yatseniuk

 PDF

RESEARCH ON THE HISTORY OF ROMANIA

I. Piddubnyi, L. Melnychuk

 PDF

SPECIALIZED DISSERTATION COUNCIL IN HISTORY (1994–2024): A COMPREHENSIVE OVERVIEW OF DEFENDED THESES

O. Dobrzhanskyi, Yu. Makar, H. Skoreiko, O. Shyliuk

 PDF

“HISTORY JOURNAL OF YURIY FEDKOVYCH CHERNIVTSI NATIONAL UNIVERSITY” AS AN INSTITUTIONAL PLATFORM FOR HISTORICAL STUDIES

M. Huivaniuk

 PDF

LIFE AND ACADEMIC WORK OF FERDINAND TZIGLAUER VON BLUMENTHAL

O. Dobrzhanskyi

 PDF

HISTORIAN, ETHNOLOGIST, AND LOCAL STUDIES SCHOLAR – PROFESSOR RAIMUND FRIEDRICH KAINDL

O. Dobrzhanskyi, M. Chuchko

 PDF

PROFESSOR STEPAN SMAL-STOTSKYI AS A HISTORIAN

O. Dobrzhanskyi

 PDF

JOHANN POLEK AS A PROMOTER OF BUKOVYNIAN STUDIES

O. Dobrzhanskyi

 PDF

ION NISTOR AS A HISTORIAN AND STATESMAN

I. Piddubnyi

 PDF

PROFESSOR SIMEON RELI AS A SCHOLAR OF CHURCH HISTORY

M. Chuchko

 PDF

TEODOR BALAN AS A HISTORIAN AND ARCHEOGRAPHER

O. Rusnak

 PDF

VOLODYMYR HOLOBUTSKYI AS A PERSONALITY, EDUCATOR, AND SCHOLAR OF COSSACK HISTORY

T. Kovalets, H. Yatseniuk

 PDF

MAMEDKESIR ALEKBERLI AS AN AZERBAIJANI RESEARCHER OF UKRAINIAN HISTORY

O. Balukh

 PDF

PROFESSOR YEVHEN CHEREZOV’S LIFE AND ACADEMIC PATH

B. Bodnariuk

 PDF

IVAN HRYTSENKO AS ONE OF THE FOUNDERS OF THE FACULTY OF HISTORY

H. Skoreiko, O. Balukh

 PDF

PAVLO MYKHAILYNA AS A NOTED HISTORIAN AND FIRST HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF UKRAINIAN HISTORY

S. Herehova

 PDF

BORYS TYMOSHCHUK AS THE FOUNDER OF THE BUKOVYNIAN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SCHOOL

M. Ilkiv

 PDF

PETRO BRYTSKYI AS AN EDUCATOR AND SCHOLAR

M. Yurii, N. Khrystan

 PDF

HEORHII KOZHOLIANKO AS AN ETHNOGRAPHER PROFESSOR

I. Vorotniak

 PDF

VASYL BOTUSHANSKYI AS A TIRELESS RESEARCHER OF BUKOVYNA’S PAST

M. Huivaniuk, O. Dobrzhanskyi

 PDF





CfP: Russia and the appropriation of the Arctic. Interests, instruments and identities from the late Tsarist period to the present day

 CfP: Russia and the appropriation of the Arctic. Interests, instruments and identities from the late Tsarist period to the present day

International Workshop, Chair of Russian-Asian Studies, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich

12–14 March 2026, Deadline: 30 November 2025


More than any other country, Russia has colonised and industrialised the Arctic—including its coasts—and has utilised the ocean as a strategic sea route. Today, the Russian Far North serves as a projection screen for national interests and identities; its history legitimises the supposedly “natural” privileges of the largest Arctic state. Central to these narratives is the concept of “appropriation” (osvoenie)—a buzzword originating in the Stalin era that has, in recent years, regained significant prominence as an ideological tool in Russian Arctic discourse. Researchers often translate it too narrowly as “conquest”, yet the term encapsulates a multifaceted complex of processes. It serves as a euphemism describing diverse practices and dynamics: exploration and scientific surveying, resource exploitation, the “Sovietisation” and transformation of indigenous populations, the migration and settlement of groups from the Russian sub-Arctic, and their mental, ideological, and physical adaptation to the environment. This complex also encompassed the assertion of economic and legal claims in the Arctic Ocean, alongside a militarisation that has accelerated since 2022. At an ideological level, appropriation transforms the Arctic into a core realm of Russian history—an emotionally charged counter-image, the ‘Russian North’, contrasted both with a supposedly declining West and with subarctic Asia.

The workshop foregrounds a comprehensive analysis of Russian and Soviet “appropriation” in the Arctic up to the 2020s. While osvoenie serves as a conceptual probe, the scope extends beyond conceptual history (Begriffsgeschichte). Contributions may examine actors and objectives, images and ideologies, methods and epistemologies, interests and achievements, as well as costs, failures, resistance and collaboration. As strategies varied by region, the project deliberately refrains from imposing rigid boundaries. However, particular emphasis will be placed on the formative connection between ocean and coastal regions: the Arctic Ocean is no longer regarded as a distant, impenetrable ice sheet north of Siberia, but instead has provided a strategic sea route to Siberia and is now considered one of Moscow’s most important geopolitical focal points. The timeframe spans from the late nineteenth century, when St Petersburg asserted claims over the Arctic Ocean and technological advances made the icy seas more accessible, through to the present, as the Arctic rises ever higher on the economic and security agenda of the Russian Federation. The workshop and the planned volume aim to analyse these developments through a historically grounded framework that brings together disciplinary perspectives from political science, anthropology, literary studies, law and economics, amongst others.

We invite contributions from scholars at all career levels whose research explores one or more of the following aspects of Russian/Soviet Arctic history:State and empire building

Oceanic and maritime history

Science, technology and medicine

Modernity and indigenous cultures

Heroes and heroines

Human and non-human actors

Built environments and imagined geographies

Historiography and master narratives

Geopolitical concepts and economic interests

Local experiences and perspectives

The workshop aims to lay the groundwork for a joint publication. Rather than producing another anthology of specialised research or a handbook with survey articles, its goal is to assemble a coherent collection of previously unpublished papers that address a shared, cross-cutting theme from multiple disciplinary perspectives. The resulting volume is intended to be finalised by the end of 2027 and to foster ongoing scholarly collaboration.

Proposals should include a concise outline of a specific chapter (approximately 500–750 words) that demonstrates a clear connection to the overarching theme of ‘Appropriation’ and formulates a research question, as well as a one-page cv. Please send your submission to Andreas Renner at andreas.renner@lmu.de by 30 November 2025.


Authors whose proposals are accepted will be invited to a workshop at the Chair of Russian-Asian Studies at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität in Munich, 12–14 March 2026. The workshop is intended to take place on site, but hybrid participation can be arranged if required.


The conference will be supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG), which enables us to reimburse participants’ travel expenses up to a specified limit.


[Image — The Russian nuclear icebreaker Yamal cutting through the Arctic Ocean ice at the North Pole. Photo credit: Peter Guttman/Getty Images.]

Slovo a smysl / Word & Sense 22 (2025): Dmytro Čyževs’kyj and Prague

 Slovo a smysl / Word & Sense 22 (2025): Dmytro Čyževs’kyj and Prague


OPEN ACCESS: https://wordandsense.ff.cuni.cz/magazin/2025-22-46/


Úvodník, red, p. 7-10



Studie a skici

Dmytro Čyževs’kyj and Prague: Perspectives of Intellectual Entanglement, Irina Wutsdorff, p. 13-14



Dmitrij Tschižewskij’s Reading of Jan Amos Komenský’s Labyrint světa a ráj srdce, Renate Lachmann, p. 15-30




Čyževs’kyj und das „barocke Lebensgefühl“ im Prag der 30er Jahre, Josef Vojvodík, p. 31-56




Čyževs’kyjs Mácha-Lektüre im Kontext des Prager Linguistischen Zirkels, Irina Wutsdorff, p. 57-73




Dmytro Tschižewskij in Prag. Ein Beitrag zur Biographie des Wissenschaftlers, Roman Mnich, p. 74-85




From Kant to Dostoyevsky: Dmytro Čyževs’kyj’s Literary Anthropology, Patrick Flack, p. 86-103




Remapping Ukrainian Philosophy: Čyževs’kyj’s Approach to the History of Philosophy in Eastern Europe, Maxim Demin, p. 104-120




Retrospektiva

Jakobsonova brněnská přednáška o staročeské literatuře (1934), Martina Mecco, p. 123-134



Česká středověká poezie (1934)

Roman Jakobson, p. 135-152



Kritické rozhledy

AC Roma, Libuše Heczková, Petr Málek, Luboš Merhaut, Marie Škarpová, Michael Špirit, Josef Vojvodík, Jan Wiendl, p. 155-172



Nekonečné možnosti psaní o sobě, Jan Musil, p. 173-177



Blažek a Vodrážka o Bondym — zmařená šance II, Martin Machovec, p. 178-187



Překlad I

Cena Otokara Fischera 2024

p. 191



Laudatio pro Lenku Kerdovou a knihu Malý Berlín ve Velké Praze, Martina Niedhammer, p. 192-193



Laudatio pro Lenu Dorn a knihu Übersetzungsbewegungen, Štěpán Zbytovský, p. 194-196



Architekt Erwin Katona, Lenka Kerdová, p. 197-207



Poznámky ke kulturním dějinám literárního překladu, Lena Dorn, p. 208-216



Překlad II

Fresky v poušti jako metafora pro palimpsest islámu, Josef Řídký, p. 219-222



Fresky na poušti, Shahzad Bashir, p. 223-229




Thursday, 16 October 2025

CfA: Reproductive Governance from Below: Childbearing, Trust, and Community Norms in East Central Europe, 1850–1945

 CfA: Reproductive Governance from Below: Childbearing, Trust, and Community Norms in East Central Europe, 1850–1945

The deadline for the submission of abstracts is December 1, 2025.

The deadline for the accepted papers: April 1, 2026.

This Special Issue encourages reconceptualization of fertility as a structuring force, reversing conventional explanations of demographic behavior. Rather than treating reproduction as a passive outcome of ethnicity, religion, or economy, it analyses the decisions made by families and communities, challenging the teleology of demographic transition theory while moving beyond classic family history and historical demography. The Special Issue focuses on East Central Europe, especially the Habsburg Empire and successor states, where similar institutions produced divergent reproductive strategies. This imperial context offers an ideal comparative laboratory, combining shared legal frameworks with varied kinship systems and community norms. The innovative aspect of this approach lies in the reversal of causality: instead of reading fertility as a reaction to external pressures, the Special Issue shows how practices of childbearing reshaped authority, economic strategies, and community cohesion. It foregrounds reproductive governance from below, calling attention to the ways in which midwives, older women, and village judges, for instance, sustained or contested norms. This perspective complements analyses of church and state, stressing interactions between formal and informal authorities. Methodologically, the Special Issue integrates historical anthropology, microhistory, and gender history with demographic tools, network analysis, and GIS. It pioneers the use of underexplored “crisis archives,” such as the documents produced during abortion trials and inheritance disputes, presbytery minutes, folklore, and various ego-documents, which, precisely because they emerge from moments of tension, reveal hidden negotiations of norms.

Topics of interest include (but are not limited to):

the role of trust, reputation, and the influence of informal authorities (midwives, older women, village judges) on reproductive decision-making

the role of informal and formal authorities: comparing community actors with clergy, teachers, and officials across local contexts

the role of community cooperation, female solidarity, and the informal market for abortion through abortion trials

the role of “folk” knowledge about birth control, with particular regard to the roles of doctors, midwives, and older women

the light shed on childbearing practices by conflicts and crises, as evidenced in abortion trials, reconciliation papers, inheritance disputes, and domestic-violence cases

the role of reproductive strategies and abortion decisions in rural Jewish and Roma communities

methodological reflections on analyses of childbearing practices and the sources on which these analyses are based.

We welcome submissions from scholars in various disciplines, including history, the history of science, the history of education, art history, literary history, and cultural studies. We especially encourage submissions that offer interdisciplinary perspectives and engage with current historiographical debates.

Please send an abstract of no more than 500 words and a short biographical note with a selected list of the author’s three most important publications (we do not accept full CVs) no later than December 1, 2025.

Proposals should be submitted to the special editor of the issue by email:

koloh.gabor@abtk.hu

The editors will ask the authors of selected papers to submit their final articles (max. 10,000 words) no later than April 1, 2026.

The articles will be published open access after a double-blind peer-review process. We provide proofreading for contributors who are not native speakers of English.

All articles must conform to our submission guidelines.

The Hungarian Historical Review is a peer-reviewed international quarterly of the social sciences and humanities, the geographical focus of which is Hungary and East-Central Europe. For additional information, please visit the journal’s website: https://hunghist.org/

Contact:

koloh.gabor@abtk.hu

Wednesday, 15 October 2025

15th Bukovyna International Historical and Local History Conference Dedicated to the 150th Anniversary of the Yuri Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

15th Bukovyna International Historical and Local History Conference Dedicated to the 150th Anniversary of the Yuri Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Chernivtsi, October 17–18, 2025, hybrid.

Program and zoom links: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FxNk5pU1CSXNbkgwptmOX8YZfBcLsLTK/view?usp=sharing

Anna Mazanik: Sanitizing Moscow: Waste, Animals, and Urban Health in Late Imperial Russia

 Anna Mazanik: Sanitizing Moscow: Waste, Animals, and Urban Health in Late Imperial Russia. University of Pittsburgh Press 2025. isbn : 9780822967729



Sanitizing Moscow presents an environmental history of public health reforms in late imperial Moscow between 1870 and 1917. It explores the relationship between Russia’s urban modernization and the more-than-human environment in the context of the major social and political changes, triggered by the liberal reforms of the 1860s and 1870s, and the transnational rise of scientific medicine and sanitary technologies. Mazanik is the first to combine environmental history and the history of urban public health in the context of imperial Russia.


about the author

Anna Mazanik is an environmental and medical historian of Russia and a research fellow at the Max Weber Network Eastern Europe in Germany. Born in Moscow, she has studied in Russia, Hungary, Germany, and the United States and holds a PhD in history from Central European University. She lives in Munich.



More Praise

  Sanitizing Moscow is a superb book that focuses on efforts in late imperial Russia to improve public health in complex and sometimes contradictory ways. It deftly shows how social, political, and cultural factors influenced the establishment of a sewage system, the regulation of a public abattoir, and the imposition of a health regime on children. 

Andy Bruno, Indiana University Bloomington


A deeply researched, creatively argued, and well-written book that will appeal to several different audiences, Sanitizing Moscow offers at the same time fascinating granular detail about everyday life in turn-of-the century Moscow and contributes to larger arguments around Europe’s influence on Russia as well as about the global impacts of the revolutions in scientific thinking on disease and sanitation. 

Ryan Jones, University of Oregon


Dějiny věd a techniky - History of Sciences and Technology, 2025 / 1-2

Dějiny věd a techniky - History of Sciences and Technology, 2025 / 1-2. URL: https://dvt-journal.cz/en/issues/2025-1-2/

From Whale Oil to a Cornerstone of Organic Chemistry: The Double Anniversary of Benzene [cs]

Tomáš Hermann – Vladimír Karpenko

Von Economo’s Encephalitis: An Enigmatic Pandemic, Pandemic Enigma, or a ʽSyndemicʼ of Its Kind? [en]

Milan Novák – Michal V. Šimůnek – Avi Ohry

The History of Chemistry in Technical Museum Exhibitions: Development, Important Figures, and Technological Milestones [cs]

Ivana Lorencová

Theatrum Divinum by Matouš Konečný (1616): A Bohemian “Popular Encyclopaedia” in the Context of Early Modern Mosaic Physics [cs]

Jan Čížek

Women’s religious institutions and their nursing activities 1800-1950 in the Czech Lands 1800-1950 [cs]

Antonín Šťastný

Reviews and News [cs]

Sunday, 12 October 2025

CFP: Recycling in the Cold War Era: Capitalist and Socialist Waste Regimes

 CFP: Recycling in the Cold War Era: Capitalist and Socialist Waste Regimes. Berlin 09.07.2026 - 10.07.2026, Deadline 01.12.2025


Throughout most of human history, waste and its reuse have played a central role in economic activity. During the Cold War, rivalry between the Eastern and Western blocs extended beyond the arms race and ideological confrontation. Competition for economic and technological supremacy also encompassed waste recycling—shaping resource flows, production and consumption systems, and later, environmental protection. In both capitalist and socialist economies, recycling was integral to resource governance, embedded in efforts toward efficiency, self-sufficiency, modernization, and international leadership.

While waste studies have grown rapidly, they have focused more on discarding than on recycling and related issues such as reprocessing waste into recyclates and integrating them into production flows. This conference will therefore explore waste recycling during the Cold War in greater detail. It will examine the actors, practices, and material streams of recycling in both socialist and capitalist regimes, addressing questions such as: What differences and similarities can be identified in actors, materials, practices, technologies, or symbolic meanings? Was recycling driven by ideological confrontation, or was it more often a pragmatic response to shortages, technological challenges, or environmental concerns? What regional specifics can be observed? How did different regimes influence or learn from one another? And in what cases did asymmetrical waste trade between blocs shape recycling schemes?

To date, Anglophone research remains fragmented, often focusing on single waste types or individual countries. The most comprehensive study of recycling in the Cold War context is Zsuzsa Gille’s work on the Hungarian waste regime (2007). More recent research has explored entanglements between East and West Germany (Lange 2020; Stuck & Weber 2025). Studies on national programs include plastics in Poland (Kijeński & Polaczek 2005), France (Dufour 2023), and Norway (Haavard B. A. 2024); paper or glass in the Netherlands, Germany, and Hungary (Oldenziel & Veenis 2013; Weber 2021; Pal 2023); and metals in the United States (Zimring 2005). Yet many regions remain underrepresented, and comparative analysis of recycling practices and technologies across—and within—blocs is still lacking.

Existing work has shown how waste symbolized industrial crisis and became a site for of civic engagement and environmental activism (Park 2004; Westermann 2013; Boyce 2013) But it remains unclear how Cold War recycling reflected and shaped civic culture, ideology, and policy in different systems. The symbolic meaning of waste—how it shifted under political, economic, and cultural pressures, and how it shaped understandings of modernity, progress, efficiency and responsibility—also remains underexplored.

In sum, scholarship offers only a fragmented picture of socialist and capitalist recycling practices during the Cold War. What is missing is a broader understanding of how recycling models were formed, developed, and interacted across historical contexts - including continuities, ruptures, and their impact on global and regional material flows. This also applies to the role of different actors in shaping these practices and to the changing symbolic meanings of waste within the bipolar world order.

The two-day, international workshop, organized by Tatiana Perga and Heike Weber, thus aims to bring together different perspectives on recycling in the Cold War era.

Our keynote speaker is Zsuzsa Gille with the report “Recycling in the Socialocene.”

Papers should engage with the following topics:

1. Institutions and Recycling Systems

We invite analyses of how institutional mechanisms for waste recycling developed in both Eastern and Western bloc countries. This includes the roles of private businesses, state bodies, ministries, municipalities, parties, and NGOs in shaping and enforcing recycling policies. Particular attention may be given to legal frameworks, planned and market-based instruments, international agreements, and institutional transformations during periods of reform and crisis.

2. Economic Systems, Technologies, and Innovations

We seek papers on how different economic systems influenced recycling principles, technology choices, and investments in infrastructure. Comparisons of strategies and technological solutions that stimulated innovation and efficient resource use in contexts of scarcity, competition, and ideological mobilization are especially welcome. Relevant aspects include R&D, economic incentives, patents, technology transfer, international cooperation, and informal economies.

3. (Trans)national Material Flows and Recycling Infrastructures

We aim to examine the emergence of recycling infrastructures, networks, and logistics, and their role in exchange and interaction between socialist and capitalist regimes. This perspective highlights both cooperation and competition in global and regional recycling histories, as well as the role of material flows as hidden diplomacy across the Cold War divide. Shadow economies, black markets, and informal recycling networks will also be considered.

4. Actors, Knowledge, and Their Networks

We want to explore the diversity of actors involved in recycling processes: state and municipal authorities, businesses, industrial enterprises, corporations, trade unions, schools and households, the military and prisons, institutions for the disabled cooperatives, international organizations, individual waste collectors, and more. We are interested in how these groups engaged with recycling—whether voluntarily, under compulsion, ideologically, or economically motivated—and how their participation shaped perceptions of responsibility, labour, scarcity, profit, and modernization.

5. Environmental Discourses, Knowledge, Risks

We welcome contributions on how waste and recycling were conceptualized environmentally in socialist and capitalist countries. Were elements of environmental knowledge and concern about waste present as early as the 1950s or 1960s, and how were they framed? This theme also addresses how the environmental consequences of waste production and accumulation entered public debate, science, education, and activism. Focus may be placed on perception of risks in the 1970s-1980s, the rise of environmental consciousness, the role of scientific expertise, transnational exchanges of knowledge, and conflicts over waste and its politicization.

We welcome contributions from economics, technology studies, sociology, history, political science, and related disciplines.

The workshop will be held at TU Berlin on the 9th – 10th of July 2026.

We will apply for funding to cover travel and accommodation.

Papers (6,000-8,000 words) are due by June 1st to be pre-circulated before the workshop. Each presenter will give a 10-minute presentation, followed by a discussion. We aim to publish the papers as a special issue of the journal.

Proposals should include an abstract (max. 300 words) and a one-page CV.

The deadline for sending proposals is the 1st of December 2025, with notification of acceptance by mid-December.

Please send proposals to tetiana.perga@tu-berlin.de.






RUTA Annual Conference 12–15 July 2026 Rooted knowledges and dialogues for change

 RUTA Association for Central, South-Eastern, and Eastern European, Baltic, Caucasus, Central and Northern Asian Studies in Global Conversation

Annual Conference

12–15 July 2026

Rooted knowledges and dialogues for change

URL: https://ruta-association.org/conference/rooted-knowledges-and-dialogues-for-change/


For many years, canonized expertise on the RUTA region(s) has been produced from the outside, in particular through a Western academic gaze. This gaze has further largely reproduced the Russian imperial perspective on RUTA societies. In doing so, it elevated imperial lines of thought, devaluing and othering the intellectual and cultural heritage of peripheralized communities, who have been interpreted predominantly through metropolitan vantage points. Institutionalised as authoritative expertise, these ways of knowledge-making have obscured the colonial foundations of research as an endeavour: imperial societies studying, categorising and explaining the Other, to whom they relate from curious afar and in ways that commonly extract and abstract from lived realities. These ‘proper’ ways of conducting research have often prioritised distance over connection, emphasising a certain type of objectivity as a quality produced through detachment, while devaluing closeness, relational bonds and emotions as obstacles to ‘pure’ and reliable knowledge.

With our RUTA communities, we have been reclaiming the work of knowledge-making on the RUTA region(s) and societies. During our 2026 annual conference, we will be exploring rooted and embodied knowledges as catalysts for change and as drivers of shifts in power. In particular, we are keen to ask, how does the production of knowledge and cultural heritage differ when it is rooted in the places and communities it speaks to, and what possibilities does this enable? By re-connecting with generations of knowledges from the RUTA region(s) as well as those in dialogues with us, we wish to discuss what is distinctive about scholarship and art that is embedded within our regions and communities. How do our research and art practices change when they are rooted in a place, centering the lived and embodied experiences of its people? And what do such embodied and rooted knowledges and art mean for those who make them, those who learn from them, and for the ways we engage with the world?

Generations of thinkers and advocates of social justice and the makers of political art have emphasized the crucial role of positionality for thinking, acting and creative practice that stands the chance to empower, mobilise and improve the wellbeing of oppressed communities. Their observations appear even more pressing in the context of resistance against authoritarian rule, imperial subjugation and wars of aggression. What is the role of rooted knowledges in the protection of human life and our precious ecosystems amid the rise of (neo)colonialism and fascism? And how can we best protect what is endangered beyond an over-emphasis on the resilience of affected communities, but with insistence on the ending of the cycles of perpetration and systems of destruction and violence?

These questions also invite us to engage with the inherent vulnerability of our bodies as sites of knowledge production and what the fundamentally frail condition of human existence teaches us about knowledge-making, but also more broadly about the need for justice, safety and real possibilities for thriving, thinking, writing and creating. Moreover, in a world where the safety of some is paid with the lives of those who dare to resist systemic destruction, can the shift toward embodied knowledges contribute to much-needed shifts in power for a more equitable protection of human life and endangered environments? How do we then carry knowledges from one place to another, in ways that convey the urgency of change? These concerns highlight the importance of direct and equitable dialogues, but also the crucial need for turning dialogues into meaningful actions. In particular, actions that will lead toward the changes that communities at risk have been advocating for and paving with their thinking and work.

We especially welcome contributions on these (but not only these) topics:

Rooted knowledges and RUTA dialogues.

Emotions as sources and vectors of knowledge.

Embodied and rooted knowledges: approaches and methodologies.

Positionality in research, activism and art.

Perspectives on and beyond resilience.

Vulnerability, embodiment, dissent.

Ecocide and environmental protection.

Indigeneity and Indigenous approaches to lifeways in and beyond the RUTA regions.

Never again for anyone: preventing and stopping genocides and epistemicides.

Transitional justice: what it is and why it is important.

Antifascism and transformative social movements.

Border violence, belonging and asylum.

Migration: forced migration, exploitation, socio-economic justice.

Labour relations in the RUTA region(s): addressing exploitation and extractivism.

Social reproduction and gender equity.

Queering and decolonising the canon.

Archives and libraries as sites of resistance.

Allyship and solidarities across regional, disciplinary and academic / activist borders.

Politically engaged research and its methods.

Identifying and countering disinformation and propaganda.

Disruptive and reparative knowledges.

The conference will take place from July, 2026 in Ukraine’s Carpathian Mountains, in a location with on-site air raid shelters. The Carpathians are recognised as a Green All state and local guidelines regarding safety and security will be strictly adhered to throughout the conference. For safety and security reasons, the venue and logistics pertaining to the conference will be disclosed to registered participants close to the conference date.

Proposals of panels, roundtables, as well as individual presentations must be submitted by November 15, 2025. Confirmations of acceptance will be communicated by the end of January 2026.

Preference will be given to transregional panels that bring region(s) into conversation (ideally, perspectives on an umbrella topic by scholars from multiple RUTA region(s), tracing how particular concerns manifest in similar / different ways across the region).

Submissions that discuss the RUTA region(s) in the global context are highly encouraged.

Individual Papers

Paper abstract (300 words max.)

Biography (100 words max.)

Individual submissions will be clustered into trans-regionally conceptualised panels that will involve experts working from/on different parts of the RUTA region(s) and beyond.

Panels and Roundtables

Panels (consisting of four papers; or held e.g. as a discussion on a particular concept or text, in which case please propose a suitable format under the panel description in the submission form) and roundtables (with a maximum of five participants-speakers, including a moderator – in total a maximum six people per roundtable)

Panel and roundtable abstract (300 words max.)

List of participants with presentation titles and paper abstracts (each 300 words max.)

Biography of each participant (100 words max. per participant)

We strongly encourage and prioritise trans-regional panels and roundtables, involving researchers working from/on various parts of the RUTA region(s) and globally. In regards to the format of the debates, we welcome panels and roundtables discussing particular topics, but also e.g. different ways that specific concepts or theories have been worked with or critiqued in various parts of the RUTA region(s) and globally. We also welcome panels and roundtables that will focus on discussing the significance of a specific core text and its links or importance to the RUTA region(s) and beyond; and those that will explore how to conduct socially responsible, ethically sound, non-extractivist and anti-colonial forms of research and fieldwork in the RUTA region(s) and globally.

Artistic Engagements

Possible artistic engagements might include pop-up events, workshops, art interventions, activations, performances, screenings, etc.

Project description (500 words max.). Please include information about the necessary equipment and setting requirements. Priority will be given to projects that meet the criteria of feasibility.

Biography of each participant (100 words max. per participant).

Conference registration fee: the conference will have sliding scale fees. As the RUTA Association, we are committed to making our conferences affordable for scholars from the RUTA region(s).

There will be a limited number of travel grants that participants in need of financial assistance and without institutional funding can apply for.

Please send your enquiries to: conference@ruta-association.org

Studia Historiae Scientiarum Vol. 24 (2025): FirstView Articles

 Studia Historiae Scientiarum Vol. 24 (2025): FirstView Articles

Webmastered and edited by Michał Kokowski

Published: 30-09-2025

EDITORIAL

The Evolutionary Transformation of the Journal. Part 12DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.001.21839

Michał Kokowski

 PDF (Język Polski)

WORKSHOP OF THE HISTORIAN OF SCIENCE

A Proposal for a Research Method within the History of Science in the Context of the Discussion on its Scientific StatusDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.002.21840

Wiesław Wójcik

 PDF (Język Polski)

FOCAL POINT

Introduction. Socialist Science Cities: from Utopia to Urban LifeDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.003.21841

Mikhail Piskunov, Timofey Rakov

 PDF

Dunaújváros and Paks: Socialist Science and Technology Cities of Hungary?DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.004.21842

Melinda Harlov-Csortán, Máté Tamáska

 PDF

Remembering Science Cities: Urban Space and Community Identity of Post-Soviet Scientific and Technical IntelligentsiaDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.005.21843

Madina Kalashnikova

 PDF

‘And Here We’ll have a Science Town’: Akademgorodok of the Kola Scientific Center as a Form of Organization of the Scientific Space in the Soviet NorthDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.006.21844

Vera Kliueva

 PDF

SCIENCE IN POLAND

The Arduous Path to Independence. Ethnography/Ethnology within the Structures of the Polish Academy of Sciences and the Polish Academy of SciencesDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.007.21845

Róża Godula-Węcławowicz, Renata Hołda

 PDF (Język Polski)

The Origins of the 1880 Edition of Stanisław Janikowski’s Słowniczek wyrazów psychijatrycznych…DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.008.21846

Lucyna Agnieszka Jankowiak

 PDF (Język Polski)

Bureaucratization and the National Culture Fund – a Phenomenon of a Bureaucracy-Free Institution in the Science of the Second Polish RepublicDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.009.21847

Mateusz Hübner

 PDF (Język Polski)

Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae – One Hundred Years of Evolution in Form and Content (1923–2022)DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.010.21848

Piotr Köhler

 PDF

Krakow School of Architecture: Włodzimierz GruszczyńskiDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.011.21849

Tomasz Węcławowicz

 PDF (Język Polski)

Institutional Censorship of Academic Humanities Publishing in Communist Poland. Preliminary Findings and Research PerspectivesDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.012.21850

Kamila Budrowska

 PDF

The Scientific Collection of the Jagiellonian University Museum – 2024. On the Sixtieth Anniversary of its Opening to the PublicDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.013.21851

Ewa Wyka

 PDF (Język Polski)

SCIENCE BEYOND BORDERS

History of Research on Heavy Metals in the Roadside EnvironmentDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.014.21852

Joanna Korzeniowska

 PDF

BIBLIOMETRICS, SCIENCE POLICY, SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION

Evaluation of Journals on the History of Science and History in the Transparent Model of Journal Evaluation by the Pracownia Naukoznawstwa IHN PAN© 2024 and 2025DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.016.21854

Michał Kokowski

 PDF (Język Polski)

PRESENTATIONS AND REVIEWS

Fifth volume of Encyclopaedia of Shevchenko Scientific Society. Naukove tovarystvo imeni Shevchenka: Entsyklopediia. Vol. 5, Dash. – Zh. Edited by Oleh Kupchyns’kyi, Oleksandra Savula. L’viv, 2022. – 700 pp.DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.015.21853

Vitalii Telvak, Viktoria Telvak

 PDF

VARIA

On the Contribution of Professor Vladimir Andreevich Mozharov to the Development of Metallurgy in the 20th CenturyDOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.017.21855

Dmytro Zhurylo, Volodymyr Levchenko

 PDF

Application of Electrical Engineering within Ukrainian Tactical Medicine in the First Decade of the Russian-Ukrainian War (2014–2024)DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.018.21856

Hanna Demochko, Ihor Robak, Vasyl Malikov

 PDF

NEWS, COMMENTS, LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Statement by the Authors of the Article “School Books in Galicia in the Second Half of the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries in the Light of the Work of the Commission for School Handbooks at the National School Board” Published in the Journal Education – Technology – Information Science (2018) Regarding the Unauthorized Borrowings from an Article by Professor Maria Stinia (2004)DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.019.21857

Wojciech Walat, Tomasz Warzocha

 PDF (Język Polski)

RAPORT ON THE ACTIVITY OF THE PAU COMMISSION ON THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE

The Activity Report of the PAU Commission on the History of Science in 2024/2025DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.25.020.21858

Michał Kokowski

 PDF (Język Polski)


Wednesday, 8 October 2025

CFP: Intimate States: New Histories of Medicine, Welfare, and Care under Socialism - Prag 05/2026

 CFP: Intimate States: New Histories of Medicine, Welfare, and Care under Socialism - Prag 05/2026


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


An international conference in May 2026 in Prague that will explore diverse state socialist institutions through the lens of intimacy.


Intimate States: New Histories of Medicine, Welfare, and Care under Socialism

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. Kateřina Lišková, ExpertTurn, Institute of History, Czech Academy of Sciences; Alexander Langstaff, New York University, 11100 Prag (Czech Republic)

28.05.2026 - 29.05.2026

Deadline: 15.11.2025


Health, social welfare, and the organization of family and social life have been central concerns for historians of socialist states. This conference invites a fresh perspective, examining how intimacy—as both concept and practice—offers new insights into how socialist institutions fostered, reimagined, or contained bonds between parents and children, patients and practitioners, and citizens and the state itself.


How might foregrounding intimacy reshape our understanding of health, medicine, and welfare in Europe under state socialism? We particularly welcome work that explores the role of expertise and caregiving practices within diverse institutional spaces. We are interested in a breadth of state socialist institutions, spanning hospitals and clinics, nurseries and retirement homes, asylums and sanitoria, maternity wards and childcare centers, among many others. By centering intimacy in institutional settings, this conference seeks to generate new histories of medicine, society, and the everyday that reveal socialism’s distinctive social worlds.


We particularly welcome work that explores the role of professional expertise, the labor of care and emotional work, and the organization of diverse institutional spaces as sites where intimacy was generated or refashioned. From official complaints and personal diaries to documentary films and family scrapbooks, we invite the creative use of diverse historical sources that take us behind institutional walls and reveal the varied landscape of state spaces.


Topics may include but are not limited to:


- How did intimacy or impersonality within socialist medical or welfare institutions transform definitions of health, normality, and pathology?


- What tensions emerged between professional expertise and intimate care, and how did people working and living within socialist institutions navigate these competing logics?


- In what ways did intimacy become a site of resistance, negotiation, or redefinition of socialist medical and welfare policies and practices?


- How did everyday encounters between practitioners and patients generate new forms of knowledge within socialist clinical and welfare practices?


- How did different notions of intimacy emerge from cross-disciplinary exchanges of knowledge between fields such as psychiatry, psychology, pediatrics, social work, and geriatrics?


- How did the transnational flow of medical and welfare knowledge—across socialist borders and beyond—shape understandings of intimacy?


Please send a 500-word abstract and a short bio to intimatestates2026@gmail.com by November 15, 2025.

Our conference will take place in Prague, 28-29 May, 2026.


History of the Human Sciences Early Career Prize, 2025-26

 History of the Human Sciences Early Career Prize, 2025-26




*History of the Human Sciences*  ttps://journals.sagepub.com/home/hhs> – the international journal of peer-reviewed research, which provides the leading forum for work in the social sciences, humanities, human psychology and biology that reflexively examines its own historical origins and interdisciplinary influences – is delighted to announce details of its

annual prize for early career scholars. The intention of the annual award is to recognise a researcher whose work best represents the journal’s aim <https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/history-of-the-human-sciences/journal200813> to critically examine traditional assumptions and preoccupations about human beings, their societies and their histories in light of developments that cut across disciplinary boundaries. In the pursuit of these goals, *History of the Human Sciences *publishes traditional humanistic studies as well work in the social sciences, including the fields of sociology, psychology, political science, the history and philosophy of science, anthropology, classical studies, and literary theory. Scholars working in any of these fields are encouraged to apply.



*Guidelines for the Award*



Scholars who wish to be considered for the award are asked to submit an up-to-date *two-page CV* (including a statement that confirms eligibility for the award) and *an essay that is a maximum of 12,000 words long* (including notes and references). The essay should be unpublished and not under consideration elsewhere, based on original research, written in English, and follow *History of the Human Science*’s style guide. Scholars are advised to read the journal’s description of its aims and scope <https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/history-of-the-human-sciences/journal200813#description>, as well as its submission guidelines <https://journals.sagepub.com/author-instructions/HHS>.



Entries will be judged by a panel drawn from the journal’s editorial team and board. They will identify the essay that best fits the journal’s aims and scope.


*Eligibility*


Scholars of any nationality who have either not yet been awarded a PhD or are no more than five years from its award are welcome to apply. The judging panel will use the definition of “active years”, with time away from academia for parental leave, health problems, or other relevant reasons being disregarded in the calculation. They will also be sensitive to the disruption that the Covid 19 pandemic has had on career progression and will take such factors into account in their decision making. Candidates are encouraged to include details relating to any of these issues in their supporting documents.


Scholars who have submitted an essay for consideration in previous years are welcome to do so again. However, new manuscripts must not be substantially the same as any submitted in the past.



*Prize*



The winning scholar will be awarded £250 and have their essay

published in *History of the Human Sciences* (subject to the essay passing through the journal’s peer review process). The intention is to award the prize to a single entrant but the judging panel may choose to recognise more than one essay in the event of a particularly strong field.


*Deadlines*


Entries should be made by Friday 30th January 2026. The panel aims to make a decision by mid-May 2026. The winning entry will be submitted for peer review automatically. The article, clearly identified as the winner of the *History of the Human Sciences *Early Career Prize, will then be published in the journal as soon as the production schedule allows. The winning scholar and article will also be promoted by *History of the Human Sciences*, including

on its website <http://www.histhum.com/>, which hosts content separate to the journal.



*Previous Winners*




*2024-25:* Jonah Walters (UCLA), “"The Taser in the Skinner box: Science

fiction, aversive conditioning, and the paradigm of electric shock

policing". Special commendation: Heewon Kim (Hanyang University), "Face in

Codes: Trained Observers and Sensory Multipliers Across Competing

Universes, 1952–1971".




*2023-24:* Libby O’Neil (Yale University), ‘Thinking in Systems: Problems

of Organization at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences

and the Society for General Systems Research, 1950-1957’; Alfred Freeborn

(Max Planck Institute for the History of Science), ‘Testing Psychiatrists

to Diagnose Schizophrenia: Crisis, Consensus and Computers in post-war

Psychiatry’




*2022-23*: Freddy Foks (Manchester), “Finding modernity in England’s past:

social anthropology and the transformation of social history in Britain,

1959-1977”




*2021-22*: Harry Parker (Cambridge), “The regional survey movement and

popular autoethnography in early 20th century Britain”. Special

commendation: Ohad Reiss Sorokin (Princeton), “"‘Intelligence’ before

‘Intelligence Tests’: Alfred Binet’s Experiments on his Daughters

(1890-1903)".




*2020-21*: Liana Glew (Penn State), “Documenting insanity: Paperwork and

patient narratives in psychiatric history”, and Simon Torracinta (Yale),

"Maps of desire: Edward Tolman’s Drive Theory of Wants". Special

commendation: Erik Baker (Harvard), "The ultimate think tank: The rise of

the Santa Fe Institute Libertarian".




*2019-20*: Danielle Carr (Columbia), “Ghastly Marionettes and the political

metaphysics of cognitive liberalism: Anti-behaviourism, language, and The

Origins of Totalitarianism”. Special commendation: Katie Joice (Birkbeck),

“Mothering in the Frame: cinematic microanalysis and the pathogenic mother,

1945-67”.




You can read more about these essays in interviews with the authors on the

journal’s website <http://www.histhum.com/category/ecr-prize/>.






*To Apply*




Entrants should e-mail an anonymised copy of their essay, along with an

up-to-date CV, to hhs@histhum.com.






*Further Enquiries*




If you have any questions about the prize, or anything relating to the

journal, please email hhs@histhum.com.


Tuesday, 7 October 2025

Berlin Brandenburg Colloquium on Environmental History

Monday, 13.10.2025         Timothy Moss (Berlin): (in German)

Book Launch - Meet the Authors: Grounding Berlin. Ecologies of a Technopolis, 1871 to the Present

In Kooperation mit dem Forschungsschwerpunkt „Umwelt, Klima, Energie" im Centre Marc Bloch, Friedrichstraße 191, 3. OG, Simmelsaal und online 

4-6 p.m. Berlin time


Monday, 15.12.2025         Žiga Zwitter (Ljubljana): 

Hay Meadows in the Alps, 16th–Mid-20th Centuries: A Material and Cultural Environmental History, and “Usable Pasts”


Monday, 19.01.2026         Rebecca Janzen (Columbia, S.C., USA): 

Mining Religion: Religious Sites and Extractive Industries across the Americas


Monday, 09.02.2026         Tetiana Perga (Berlin):

Waste, Power, and Ideology: Recycling in the Early Soviet Ukraine

In Kooperation mit dem Forschungsschwerpunkt „Umwelt, Klima, Energie" im Centre Marc Bloch, Friedrichstraße 191, 7. OG, Tillionsaal und online

Ort:                                        ONLINE on ZOOM: https://hu-berlin.zoom-x.de/j/65558796751?pwd=U3hkYVMzTDkrc3lGdk5nekdGL2l6Zz09

Meeting-ID: 655 5879 6751; Passwort: 264162

Zeit:                                       6-8 p.m. Berlin Time

Kontakt:                                Astrid M. Kirchhof astrid.m.kirchhof@hu-berlin.de


Jan-Henrik Meyer meyer@zzf-potsdam.de

---------------------------------------------------

Montag, 13.10.2025         Timothy Moss (Berlin): 

Book Launch - Meet the Authors: Grounding Berlin. Ecologies of a Technopolis, 1871 to the Present

In Kooperation mit dem Forschungsschwerpunkt „Umwelt, Klima, Energie" im Centre Marc Bloch, Friedrichstraße 191, 3. OG, Simmelsaal und online Abweichend: 16-18 Uhr


Abstract:


Das jüngst erschienene Buch Grounding Berlin. Ecologies of a Technopolis, 1871 to the Present (Hg. Timothy Moss) ist ein innovativer Beitrag zwischen Umwelt-, Stadt- und Technikgeschichte. Es  untersucht die Rolle Berlins als Pionierstadt für urbane Technologien und Stadtökologie von 1871 bis heute und zeigt, wie tiefgreifende Eingriffe in Energieversorgung, Wasser, Abfallentsorgung und Flächennutzung Berlin zu einem internationalen Vorreiter der technologischen Moderne machten – von der Industrialisierung über die Weimarer Republik und die Zeit der Teilung bis hin zu Nachhaltigkeits- und Dekarbonisierungs-Strategien der Gegenwart. Berlin wird dabei als Fallbeispiel genutzt, um die komplexen Wechselbeziehungen zwischen Gesellschaft, Natur und Technologie in Städten sichtbar zu machen.

Dieser Book Launch bietet neben der Einführung in das Konzept des Buches, auch die Gelegenheit zur vertieften Diskussion einzelner Beiträge mit verschiedenen Autorinnen und Autoren. Die Veranstaltung findet auf Deutsch statt und ist auch online zugänglich.


Kurzbiographie: 

Timothy Moss ist Senior Researcher am Integrative Research Institute on Transformations of Human-Environment Systems (IRI THESys) an der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin und Honorarprofessor an der Leibniz Universität Hannover. Seit über 30 Jahren erforscht er städtische Energie- und Wassersysteme aus geschichts- und sozialwissenschaftlichen Perspektiven. Kennzeichnend für seine Forschungen ist die Verzahnung von historischen Infrastrukturstudien mit aktuellen Debatten über soziotechnische und urbane Transformationen. Sein Buch Remaking Berlin. A History of the City through Infrastructure, 1920-2020 erschien 2020 bei MIT Press. Aktuell leitet er ein interaktives DFG-Projekt über „usable pasts“ der Berliner Infrastrukturgeschichte (mit den Schwerpunkten Energie und Wasser) als Impulsgeber für heutige Transformationsprozesse.


Montag, 15.12.2025         Žiga Zwitter (Ljubljana): 

Hay Meadows in the Alps, 16th–Mid-20th Centuries: A Material and Cultural Environmental History, and “Usable Pasts”


Abstract 

The forthcoming 980-page volume Historical Biodiversity in the Alps: Grassland Agroecosystems in the Last Millennium (Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, autumn 2025), written in cooperation with botanist Leonid Rasran, will be presented by the first author. The book combines novel research insights—based on archival and published primary sources, oral-history interviews, historical artefacts and paintings, fieldwork, and interdisciplinary botanical and agronomic interpretations—and literature to synthesize a material and cultural environmental history of hay meadows in the Alps. The volume contains the following chapters: (1) Introduction, (2) Brief phytosociological overview, (3) Fluctuations in grassland area in the Alps over the last millennium, (4) Natural and nature-induced environmental changes in grasslands, (5) Historical changes in livestock size and feed demand, (6) Selected historical practices of species-rich grassland management and their ecological impacts, (7) Introduction of plant species to grasslands in the Alps through human activities in the context of economic history, political history, and the history of botany and ornamental plants, (8) Gathering of grassland plants and lichens, (9) Abandonment of grasslands in the Alps: a case study with an emphasis on the role of plant species composition, (10) Applicability of grassland history in the twenty-first century, with an emphasis on meadows, and (11) Conclusions. A selection of historical contents will be presented, enabling the presentation of a few examples of “usable pasts” in the 21st century, when species-rich grasslands are being rapidly lost.


Short Bio: 


Žiga Zwitter, PhD, University of Ljubljana, graduated in history and geography, and obtained his PhD in history in 2015. He is an assistant professor of early modern history. Since his postdoctoral project at the Vienna’s Institute of Social Ecology (2016–2017), his research has focused on long-term environmental history and historical ecology of grasslands in the Alps. Together with botanist Leonid Rasran, they wrote the interdisciplinary volume Historical Biodiversity in the Alps: Grassland Agroecosystems in the Last Millennium (Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, autumn 2025). Zwitter has been representative of the European Society for Environmental History’s Dinaric Region and he is recently elected president of the Historical Association of Slovenia. He was visiting professor at the University of Innsbruck (2024) and at the Rachel Carson Center for Environment and Society (2025).


Montag, 19.01.2026         Rebecca Janzen (Columbia, S.C., USA): 

Mining Religion: Religious Sites and Extractive Industries across the Americas


Abstract:


This presentation is part of a larger project called Mining Religion, a single-authored monograph that examines the complex relationship between Catholic religious devotion in churches and shrines near mines – looking at mining saints, and church buildings, and altars inside of mines in Oruro, Bolivia; Diamantina, Brazil; Santiago de Cuba, Cuba; Real de Catorce, Mexico. It situates this religious veneration in its historical context in relationship to booms and busts in mining and relates the popularity of certain saints (and not others) to support from government tourism programs, and the UNESCO world heritage program. The presentation speak to the relationship between the natural world, the mining industry, and religious practice and offer a case study from Mexico. 

The presentation engages with questions such as: what does the environment afford religious practice? How does the mountainous and desert-like space in San Luis Potosí, Mexico, as well as copper mining, relate to Huichol Indigenous pilgrimages, spiritual engagement with peyote, and Catholic pilgrimages? Moreover, how have the booms and busts associated with mining, and, more recently, tourism, affected the local environment and the people who live there?


Short Bio: 


Rebecca Janzen is Professor of Spanish and Comparative Literature at the University of South Carolina – Columbia and a Humboldt Foundation Experienced Research Fellow at the Deutsches Bergbau Museum (2025-2027). She is a scholar of gender, disability and religious studies whose research focuses on excluded populations in Latin America. She has written four books about literature, film, religion and law in Mexico: The National Body in Mexican Literature: Collective Challenges to Biopolitical Control (2015), Liminal Sovereignty: Mennonites and Mormons in Mexican Culture (2018), Unholy Trinity: State, Church and Film in Mexico (2021), and Unlawful Violence: Law and Cultural Production in 21st Century Mexico (2022). 


Montag, 09.02.2026         Tetiana Perga (Berlin):

Waste, Power, and Ideology: Recycling in the Early Soviet Ukraine

In Kooperation mit dem Forschungsschwerpunkt „Umwelt, Klima, Energie" im Centre Marc Bloch, Friedrichstraße 191, 7. OG, Tillionsaal und online


Abstract:

This paper explores the features of the early Soviet waste regime in the Ukrainian SSR during the 1920s and early 1930s, examining waste recycling as a survival strategy for enterprises, institutions, private entrepreneurs, charitable organizations, and ordinary citizens amid chronic raw material shortages, forced industrialization and collectivization, social transformations, the project of forming the “new Soviet person,” and the Holodomor of 1932–1933. How did they compete for this limited yet valuable resource during the “waste fever” that swept across Ukraine at the time? What practices did they employ in this intense competition? Which factors determined success and failure for businesses and individuals? The sheds light on how everyday survival strategies, competition, ingenuity, ambition, and practical knowledge shaped the functioning of the waste collection and recycling system in early Soviet Ukraine and it is built on a wide range of primary sources.


 


Short Bio: 


Tetiana Perga received her Ph.D. from Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine, and has worked at the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine for over 30 years. She has participated in international research programs funded by DAAD, DFG, the Volkswagen Foundation, the Max Weber Foundation, the Leibniz Institute for Jewish History and Culture (Germany), and the Aleksanteri Institute at the University of Helsinki (Finland). Currently, she is affiliated with the Technical University of Berlin. She is a member of the European Society for Environmental History and the Leo Baeck Institute Research Group in Jewish Environmental History, serves as an expert for the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine and a member of editorial boards of two Ukrainian academic journals. She is also a participant in UGHI, where she is working on the excremental history of Ukraine. Tetiana Perga has presented at numerous international conferences and is the author of 140 articles, co-author of eight books, and author of two monographs, focusing on diverse aspects of environmental history.


 


Contact Information

Astrid M. Kirchhof astrid.m.kirchhof@hu-berlin.de


Jan-Henrik Meyer meyer@zzf-potsdam.de


100th anniversary of Zygmunt Bauman's birth (1925-2017).

We are pleased to invite you to the upcoming seminar in the "Polish Marxism" series, taking place on Wednesday, November 19, 2025,...